اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 367 |
| تعداد مقالات | 3,004 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,032,343 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,686,439 |
تاثیر جنسیت در کاربرد افعال در نوشتار فارسیآموزان خارجی عربزبان سطح پیشرفته از منظر دستور نقشگرای نظاممند | ||
| پژوهش نامه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیر فارسی زبانان | ||
| مقاله 10، دوره 12، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 25، فروردین 1402، صفحه 168-194 اصل مقاله (1.22 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/jtpsol.2024.19558.1651 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| ابراهیم رضاپور* 1؛ ابوالفضل موچانی2 | ||
| 1نویسندۀ مسئول، استادیار گروه زبانشناسی دانشگاه سمنان. سمنان. ایران. | ||
| 2دانش آموختۀ کارشناسی ارشد آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسی زبانان. سمنان. ایران. | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 20 آبان 1402، تاریخ بازنگری: 25 دی 1402، تاریخ پذیرش: 01 بهمن 1402 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| این پژوهش، در چارچوب دستور نقشگرای نظاممند هلیدی، به بررسی و مقایسهی نوع افعالی که فارسیآموزان خارجی سطح پیشرفته زن و مرد در نوشتار خود استفاده کردهاند، میپردازد. یادگیری افعال در فراگیری ساختار معنایی و دستوری هر زبان اهمیت زیادی دارد. افعال در دستور نقشگرای نظاممند هلیدی و فرانقش اندیشگانی، در قالب فرایندها بازنمایی میشوند. هدف این پژوهش، بررسی تاثیر جنسیت بر استفاده فارسیآموزان سطح پیشرفته از فرایندها در چارچوب دستور نقشگرای نظاممند هلیدی است. نمونه آماری و پیکره مورداستفاده در این پژوهش نوشتار 248 نفر از فارسیآموزان خارجی سطح پیشرفته زن و مردِ مرکز آموزش زبان فارسی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد است. روش نمونهگیری این پژوهش از نوع نمونهگیری تصادفی ساده است. روش کار بدینصورت انجام شد که نوشتار 248 نفر از فارسیآموزان بر اساس جنسیت تفکیک شد (124 نفر زن و 124 نفر مرد). سپس تمام فعلهای بهکاررفته در نوشتار فارسیآموزان مرد و زن براساس تقسیمبندی هلیدی تعیین شد. سپس تعداد و درصد توزیع انواع فرایندها محاسبه و نتایج با هم مقایسه شد. برای بررسی معنادار بودن تفاوتها میان زنان و مردان، از آزمون آماری خی دو استفاده شد. سرانجام، این نتایج حاصل شد که فرایند مادی و رابطهای، پربسامدترین فرایندها و فرایندهای وجودی و کلامی کمبسامدترین فرایندها در نوشتار فارسیآموزان سطح پیشرفته هستند. زنان بیش از مردان از فرایندهای مختلف استفاده کردهاند. مردان 26/3 درصد بیشتر از زنان از فرایند مادی استفاده کردهاند. زنان 83/2 درصد بیشتر از مردان از فرایند ذهنی استفاده کردهاند که ازنظر آماری معنادار است. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| گونه نوشتاری؛ فارسیآموزان خارجی؛ جنسیت؛ دستور نقشگرای نظاممند هلیدی؛ فرایند | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Effect of Gender in The Use of The Verbs in The Writings of Advanced Foreign Learners of Persian Language Based on Functional Grammar | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Ebrahim Rezapour1؛ Abolfazl Mouchani2 | ||
| 1Corresponding author, Assistant Professor of Linguistics, Faculty of Literature and Foreign Languages, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran. | ||
| 2M. A. in Teaching Persian Language to non-Persian Learners, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| This research has been done to investigate the impact of gender on different processes usage in the writings of foreign learners of Persian language based on Halliday's systemic functional grammar approach. The method of this research is descriptive-analytic method. The sample and the corpus of this research was the writing of 248 advanced female and male foreign learners of Persian language of the center for teaching Persian language in Ferdowsi university of Mashhad. Sampling method is done in this order: first, the writing of 248 advanced female and male foreign learners of Persian language was separated based on gender (124 men and 124 women); Then, the process of the verbs in the texts was determined based on the segmentation of Halliday; after that, the distribution of all processes, was determined and shown by charts and compared. The chi - square statistical test was used to study the significance of differences between men and women. The results indicate that the material and relational processes are the most frequent processes and the existential and verbal processes are the least frequent processes in writing of advanced female and male foreign learners of Persian language. The results showed that the women have used the different processes in their writing more than the men. The men have used the material process, 3.26 percent more than the women. The women have used the mental process, 2.83 percent more than the men. Extended Abstract: Introduction For many years, researchers have attempted to discover the complex interrelationship between language and gender. This research investigated verbs usage in the writings of foreign female and male learners of Persian language. This research has been done based on Halliday's systemic functional grammar approach, because, this theoretical framework provides a systemic method for text analysis. Halliday’s systemic-functional grammar (1985;1994), enables the analysis of the experiential function of people’s perception of the world through the way they use language. As Halliday puts it, ‘language enables human beings to build a mental picture of reality, to make sense of what goes on around them and inside them’ (Halliday, 1994, p. 106). In the functional approach, the process appears in the form of the verbs. According to the Halliday's systemic functional grammar, the verbs can be classified in six processes: material, verbal, relational, behavioral and existential. In fact, this research has been done to investigate the impact of gender on different processes usage in the writings of foreign learners of Persian language based on Halliday's systemic functional grammar approach. In Iran, Razavian and Feizi (2017), in a research, investigated verb usage in Persian language learners’ written production based on Halliday's systematic functional grammar. Regarding the impact of gender on the writings and speaking of Persian language speakers, valuable studies have been conducted so far, for example, Tabrizi Manesh, M. (2006), Abolhasani, Z., & MirmalakSani, M. (2008), Ramezani, A. & Rostambeik Tafreshi, A. (2015) and Modarresi Tehrani, Y. & Hajizadeh, M. (2016); But any research has not investigated the impact of gender on the verb usage in the writings of foreign learners of Persian language. Methodology The method of this research is descriptive-analytic method. The population of this study included Advanced Foreign learners of Persian language which studied at Persian Language Center of Ferdowsi University. This field study used random sampling for participant selection. data were collected through tests and writing assignments. The sample and the corpus of this research was the writing of 248 advanced female and male foreign learners of Persian language of the center for teaching Persian language in Ferdowsi university of Mashhad. Sampling method is done in this order: first, the writing of 248 advanced female and male foreign learners of Persian language was separated based on gender (124 men and 124 women); Then, the process of the verbs in the texts was determined based on the segmentation of Halliday; after that, the distribution of all processes, was determined and shown by charts and compared. The chi - square statistical test was used to study the significance of differences between men and women. Results The results based on the segmentation of Halliday’s systemic functional grammar indicate that the material and relational processes are the most frequent processes and the existential and verbal processes are the least frequent processes in the writings of advanced female and male foreign learners of Persian language. The number of the processes in the learners' writing is: material process, 1149 cases; relational process, 966 cases; mental process, 386 cases; behavioural process, 283 cases; verbal process, 102 cases; existential process, 230 cases. There are gender differences in the use of the processes. The number of the processes in the female learners' writing is: material process, 555 cases; relational process, 487 cases; mental process, 217 cases; behavioural process, 134 cases; verbal process, 63 cases; existential process, 118 cases. The number of the processes in the male learners' writing is: material process, 594 cases; relational process, 479 cases; mental process, 169 cases; behavioural process, 149 cases; verbal process, 39 cases; existential process, 112 cases. The results showed that the women have used the different processes in their writing more than the men. The men have used the material process, 3.26 percent more than the women. The use of the verbs like “travel”, “walk”, “run” and “immigrate” in the writing of male learners is more than the writing of female learners. The women have used the mental process, 2.83 percent more than the men. The use of the verbs like “think”, “know”, “understand”, “like” and “feel” in the writing of female learners is more than the writing of male learners. The difference between men and women in the use of relational process is insignificant. Both in the writing of female learners and in the writing of male learners, relational process, is the second frequent process. From the above analysis, we get the distribution frequency of the processes as shown in Graph 1. Graph 1. From Graph 1, we can see that material processes are used most in the writing of learners (for men with a percentage of 38.52% and for women with a percentage of 35.26%). Conclusion this research has been done to investigate the impact of gender on different processes usage in the writings of foreign learners of Persian language based on Halliday's systemic functional grammar approach. There are gender differences in the use of the processes. As Holmes (1998) said, women and men develop different patterns of language use. The results showed that the women have used the different processes in their writing more than the men. As James and Drakich (1993, pp. 302–3) said, women are expected to use and do use talk to a greater extent than men to serve the function of establishing and maintaining personal relationships. The Processes in the men’s writings (e.g. travel, walk, and immigrate) reveal that males were ‘adventurous’, ‘risk taker’, ‘active’ and ‘independent’ (Evans & Davies, 2000; Emilia, et. al., 2017). The women have used the mental process more than the men. based on ‘sociolinguistic universal tendencies,’ that Holmes (1998) offers, women tend to focus on the affective functions of an interaction more often than men do. The affective functions of an interaction appear in the form of mental process. Also, James and Drakich (1993, pp. 302–3) said women are expected to talk, and do talk, about personal feelings and other socioemotional matters relevant to interpersonal relationships to a greater extent than men. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Written Varieties, Advanced Foreign Learners of Persian Language, Gender and Language, Halliday', s Systemic Functional Grammar, Process | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
ابوالحسنی، زهرا، میرملک ثانی، مریم. (1387). بررسی کتابهای درسی دانشگاهی بر اساس نظریة نقشگرای نظاممند هلیدی و مقایسة آن با متون همسان غیردرسی، معرفی یک پایاننامه، پژوهش و نگارش کتب دانشگاهی: سخن سمت، دوره 13، شمارهی 20، صص 129- 144.
آقاگلزاده، فردوس. (1384). کاربرد آموزههای زبانشناسی نقشگرا در تجزیه و تحلیل متون ادبی. مجله دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی دانشگاه مشهد، شماره 149- تابستان 1384.
آقاگلزاده، فردوس؛ کردزعفرانلو کامبوزیا، عالیه و رضویان، حسین. (1390). سبکشناسی داستان براساس فعل: رویکرد نقشگرا. فصلنامه تخصصی سبک شناسی نظم و نثر فارسی (بهار ادب) علمی – پژوهشی، سال چهارم، شماره اول، بهار، شمارهی پیاپی11، صص 243-254.
تبریزیمنش، معصومه. (1385). بررسی مجموعه فارسی بیاموزیم (آموزش زبان فارسی) از منظر فرانقش تجربی براساس چارچوب نظری دستور قشگرای نظاممند هلیدی (پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد). دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.
دستجردی کاظمی، مهدی. (1388). توصیف گفتار دانشآموزان پایه اول دبستان براساس نظریه نقشگرای نظاممند هلیدی. (رساله دکتری). پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی، پژوهشکده زبانشناسی، تهران، ایران.
رضایی، مرجان. (1390). بررسی تاثیر جنسیت بر رویکرد شاعران معاصر فارسی زبان ایران (پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد). دانشکده ادبیات، زبانها و تاریخ، دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران.
رضویان، حسین و فیضی، مریم. (1396). فعلهای پرکاربرد در نوشتار فارسیآموزان غیرفارسیزبان: تحلیلی بر پایه دستور نظاممند نقشگرا. پژوهشنامه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسیزبانان، دوره 6، شماره یک- پیاپی 13، بهار و تابستان 1396، صص 83 - 114.
رمضانی، احمد و رستم بیک تفرشی، آتوسا. (1394). تحلیل متن کتاب زبان انگلیسی هفتم بر مبنای دستور نقشگرای نظاممند هلیدی، پژوهشنامه انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی، سال 15، شمارهی 3، صص: 59- 76.
صفارمقدم، احمد (1391). « گونههای گفتاری و نوشتاری در آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسیزبانان». زبانشناخت، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی، سال سوم، شمارة دوم، پاییز و زمستان 1391، صص 45-68.
محمدنژاد عالی زمینی, یوسف و الهیان, لیلا. (1396). تحلیل فرایندهای کتابهای آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسیزبانان: مطالعة موردی رویکرد نقشگرای نظاممند. پژوهشنامه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسی زبانان، دوره 6، شماره دو- پیاپی 14، صص 17 – 38.
مدرسی، یحیی. (1390). درآمدی بر جامعهشناسی زبان . تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی. مدرسی، یحیی و حاجی زاده، معصومه. (1395). نگاهی تطبیقی به فرایندهای ششگانه هلیدی در تحلیل متون تألیفی و ترجمهای پزشکی، فصلنامه زبان شناخت، سال هفتم، شماره 1، صص: 151- 170.
مهاجر، مهران و نبوی، محمد. (1393). بهسوی زبانشناسی شعر . تهران: نشر آگه.
References:
Abolhasani, Z., & MirmalakSani, M. (2008). A Survey on University Textbooks within the framework of Halliday’s Systemic Functional Theory, researching and writing academic books: sokhanesamt, 13(20), pp. 129-144. [In Persian].
Agha Golzadeh, F. (2005). Application of Halliday’s Functional Approach in The Analysis of Literary Texts. Journal of Language and Literature, Faculty of Letters and Humnities, Summer 2005, Volume 38, Number 2; Page(s) 1 To 21. [In Persian].
Agha Golzadeh, F., Kord Zafaranlu, A. & Razavian, H. (2011). Stylistics of Story Based on Verbs, Functional Approach. Quarterly Journal methodologies of Persian poetry and prose (Bahar-e-adab), volume Number 4, number In Volume 1, Spring 2011, Fourth Year, Number 1, issue Number 11. 243- 254. [In Persian].
Coates, J. (1986). Women, Men and Language, New York, Longman.
¾¾¾¾ (1998). Language and gender: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
Dastjerdi kazemi, M. (2010). A description of first grade students' speech within Halliday's Systemic Functional Grammar framework (PhD. Dissertation). Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian].
Emilia, Emi; Moecharam, Nicke Yunita & Syifa, Iva Laela (2017). Gender in EFL Classroom: Transitivity Analysis in English Textbook for Indonesian Students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 7 No. 1, May 2017, pp. 206-214.
Evans, L. & Davies, K. (2000). No sissy boys here: A content analysis of the representation of masculinity in elementary school reading textbooks. Sex roles, 42(3/4), pp. 255-270.
Gallardo, B. C. (2001). Why can’t women talk like a man: An Investigation of Gender in the Play Pygmalion by Bernard Shaw (Master’s thesis). Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Brazil.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1989). Spoken and Written Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
¾¾¾¾¾¾¾ (1985/1994/1998). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold Limited.
¾¾¾¾¾¾¾ (1993). Towards a Language-based Theory of Learning. Linguistics and Education, 5: 93-116.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen C. (2004), An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Third Ed. London: Edward Arnold Limited.
Holmes, J. (1986). “Functions of you know in women's and men's speech”. Language in Society. Volume 15, Issue 1, March 1986, pp. 1-21. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
¾¾¾¾ (1992). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London: Longman.
¾¾¾¾ (1998). Woman’s Talk: The Question of Sociolinguistic Universals. In Coates (1998).
James, D. & J. Drakich (1993). Understanding Gender Differences Amount of Talk: A Critical Review of Research. In Tannen (1993).
Krahnke, K. (1987). Approaches to Syllabus Design for Foreign Language Teaching. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and Woman’s place. Language in Society,2: 45-80.
¾¾¾¾ (1975). Language and Woman’s place. New York: Harper & Row.
Modarresi, Y. (2017). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. [In Persian].
Modarresi Tehrani, Y. & Hajizadeh, M. (2016). A comparative examination of the Halliday`s six-fold processes in medical compilation and translation texts. Language Studies, 6(12), 99-118. [In Persian].
Mohajer, M. & Nabavi, M. (2014). Towards the linguistics of poetry. Tehran: Nashr-e-Aghah. [In Persian].
Mohammadnezhad Alizamini, Y. & Elahian, L. (2017). Exploring the representation of processes in Persian language learning textbooks: A case study based on systemic functional linguistics. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 6(TOME 14), 17-38. [In Persian].
Mulac, A. (1999). Perceptions of women and men based on their linguistic behavior: the gender- linked effect. In P. Ursula., & F. Braun (Eds), Perceiving and performing gender (pp. 88-104). Opladen: Westdeutscher verlag.
Ramezani, A. & Rostambeik Tafreshi, A. (2015). Text Analysis of Prospect 1 Based on Halliday’s Systemic Functional Grammar. Critical Studies in Texts & Programs of Human Sciences, 15(36), 53-68. [In Persian].
Razavian, H. & Feizi, M. (2017). The Most Frequent Verbs in the Written Production of non-Iranian Learners of Persian: An Analysis Based on Systemic Functional Grammar. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 6(TOME 13), 83-114. [In Persian].
Rezaei, M. (2012). The investigation of the effect of gender on the approach of contemporary Iranian persian- speaking poets (Master’s thesis). Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian].
Richards, J. C. & Rogers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.), USA: Cambridge University Press.
Tabrizi Manesh, M. (2006). The Study of Let’s learn Persian as a Training Course on The Basis of Experimental Metafunction Within Halliday's systemic functional grammar approach (Master’s thesis). Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian].
Saffar Moghadam, A. (2013). Spoken and Written Variants in Teaching Persian Language to non-Persian Speakers. Language Studies, 3(6), 45-68. [In Persian].
Thompson, G. (1997). An Introducing Functional Grammar, second Ed, New York: Oxford University Press.
¾¾¾¾ (2004). An Introducing Functional Grammar, second Ed, New York: Oxford University Press.
Trudgill, P. (1974). Sociolinguistics: An Introduction. Middlesex: Penguin.
Wardhaugh, R. (2006). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Fifth Ed. Blackwell.
Wilkins, D. (1976). Notional Syllabuses: A Taxonomy and Its Relevance to Foreign Language Curriculum Development. London: Oxford University Press.
Wodak, R. (1997). Gender and Discourse. London: Sage Publications.
Zhang, Y. (2017). Transitivity Analysis of Hillary Clinton’s and Donald Trump’s First Television Debate. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 6(7), 65-72. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 286 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 188 |
||