دانشگاه بین المللی امام خمینی
معاونت پژوهشی و فناوری
نشریات دانشگاه در پرتال وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها388
تعداد مقالات3,187
تعداد مشاهده مقاله4,398,209
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله2,977,611
خجسته فر, مهدیه, برک پور, ناصر. (1403). ارزیابی قوانین شهری ایران با رویکرد سلامت شهری. لسان مبین, 2(2), 219-236. doi: 10.30479/ust.2024.20818.1162
مهدیه خجسته فر; ناصر برک پور. "ارزیابی قوانین شهری ایران با رویکرد سلامت شهری". لسان مبین, 2, 2, 1403, 219-236. doi: 10.30479/ust.2024.20818.1162
خجسته فر, مهدیه, برک پور, ناصر. (1403). 'ارزیابی قوانین شهری ایران با رویکرد سلامت شهری', لسان مبین, 2(2), pp. 219-236. doi: 10.30479/ust.2024.20818.1162
خجسته فر, مهدیه, برک پور, ناصر. ارزیابی قوانین شهری ایران با رویکرد سلامت شهری. لسان مبین, 1403; 2(2): 219-236. doi: 10.30479/ust.2024.20818.1162

ارزیابی قوانین شهری ایران با رویکرد سلامت شهری

اندیشه راهبردی شهرسازی
مقاله 15، دوره 2، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 4، شهریور 1403، صفحه 219-236    اصل مقاله (1.96 M)
نوع مقاله: مقاله مستخرج از پایان نامه
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/ust.2024.20818.1162
نویسندگان
مهدیه خجسته فر* 1؛ ناصر برک پور2
1کارشناسی ارشد برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر، تهران، ایران.
2استاد گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر، تهران، ایران.
تاریخ دریافت: 04 شهریور 1403،  تاریخ بازنگری: 15 آبان 1403،  تاریخ پذیرش: 15 آذر 1403 
چکیده
مقدمه: مدیریت شهری از طریق اعمال قوانین شهری نقش مهمی در سلامت شهری ساکنان دارند. قوانین شهری خوب پایه‌ای برای موثر‌بودن برنامه‌ریزی و پایه توسعه شهری پایدار محسوب می‌شوند. در شرایطی که قوانین به درستی تدوین نشده‌اند یا زیرساخت‌های حقوقی ضعیفی برای اجرای آنها وجود دارد،  نابرابری‌های قدرت (سیاسی، مالی، فنی و فرهنگی) ممکن است برنامه‌ریزی را از تمرکز بر سلامت عمومی دور کرده و به ارزش زمین برای کسانی که منابع را در اختیار دارند معطوف کند. بنابراین وجود ابزاری برای ارزیابی معیار کیفیت قانون‌گذاری، ضروری است.
هدف پژوهش: هدف اصلی پژوهش، ارزیابی قوانین شهری از نظر تطابق با مولفه‌ها و معیارهای سلامت شهری و همچنین معیارهای یک قانون باکیفیت است.
روش‌شناسی: با استفاده از روش محتوای کیفی و کمی جهت‌دار، به ارزیابی قوانین اصلی و پایه‌ای جاری شهرسازی ایران در سطح ملی، در دو بعد محتوا و عملکرد از جهت سلامت شهری پرداخته ‌شده‌است.
یافته‌ها و بحث: میانگین امتیاز مولفه‌های عملکردی قوانین منتخب برابر با 6/2 است و محتوایی برابر با یک است. نتایج نشان می‌دهد میانگین امتیاز بعد محتوایی و عملکردی در قانون تعاریف محدوده و حریم شهرها و روستاها و شهرک و نحوه تعیین آنها شهر برابر با (9/1) است که در مجموع بیشترین امتیاز را نسبت به سایر قوانین بدست آورده‌است. میانگین امتیازهای مولفه‌های محتوایی و عملکردی نشان‌دهنده آن است که قوانین پایه و اصلی شهرسازی ایران به لحاظ کیفیت (عملکرد) و محتوا (سلامت شهری) اختلاف ناچیزی با یکدیگر دارند و در هر دو بعد دارای ضعف اساسی هستند.
نتیجه‌گیری: بررسی‌ها نشان می‌دهد که مجموعه قوانین پایه و اصلی شهرسازی ایران، به مولفه‌های سلامت شهری کمتر معطوف شده‌اند. در قوانین شهری ایران فقط مولفه‌ سلامت شهری، طراحی و اجرای برنامه‌های توسعه شهری، منطقه‌ای و ملی است که نسبتا موردتوجه قرار گرفته‌است. میانگین امتیاز مولفه‌های عملکردی نیز نشان‌دهنده کیفیت نامطلوب قوانین است. تنها مولفه‌ دسترس‌پذیری قوانین امتیاز مطلوب را بدست آورده است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
سلامت شهری؛ قوانین شهری؛ ارزیابی عملکرد قانون؛ ارزیابی محتوای قانون
عنوان مقاله [English]
Assessment of Urban Laws in Iran with Urban Health Approach
نویسندگان [English]
Mahdie Khojastefar1؛ Naser Barakpour2
1Master of Urban Planning, Faculty of Urban Planning, Art University, Tehran, Iran.
2Full Professor of Urban Planning, Faculty of Urban Planning, Art University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]
Introduction: Throughout history, cities have evolved in response to threats about health and other forms of security. Urban planning laws in England, France, and the United States were enacted to address the consequences of industrialization and poor sanitary conditions.
The examination of the reasons and the legislative process in leading countries in urban planning shows that urban planning laws were directly intended to enhance the health of citizens. Nowadays, with rapid urbanization worldwide, cities face numerous challenges. Addressing these challenges to improve urban health and quality of life involves enhancing the quality of urban environments, ensuring justice, providing infrastructure and public services, and controlling construction and density. Establishing cities and defining their boundaries, overseeing transport systems, delineating the scope of authorities and duties, and decision-making structures are all responsibilities of urban laws.
Good urban laws are the foundation of effective planning and sustainable urban development. In the absence of sound planning laws or resources to make changes in unhealthy urban areas, health outcomes can be negative. Weak laws or poor infrastructure for their enforcement can result in inappropriate policies and allow inequalities in power (financial, political, technical, and cultural) to shape planning away from supporting public health, focusing instead on land value for those who control the resources. Therefore, ensuring that planning laws function effectively often requires continuous evaluation due to changing conditions and needs. Having tools to assess the quality of legislation and identify key features or their absence is crucial.
The Purpose of the Research: This research aims to assess urban laws in terms of their alignment with the components and criteria of urban health, as well as the quality of these laws.
Methodology: The most important urban planning laws in Iran have been selected for this purpose. Although, despite scattered efforts in the last two to three decades, a comprehensive law under the title of "Planning Act" has not yet been developed, the set of selected laws in this study (such as the law establishing the Supreme Council of Urban Planning, the law on renaming the Ministry of Development and Housing, and …) serve the same function. The assessment was conducted at the national level, using both qualitative and quantitative content analysis methods.
Findings and Discussion: The results show that the average score for the performance components of the selected laws is 2.6, and the average score for the content components is 1. The combined score for content and performance in the law "defining the boundaries of cities, villages, and towns" is 1.9, the highest among the laws. Laws of "Municipality"," The creation of new cities", “renaming the Ministry of Reconstruction and Housing to the Ministry of Housing and Urban Development", and "The establishment of the Supreme Council of Architecture and Urban Planning of Iran" scored above 1.5, while other laws scored below 1.5. These scores indicate that Iran's basic and principal urban planning laws have minimal differences in quality (performance) and content (urban health), with both aspects showing significant weaknesses.
Conclusion: Planning laws, planning and development control regulations determine land use and building characteristics, thus having a significant impact on individual health and safety, access to public services, and the overall built environment. Effective and efficient laws are one of the key tools for urban planning and management. The historical trajectory of urban planning laws in the country shows that the main goal of legislative authorities is focused on controlling and directing urbanization and addressing its problems in various dimensions.
Overall, the results of this study indicate that in Iran's basic and principal urban planning laws, the only urban health component considered is "The design and implementation of urban, regional, and national development plans". The low scores in the content components suggest that, except for the laws of “municipality” and “the support for the renewal and renovation of urban decay”, which directly relate to urban health, other laws have little content relevance to urban health, despite their significant impact on it. The average performance component scores reflect that the laws do not meet the desired quality. The only component that achieved a satisfactory score within this research is the accessibility of laws. The widespread use of the internet has made accessing laws and regulations easier than before.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
law function assessment, law content assessment, urban health, urban laws
مراجع
  1. Alansari, E. N., & Alomary, A. Y. (2022). Urban landscape design for riverfronts in Iraqi cities a comparative study between local and regional legislation. Sustainable Development and Planning, 17)7(, 2327-2333. doi:https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.170734
  2. Benevolo, Leonardo (1967), The origins of modern town planning; Mohammad Taghi Katebi, Amir Kabir; Tehran
  3. Booth, P., & Huxley, M. (2012). 1909 and all that: reflections on the Housing, Town Planning, Etc Act 1909. Planning Perspectives, 27(2), 267-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2012.646776
  4. Burris, S., & Lin ,V. (2021). Law and urban governance for health in times of rapid change. Health Promotion International, 36, 4-12. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daab064
  5. Capasso, L., Faggioli, A., Rebecchi , A., Capolongo ,S., Gaeta, M., Appolloni, L., et al. (2018). Hygienic and sanitary aspects in urban planning: contradiction in national and local urban legislation regarding public health. Epidemiol Prev, 42(1), 60-64. 19191/EP18.1.P060.016.
  6. Cheshmehzangi, A. (2021). Urban Health, Sustainability, and Peace in the Day the World Stopped. Singapore: Springer International Publishing.
  7. Corburn, J. ( 2009). Toward the healthy city: people, places, and the politics of urban planning. Massachusetts: Mit Press.
  8. De Freitas, M., & Fernandes, R. (2021). The role of legislation in promoting environmental comfort and controlling the spread of coronavirus in cities. Direito Da Cidade-City Law, 13(1).85-105. doi:https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A686102672
  9. Dehqan, R. (2015). Evaluate the possibility of implementing a City Development Startegy plan in the point of view of current urban planning laws in Iran. Master's thesis, University of Imam Khomeini Internatinal, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Department of [In Persian].
  10. Echendu, A., & Georgeou, N. (2021). Not Going to Plan: Urban Planning, Flooding, and Sustainability in Port Harcourt City, Nigeria. Urban Forum. 32, 311-332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-021-09420-0
  11. Fani, Z., & Mouloudi, J. (2010). The assessment of urban environment on regulations & norms: with emphasis on air pollution. Urban management, 7(24), 51-64. [in persian]. https://sid.ir/paper/91984/fa
  12. Glasser, M., & Berrisford, S. (2015). Urban Law: A Key to Accountable Urban Government and Effective Urban Service Delivery. World Bank Legal Rev, 6, 211.1596/978-1-4648-0378-9
  13. Gorsky, M., Lock, K., & Hogarth, S. (2014). Public health and English local government: historical perspectives on the impact of 'returning home'. public health, 36(4), 546-551. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdt131
  14. Grover, A., & Singh, R. B. (2020). Urban Health and Wellbeing;Indian Case Studies. Singapore: Springer.
  15. Jones, L., Anderson, S., Læssøe, J., Banzhaf, E., Jensen, A., Bird, D. N., et al. (2022). A typology for urban Green Infrastructure to guide multifunctional planning of nature-based solutions. Nature-Based Solutions, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2022.100041
  16. Kazemian, G., & Masoumifar, A. (2019). Content and procedural analysis of the right to the city in the laws of the city and citizenship of Iran. Sofeh, 29(3), 92-99. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.29252/soffeh.29.3.83
  17. Luk, T. H. (2020). Legal Analysis of Health Planning Law in British Columbia. Master's thesis, University of British Colombia, Department of Community and Regional Planning.
  18. Marinova, D., Mcgrath, N., & Newman, P. (2004). Dialogue with the city: an era of participatory planning for provision of more sustainable infrastructure in Perth. Proceedings of the 6th International Summer Academy on Technology Studies: Urban Infrastructure in Transition: What Can We Learn from History. Deutschlandsberg.
  19. Moroni, S., Buitelaar, E., Sorel, N., & Cozzolino, S. (2020). Simple Planning Rules for Complex Urban Problems: Toward Legal Certainty for Spatial Flexibility. Planning Education and Research, 40(3), 320–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X18774122
  20. Neuffld, L. (2013). Building a healthy city for all: exploring the creation and implementation of a healthy planning and development toolkit (Lessons for Vancouver from Four International Case Studies). Master's thesis, University of British Columbia, Department of Community and Regional Planning.
  21. Nikolove, P. (2024). A Survey of Bulgarian (National) Planning and Regulation Acts and Documents Concerning Urban Sprawl. civil Engineering and Architecture, 18, 318-325. 10.17265/1934-7359/2024.07.002
  22. Palmer, L. (2009). What is urban health policy and what's law got to do with it. Georgetown Poverty Law & Policy, 15(3), 9-13. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1431973
  23. Russell, P. L. (2012). The Built Environment and Public Health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  24. Salmanzadeh, S., & Ghasemsharifi, T. (2019). Legal and legal evaluation of performance improvements Neighborhood rahray. Geography and Human Relationships, 1(4), 1-23. [In Persian]. 1001.1.26453851.1398.1.4.1.2
  25. Sepe, M. (2023). Designing Healthy and Liveable Cities Creating Sustainable Urban­Regeneration. New York: Routledge.
  26. Sietchiping, R.(2021).Annual report 2021 policy, legislation and governance section urban practices branch global solutions division. Nairobi: UN-Habitat. https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2022/06/plgs_annual_report_2021_web_vers.pdf
  27. Soeiro, D. (2021). Cities, Health and Wellbeing: Global Governance and Intersectoral Policies. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
  28. Tulchinsky, T., & Varavikova, E. (2014). A History of Public Health. The New Public Health, 1-42. 1016/B978-0-12-415766-8.00001-X
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 132
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 28


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب