تعداد نشریات | 19 |
تعداد شمارهها | 380 |
تعداد مقالات | 3,121 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,250,976 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,845,060 |
Genetic of resistance to ear rot causal agent (Fusarium moniliforme) in quality protein maize (QPM) using line×tester analysis | ||
Iranian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding | ||
مقاله 5، دوره 6، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 11، تیر 2017، صفحه 38-47 اصل مقاله (540.76 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research paper | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/ijgpb.2017.1372 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Bashir Omolaran Bello* 1؛ Mohammad Lawal2؛ Jimoh Mahamood3؛ Joseph Ivala Kioko4؛ James Oludare Agbolade5؛ Yussuf Abdulmaliq Suleiman6؛ Sunday Ayodele Ige7؛ Afolabi Micheal Segun8؛ Hakeem Alafe Azeez9 | ||
1Department of Agronomy, Federal University, Gashua, Nigeria. | ||
2Department of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Fountain University, Osogbo, Nigeria. | ||
3Lower Niger River Basin Development Authority, Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria. | ||
4Department of Biodiversity and Conservation, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa. | ||
5Department Plant Science and Biotechnology, Federal University, Oye Ekiti, Nigeria and Department of Biodiversity and Conservation, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa. | ||
6Department of Agronomy, Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida University, Lapai, Niger State, Nigeria. | ||
7Department of Crop Science, Landmark University, Omuaran, Kwara State, Nigeria. | ||
8Department Agronomy, Osun State University, Ejigbo Campus, Osogbo, Osun State, Nigeria. | ||
9Department of Crop, Soil & Pest Management, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria. | ||
تاریخ دریافت: 21 خرداد 1397، تاریخ پذیرش: 21 خرداد 1397 | ||
چکیده | ||
Breeding for QPM ear rot resistant cultivars could offer a reliable environmental and economic control of mycotoxins especially for the resource-poor communities that require inexpensive protein diets. This research aims at evaluating a testcross of QPM inbreds with ear rot resistant cultivars to develop resistant topcrosses with high grain protein quality and yield. Seven QPM inbreds (lines) and two open pollinated ear rot resistant varieties (testers) were crossed in a line × tester method (2 × 7). The 14 F1 topcrosses, 9 parents and 2 commercial hybrids (checks) were evaluated at the Lower Niger River Basin Authority, Oke-Oyi, Nigeria in 2014 and 2015 cropping seasons. The ear rot disease ratings in all topcrosses were low (< 3.0), relative to the two controls of 3.4. K2GCA/ K2SCA values were higher than unity for grain yield, ear rot rating, husk cover, tryptophan and lysine characters, signifying that additive effects were controlling the inheritance of the traits. The three topcross hybrids (TZEQI 76× AMA TZBR YCF,TZEQI 74× AMA TZBR YCF,andTZEQI 81× TZEI 25) that possessed consistently low ear rot severity infection across years with TZEQI 76× AMA TZBR YCF,TZEQI 74× AMA TZBR YCF,andTZEQI 81× TZEI 25 outstanding for grain yield and quality protein are recommended for further evaluation in several years and locations before being released for commercial use. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Additive؛ Grain Yield؛ Lysine؛ Topcross؛ Tryptophan | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
ژنتیک مقاومت به عامل پوسیدگی طوقه (Fusarium moniliforme) در ذرت با کیفیت خوب پروتئین با استفاده از تجزیه لاین×تستر | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
بشیر املاران بیلو1؛ محمد لاوال2؛ جیمو محمود3؛ جوزف آیوالا کیوکو4؛ جیمز الووادار آق بلاد5؛ یوسف عبدالملک سلیمان6؛ ساندی آیودل ایگ7؛ افلابی میخائیل سگون8؛ حکیم علاف عزیز9 | ||
1دپارتمان زراعت، دانشگاه فدرال، گاشوا، نیجریه. | ||
2دپارتمان علوم کامپیوتر و ریاضی، دانشگاه فاونتین، آزوگبو، نیجریه. | ||
3مرکز توسعه حوزه آبگیر رودخانه نیجریه پایین، ایلورین، ایالت کوارا، نیجریه. | ||
4دپارتمان تنوع زیستی و محیط زیست، دانشگاه تکنولوژی کیپ پنینسولا، کیپ تاون، آفریقای جنوبی. | ||
5دپارتمان بیوتکنولوژی و علوم گیاهی، دانشگاه فدرال، اوی اکیتی، نیجریه و دپارتمان تنوع زیستی و محیط زیست، دانشگاه تکنولوژی کیپ پنینسولا، کیپ تاون، آفریقای جنوبی. | ||
6دپارتمان زراعت، دانشگاه ابراهیم بادامسی بابانگیدا، لاپی، ایالت نیجر، نیجریه. | ||
7دپارتمان علوم زراعی، دانشگاه لندمارک، اموران، ایالت کاوارا، نیجریه. | ||
8دپارتمان زراعت، دانشگاه ایالتی اسون، پردیس اجیگبو، اسوگبو، ایالت اسون، نیجریه. | ||
9دپارتمان مدیریت آفات، خاک و زراعت، دانشگاه فدرال تکنولوژی، آکور، نیجریه. | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
بهنژادی برای رسیدن به رقمهای QPM مقاوم به پوسیدگی طوقه، ممکن است از نظر اقتصادی و زیست محیطی کنترلی اطمینانبخش بر مایکوتوکسینها داشته باشد؛ بهویژه برای جوامع با منابع کم که به رژیمهای پروتئینی ارزان نیاز دارند. هدف این پژوهش، ارزیابی یک آمیزش برگشتی اینبردهای QPM با رقمهای مقاوم به پوسیدگی طوقه برای دستیابی به تاپ کراسهایی با کیفیت مناسب پروتئین بذر و محصولدهی فراوان است. هفت QPM اینبرد و دو رقم (تستر) مقاوم به پوسیدگی طوقه دگرگشن با روش لاین×تستر (7×2) با هم آمیزش داده شدند. تعداد 14 F1 تاپ کراس، 9والد و دو هیبرید تجاری (شاهد) در فصل کشت 2014 و 2015 در Lower Niger River Basin Authority, Oke-Oyi, Nigeria ، ارزیابی شدند. میزان بیماری پوسیدگی طوقه در تمام تاپ کراسها (3>)، نسبت به دو شاهد با 4/3 اندک بود، درحالی که مقادیرK2GCA/ K2SCA از واحد میزان بذر، میزان پوسیدگی طوقه، پوشش بذر، تریپتوفان و لیزین بیشتر بودند. این نتیجه نشان میدهد که اثرهای فزایندة وراثت، به کنترل این صفات کمک میکند. بنابراین، سه هیبرید تاپ کراس TZEQI 76× AMA TZBR YCF، TZEQI 74× AMA TZBR YCF و TZEQI 81× TZEI 25 - که طی چندین سال آلودگی پوسیدگی طوقه کمی نشان دادند- و TZEQI 76× AMA TZBR YCF، TZEQI 74× AMA TZBR YCF و TZEQI 81× TZEI 25 - که دارای محصول بذر و کیفیت پروتئین قابل توجهی هستند- پیش از آزاد شدن برای استفادة تجاری، به قصد ارزیابی بیشتر طی چندین سال در نقاط مختلف توصیه میشوند. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
افزایشی, تاپ کراس, تریپتوفان, لیزین, محصول بذری | ||
مراجع | ||
Abd El-Mottalb A. A., Mostafa M. A., and Gamea A. A. (2013). Combining ability for yield and some agronomic traits of seven new white maize inbred lines. Egyptian Journal of Plant Breeding, 17: 13–22.
Afolabi C. G., Ojiambo P. S., Ekpo E. J. A., Menkir A., and Bandyopadhyay R. (2007). Evaluation of maize inbred lines for resistance to Fusarium ear rot and fumonisin accumulation in grain in tropical Africa. Plant Diseases, 91: 279–286.
Aliu S., Rusinovci I., Fetahu S., and Rozman L. (2016). The combining ability of maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines for grain yield and yield components. Agriculture and Forestry, 62: 295-303.
Amin M. N., Amiruzzaman M., Ahmed A., and Ali M. R. (2014). Evaluation of inbred lines of maize (Zea mays L.) through line×tester method. Bangladesh Journal Agricultural of Research, 39(4): 675-683.
Badu-Apraku B., Fakorede M. A. B., Menkir A., and Sanogo D. (2012). Conduct and management of maize field trials. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria, 26‒28.
Baker R. J. (1978). Issues in diallel analysis. Crop Science, 18: 533–536.
Bankole F., Menkir A., Olaoye G., Crossa J., Hearne S., Unachukwu N., and Gedil M. (2017). Genetic gains in yield and yield related traits under drought stress and favorable environments in a maize population improved using marker assisted recurrent selection. Frontiers Plant Science, 8: 808.
Bello O. B., and Olaoye G. (2009). Combining ability for maize grain yield and other agronomic characters in a typical southern guinea savanna ecology of Nigeria. African Journal of Biotechnology, 8(11): 2518–2522.
Bello O. B., Olawuyi O. J., Azeez M. A., Lawal M. Abdulmaliq S. Y., Afolabi M., Ige, S.A., and Mahamood J. (2012). Genotypic variation in protein, lysine and tryptophan contents of extra early maize genotypes and their quality protein versions in nitrogen stress and non-stress environments. Journal of Research (Science), 23(1‒4): 27‒48.
Bello, O. B., Mahamood J., Afolabi M. S., Azeez M. A.,Ige S. A., and Abdulmaliq, S. Y. (2013). Evaluation of biochemical and yield attributes of quality protein maize (Zea mays L.) in Nigeria. Tropical Agriculture, 90(4): 160‒176.
Bello O. B., Olawuyi O. J., Ige S. A., Mahamood J., Afolabi M. S., Ganiyu O. T., Azeez M. A., and Abdulmaliq, S. Y. (2015). Interactive effects of genotype×year on disease reactions, grain yield and other agronomic traits of newly developed quality protein maize in Nigeria. Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 11(2): 399–412.
Bello O. B., and Olawuyi O. J. (2015). Gene action, heterosis, correlation and regression estimates in developing hybrid cultivars in maize. Tropical Agriculture,92(2): 102‒117.
Bello O. B. (2017). Diallelic analysis of maize streak virus resistance in quality protein maize topcrosses. Euphytica, 213: 270–279.
Bolduan C., Miedaner T., Utz H. F., Dhillon B. S., and Melchinger A. E. (2010). Genetic variation in testcrosses and relationship between line per se and testcross performance for resistance to Gibberella ear rot. Crop Science, 50: 1691–1696.
Bua B., and Chelimo B. M. (2010). The reaction of maize genotypes to maize streak virus disease in central Uganda. Second RUFORUM Biennial Meeting, 20–24 September, Entebbe, Uganda, 293–297.
Cisar C., Brown C. M., and Jedlinski H. (1982) Diallel analyses for tolerance in winter wheat to the barley yellow dwarf virus. Crop Science, 22: 328–333.
Derera J., Tongoona P., Pixly K.V., Vivek B., Laing M. D., and Van Rij N. C. (2008). Gene action controlling gray leaf spot resistance in southern African maize germplasm. Crop Science, 48: 93–98.
Eller M. S., Payne G. A., and Holland J. B. (2010). Selection for reduced Fusarium ear rot and fumonisin content in advanced backcross maize lines and their topcross hybrids. Crop Science, 50: 2249–2260.
Emmanuel G., Vah E.G., Ndebeh J., Akromah R., and Obeng-Antwi K. (2017). Evaluation of maize top cross hybrids for grain yield and associated traits in three agro-ecological zones in Ghana. International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology, 2(4):2076-2087.
Fan X., Yin X., Zhang Y., Bi Y., Liu L., Chen H., and Kang M. S., (2016). Combining ability estimation for grain yield of maize exotic germplasm using testers from three heterotic groups. Crop Science, 56: 2527–2535.
Ferreira E. A., Paterniani, M. E. A. G. Z., Duarte A. P, Gallo, P. B., Sawazaki E., Azevedo F. J. A., and Guimarães P. S. (2009). Desempenho de híbridos top crosses de linhagens S3 de milho em três locais do estado de São Paulo. Bragantia, 68(2): 319–327.
Field Guide for Integrated Pest Management (2015). In Hops, 3ed. Retrieved from http://msue.anr.msu.edu/uploads/234/71503/Hop_Field_Guide_Third_Edition.pdf.
Gichuru L., Njoroge K., Ininda J., and Peter, L. (2011). Combining ability of grain yield and agronomic traits in diverse maize lines with maize streak virus resistance for Eastern Africa region. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, 2: 432–439.
Hornandez H., and Bates L. S. (1969). A modified method for rapid tryptophan analysis of maize. CIMMYT Research Bulletin, 13, Retrieved from http://libcatalog.cimmyt.org/Download/cim/1857.pdf.
Hung H., and Holland J. B. (2012). Diallel analysis of resistance to Fusarium ear rot and fumonisin contamination in maize. Crop Science, 52: 2173–2181.
Izhar T., and Chakraborty M. (2013). Combining ability and heterosis for grain yield and its components in maize inbreds over environments (Zea mays L). African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8: 3276–3280.
Kempthorne O. (1957). An introduction to Genetic Statistical. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, U.S.A. Retrieved from https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19580101090.
Kurosawa R. N. F., Junior A. T. A., Vivas J. M. S., Guimarães A. G., Miranda S. B., Dias V. M., and Scapim C. A. (2017). Potential of popcorn germplasm as a source of resistance to ear rot. Bragantia Campinas, 76: 378-385.
Lanubile A., Luca P., and Adriano M. (2010). Differential gene expression in kernels and silks of maize lines with contrasting levels of ear rot resistance after Fusarium verticillioides infection. Journal of Plant Physiology,167: 1398–1406.
Loffler M., Kessel B., Ouzunova M., and Miedaner T. (2011). Covariation between line and testcross performance for reduced mycotoxin concentrations in European maize after silk channel inoculation of two Fusarium species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 122: 925–934.
Mbuya K., Nkongolo K. K., and Kalonji-Mbuyi A. (2011). Nutritional analysis of quality protein maize varieties selected for agronomic characteristics in a breeding program. International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics, 5: 317-327.
Meseka S., and Ishaaq, J. (2012). Combining ability analysis among Sudanese and IITA maize germplasm at Gezira Research Station. Journal of Applied Biosciences, 57: 4198–4207.
Mesterházy A., Lemmens M., and Reid. L. M. (2012). Breeding for resistance to ear rots caused by Fusarium spp. in maize - A review. Plant Breeding, 131(1): 1–19.
Mukanga M., Derera J., and Tongoona P. (2010). Gene action and reciprocal effects for ear rot resistance in crosses derived from five tropical maize populations. Euphytica,174: 293–301.
Olowe O., Olawuyi O., and Odebode A. (2015). Response of maize genotypes to Fusarium verticillioides strains from two agro-ecological zones in southwest Nigeria. International Journal of Pure and Applied Science and Technology, 27: 77–86.
Pereira G. S., Camargos R. B., Balestre M., Von Pinho R. G., and Melo, W. M. C. (2015). Indirect selection for resistance to ear rot and leaf diseases in maize lines using biplots. Genetics and Molecular Research, 14 (3): 11052–11062.
Pinto R., Kvitschal M. C., Scapim M. V., Fracaro C. A., Bignotto M., and Souza Neto L. S. (2007). Análise dialélica parcial de linhagens de milho-pipoca. Revista Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo, 6(3): 325–337.
Reid L. M., Zhu C. X., Parker C. A., and Yan C. W. (2009). Increased resistance to Ustilago zeae and Fusarium verticillioides in maize inbred lines bred for Fusarium graminearum resistance. Euphytica,165: 567–578.
Robinson J. O., Comstock R. E., and Harvey P. H. (1955). Genetic variance in open pollinated varieties of corn. Genetics, 40: 45–60.
Rovaris S. R. S., Paterniani M. E. Z., and Sawazaki E. (2014). Combining ability of white corn genotypes with two commercial hybrids. Maydica, 59: 96–103.
SAS (2009). The statistical application software (SAS), the statistics system for windows release version 9.2. SAS Institute, Inc, Cary. NC, USA.
Sentayehu A. (2008). Protein, tryptophan and lysine contents in quality protein maize. North Indian Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences, 18(2): 9‒15.
Sibiya J., Tongoona P., Derera J., and Van Rij N. (2011). Genetic analysis and genotype×environment (G×E) for grey leaf spot disease resistance in elite African maize (Zea mays L.) germplasm. Euphytica, 179(1): 312–325.
Singh P. K. and Roy A. K. (2007). Diallel analysis of inbred lines in maize (Zea mays L.). International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3(1): 213–216.
Steel R. G. D., and Torrie J. H. (1980). Principle and Procedures of Statistics. A biometric Approach. 2nd Ed. McGraw Hill, N.Y, USA.
Tembo L., Asea G., Gibson P. T., and Okori P. (2013). Resistance breeding strategy for Stenocarpella maydis and Fusarium graminearum cob rots in tropical maize. Plant Breeding, 132 (1): 83-89.
Tembo L., Asea G., Gibson P. T., and Okori P. (2016). Indirect selection for resistance to Stenocarpella maydis and Fusarium graminearum and the prospects of selecting for high-yielding and resistant maize hybrids. Plant Breeding, 135(4): 446–451.
Vivek B. S., Odongo O., Njuguna J., Imanywoha J., Bigirwa G., Diallo A., and Pixley K. (2010). Diallel analysis of grain yield and resistance to seven diseases of 12 African maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines. Euphytica, 172: 329–340.
Zarea M., Choukan R., Bihamta M. R., Majidi H. E., and Kamelmanesh M. M. (2011).Gene action for some agronomic traits in maize (Zea mays L.). Crop Breeding Journal, 1(2): 133-141. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 440 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 377 |