اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 410 |
| تعداد مقالات | 3,366 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,894,930 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 3,299,611 |
بررسی سواد ارزیابی مدرسان زبان فارسی به غیر فارسی زبانان | ||
| پژوهش نامه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیر فارسی زبانان | ||
| دوره 14، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 29، فروردین 1404، صفحه 95-127 اصل مقاله (2.28 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/jtpsol.2025.21944.1707 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| زهراسادات حسینی1؛ عنایت اله شعبانی* 2 | ||
| 1استادیار گروه آموزش زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2نویسنده مسئول، دانشیار گروه زبانهای خارجی، کالج بین الملل دانشگاه، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران، ایران | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 08 اردیبهشت 1404، تاریخ بازنگری: 09 تیر 1404، تاریخ پذیرش: 21 تیر 1404 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| سنجش و ارزیابی در آموزش و یادگیری زبان دوم از اهمیت ویژه ای برخوردار است. بنابراین، گروه های مختلفی که درگیر آموزش، سنجش و ارزیابی هستند، از جمله مدرسان، متخصصان حوزۀ سنجش و ارزیابی و پژوهشگران نیازمند این هستند که در این زمینه اطلاعات و دانش مورد نیاز را کسب کنند. با وجود اینکه اکثر مدرسان زبان فارسی به غیرفارسی زبانان، دوره های استادپروری قبل از خدمت را می‌گذرانند، ولی در مواجهه با فعالیت‌های مرتبط با آزمون سازی از توانایی لازم برخوردار نیستند. بخشی از این مشکل ناشی از عدم شفاف بودن ساختار سواد ارزیابی زبان می‌باشد. این پژوهش در نظر دارد کمبودهای سواد سنجش و ارزیابی مدرسان زبان فارسی، نیازهای آنها به این مقوله، و برداشت آنها از اهمیت عناصر سازندۀ آن در عمل را بررسی نماید. بدین منظور ، 45 مدرس زبان فارسی به غیر فارسی زبانان در این مطالعه شرکت کردند. برای جمع آوری داده های مورد نیاز از پرسشنامۀ Fulcher (2012) استفاده شد. نتایج این پژوهش بیانگر این است که نیاز مدرسان زبان فارسی به غیر فارسی زبانان در نمره‌دهی آزمون مهارت های تولیدی (گفتاری و نوشتاری) دارای بالاترین فراوانی انتخاب و تاریخچۀ آزمون سازی زبان دارای پایین ترین فراوانی انتخاب است. همچنین، بین رشته تحصیلی و مولفه‌ی نوشتن ویژگی‌ها/طرح کلی آزمون رابطه‌ی معنی‌داری وجود دارد. به ترتیب مدرسانی که در رشته‌ی آموزش زبان انگلیسی، آزفا، زبان‌شناسی و زبان و ادبیات فارسی تحصیل کرده‌اند بیشترین اهمیت را به این مورد می‌دهند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| سواد ارزیابی؛ آموزش زبان فارسی به غیر فارسی زبانان (آزفا)؛ مدرسان زبان فارسی به غیرفارسی زبانان؛ آزمون سازی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Examining the Assessment Literacy of Teachers of Persian to Speakers of other Languages | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Zahrasadat Hoseini1؛ Enayat Shabani2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature Education, Farhangian University of Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Corresponding author, Associate Professor, Department of Foreign Languages, International College, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Assessment plays a pivotal role in second language teaching and learning. Consequently, it is essential that the stakeholders involved in instruction, assessment, and evaluation – including teachers, assessment specialists, and researchers – gain and possess adequate knowledge in this domain. Although most instructors teaching Persian to speakers of other languages (TPSOL) undergo pre-service teacher training programs, their performance in test development-related tasks often remains virtually unsatisfactory. This issue may, in part, stem from the conceptual ambiguity surrounding assessment literacy (AL) in language education. This study aims to examine TPSOL teachers’ deficiencies in AL, their perceived needs in this area, and their views on the practical importance of its various components. To this end, the assessment literacy for the language classroom questionnaire (Fulcher, 2012) was administered to 45 TPSOL instructors. The findings revealed that the most frequently identified need among participants was related to scoring the assessment of productive skills (i.e., speaking and writing), while the least prioritized area was knowledge of language testing history. Additionally, a significant relationship was found between the participants’ academic majors and their emphasis on writing test specifications. Specifically, instructors with degrees in Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL), Teaching Persian as a Foreign Language (TPFL, also known as AZFA), Linguistics, and Persian Language and Literature, respectively, attached the greatest importance to this component. The study concludes with further findings and pedagogical implications for teacher education and professional development programs. Extended Abstract Introduction Assessment is a central component of language education, shaping both teaching practices and learner outcomes. In the context of teaching Persian to speakers of other languages (TPSOL), the role of teachers in designing, implementing, and interpreting language assessments is crucial. Despite undergoing pre-service teacher training, many instructors lack sufficient competence in language test development. This issue may partly stem from the conceptual ambiguity surrounding assessment literacy in language education. Addressing this gap, the present study explores the needs, perceptions, and challenges of Persian language instructors concerning assessment literacy, aiming to provide insights into how assessment practices can be enhanced in this specialized field. Specifically, this study was designed to investigate the perceived needs of teachers of Persian to speakers of other languages in relation to language assessment literacy, the relationship between teachers’ assessment literacy and their professional experience, and the relationship between assessment literacy components and teachers’ academic background. Theoretical Framework The study is grounded in the conceptual framework of language assessment literacy, which includes teachers’ theoretical knowledge, practical skills, and ethical awareness regarding assessment. Drawing on the works from scholars such as Fulcher (2012), Popham (2004), and Inbar-Lourie (2013), the study emphasizes assessment literacy as a multidimensional construct involving technical, pedagogical, and contextual knowledge. Teachers with strong assessment literacy are better equipped to evaluate student performance, make instructional decisions, and communicate results effectively. Methods A descriptive survey design was employed using a questionnaire developed by Fulcher (2012), specifically intended to assess language teachers’ assessment literacy. The questionnaire included 23 core items rated on a five-point Likert scale (from "not important at all" to "very important"), along with demographic items related to academic degree, field of study, teaching experience, and prior involvement in test development (e.g., SAMFA exam). The sample consisted of 45 instructors teaching Persian to non-Persian speakers at several universities in Iran, including Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Imam Khomeini International University, and others. Among the participates, 57.8% held a Master’s degree and 42.2% held a Ph.D. Their academic backgrounds were as follows: Teaching Persian to Speakers of other Languages (64.4%), Linguistics (20%), Persian Language and Literature (13.3%), and English Language Teaching (AKA TEFL) (2.2%). Their teaching experience ranged from less than one year to over five years, with the majority (66.7%) having more than five years of teaching experience. Nearly half (48.9%) had more than five years of experience in language test development. Results Needs Assessment The most highly rated areas of need included scoring productive skills (speaking and writing), writing assessment tasks and questions, and conducting classroom-based assessment. Conversely, the lowest-rated item was knowledge of the history of language testing, suggesting that teachers prioritized practical assessment skills over theoretical knowledge. Experience-Based Differences Using the Kruskal-Wallis test, significant relationships were found between teachers’ years of teaching experience and several assessment literacy components. Teachers with 1-3 years of experience placed higher value on test task writing, reliability, classroom assessment, large-scale test development, and test standards. In addition, those with more than five years of experience showed moderate emphasis, while teachers with less than one year of experience placed the least importance on these components. Disciplinary Background Differences A significant difference was observed between teachers’ academic fields and their emphasis on test blueprint development. Teachers with degrees in English Language Teaching rated this component highest, followed by those in TPSOL, Linguistics, and Persian Literature. Discussion The findings suggest that although the instructors recognized the importance of assessment, their understanding of key concepts – reliability, test theory, and ethical issues – remains limited. While many instructors carry out assessment tasks regularly, their formal training and education in these areas appear insufficient. Furthermore, assessment literacy varies significantly depending on teaching experience and educational background, pointing to the need for more tailored professional development. Implications Based on the findings, this study underscores the urgent need to incorporate comprehensive assessment literacy modules into teacher education programs for TPSOL instructors. Also, it is essential to design in-service training sessions focused on both theoretical foundations and practical applications of language assessment. Promoting reflective assessment practices which are culturally and pedagogically responsive to the needs of diverse learners is of significance. Additionally, policymakers and curriculum designers should consider establishing national standards for assessment literacy to ensure consistency and quality in assessment practices across Persian language programs. Conclusions Assessment literacy is not merely a technical competency but also a pedagogical competency essential for effective language instruction. As this study reveals, TPSOL instructors, particularly novice and non-specialist instructors, require targeted support in developing robust assessment competencies. Addressing these needs will not only enhance instructional effectiveness but also ensure more equitable and valid evaluations of learner progress. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Assessment literacy, teaching of Persian to speakers of other languages, assessment and testing | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
طیبی، معصومه؛ مرادی عباس آبادی، محمود. (1399). مؤلفه‌ها و نیازهای سواد ارزیابی نگارش انگلیسیِ کلاس- محور: دیدگاه معلمان انگلیسیِ ضمن خدمت در ایران. پژوهشهای زبانشناختی در زبانهای خارجی (3)10.
عباسیان، غلامرضا؛ کوشا، مهدی. (1396). بررسی میزان سواد ارزیابی مدرسین زبان انگلیسی در بافت آموزشی ایران. پژوهشهای زبانشناختی در زبانهای خارجی (7)1.
مهماندوست، زهره؛ علوی، سیدمحمد؛ کیوان پناه، شیوا. (1397). بررسی سواد سنجش و ارزشیابی مدرسان دانشگاهی زبان انگلیسی در ایران. پژوهشهای زبانشناختی در زبانهای خارجی (2)8.
References:
Abbasian, G. (2017). The status of teachers assessment literacy in Iran. Journal of Foreign Language Research, 7(1), 203-232. https://doi.org/10.22059/jflr.2017.229033.3221 [In Persian]
Abell, S. K., & Siegel, M. A. (2011). Assessment literacy: What science teachers need to know and be able to do? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The professional knowledge base of science teaching, 205–221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9278-z
Abbaszade, R. (2018). The relationship between teacher’s belief and their assessment literacy: with a focus on educational level [Master’s thesis]. Faculty of Humanities, University of Zanjan.
American Federation of Teachers, National Council on Measurement in Education, & National Education Association (AFT, NCME, & NEA) (1990). Standards for Teacher Competence in Educational Assessment of Students. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9, 30-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1990.tb00391.x Brookhart, S. (2011). Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2010.00195.x
Brookhart, S. M. (2003). Developing measurement theory for classroom assessment purposes and uses. Educational measurement: Issues and practice, 22(4), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2003.tb00139.x
Brown, G. T. L. (2011). Teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Comparing primary and secondary teachers in New Zealand. Assessment Matters, 3, 45-70. https://doi.org/10.18296/am.0097
Bayat, K., & Rezaei, A. (2015). Importance of teachers’ assessment literacy. International Journal of English Language Education, 3(1), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v3i1.6887
Birenbaum, M., DeLuca, C., Earl, L., Heritage, M., Klenowski, V., Looney, A., Smith, K., Timperley, H., Volante, L., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2015). International trends in the implementation of assessment for learning: Implications for policy and practice. Policy Futures in Education, 13(1), 117-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210314566733 (Original work published 2015)
Campbell, C., & Collins, V. L. (2007). Identifying essential topics in general and special education introductory assessment textbooks. Educational Measurement, Issues and Practice, 26(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2007.00084.x
Calveric, S., (2010). Elementary teachers’ assessment beliefs and practices [Ph.D. Dissertation]. Virginia Commonwealth University.
Danielson, C. (2013). The framework for teaching evaluation instrument. Princeton, NJ: The Danielson Group.
Davies, A. (2008). Textbook trends in teaching language testing. Language Testing, 25(3), 327–347. doi:10.1177/0265532208090156
Deluca, C., Lapointe-McEwan, D., & Luhanga, U. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy: A review of international standards and measures. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28, 251-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-015-9233-6
Davidheiser, S. A. (2013). Identifying areas for high school teacher development: A study of assessment literacy in the Central Bucks School District [Doctoral dissertation]. Drexel University.
Delghandi.F. (2019.) Examining Iranian high school English teachers’ assessment literacy: Proposing productive testing items for high school English learners [Master’s thesis]. Faculty of Literature, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.
DeLuca, C. (2012). Preparing teachers for the age of accountability: Toward a framework for assessment education. Action in Teacher Education, 34(5-6), 576–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2012.730347
DeLuca, C., & Klinger, D. A. (2010). Assessment literacy development: identifying gaps in teacher candidates’ learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(4), 419–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.516643
Fulcher, G. (2012). Assessment literacy for the language classroom. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9(2), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.642041
Ganske, K., Monroe, J. K., & Strickland, D. S. (2003). Questions teachers ask about struggling readers and writers. The Reading Teacher, 57(1), 118-128.
Gebril, A. & Brown, G. T. L. (2013). The effect of high-stakes examination system on teacher beliefs: Egyptian teachers’ conceptions of assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 21(1), 16-33.
Gotch, C. M., & French, B. F. (2014). A systematic review of assessment literacy measures. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 33(2), 14-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12030
Guskey, T. R. (2003). How classroom assessments improve learning. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 6-11
Harris, L., Irving, S., & Petterson, E. (2008). Secondary teachers’ conceptions of the purpose of assessment and feedback. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Brisbane, Australia.
Jahangiri, G. (2016). EAP assessment literacy: Mismatches between language teachers, content teachers and undergraduate students [Master’s Thesis]. Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Kharazmi University.
Jeong, H. (2013). Defining assessment literacy: Is it different for language testers and non-language testers? Language Testing, 30(3), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553221348033
King, J. D. (2010). Criterion-referenced assessment literacy of educators. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS.
Koh, K. H. (2011). Improving teachers’ assessment literacy through professional development. Teaching Education, 22, 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2011.593164
Janatifar, M., & Marandi, S. S. (2018). Iranian EFL Teachers' Language Assessment Literacy (LAL) under an Assessing Lens. Applied Research on English Language, 7(3), 361-382. https://doi.org/10.22108/ARE.2018.108818.1221
Inbar-Lourie, O. (2013). Language assessment literacy: What are the ingredients? In 4th CBLA SIG Symposium Programme, University of Cyprus.
Lam, R. (2015). Language assessment training in Hong Kong: Implications for language assessment literacy. Language Testing, 32(2), 169-197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214554321
Lam, R., & Lee, H. (2024). Assessment Literacy in Language Education: A Systematic Review of Teacher Competencies and Training Needs, Language Teaching Research,
Leung, C. (2014). Classroom-based assessment issues for language teacher education. In A.J. Kunnan (Ed.), The companion to language assessment. Vol. 3 (pp. 1510-1519). Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118411360.wbcla064
Malone, M. E. (2013). The essentials of assessment literacy: Contrasts between testers and users. Language Testing, 30(3), 329-344. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553221348012
Marzano, R. J. (2013). The Marzano teacher evaluation model. Englewood, CO: Marzano Research Laboratory.
Mede, E., & Atay, D. (2017). English language teachers’ assessment literacy: The Turkish context. Dil Dergisi, 0(168/1),43-60.
Mehmandoust, Z., Alavi, S. M., & Kaivanpanah, S. (2018). An exploration of teachers' assessment literacy in Iran. Journal of Foreign Language Research, 8(2), 645-664. https://doi.org/10.22059/jflr.2018.245602.422 [In Persian]
Mertler, C. A. (2003). Pre-service versus in-service teachers’ assessment literacy: Does classroom experience make a difference? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid- Western Educational Research Association, October 15-18, Columbus, Ohio.
Mertler, C. A. (2009). Teachers’ assessment knowledge and their perceptions of the impact of classroom assessment professional development. Improving Schools, 12(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480209105575
Moe, M. S. (2012). Learning, knowing, and doing classroom assessment: exposure and understanding rates of assessment knowledge among elementary pre-service teachers [University of Iowa]. https://doi.org/10.17077/etd.gctgrofj
O’Loughlin, K. (2013). Developing the assessment literacy of university proficiency test users. Language Testing, 30(3) 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532213480336
Puspawati, I., Khansa, M., & Widiati, U. (2024). Developing EFL Teachers' Language Assessment Literacy: A Systematic Literature Review on Teacher Training Programs. TESL-EJ, 28(2), n2.
Plake, B. S. (1993). Teacher assessment literacy: Teachers' competencies in the educational assessment of students. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 6(1), 21-27.
Plake, B. S., Impara, J. C., & Fager, J. J. (1993). Assessment competencies of teachers: A national survey. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12, 10–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1993.tb00548.x
Popham, W. J. (2013). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Popham, W. J. (2011). Assessment literacy overlooked: A teacher educator's confession. The Teacher Educator, 46(4), 265-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2011.605048
Popham, W. J. (2009). Assessment literacy for teachers: Faddish or fundamental? Theory into Practice, 48(1), 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577536
Qian, D. D. (2008). English language assessment in Hong Kong: A survey of practices, developments and issues. Language Testing, 25(1), 85-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532207083746
Salimi, E. A. and farsi, M. (2018). An Investigation of Assessment Literacy Among Native and Non-Native English Teachers. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 10(22), 49-62.
Schafer, W. D., & Lizzitz, R. W. (1987). Measurement training for school personnel: Recommendations and reality. Journal of Teacher Education, 38(3), 57-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718703800312
Scarino, A. (2013). Language assessment literacy as self-awareness: Understanding the role of interpretation in assessment and in teacher learning. Language Testing, 30(3), 309-327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532213480128
Shao, S. (2024). Developing Language Assessment Literacy: Formative Assessment Practice from Pre-service Teacher to Novice Teacher. The Asia-Pacific Education Researche
Stiggins, R. J. (2001). The unfulfilled promise of classroom assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20(3), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2001.tb00065.x
Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 758-765. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170208301010
Stiggins, R. (2004). New assessment beliefs for a new school mission. Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170408600106
Tajeddin, Z., Alemi, M., & Yasaei, H. (2018). Classroom assessment literacy for speaking: Exploring novice and experienced English language teachers’ knowledge and practice. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 6(3 (Special Issue)), 57-77. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2018.120601
Tao, N. (2014). Development and validation of classroom assessment literacy scales: English as a foreign language (EFL) instructors in a Cambodian higher education setting. Victoria University.
Taylor, L. (2009). Developing Assessment Literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0267190509090035
Taylor, L. (2013). Communicating the theory, practice and principles of language testing to test stakeholders: Some reflections. Language Testing, 30(3), 403-412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532213480338
Tayyebi, M. & Moradi Abbasabadi, M. (2020). Classroom-based writing assessment literacy components and needs: Perspectives of in-service EFL teachers in Iran. Journal of Foreign Language Research, 10(3), 588-601. https://doi.org/10.22059/jflr.2020.310866.757 [In Persian]
Volante, L., & Fazio, X. (2007). Exploring Teacher Candidates' Assessment Literacy: Implications for Teacher Education Reform and Professional Development. Canadian Journal of Education, 30(3), 749-770.
Vogt, K., & Tsagari, D. (2014). Assessment literacy of foreign language teachers: Findings of a European study. Language Assessment Quarterly, 11(4), 374-402. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2014.960046
Vogt K, Bøhn H, Tsagari D. (2024) Language assessment literacy. Language Teaching. 2024;57(3):325-340. doi:10.1017/S0261444824000090
Xu, Y. T., & Brown, G. T. L. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 149-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.010
Zhang, Z., & Burry-Stock, J. A. (2003). Classroom assessment practices and teachers’ self-perceived assessment skills. Applied Measurement in Education, 16(4), 323-342. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1604_4
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 59 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2 |
||