اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 408 |
| تعداد مقالات | 3,353 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,861,469 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 3,271,918 |
Qualitative Quality and the Importance of Play: Reflections on the Big-Tent Model | ||
| Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies | ||
| دوره 12، Special issue (Quality in Qualitative Research)، آذر 2025، صفحه 111-117 اصل مقاله (467.81 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/jmrels.2025.3836 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Rebecca B Leach* 1؛ Sarah J. Tracy2 | ||
| 1Department of Communication, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA | ||
| 2Professor, Hugh Downs School of Human Communication, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 15 اردیبهشت 1404، تاریخ بازنگری: 11 تیر 1404، تاریخ پذیرش: 21 مرداد 1404 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Tracy’s (2010) big-tent model is a well-established, highly cited approach for assessing qualitative quality with eight criteria: a) worthy topic, b) rich rigor, c) sincerity, d) credibility, e) resonance, f) significant contribution, g) ethics, and h) meaningful coherence. In this piece, we reflect on the big-tent model’s functions, strengths, and recent extensions. Looking forward, we highlight the importance of play in producing excellent qualitative research and creating space for methodological innovation. Examples of play and what it can look like in qualitative research are included. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| big-tent model؛ qualitative quality؛ play | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Bochner, A.P. (2000). Criteria against ourselves. Qualitative Inquiry, 6(2), 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040000600209
Bochner, A.P. (2018). Unfurling rigor: On continuity and change in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(6), 359368. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417727766
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
Gioia, D., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1094428112452151
Hughes, H. E., Bridges-Rhoads, S., & Van Cleave, J. (2018). Work/think/play in qualitative and postqualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(9), 599–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417733499
Köhler, T., Smith, A., & Bhakoo, V. (2022). Templates in qualitative research methods: Origins, limitations, and new directions. Organizational Research Methods, 25(2), 183–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281211060710
Ku, E. K. (2025). Timelines: Visualizing time in narrative research. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 4(2), Article 100215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100215
Leach, R. B., Dehnert, M., Reutlinger, C., Marr, C., & Tracy, S. J. (2025). Setting up the tent poles: Revisiting and extending the big-tent model for qualitative quality. In U. Flick (Ed.), SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research Quality (pp. 469-483). Sage.
López, C., & Tracy, S. J. (2020). Anchoring the big tent: How organizational autoethnography exemplifies and stretches notions of qualitative quality. In A.F. Herrmann (Ed.), The Routledge International Handbook of Organizational Autoethnography (pp. 383–398). Routledge.
Morse, J. M. (2015). Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 25(9), 1212–1222. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497 32315588501
OpenAI. (2025). ChatGPT (Jun 24 version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com/chat
Pratt, M. G., Sonenshein, S., & Feldman, M. S. (2022). Moving beyond templates: A bricolage approach to conducting trustworthy qualitative research. Organizational Research Methods, 25(2), 211–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120927466
Riazi, A.M., Rezvani, R. & Ghanbar, G. (2023). Trustworthiness in L2 writing research: A review and analysis of qualitative articles. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2 (3), Article 100065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100065
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Tagg, C. & Manford, P. (2025). Team transcribing: an approach to analysing and interpreting online acquaintance interviews as collaborative achievements. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 4(3), Article 100250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100250
Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight ‘big tent’ criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
Tracy, S. J. (2024). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (3rd ed.). Wiley Blackwell.
Tracy, S. J. (2025). Practicing qualitative research under the “big tent”: Origins, development, and continuing relevance of the eight big-tent framework for qualitative quality. Qualitative Inquiry, https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004251348167
Tracy, S. J., & López, C. J. (in press, 2025). MashNUp as method: A gestalt qualitative practice using metaphor, arts-based research, and narrative analysis. Journal of Creative Research Methods, 1.
Wolgemuth, J. R., Rautio, P., Koro-Ljungberg, M., Marn, T. M., Nordstrom, S., & Clark, A. (2018). Work/Think/Play/Birth/Death/Terror/Qualitative/Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(9), 712–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417735860 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 9 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 7 |
||