دانشگاه بین المللی امام خمینی
معاونت پژوهشی و فناوری
نشریات دانشگاه در پرتال وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات19
تعداد شماره‌ها380
تعداد مقالات3,141
تعداد مشاهده مقاله4,264,428
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله2,859,236
میرترابی, سعید. (1396). Turkish Contradictory Foreign Policy towards Iraq in 2005-2015. لسان مبین, 6(1), 79-95.
سعید میرترابی. "Turkish Contradictory Foreign Policy towards Iraq in 2005-2015". لسان مبین, 6, 1, 1396, 79-95.
میرترابی, سعید. (1396). 'Turkish Contradictory Foreign Policy towards Iraq in 2005-2015', لسان مبین, 6(1), pp. 79-95.
میرترابی, سعید. Turkish Contradictory Foreign Policy towards Iraq in 2005-2015. لسان مبین, 1396; 6(1): 79-95.

Turkish Contradictory Foreign Policy towards Iraq in 2005-2015

مطالعات سیاسی جهان اسلام
مقاله 6، دوره 6، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 21، خرداد 1396، صفحه 79-95    اصل مقاله (170.56 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
سعید میرترابی*
عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه خوارزمی
تاریخ دریافت: 19 بهمن 1395،  تاریخ بازنگری: 21 تیر 1396،  تاریخ پذیرش: 21 تیر 1396 
چکیده
One of most sensitive relationships in the Middle East is that between Turkey and Iraq. Crucial in Turkey’s relationship with Iraq is its view of Iraqi Kurdistan. This article studies the development of the Turkish foreign policy towards Iraqi Central and Kurdistan Regional Government ( KRG) in 2005-2015. The article analyzes several dimensions of Turkey’s foreign policy towards Iraqi Central Government and KRG. Many observers have stressed on contradictory nature of Turkey’s foreign policy towards Iraq in post-2003 era. So the main question of this article is why there has not been a coherent approach in Turkish foreign policy towards central government of Baghdad and regional government of Erbil in 2005-2015? The answer of the article as its hypothesis is failing nature of Iraq central government and the vast oil resources in Kurdistan region have encouraged a pragmatic and ups and down relations between Ankara, Baghdad and Erbil in 2005-2015 which could be characterized by deep contradictories in economic and security goals. The article shows that Ankara increasing relations with KRG is a reflection of Turkish limits of influence in Iraq and in the region as a whole.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Turkey؛ Foreign Policy؛ Iraq؛ Kurdistan Regional Government؛ Change
عنوان مقاله [English]
Turkish Contradictory Foreign Policy towards Iraq in 2005-2015
چکیده [English]
One of most sensitive relationships in the Middle East is that between Turkey and Iraq. Crucial in Turkey’s relationship with Iraq is its view of Iraqi Kurdistan. This article studies the development of the Turkish foreign policy towards Iraqi Central and Kurdistan Regional Government ( KRG) in 2005-2015. The article analyzes several dimensions of Turkey’s foreign policy towards Iraqi Central Government and KRG. Many observers have stressed on contradictory nature of Turkey’s foreign policy towards Iraq in post-2003 era. So the main question of this article is why there has not been a coherent approach in Turkish foreign policy towards central government of Baghdad and regional government of Erbil in 2005-2015? The answer of the article as its hypothesis is failing nature of Iraq central government and the vast oil resources in Kurdistan region have encouraged a pragmatic and ups and down relations between Ankara, Baghdad and Erbil in 2005-2015 which could be characterized by deep contradictories in economic and security goals. The article shows that Ankara increasing relations with KRG is a reflection of Turkish limits of influence in Iraq and in the region as a whole.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Turkey, Foreign Policy, Iraq, Kurdistan Regional Government, Change
مراجع
  1. Allawi, Ali A. (2007). The Occupation of Iraq: Winning the War, Losing the Peace, New Haven. CT: Yale University Press.
  2. Alunis and Martin (2011). Making Sense of Turkish Foreign Policy in the Middle East under AKP. Turkish Studies, 12(4), 569 – 587, December.
  3. Bahrami,Mohammad (2012). Essentials of Turkish Foreign Policy in Iraqi Kurdistan. Available at: http://salahadin.net/%D8%A8%D8%A7%DB%8C%DA%AF%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C/4062(17/7/1391)
  4. Dobbins, James et al. (2003). America’s Role in Nation-Building: From Germany to Iraq. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.  
  5. Dobbins, James ET. Al. (2009). Occupying Iraq: A History of the Coalition Provisional Authority. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
  6. Dodge, Toby (2010).The Failure of Sanctions and the Evolution of International Policy towards Iraq 1990–2003. Contemporary Arab Affairs, 3, (1), 82-90, January.
  7.  Economist Intelligence Unit (2002). Trade in Turkey: Bridging Maneuvers. EIU Business Middle East, May 1
  8. EIU Business Middle East (2000). Economist Intelligence Unit. February 16.
  9. Fearon and Laitin(2003). Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Vol. 6, Issue. 2.
  10. Gramsci,Antonio(1998). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
  11. Kelly, Michael J. (2010). The Kurdish Regional Constitution within the Framework of the Iraqi Federal Constitution: A Struggle for Sovereignty, Oil, Ethnic Identity, and the Prospects for a Reverse Supremacy Clause. Penn State Law Review, 114(3):748-749.
  12. Kasfir, Nelson (2004). Domestic Anarchy, Security Dilemmas, and Violent Predation.  In Robert I .Rotberg (ed.): When States Fail: Causes and Consequences, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  13. McConnell, Malcolm (2006). My Year in Iraq: The Struggle To Build a Future of Hope,New York: Simon and Schuster.
  14. O’Hanlon, Michael E. And Ian Livingston (2010). Iraq Index: Tracking Variables of Reconstruction and Security in Post-Saddam Iraq. October 31.
  15. The Washington Post (2010). Turkey Hopes to Grow Economic Ties and Influence Within Middle East... 8 April. 4, pp. 143–152.
  16. Cagaptay, S., Evans, T. (2012). Turkey’s Changing Relations with Iraq: Kurdistan Up, Baghdad Down. Policy Focus, 122. Washington: The Washington Institute for Near East Policy.
  17. Call, T. (2006). The Fallacy of the Failed State. Paper presented at the International Studies Association Annual Meeting, California.

  18.  

  19. Candar, C. (2013). Erdogan-Barzani ‘Diyarbakir encounter’ milestone.  Al-Monitor, On-line, available at: http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2013/11/erdogan-barzani-kurdistan-diyarbakir-political-decision.html.
  20. Hale, W. (2000). Turkish Foreign Policy .London: Frank Cass.
  21.  ICG (2012). Iraq and the Kurds: The High-Stakes Hydrocarbons Gambit. Middle East Report, 120 April.
  22. International Crisis Group (2008). Turkey and Iraqi Kurds: Conflict or Cooperation? Middle East Report, No. 81.
  23. IRIS Center at the University of Maryland at College Park, (2005). State Capacity: The Dynamics of Effectiveness and Legitimacy in Government Action in Fragile States.  Working Papers on Fragile States, No. 2, produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development.
  24. Jenkins, G. (2007).  PKK Changes Battlefield Tactics to Force Turkey into Negotiations. Terrorism Focus, No. 4. On-line, available at: http://www.jamestown.org/single/?no_cache= 1&tx_ttnews%5 Btt_news%5 D=4494
  25. Johnson, K. (2015). Striking Pipeline, Kurdish Militants Deal Blow to Fellow Kurds. Foreign Policy, On-line, available at: http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/07/30/kurdish-militants-strike-pipeline-deal-blow-to-fellow-kurds/
  26. Kardas, S. (2009). The Kurdistan Regional Government Launches Oil Exports through Turkey. Eurasia Daily Monitor, Vol. 6, No. 105.
  27. Larrabee, S. and Tol, G. (2011). Turkey’s Kurdish Challenge. Survival, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 143–152.
  28. Lyons, T., and A. Samatar (1995). Somalia: State Collapse, Multilateral Intervention, and Strategies for Political Reconstruction. Washington, DC: Brookings Occasional Papers.
  29. Maureen Lorenzetti and Bob Williams (2003). Rebuilding Iraqi Oil Sector Must Navigate Feuds Old and New. The Oil & Gas Journal, 21 April.
  30. Oguzlu, T. (2008). Turkey’s Northern Iraq Policy: Competing Perspectives. Insight Turkey, 10 (1): 5–22.
  31. Onis, Z. (2011). Multiple Faces of the “New” Turkish Foreign Policy: Underlying Dynamics and a Critique. Insight Turkey, 13(1): 47–65.
  32. Özcan, M. (2011). From Distance to Engagement: Turkish Policy towards the Middle East, Iraq and Iraqi Kurds. Insight Turkey, 13 (2): 71–92.
  33. Paasche, T. F. and Mansurberg, H. (2014). Kurdistan Regional Government–Turkish energy relations: a complex partnership. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 55(2): 111–132.
  34. Pamuk, H. (2013). Defiant Kurds to truck more crude to Turkey-Genel. Reuters, On-line, available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/01/09/iraq-turkeyoil-idUSL5E9C936R20130109.
  35.  Rabasa,A. et al.(2007). Ungoverned territories’ case studies. See Ungoverned Territories: Understanding and Reducing Terrorism Risks. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
  36. Rose, Gideon (1998). Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy. World Politics, 51(1):  
  37. Rotberg, R. I. (2002). The New Nature of Nation-State Failure. Washington Quarterly, 25(3): 85–96.
  38. Salih, M. A. (2015a). Iraqi-Kurdish oil deal is slipping away. Al-Jazeera. On-line, available at: http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/02/iraqi-kurdish-oil-dealslipping-150219054908938. Html
  39. Salih, M. A. (2015b). Erbil-Baghdad oil relations swing between deals, no deal. Al-Monitor, On-line, available at: http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2015/07/iraq-oil-kirkuk-krg-somo-kurdish.html
  40. Solomon, E.  And Dombey, D. (2014). Iraqi peshmerga fighters set to join fight against Isis in Kobani. Financial Times, On-line, available at: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9c915d96-5ea8-11e4-a807-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3lQFUCjCO
  41. Tavernise, S. (2008). Kurds’ attack kills 15 soldiers, Turkey reports. New York Times, On-line, available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/04/world/asia/04iht-turkey.1.16688440.html?_r=0
  42. Tripp, C. (2007). A History of Iraq (3rd Ed.). London: Cambridge University Press.
  43. Voller, Yaniv (2013). Kurdish Oil Politics in Iraq: Contested Sovereignty and Unilateralism...
  44. Middle East Policy Council. Journal Essay, Spring, Volume XX, Number 1
  45. Zartman I .W (1995). Posing the Problem of State Collapse. In I .William Zartman (ed.), Collapsed States: The Disintegration and Restoration of Legitimate Authority,Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
  46. Patrick Cockburn. War with Isis in Iraq and Syria: Turkey Joins West as a Reluctant Ally-But What Took it So Long? Independent, July 25, 2015, http://www.independent.co.uk/news-19-6/war-with-isis-in-iraq-and-syria-turkey-joins-west-as-a-reluctant-ally-but-what-took-it-so-long-10414801.html; Steven A. Cook, “War on ISIS: America is Getting Sucked Further İnto the Quagmire,” Newsweek, July 29, 2015, http://europe.newsweek.com/war-isis-america-getting-sucked-further-quagmire-330954?rm=eu.
  47. http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/lonely-maybe-isolated-maybe-not.aspx?pageID=449&nID=53188&NewsCatID=406
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,281
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 619


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب