دانشگاه بین المللی امام خمینی
معاونت پژوهشی و فناوری
نشریات دانشگاه در پرتال وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها388
تعداد مقالات3,187
تعداد مشاهده مقاله4,398,222
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله2,977,626
خلیلی پور, اکرم, افهمی, رضا. (1403). واکاوی نقش فضای شهر تهران در رویدادهای اجتماعی معاصر (نمونه موردی انقلاب اسلامی). لسان مبین, 2(2), 237-252. doi: 10.30479/ust.2024.20755.1157
اکرم خلیلی پور; رضا افهمی. "واکاوی نقش فضای شهر تهران در رویدادهای اجتماعی معاصر (نمونه موردی انقلاب اسلامی)". لسان مبین, 2, 2, 1403, 237-252. doi: 10.30479/ust.2024.20755.1157
خلیلی پور, اکرم, افهمی, رضا. (1403). 'واکاوی نقش فضای شهر تهران در رویدادهای اجتماعی معاصر (نمونه موردی انقلاب اسلامی)', لسان مبین, 2(2), pp. 237-252. doi: 10.30479/ust.2024.20755.1157
خلیلی پور, اکرم, افهمی, رضا. واکاوی نقش فضای شهر تهران در رویدادهای اجتماعی معاصر (نمونه موردی انقلاب اسلامی). لسان مبین, 1403; 2(2): 237-252. doi: 10.30479/ust.2024.20755.1157

واکاوی نقش فضای شهر تهران در رویدادهای اجتماعی معاصر (نمونه موردی انقلاب اسلامی)

اندیشه راهبردی شهرسازی
دوره 2، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 4، شهریور 1403، صفحه 237-252    اصل مقاله (2.95 M)
نوع مقاله: مقاله مستخرج از رساله دکتری
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/ust.2024.20755.1157
نویسندگان
اکرم خلیلی پور1؛ رضا افهمی* 2
1دانش‌آموخته دکتری باستان‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.
2دانشیارگروه پژوهش و تاریخ هنر، دانشکده هنر، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
تاریخ دریافت: 19 مرداد 1403،  تاریخ بازنگری: 20 آبان 1403،  تاریخ پذیرش: 27 آذر 1403 
چکیده
مقدمه: توجه به بعد تاریخی فضاهای شهری تاثیرگذار در رویداد انقلاب 57 و میزان ظرفیت فضا برای بالا بردن ارتباط و کنش‌های
اجتماعی مهم است. اولین وقایع انقلاب اسلامی نشان‌دهنده بهره‌برداری ازفضای مدرن شهر و ظرف فضایی تثبیت‌شده آن است.
کنش‌های اعتراضی و انقلاب‌ها حاصل رودررویی حکومت و جنبش‌های اجتماعی جدید در فضای شهری است. آغاز حرکت از میدان‌های محله‌ای یا میدانی است و این میدان‌ها که محل تجمع و هویت‌بخش محله‌اند نقطه تجمیع حرکات مردمی واقع می‌شوند. اما به‌طور واضح دراین مرحله گردآوری انسانی فاقد هویت مشروع و تعّین‌بخش است، زیرا رفتار انسانی درقالب این بعد محله‌ای تنها از نوعی همبستگی طبقه اجتماعی و همچنین تعّین‌بخشی رفتار روزمره است.
هدف پژوهش: هدف پژوهش واکاوی رابطه میان ماهیت و اهداف رخدادهای سیاسی و اجتماعی و نحوه مصرف فضاهای شهری تهران در رویدادهای اعتراضی معاصر (نمونه موردی: انقلاب اسلامی) است.
روش‌شناسی: روش این پژوهش کتابخانه‌ای (اسنادی)، میدانی (بازدید از بنا‌ها) و با رویکرد توصیفی‌-تحلیلی است.
یافته ها و بحث: در سیر بررسی به‌منظور تفسیر فضاهای شهری و برقراری ارتباط میان رخداد اعتراضی و فضاهای مزبور معیارهای کمی فضا از منظر ابعاد، کیفیت ارتباط با بافت پیرامونی و از منظر نمادین ارتباط آن‌ها با ساختار کل شهر و ساختمان‌های پیرامون آن‌ها مورد توجه قرارگرفته‌است.
نتیجه گیری: درمرحله اول رویدادها درکالبد فضایی که از منظر تاریخی مشروع محسوب می‌شوند آغاز و درادامه کنش اجتماعی به خلق و بازنمایی فضاهای خود اقدام می‌کند و فضاهای روزمره به جزئی ازیک نظام نمادین جدید فضای شهری بدل می‌گردند و در مرحله سوم انقلاب با دگردیسی مفهوم فضایی، تغییر معنای نمادین فضاهای از پیش‌موجود و تلاش برای تصرف فضاهای تعّین‌یافته با هدف مقابله با گروه‌های درگیر درانقلاب، روبه‌رو هستیم. درطی رویداد بررسی‌شده معلوم شدکه سازمان فضایی شهر تهران شامل مقر حکومتی، دیوانی و اداری (میدان ارگ، میدان توپخانه و میدان بهارستان)، مرکز مذهبی (مساجد)، مرکز اقتصادی (بازار) و دیگر عناصر شهری با این رویداد در ارتباط بوده‌اند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
مصرف فضا؛ تهران؛ باستان‌شناسی شهری؛ انقلاب اسلامی و کنشگران
عنوان مقاله [English]
Analyzing the Role of Tehran's Space in Contemporary Social Events (a Case Study of the Islamic Revolution)
نویسندگان [English]
Akram Khalilipour1؛ Reza Afhami2
1Ph.D. student in Archaeology, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2Associate Professor, Department of Research and Art History, Faculty of Art, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]
Introduction: The city was born in the channel of geography and changes or dissolves over time under the influence of various factors. The way of coexistence of various classes and groups of society in every city is crystallized in the physical space of residential neighborhoods and the internal relationships between each component and the connection of each with other urban spaces.protest actions and revolutions are the result of confrontation between the government and new social movements in the urban space. The location of Tehran and the political and social concentration of movements in it have been the cause of various historical events in this city. In order to identify the political center and border of a government in social events, situational analysis studies should be done. In this approach, the dispersion of spaces and works in the landscape is a key to identify the political center and borders. Recognizing the effects of political activities of a government in archeological documents is possible through the examination and study of the territory and documents related to socio-political activities. The material manifestations of social factors in the formation of protest events have a direct relationship with the cultural works of humans and the social structure of urban spaces. The role of political competitions and protests in the formation of social actions in urban spaces is investigated and studied through urban archaeology. In archaeological data, which is related to society, there is a dialectical relationship between past and present. The way of placement of spaces, social groups and different cultures, in general the spatial organization and the constituent elements of the city are connected through communication. The quality of urban design and types of spaces have a great impact on the society. Discourse in the city can be understood as a form or a practice.
The purpose of the research: The purpose of the research is to analyze the relationship between the nature and goals of political and social events and the way Tehran's urban spaces are used in contemporary protest events (case study: Islamic Revolution).
Methodology: The method of this research is library (documents), field (visiting buildings) and with a descriptive-analytical approach.
Findings and discussion: In order to interpret the urban spaces and establish a connection between the protest event and the said spaces, the quantitative criteria of the space in terms of dimensions, the quality of connection with the surrounding context, and from the symbolic point of view, their connection with the structure of the whole city and the buildings around them are taken into consideration Has taken.
Conclusion: During the protests at the beginning of the Islamic Revolution, clerics of different times and strata played the most important role in the streets and urban spaces. The marches were held in Shahyad Square, 24 Esfand Square, Tehran University, Qaytarieh Hills and religious places of the city, which are among the most important urban spaces in this era. At the time of the 1957 revolution, due to the greater position and influence of religious people, especially clerics, and the leadership of Ayatollah Khomeini (RA), they were able to influence the target society. The difference between the use of urban spaces in this event and other events investigated in this research was in the type of welcoming, supporting and accepting the invitation of activists and protesters, and it led to the maximum use of important urban spaces. The relationship between spaces and spatial organizations with audiences and social interactions in the investigated events in the city of Tehran is two-way. During the investigated event, it was found that the spatial organization of the city of Tehran includes the government, civil and administrative headquarters, religious center, economic center and other urban elements with this event has been related.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Space consumption, Tehran, Urban archeology, Islamic revolution and activists
مراجع
  1. Abrahamian, Y. (2012). Coup: August 28, CIA organization and the roots of Iran-US relations in the modern era. Translated by Mohammad Ebrahim Fatahi, Tehran: Ney Publishing. [In Persian].
  2. Adibi, H. (1979). Iran's new middle class. Tehran: Society. [In Persian].
  3. Afshar, H., Khamse, Haydeh., & Bahramzadeh, M. (2019). Investigation of the religious architecture of religious minorities and their visibility in the context of the city of Tehran. Parse Archaeological Studies, 4(14), 185-203. [In Persian]. https://journal.richt.ir/mbp/article-1-391-fa.html
  4. Algar, J. (1981). Iran's Islamic Revolution in 4 Speeches. Translated by Morteza Asaadi and Hassan Chizari, Tehran: Qalam. [In Persian].
  5. Arent, H. (1981). Revolution. Translated by Ezzatullah Fouladvand, Tehran: Kharazmi. [In Persian].
  6. Asadi, M., & Chizari, M. (1981). Islamic revolution in Iran. Tehran: Qalam. [In Persian] .
  7. Ashraf, A., & Banu Azizi, A. (2009). Social classes, government and revolution in Iran. Translated by Soheila Torabi Farsani, Tehran: Nilufar Publications. [In Persian].
  8. Atiqpour, M. (1979). The role of the market in the Iranian revolution. Tehran: Tehran printing house. [In Persian].
  9. Azari, N. (2010). A description of the concept of neighborhood and changes in neighborhoods. Journal of Urbanism Essays, 34, 1-37. [In Persian]. https://www.magiran.com/p915759
  10. Bamdad, M. (1978). Biography of Iranian men in the 12th to 14th centuries AH. Tehran: Hatef. [In Persian]
  11. Bashiriyeh, H. (2003). Obstacles to political development in Iran. Tehran: Gam No. [In Persian].
  12. Basiratmanesh, H., & Baseri, A. (2023). the role of urban marginals in the 1957 revolution (Case study of the slum dwellers of Tehran). Two Quarterly Journals of History of the Revolution, 6(2(11), 35-58. [In Persian]
  13. Bazargan, M. (1980). Iranian revolution in two movements. Tehran: Farhang Islamic Publishing House. [In Persian]
  14. Dolatabadi, Y. (1982). Yahya's life. Tehran: Attar and Ferdosi Publishing House. [In Persian]
  15. Eftekharzadeh, M. (1981). Imam Khomeini (May God bless him and grant him peace) is an eternal memory in history. Qom: Azadi. [In Persian].
  16. Elden, S. (2007). Understanding Henri Lefebvre: Theory and the Possible. London: Continuum.
  17. Ensafpour, G. (1980). The trend of national and Islamic movements. Tehran: Islamic Revolution Publishing and Education Organization. [In Persian].
  18. Esposito, J. (2008). Iranian revolution and reflection in the world. Translated by Mohsen Mirshanehchi, Tehran: Baz. [In Persian].
  19. Foran, J. (1997). The Comparative-Historical Sociology of Third World Social Revolutions. New York: Routledge.
  20. Ghasemi, A. (1978). History of Iran's National Front. Tehran: Iran Party. [In Persian].
  21. Goonewardena, K., Kipfer, S., Milgrom, R., & Schmid, C. (2008). Space, difference, everyday life. Reading Henri Lefebvre, Routledge.
  22. Graham, R. (1979). Iran Sarab Qodrat. translated by Firouz Firoznia, Tehran: Nashahab Kitab.
  23. Green, A. (2018). Introduction Urban Historical Archaeology: Challenging Ambivalence. In Cities in the World: 1500-2000: v. 3(pp. 1-13). Routledge.
  24. Habibi, S. M. (1997). City concept. Tehran: University of Tehran.
  25. Hakimi, M. (1978). Interpretation of the sun. Tehran: Islamic culture publishing house.
  26. Hoshang Mahdavi, A. (1993). Iran's revolution. Tehran: Tarh No. [In Persian]
  27. Javan, J., Dalil, S., & Salmani Moghadam, M. (2012). Lefebvre's Dialectic of Space. Quarterly Journal of Geographical Studies of Arid Regions, 4(12(12)), 1-17. [In Persian]. https://jargs.hsu.ac.ir/article_161329.html
  28. Karimian, H., & Ahmadi, A. (2014). space archaeology; Scientific approach in studying and analyzing architectural works, urban spaces and ancient textures. Archaeological Studies, 7(2), 103-116. [In Persian]. https://jarcs.ut.ac.ir/article
  29. Katoozian, M. (1981). A collection of essays on the Iranian revolution. Tehran: Sadaf. [In Persian]
  30. Kermani, N. A. (1978). History of Islamic Iran. Misplaced: Yaran. [In Persian]
  31. Keyhan Newspaper. (1979), 10670. Tehran: Keyhan Newspaper. [In Persian].
  32. Lefebvre, H. (2012). From the production of space. In Theatre and performance design(pp. 81-84). Routledge.
  33. Malekoutian, M., Baghaei, K., & Nayeri, H. (2012). Typology of Revolutionary Theories. Quarterly Journal of Politics, 42(1), 233-249. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22059/jpq.2012.29943
  34. Masjed Jamei, A. (1982). Ideology and revolution. Tehran: Misplaced. [In Persian]
  35. Mohammadi, M. (1981). An analysis of the Islamic revolution. Tehran: Amir Kabir. [In Persian]
  36. Momeni, M. B. (1978). About Tudeh Movement and Party Issues, Tehran: Peyvand . [In Persian]
  37. Motahari, S. M. (1979). About the Islamic Revolution. Tehran: Islamic Publication Office. [In Persian]
  38. Motahari, S. M. (1979). collection. Tehran: Sadra. [In Persian]
  39. Mousavi, S. M. (2018). Causes of the Islamic Revolution of Iran; Why and How. Political Sociology of the Islamic Revolution, 1(1), 27-49. [In Persian]. https://www.psirj.ir/article_144932.html
  40. Parham, S. (1978). The Iranian Revolution and the foundations of Imam Khomeini's leadership. Tehran: Amir Kabir.
  41. Parsi, F., Mansouri, K., & Badri, N. (2010). Examining the social system in the structure of Iranian cities and explaining the place of neighborhoods as a social system that shapes the Qajar city. Published In The first national conference on Islamic architecture and urban planning. Tabriz. [In Persian]
  42. Riazi, S. A. (2009). the influence of modernity on the spatial organization of Tehran in the late Qajar period. Iranian Cultural Research Quarterly, 3(3(11)), 129-149. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.7508/ijcr.2010.11.006
  43. Rouhani, S. H. (1979). Analysis of the Imam Khomeini movement. Qum: Dar Al-Fakir.
  44. Sorush, A. (1978). Fatter than ideology. Tehran: Serat.
  45. Schmid, C. (2008). Henri Lefebvre’s theory of the production of space: Towards a three-dimensional dialectic. In Space, difference, everyday life(pp. 41-59). Routledge.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 74
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 15


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب