اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 348 |
| تعداد مقالات | 2,872 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 3,267,246 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,403,268 |
کاوشی در نحوه بکارگیری تمرینات آگاهی انگیزی در آموزش دستور زبان فارسی به غیر فارسی زبانان | ||
| پژوهش نامه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیر فارسی زبانان | ||
| مقاله 8، دوره 12، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 25، فروردین 1402، صفحه 147-166 اصل مقاله (783.33 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/jtpsol.2024.19292.1648 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| عبدالرضا نادری‌فر1؛ شکوفه وکیلی‌لطیف* 2؛ سامان عبادی3 | ||
| 1استادیار گروه زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران. | ||
| 2نویسندۀ مسئول، دکتری زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران. | ||
| 3دانشیار گروه زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی، کرمانشاه، ایران. | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 14 شهریور 1402، تاریخ بازنگری: 26 شهریور 1402، تاریخ پذیرش: 04 مهر 1402 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| این مقاله به بررسی چگونگی استفاده از تمرینات آگاهی انگیزی در مجموعه کتاب های آموزش زبان فارسی به غیر فارسی زبانان پرداخته است. ضرورت و نحوه تدریس گرامر همواره از مسائل بحث برانگیز در حیطه آموزش زبان دوم بوده است. طرفداران نظریه تحجر (fossilization) و بهینه سازی(fine-tuning) دانش زبانی معتقدند که توجه ویژه به گرامر در حوزه آموزش زبان دوم رشد دانش زبان شناختی یادگیرندگان را به همراه دارد و منجر به تولید جملات خوش ساختی از سوی آنان می شود . در این راستا، سه ساختار گرامری مشترک بین متداولترین مجموعه کتابهای آموزش زبان فارسی در ایران بطور تصادفی انتخاب و بررسی شدند. بر طبق نتایج این بررسی، الگوی اصلی آموزش گرامر در این کتابها روش ارائه- تمرین است که منجر به سطح بالایی از درستی در تولید ساختارهای گرامری می شود. این کتابها روش استنتاجی را دنبال می کنند و به دنبال ایحاد آگاهی انگیزی نیستند. علی رغم اینکه روش استنتاجی باعث سرعت در آموزش میشود و توضیحات دقیق‌تری را در بر دارد، اما این نکته منفی راترویج میکند که یادگیری گرامر مستلزم تعامل یادگیرندگان با مطالب کتابهای آموزشی نیست. مهمتر اینکه، این کتابها نمی‌توانند دو سبک یاد گیری تحلیلی و جامع نگر را پوشش دهند و قدرت تجزیه و تحلیل یادگیرندگان را ارتقا دهند. به همین دلیل، ارتقا آگاهی طراحان کتابهای آموزشی از توانایی های باقوه الگوهای ارائه گرامر ضروری است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها: گرامر؛ روش استنباطی و استنتاجی؛ ارائه؛ تمرین؛ تولید زبان | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Exploring how to use conscious exercises in teaching Persian grammar to non-Persian speakers | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Abdolreza Naderifar1؛ Shokofa Vakili Latif2؛ saman ebadi3 | ||
| 1Assistant professor, Faculty of Humanities, Department of language and literature, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran. | ||
| 2Corresponding Author, Ph.D. in TEFL, Faculty of Humanities, Department of language and literature,Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran. | ||
| 3Associate professor, Faculty of Humanities, Department of language and literature, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| One of the influential factors in deep language learning is the usage of consciousness raising tasks in grammar teaching. These tasks facilitate language learning through strengthening the link between grammar rules and the real contexts of using them. This study explored the way consciousness raising tasks are employed in Persian Language Teaching (PLT) series. In so doing, it randomly selected and analyzed three grammatical structures common to the most famous PLT series in Iran. Based on our research, these textbooks mainly follow the Presentation-Practice approach of grammar presentation which leads to high levels of grammatical accuracy. The series use the deductive way of grammar presentation, and do not use the consciousness raising tasks. Although the deductive approach decreases teaching time and involves more accurate explanations, it privileges the idea that language learning doesn’t nead learners` engagement in the learning process. Moreover, it doesn’t cover learners` analytic and holistic learning styles and does not improve their critical thinking. Thus, material developers need to pay more attention to the potentials of the grammatical tasks they employ. Extended Abstract: Introduction The necessity and method of grammar teaching have always been among controversial issues in the field of second language teaching and learning. Proponents of the fossilization and fine-tuning theories believe that paying special attention to grammar in the field of second language teaching and learning means facilitating the growth of the linguistic knowledge leads to the production of well-constructed sentences of positive influence on students` meaning transformation during the communication process (Thornberry, 1999). Chand Sharma (2002) believes that grammar teaching pursues such general goals as creating a relatively formal framework for communication during meaning based exercises and activities. In working toward this goal, he recommends the descriptive method of the grammar teaching considering the practical application of different grammatical categories. The functional method of teaching grammar mainly involves taking social relations into account and trying to make learners understand why in some communicative situations some language structures seem more suitable than the others. Methodology In this research, we aimed at determining the extent to which the Iranian books used for teaching Persian as a foreign language follow the consciousness raising method of grammar teaching. The importance of the issue lies in the fact that despite the recent significant rise in the number of learners of Persian as a foreign language in Iran, the content of relevant books has not been much criticized, especially when it comes to the issue of grammar teaching. In fact, no comprehensive research has been conducted on the form and the applicability of the grammar exercises, while the way grammar is presented can lead to a deeper and more successful language learning. In this research, the grammar exercises of three books namely, "Persian is sweet" by Brookshaw and Shabani Jadidi, "Learn Farsi" by Zulfiqari, Ghafari and Bakhtiari and "Persian language" by Moghadam were analyzed considering the framework of Nitta and Gardner (2005) which is used to identify and classify the grammar exercises. We aimed at revealing whether the Persian language teaching books in Iran follow the consciousness raising approach of grammar teaching. Further we aimed to improve the grammar teaching method based on the consciousness raising principles. Ellis (1993) divides consciousness raising exercises into three groups according to the level of awareness they create in learners` minds: consciousness raising tasks, interpretation tasks, and focused communication tasks. The tasks of the first group are the most obvious and important type of awareness exercises because they create the highest amount of mental awareness. As for the tasks of the second and third types, however, the awareness characteristic is gradually reduced. Ellis`s (1993) classification was later used by Nitta and Gardner (2005) and formed the first three categories of their framework. In their new framework, Nitta and Gardner called consciousness raising tasks, interpretation tasks, and focused communication tasks as traditional grammar tasks and combined them with grammar tasks and what Ur (1998) calls focused communicative tasks to form a five-level model. In the new framework, traditional grammar exercises are considered as consciousness raising tasks and the last two categories as continuous repetition exercises. Results The general review of the grammar part of the selected books shows that they use different methods for teaching. As for the grammar teaching however, they mainly rely on the direct presentation method. "Persian is sweet" and "Persian language" follow the presentation-practice method and their practice part mostly shows the use of grammar tasks. Unlike these two collections, "Learn Farsi" follows the presentation-practice-production method and in this way tries to give learners the opportunity to use these structures in real and close to reality situations. The tasks used in the language production section in this book try to encourage learners to produce language creatively going beyond practicing grammatical structures. Therefore, these tasks focus on learning linguistic structures and obtaining a high level of accuracy in producing grammatical structures (Thornbury,1999). The books reviewed in this study also prefer the deductive method to the inductive method in order to meet the possible expectations of learners regarding grammar learning (Ellis, 2002). Although this rule-based method leads to less wasted time during training and more accurate explanations by teachers, designers of educational materials should care about the consequences of the idea that this type of presentation of materials unconsciously promotes; learning a language means learning a series of grammar rules and ignoring the amount of communication that learners establish with books and educational materials. This study also shows that in relation to the examined books, focused communicative tasks are the most important manifestation of the consciousness raising flow in learners` mind. In addition, except for the "Learn Farsi" collection, which uses a combination of consciousness raising and grammar tasks, the other reviewed books only rely on grammar tasks. This is contrary to the recommendation of Fox (1998) who points out the benefits of consciousness raising tasks such as covering both analytical and holistic learning styles, providing different situations for learners to be exposed to the language and developing their analytical power. Conclusion This study encourages increasing awareness of the designers of educational materials about the structures and formats of grammar tasks as one of the important parts of the language teaching books. Using consciousness raising tasks in the form of presentation-practice-production is more effective than relying only on repeating grammatical items, because in this case, temporary consolidation of the learned material is usually done in the practice phase and language production is easier. Another advantage of this pattern is meeting the linguistic needs of both groups of learners who use the method of continuous repetition and mental exploration to learn. Teachers of these types of books can make necessary changes in their textbooks in order to take into account the dominant way of learning grammar among their students. Conflict of Interest The authors have no conflict of interest. Acknowledgment We would like to express our gratitude to Imam Khomeini International University for providing financial support for this study. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Consciousness raising tasks, Grammar, Persian language learners | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
دبیر مقدم،م. و صدیقیفر، ز. (1391). آموزش جملههای شرطی زبان فارسی به غیرفارسی زبانان با مقایسه دو روش تدریس ساختاری و تکلیفمحور. پژوهشنامه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسی زبانان، دوره 1، شماره 2، زمستان 1391، صص:59-31
رضایی، و. و کوراوند، آ. (1393). ارزیابی دستور آموزشی در کتابهای آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسی زبانان. پژوهشنامه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسی زبانان، دوره 3، شماره 3 (پیاپی 8)، پاییز و زمستان 1393، صص: 141-117.
صحرایی،ر. واعتمادالاسلامی، م. (1392). بازخوردهای تصحیحی و پاسخ به آنها در کلاسهای فارسیآموزان خارجی. پژوهشنامه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسی زبانان، دوره 2، شماره 2، تابستان 1392، صص: 57-31.
متولیان نایینی،ر. و استوار ابرقوئی. ع. (1392). خطاهای نحوی عربزبانان در یادگیری فارسی بهعنوان زبان دوم. پژوهشنامه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسیزبانان، دوره 2، شماره 2، تابستان 1392، صص: 86-57.
وکیلی فرد،ا. کولی وندی، ا. و فاطمی منش، ع. (1392). بسامد تکرار زمانهای دستوری در گفتار و نوشتار زبان فارسی: در جستجوی اولویتهای آموزشی دستور برای فارسیآموزان. پژوهشنامه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسی زبانان، دوره 2، شماره 3، پاییز و زمستان 1392، صص: 115-99.
References:
Chand Sherma, T. (2002). Modern Methods of Language Teaching. New
Delhi.
Dabirmoghaddam, M., & Sedighifar, Z. (2013). Teaching Persian Conditional Sentences
to Non-Persian Speakers: A Comparison Between Task-based and Structural Methods. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 1(2), 31-59.
Ellis, R. (1993). Second language acquisition: how does it help language teachers? ELT Journal, 47(1), 3-11.
Ellis, R. (1997).SLA research and language teaching. Oxford; Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (1997). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford; Oxford
University Press.
Ellis, R. (2002). Methodological points in grammar teaching materials. New perspective on grammar teaching in second language classrooms. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fox, G. (1998). Using corpus data in classroom. Materials development in language teaching. B.Tomlinson. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press: 25-43.
Morad Sahrayi, R., & Etemad Eslami, M. (2013). Corrective Feedback and Responses
from Persian Learners. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of
Other Languages, 2(2), 31-56.
Motavallian Nayini, R., & Abarghouyi, A. (2013). The Study of Persian Syntactic Errors
by Arabic-Speaking Learners. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 2(2), 57-86.
Nitta, R & Gardner, S. (2005). Consciousness raising and practice in ELT course books. ELT Journal, 59 (1), 3-13.
Rezei, V., & Kuravand, A. (2014). Evaluating the Pedagogical Grammar in Teaching Persian Language Coursebooks. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other
Languages, 3(VOL.3,NO.3,(TOME 8)), 117-141.
Schemidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied
linguistics, 11, 129-158.
Silakhori, f. A., & Abbasi, Z. (2012). Teaching Persian Subjunctive Mood to Non-Persian Students Based on Cognitive Linguistics (Mental Spaces Theory). Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 2, (9), 1950-1960.
Shabani Jadidi, P. & Brookshaw, D. P. (2010). The Routledge Introductory Persian Course. USA: Routldge.
Thornbury, S. (1999). How to teach grammar. England, Harlow: Longman.
Ur. P. (1998). Grammar Practice activities. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Vakilifrad,A., & Kulivandi, A., & Fatemimanesh, A. (2013). Frequency of
Grammatical Tenses in Written and Spoken Farsi: Seeking the Priorities in
Teaching Farsi Grammar. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other
Languages, 2(3), 99-115.
Willis, D. & Willis, J. (1996). Challenge and change in language teaching. Oxford: Heinemann.
Zolfqari, H, Qafari,M & Bakhtiari, B.M.(2009). Lets` Learn Persian. Islamic
Republic of Iran: Madreseh. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 43 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 48 |
||