تعداد نشریات | 19 |
تعداد شمارهها | 380 |
تعداد مقالات | 3,121 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,251,505 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,845,942 |
رتبهبندی عوامل موثر بر حوادث انفجار با استفاده از تحلیل سلسله مراتبی | ||
نشریه مهندسی منابع معدنی | ||
مقاله 5، دوره 5، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 17، مهر 1399، صفحه 77-92 اصل مقاله (819.89 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: یادداشت فنی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/jmre.2019.9093.1153 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
مسعود منجزی* 1؛ حسام دهقانی2؛ محمدرضا عجم زاده3؛ سعید احمدیان4 | ||
1استاد، گروه معدن، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران | ||
2استادیار، دانشکده مهندسی معدن، دانشگاه صنعتی همدان، همدان | ||
3دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده مهندسی معدن، دانشگاه صنعتی همدان، همدان | ||
4کارشناسی ارشد استخراج معدن، گروه معدن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران | ||
تاریخ دریافت: 01 مرداد 1397، تاریخ بازنگری: 27 اسفند 1397، تاریخ پذیرش: 16 اسفند 1397 | ||
چکیده | ||
خطر احتمال وقوع حوادث و اثرات ناشی از آن همواره در هر پروژه وجود دارد. حوادث باعث ایجاد خسارات مالی، زمانی، جانی و ... میشود و از نظر روانی نیز برکارکنان و کارگران تاثیر منفی میگذارد. شناسایی و مدیریت عوامل موثر در حوادث برای جلوگیری و یا کاهش احتمال وقوع حادثه در پروژهها لازم است. انفجار، یکی ازعملیاتی است که همواره خطر وقوع حادثه را به همراه دارد. در این تحقیق از بین تعداد زیادی عوامل موثر بر وقوع حوادث ناشی ازانفجار در عملیات معدنی و عمرانی، 13 عامل با نظر کارشناسان انتخاب و با رتبهبندی این عوامل، موثرترین عامل شناسایی شده است. برای نیل به این هدف از روش شبیهسازی مونتکارلو بههمراه روش تصمیمگیری تحلیل سلسله مراتبی استفاده شد و رتبهبندی بر اساس نظر 15 نفر از کارشناسان خبره در این حوزه انجام گرفت. در نهایت با بررسی نتایج حاصل، سه عامل زمان نامناسب، کیفیت چالزنی و مهارت فردی، به عنوان مهمترین عوامل ایجاد یک حادثه شناسایی شدند. همچنین نتایج نشان داد که ویژگیهای الگوی حفاری، نوع ماده منفجره و خصوصیات تودهسنگ، کمترین تاثیر را بر وقوع یک حادثه دارند. مقایسه نتایج با عوامل ثبتشده برای حوادث واقعی، صحت نتایج حاصل از این تحقیق را تایید کرد. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
رتبهبندی؛ تحلیل سلسله مراتبی؛ حوادث انفجار | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Ranking the Effective Factors of Blasting Incidents Using Analytical Hierarchy Process | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
M. Monjezi1؛ H. Dehghani2؛ M.R. ajamzadeh3؛ S. Ahmadiyan4 | ||
1Professor, Faculty of Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran | ||
2Assistant Professor, Dept. of Mining Engineering, Hamedan University of Technology, Hamedan, Iran | ||
3M.Sc, Dept. of Mining Engineering, Hamedan University of Technology, Hamedan, Iran | ||
4M.Sc Student, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
In each project, there is always a possibility of occurrence of hazards and risks. Accidents cause many damages such as financial and psychological problems, that may have a negative effect on the workers life. To prevent or reduce the occurrence of incidents, it is necessary to identify and manage the relevant affecting factors. Blasting is one of the events that has frequently led to accidents. In this paper, 13 factors affecting the occurrence of blasting related accidents in the mining and construction projects, have been selected according to the opinion of experts and ranked to identify the most important one. For this purpose, Monte Carlo simulation method and analytical hierarchy process method were implemented. The factors were ranked based on the opinion of 15 experts in this field. Finally, based on the obtained results, inappropriate blasting time, unprofessional personnel were selected as the most important factors. Also, blasting pattern specifications, type of explosive and rock mass characteristics have the least effect in this regard. Validity of the paper outcomes was checked with comparing the real recorded events. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Ranking, Analytical Hierarchy Process, Blasting incidents | ||
مراجع | ||
[1] Lanke, A. A., Hoseinie, S. H., and Ghodrati, B. (2016). “Mine production index (MPI)-extension of OEE for bottleneck detection in mining”. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 26(5): 753-760. [2] Joy, J. (2004). “Occupational safety risk management in Australian mining”. Occupational Medicine, 54(5): 311-315. [3] Duzgun, H. S. B., and Einstein, H. H. (2004). “Assessment and management of roof fall risks in underground coal mines”. Safety Science, 42(1): 23-41. [4] Heuberger, R. (2005). “Risk analysis in the mining industry”. The Journal of South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 105(2): 75-79. [5] صیادی، ا. ر.، منجزی، م.، وحیدی، م.؛ 1386؛ "ارزیابی اقتصادی و تحلیل ریسک معدن مس سونگون". نشریه علمی پژوهشی مهندسی معدن، دوره دوم، شماره 3، ص 21-39. [6] Steffen, O., and Contreras, L. (2007). “Mine planning-its relationship to risk management”. In International Symposium on Stability of Rock Slopes in Open Pit Mining and Civil Engineering, Perth, Australia. [7] Evans, R., Brereton, D., and Joy, J. (2007). “Risk assessment issues: lessons from the Australian coal industry”. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 7(5): 607- 619. [8] Ataee-pour, M., and Dehghani, H. (2010). “The Effect of Risk in Mine Planning State”. Iranian Global Congress on Mining, 20: 1-6. [9] صیادی، ا. ر.، حیاتی، م.، آذر، ع.؛ 1390؛ "ارزیابی و رتبهبندی ریسک در پروژههای تونلسازی با استفاده از روش تخصیص خطی". مجله بینالمللی علوم مهندسی، جلد 22، شماره 1، ص 28-38. [10] Fuentes, J. E., George, T., and Whittikar, J. (2009). “Measuring and mitigating risk in mining operations”. In III International Conference on Mining Innovation, 2-9. [11] Canbulat, I., Hoelle, J., and Emery, J. (2013). “Risk management in open cut coal mines”. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 23(3): 369-374. [12] Krause, E., and Krzemień, K. (2014). “Methane risk assessment in underground mines by means of a surveyby the panel of experts (sope)”. Journal of Sustainable Mining, 13(2): 6-13. Doi:10.7424/jsm140202. [13] Zhang, P., Peterson, S., Neilans, D., Wade, S., McGrady, R., and Pugh, J. (2016). “Geotechnical risk management to prevent coal outburst in room-and-pillar mining”. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 26(1): 9-18. [14] Fan, B., and Yuan, Y. (2016). “Constructing an assessment index system for strategic risk management in coal science and technology enterprises”. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 26(4): 653-660. [15] Whittall, J., McDougall, S., and Eberhard, E. (2017). “A risk-based methodology for establishing landslide exclusion zones in operating open pit mines”. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 100: 100-107. [16] Mark, C., and Gauna, M. (2016). “Evaluating the risk of coal bursts in underground coal mines”. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 26(1): 47-52. [17] Yang, T., Chen, M. C., and Hung, C. C. (2007). “Multiple Attribute decision making Methods for the dynamic operator allocation problem”. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 73(5): 285-299. [18] Kerzner, H. (2017). “Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling”. John Wiley & Sons. [19] Liqun, z., Shihui, L., Lianfu, Z., and Lianming, J. (1995). “The analysis and practice of multi objective decision making technique for selecting a mining plan”. In Proceedings APCOM XXV Conference, 255-259. [20] Dessureault, S., and Scoble, M. J. (2000). “Capital investment appraisal for the integration of new technology logy into mining systems”. Mining Technology, 109(1): 30-40. [21] Karadogan, A., Bascetin, A., Kahriman, A., and Gorgun, S. (2001). “A new approach in selection of underground mining method”. Proceedings of the International Conference Modern Management of Mine Producing Geology and Environment Protecion, 171-183. [22] Elevli, B., Demirci, A., and Dayi, O. (2002). “Underground haulage selection: shaft or ramp for a small scale Underground mine”. The Journal of The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 102: 255-260. [23] Kesimal, A., and Bascetin, A. (2002). “Application of fuzzy multiple attribute decision making in mining operations”. Mineral Resource Engineering, 11: 59-72. [24] Samanta, B., Sarkar, B., and Murherjee, S. K. (2002). “Selectio of opencast mining equipment by a multi criteria decision-making process”. Mining Technology (Transactions of the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy), 11: 136-142. [25] Vieira, F. M. C. C. (2003). “Utility-based framework for optimal mine layout selection, subject to multiple-attribute decision criteria”. In Proceedings of the 31st International Symposium on Application of Computers and Operations Research in the Minerals Industries, 133-149. [26] Bascetin, A. (2004). “An application of the analytic hierarchy process in equipment selection at Orhaneli open pit coal mine”. Mining Technology (Transactions of the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy), 113: A192-A199. [27] Elevli, B., and Demirci, A. (2004). “Multi criteria choice of ore transport system for an underground mine: application of PROMETHEE methods”. The Journal of The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 56: 251-256. [28] Bitarafan, M. R., and Ataei, M. (2004). “Mining method selection by multiple criteria decision making tools”. The Journal of The South African Institute of Mening and Metallurgy, 104(9): 493-498. [29] Kazakidis, V. N., Mayer, Z., and Scoble, M. J. (2004). “Decision making using the analytic hierarchy process in mining engineering,Transactions of the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy”. Mining Technology, 113: A30-A42. [30] Ataei, M. (2005). “Multicriteria selection for an alumina-cement plant location in East Azerbaijan province of Iran”. The Journal of The South African Institute of Mening and Metallurgy, 105(8): 507-513. [31] De Almeida, A. T., Alencar, L. H., and De Miranda, C. M. G. (2005). “Mining methods selection based on multi criteria models. Proceedings of the Application of Computers and Operations Research in the Mineral Industry”. Dessureault, Ganguli, Kecojevic and Dwyer (Eds), Taylor and Francis Group, London, 19-24. [32] Bottero, M., and Peila, D. (2005). “The use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process for the comparison between micro tunneling and trench excavation”. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 20(6): 501-513. [33] Uysal, O., and Demirici, A. (2006). “Shortwall stoping versus sublevel longwall caving - retreat in Eil coal Fields”. The Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 106(6): 425-432. [34] Bascetin, A., Oztas, O., and Kanli, A. I. (2006). “EQS: a computer software using fuzzy logic for equipment selection in mining engineering”. The Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 106: 63-70. [35] Acaroglu, O., Ergin, H., and Eskikaya, S. (2006a). “Analytical hierarchy process for selection of road headers”. The Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 106: 569-575. [36] Acaroglu, O., Feridunoglu, C., and Tumac, D. (2006b). “Selection of road headers by fuzzy multiple attribute decision making method”. Transactions of the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, A115: A91-A98. [37] Rahimdel, M. J., and Ataei, M. (2014). “Application of analytical hierarchy process to selection of primary crusher”. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 24(4): 519-523. [38] Karimnia, H., and Bagloo, H. (2015). “Optimum mining method selection using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process–Qapiliq salt mine Iran”. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 25(2): 225-230. [39] Alizadeh, S., Salari Rad, M. M., and Bazzazi A. A. (2016). “Alunite processing method selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment”. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 26(6): 1017-1023. [40] Kasap, Y., and Subas, E. (2017). “Risk assessment of occupational groups working in open pit mining: Analytic Hierarchy Process”. Journal of Sustainable Mining, 16(2): 38-46. [41] Kamenopoulos, S., Agioutantis, Z., and Komnitsas, K. (2017). “A new hybrid decision support tool for evaluating the sustainability of mining projects”. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 28(2): 259-265. [42] عطایی، م.؛ 1389؛ "تصمیمگیری چند معیاره". انتشارات دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود، شاهرود، 348 صفحه. [43] Wang, T. C., and Chen, Y. H. (2007). “Applying consistent fuzzy preference relations to partnership selection”. Omega, 35(4): 384-388. [44] Deng, H. (1999). “Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pair-wise comparison”. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 21(3): 215-231. [45] Ataei, M., Shahsavany, H., and Mikaeil, R. (2013). “Monte Carlo Analytic Hierarchy Process (MAHP) approach to selection of optimum mining method”. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 23: 573-578. [46] Marseguerra, M., Zio, E., and Podofillini, L. (2002). “Condition-based maintenance optimization by means of genetic algorithms and Monte Carlo simulation”. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 77(2): 151-166. [47] Cardoso, J. B., Almeida, J. R., Dias, J. M., and Coelho, P. G. (2008). “Structural reliability analysis using Monte Carlo simulation and neural networks”. Advances in Engineering Software, 39(6): 505-513. [48] Hsu, T. H., and Pan, F. C. (2009). “Application of Monte Carlo AHP in ranking dental quality attributes”. Expert Systems With Applications, 36(2): 2310-2316.
| ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 706 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 646 |