اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 347 |
| تعداد مقالات | 2,862 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 3,253,787 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,389,338 |
Postgraduate TEFL Students' Performance and Perception on Research Article Writing and their Challenges in Conducting Research | ||
| Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 8، شماره 3، مهر 2021، صفحه 125-151 اصل مقاله (800.94 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: research paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/jmrels.2020.12740.1577 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Leila Sajedi؛ Mahnaz Saeidi* ؛ Touran Ahour | ||
| Department of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 30 بهمن 1398، تاریخ بازنگری: 13 تیر 1399، تاریخ پذیرش: 16 تیر 1399 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Writing publishable research articles is a great concern of academicians, which requires awareness on all its relevant aspects. However, the obstacles are elusive and postgraduate students' challenges are not fully explored. In this mixed methods research and for the purpose of investigating Iranian graduate and postgraduate EFL students’ performance on their research articles in terms of language and compositional conventions, 30 students participated. Their research articles were analyzed using a researcher-made scale. The same conventions were utilized as a questionnaire to investigate participants' perceptions on the essentials of language conventions in research articles to find the relationship between their performance and perceptions. Besides, a focus group interview was conducted among 12 of the participants to investigate challenges they face in conducting research and writing research articles. The results of the content analysis of the research articles indicated a mediocre performance, while the data analysis of the questionnaire indicated a high perception towards essentials of research article writing. This discrepancy was confirmed by the statistical analysis of correlation. The results of the analysis of the multifaceted challenges students have in both conducting research and writing a research article paved the way for pertinent implications to practitioners in terms of curriculum, syllabus, and methodology. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Challenge؛ Perception؛ Performance؛ Research article | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| عملکرد و ادراک دانشجویان مقاطع ارشد و دکتری زبان انگلیسی در نگارش مقالات و چالش های آنها در انجام تحقیق | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| لیلا ساجدی؛ مهناز سعیدی؛ توران آهور | ||
| دانشکاه اسلامی آزاد-تبریز | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| انجام تحقیق و نگارش مقالات مسایل مهمی برای دانشگاهیان می باشند.اگرچه موانع اجتناب ناپذیر بوده و چالش های دانشجویان بطور کامل بررسی نمی شوند.در این مطالعه،ابتدا محققان عملکرد نگارشی سی شرکت کننده را با استفاده از یک مقیاس بررسی کردند.سپس، ادراک شرکت کنندگان با استفاده از پرسشنامه بررسی گردید.نهایتا، جهت بررسی مشکلات شرکت کنندگان در انجام تحقیق و نگارش مقالات، مصاحبه ی گروهی متمرکز با دوازده نفر از آنها صورت گرفت.نتایج تحلیل محتوای مقالات حاکی از عملکرد معمولی شرکت کنندگان بوده درحالیکه آنالیز دیتای پرسشنامه نشان داد که دانشجویان در مورد ضرورت های مهم مربوط به قراردادهای زبانی-دستوری وقراردادهای ترکیبی برای نوشتن مقاله بطور تیوریکی آگاه هستند. آنالیز آماری همبستگی ، تفاوت بین عملکرد و ادراک شرکت کنندگان را تایید کرد که دوره های نگارش آکادمیکی را ملزم به آموزش های عملی تری نسبت به گرایش های تیوریکی می کند .نتایج آنالیز چالش های چند جانبه ای دانشجویان میتواند پیامدهای مهمی برای بهبود نگارش آکادمیک ودوره های روش تحقیق داشته باشد. وازه های کلیدی:چالش؛ادراک؛ عملکرد؛مقاله تحقیق | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| چالش, ادراک, عملکرد, مقاله تحقیق | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ahmadi, A. (2014). Plagiarism in the academic context: A study of Iranian EFL learners. Research and Ethics, 10(2), 151–170.
Alama, F., Alamb, Q., & Rasul, M. G. (2013). A pilot study on postgraduate supervision. Procedia Engineering, 56, 875 –881.
Alsied, M., & Ibrahim, W. (2017). Exploring challenges encountered by EFL Libyan learners in research teaching and writing. IAFOR Journal of Language Learning, 3(2), 143-160.
Astafurova, T., Skrynnikova, I., & Sytina, N. (2017). Methodology of mastering academic writing competence in Englishwithin program of university training. In J. Kitzinger (Ed.), Advances in social science education and humanities research, (pp. 112-130). Atlantis Press.
Best, J. W., & Kahn, J.V. (2006). Research in education. Pearson Education, Inc.
Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. Routledge.
Bogdan, R., & Biklen. S.K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Allyn & Bacon.
Bowker, D. (2012). Negotiating understanding and agreement in master's supervision meetings with international students (Doctoral Dissertation, University ofSterling, United Kingdom). Retrieved from http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/11735
Brailsford, I. (2010). Motives and aspirations for doctoral study: Career, personal, and inter-personal factors in the decision to embark on a history Ph.D. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 4(5), 15-27.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Bruce, C., & Stoodley, I. (2013). Experiencing higher degree research supervision as teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 38(2), 226-241.
Cai, L., & Kong, H. (2013). Students’ perceptions of academic writing: A needs analysis of EAP in China. Language Education in Asia, 4(1), 5-22.
Castelló, M., & Iñesta, A. (2012). Texts as artifacts-in-activity: Developing authorial identity and academic voice in writing academic research papers. In M. Castelló & C. Donahue (Eds.), University writing: Selves and texts in academic societies (pp. 177-200). Emerald Group.
Catterall, J., Ross, P., Aitchison, C., & Burgin, S. (2011). Pedagogical approaches that facilitate writing in postgraduate research candidature in Science and Technology. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 8(2), 1-10. Retrieved April 2, 2016, from http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1212&context=jutlp
Creswell, J. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publication.
Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Dong, Y. (1998). Non-native graduate students' thesis/dissertation writing US institutions. English for Specific Purposes, 17(4), 369- 390.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Erbay, S., & Yılmaz, S. (2017). How Students perceive graduation thesis writing process: A qualitative inquiry. Journal of Narrative and Language Studies, 6(5), 46-58.
Ferenz, O. (2005). EFL writers’ social networks: Impact on advanced academic literacy development. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(4), 39-351.
Flowerdew, J. (1999). Problems in writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 243- 264.
Harrison, M., & Whalley, W. (2008). Undertaking to dissertation from start to finish: The process and product. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 32(3), 401-418.
Hasrati, M. (2013). Why bother about writing a master's dissertation? Assumptions of faculty and master students in an Iranian setting. Asia-Pacific Education Review, 14(3), 455-465.
Hasrati, M., & Tavakoli, P. (2016). MA TESOL dissertations across five Anglophone countries: A case study. English Educational Research.
Huang, R. (2007). A challenging but worthwhile experience: Asian international student perspectives of undertaking a dissertation in the UK. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport, and Tourism Education, 6(1), 29-38.
Hyland, K. (2015). Genre, discipline, and identity. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(19), 32-43.
Ibrahin, S. (2017). Tertiary education trust fund (TET Fund), research and development and Nigeria's higher education. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(7), 799-817.
Jalongo, M., Boyer, W., & Ebbeck, M. (2014). Writing for scholarly publication as “tacit knowledge”: A qualitative focus group study of doctoral students in education. Journal of Early Childhood Education, 4(2), 241-250.
Kaufhold, K. (2015). Conventions in postgraduate academic writing: European students’ negotiations of prior writing experience at an English speaking university. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(20), 125-134.
Kawase, T. (2015). Metadiscourse in the introductions of Ph.D. theses and research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(20), 114-124.
Kimani, N. (2014). Challenges in quality control for postgraduate supervision. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education, 1(9), 63-70.
Kitzinger, J., & Barbour, R. (1999). Introduction: The challenge and promise of focus groups. In R. Barbour & J. Kitzinger (Eds.), Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory, and Practice (pp.1-20). London: Sage.
Krueger, R. (2002). Designing and conducting focus group interviews. Retrieved from http://www.shadac.umn.edu/img/assets/18528/FocGrp_Krueger_Oct02.pdf Kruger, R.A., & Casey, M.A. (2000). Focus groups: A guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Sage Publication.
Lavelle, E., & Bushrow, K. (2007). Writing approaches of graduate students. Educational Psychology, 27(6), 807-822.
López-Cózar, C., Priede, T., & Benito, S. (2013). Analysis of the written expression in the Universities of Madrid through the subject Final Degree Work in the studies of ADE. Journal of University Teaching, 11 (3), 279-299.
Mapolisa, T., & Mafa, O. (2012). Challenges being experienced by undergraduate students in conducting research in open and distance learning. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 2(10), 1672–1684.
McGarrell, H., & Verbeem, J. (2007). Motivating revision of drafts through formative feedback. ELT Journal, 61(3), 228-236.
McGinty, S., Koo, Y., & Saeidi, M. (2010). A cross-country study on research students’ perceptions of the role of supervision and cultural knowledge in thesis development. International Journal of Inclusive Education. 14(5), 517-531.
Parry, K., & Su, X. (1998). Culture, Literacy, and Learning English: Voices from the Chinese classroom. Boynton.
Russel, D., & Cortes, V. (2012). Academic and scientific texts: The same or different communities? In M. Castello & C. Donahue (Eds.), University writing: Selves and texts in academic societies (pp. 177-200). Emerald Group.
Saeidi, M. (2015). A brief guide to writing style of articles and references (2nd ed.). Islamic Azad University Publication.
Swales, J., & Feak, C. (2004). Academic Writing for Graduate Students (2nd ed.).University Press.
Swales, J., & Post, J. (2017). Student use of imperatives in their academic writing: How research can be pedagogically applied. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20(7), 56- 70.
Tien, P. (2013). The Development of the Higher Education Sector of Vietnam within the Globalization Discourse: Using Futures Methodologies. Journal of Foreign Studies, 29(1), 65-71.
Todd, M., Bannister, P., & Clegg, S. (2004). Independent inquiry and the undergraduate dissertation: Perceptions and experiences of final-year social science students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(3), 335-355.
Todd, A., Galinsky, A., & Bodenhausen, G. (2012). Perspective taking undermines stereotype maintenance processes: Evidence from social memory, behavior explanation, and information solicitation. Social Cognition, 3(30), 94–108.
Wang, T., & Li, L. (2008). Understanding international postgraduate research student' challenges and pedagogical needs in thesis writing. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 4(3), 88-96.
Wenger, E. (2010). Communities of practice and social learning systems: The career of a concept. In C. Blackmore (Ed.), Social learning systems and communities of practice (p. 40). London: Springer.
Wolwark, A. (2011). English for writing research papers. New York: Springer. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 478 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 394 |
||