اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 348 |
| تعداد مقالات | 2,872 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 3,265,023 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,400,373 |
Effect of Online Strategies-Based Instruction on Iranian EFL Learners’ Speaking Scores: A Case of Affective and Social Strategies Instruction | ||
| Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 8، شماره 3، مهر 2021، صفحه 51-71 اصل مقاله (733.5 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: research paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/jmrels.2020.11916.1478 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Samira Abbasi؛ Azizeh Chalak* ؛ Hossein Heidari Tabrizi | ||
| Department of English , Islamic Azad University, Isfahan(Khorasgan) Branch,Isfahan, Iran | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 22 آبان 1398، تاریخ بازنگری: 05 بهمن 1398، تاریخ پذیرش: 16 بهمن 1398 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Enhancing speaking ability is an important component of the acquirement of a language. The present study focused on improving speaking ability through online strategy-based instruction. The innovation aspect of this study is applying the Moodle course management system as an instructional platform. To this end, a group of 80 Iranian female and male students at the intermediate level participated in the treatment. Participants of the study were divided into four groups of 20. The subjects in experimental groups benefited from two particular instructional focuses of this study include social and affective strategies. In order to assess the effect of the treatment pre and posttests design were utilized. Consequently, the data were analyzed through One-Way ANOVAs and t-tests. The findings revealed that strategy treatment was successful in improving the participants’ speaking ability. However, there was no significant difference between the performance of male and female treatment groups. Therefore, the findings suggest that online strategy-based instruction can positively influence the speaking ability of Iranian intermediate EFL learners. This study may have pedagogical implications for material practitioners, CALL package designers and distance learning planners to include strategy instruction in English courses. Keywords: Moodle, Online learning, Social and affective strategies, Speaking ability, Strategy instruction | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Online learning؛ Language learning strategies؛ Speaking ability؛ Strategy instruction | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| تاثیر آموزش بر خط راهکار محور بر پیشرفت نمره کلامی فراگیران ایرانی زبان انگلیسی: مورد آموزش راهکارهای اجتماعی و عاطفی | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| سمیرا عباسی؛ عزیزه چالاک؛ حسین حیدری تبریزی | ||
| دانشگاه آزاد اصفهان | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Online learning, Language learning strategies, Speaking ability, Strategy instruction | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ahmadian, M., & Yadegari, H. R. (2009). The effects of extraversion/introversion on the use of strategic competence in written referential communication. IJAL, 12(1), 28-60.
Allen, D. (2004). Oxford placement test. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alzubi, A. A. F., Singh, M. K. M., & Pandian, A. (2017). The use of learner autonomy in English as a foreign language context among Saudi undergraduates enrolled in preparatory year deanship at Najran University. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(2), 152-160.
Ameri-Golestan, A. (2012). Impact of task planning on IELTS task 1 writing GRA score. In First National Conference on Innovations and Challenges in English Language Pedagogy, IAU-Najafabad Branch, Isfahan, Iran.
Anderson, A., & Lynch, T. (1988). Listening. Oxford University Press.
British Broadcasting Corporation. (2019). Task-based speaking. Retrieved from https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/task-based-speaking
Baker, L. (2002). Metacognition in comprehension instruction. In C. Block, & M. Pressely (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp.77-95). Guilford.
Block, C., & Pressley, M. (2007). Best practices in teaching comprehension. In L. Gambrell, L. Morrow, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (pp. 220–242). Guilford.
Canale, M. (2014). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In: J. Richards, R. Schmidht (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 14-40). Routledge.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1–47.
Chai, J. X., & Fan, K. K. (2016). Mobile inverted constructivism: Education of interaction technology in social media. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(5), 1425-1442.
Chamot, A. U. (2004). Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching. Electronic journal of foreign language teaching, 1(1), 14-26.
Cohen, A. D. (2011). Second language learner strategies. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp.681-698), Routledge.
Dörnyei, Z. (1995). On the teachability of communication strategies. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 55-85.
Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning: Advances in theory, research, and applications. Language Learning, 53(1), 3-32.
Ferris, D. R. (2011). Treatment of error in second language student writing (2nd ed.). The University of Michigan Press.
Griffiths, C., & Oxford, R. L. (2014). The twenty-first century landscape of language learning strategies: Introduction to this special issue. System, 43, 1-10.
Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.
Hauck, M., & Hampel, R. (2008). Strategies for online learning environments. In S. Hurd & T. Lewis (Eds.), Language learning strategies in independent settings (pp. 283-302). Multilingual Matters.
Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.
Hengki, H., Jabu, B., & Salija, K. (2017). The effectiveness of cooperative learning strategy through an English village for teaching speaking skills. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(2), 306-312.
Hung, S. T. A. (2016). Enhancing feedback provision through multimodal video technology. Computers & Education, 98, 90-101.
Lessard-Clouston, M. (1997). Language learning strategies: An overview for L2 teachers. The Internet TESL Journal, 3(12), 69-80.
Littlewood, W. (2007). Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. Language Teaching, 40(3), 243-249.
Mendez, M. (2007). Developing speaking strategies. In M. Mendez & A. Marin (Eds.), Effects of strategy training on the development of language skills (pp. 73-102). Pomares-UQROO.
Mendez, M. (2011). Speaking strategies used by BA ELT students in public universities in Mexico. MEXTESOL Journal,35(1), 580-598.
Moodle. (2019). About Moodle. Retrieved from https://docs.moodle.org/38/en/About_Moodle
Mugford, G. (2007). How rude! Teaching impoliteness in the second-language classroom. ELT Journal, 62(4), 374-384.
Nakatani, Y. (2005). The effects of awareness-raising training on oral communication strategy use. Modern Language Journal, 89 (1), 76-91.
Nation, I.S.P. (2008). Teaching vocabulary: Strategies and techniques. Heinle Cengage Learning.
Oxford, R. L. (1990) Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Newbury House.
Oxford, R. L. (2002). Language learning strategies in a nutshell: Update and ESL suggestions. In J. C. Richards, & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 124-132). CambridgeUniversity Press.
Oxford, R. L. & Lin, C. (2011). Autonomous learners in digital realms: Exploring strategies for effective digital language learning. In B. Morrison (Ed.), Independent language learning: Building on experience, seeking new perspectives (pp.157-171). Hong Kong University Press.
Oxford, R. L. (2016). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context. Routledge.
Piaget, J. (1964). Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(3), 176-186.
Pylkin, A., Stroganova, O., Sokolova, N., & Pylkina, M. (2019, June). The development of information technology and the problem of identity. In 2019 8th Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
Reinders, H. (2018). Technology and autonomy. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1-5.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge university press.
Ridgway, T. (2000). Listening strategies—I beg your pardon? ELT Journal, 54(2), 179–185.
Rubin, J. (1975). What the good language learner can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 41-51.
Sayer, P. (2005). An intensive approach to building conversation skills. ELT Journal, 59(1), 14-22.
Schwienhorst, K. (2003). Learner autonomy and tandem learning: Putting principles into practice in synchronous and asynchronous telecommunications environments. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(5), 427-443.
Xiao, J. (2018). On the margins or at the center? Distance education in higher education. Distance Education, 39(2), 259–274.
Zarei, A. A., & Abbasi, S. (2013). L2 idiom learning in the context of distance learning: a focus on textual and pictorial glossing and hyperlink. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 4(2), 275-284.
Zarei, A. A., & Shahidi Pour, V. (2013). Language learning strategies as predictors of L2 idioms comprehension. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 4(2), 313-330.
Zarei, A. A., & Hashemipour, M. (2015). The effect of computer-assisted language instruction on improving EFL learners’ autonomy and motivation. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 40-58
Ziahosseini, S. M., & Salehi, M. (2008). An investigation of the relationship between motivation and language learning strategies. Pazhuhesh-e Zabanha-ye Khareji, 41, 85-107. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 714 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 751 |
||