Introduction: Recently, “Power” has become the inevitable question of the theory and practice of urban planning. Urban planning is based on intervention and involved in the public interest, interests of numerous structures, institutions and activists. Therefore, Urban Planning is inevitably politically and explained in connection with power relations. The analysis of the role of power and politics in urban planning has been considered in literature for decades. However, such efforts in urban planning research and urban studies of Iran have been made less. Despite the attention to the concept of power in recent decades in urban studies and planning research, the definitions and coordinates of this concept have had many ambiguities and the literature has made different perceptions of the concept of power. The roots of these semantic ambiguities and multiplicity may be sought in the multiplicity of the meanings of power in the social science and political philosophy. Here, the main question is: what is the reading of the "what" of the concept of power in the field of urban planning and urban studies? And what the components of power research, including "who," "why," and "how," have taken this concept in response?
The Purpose of the Research: The main purpose of this article is to understand the conceptual discourses of "power" and explain its various aspects in urban studies. The mentioned goal is defined in connection with the main question of the article, i.e. "what" is the concept of power and its relationship with "why" and "how" of power relations in urban research.
Methodology: In order to answer the question of the research and within the framework of the interpretive paradigm, qualitative methodology and directed content analysis method have been used. Content analysis and data coding are conducted based on themes, and the authors have classified, summarized, and understood the textual data in the field of power based on the interpretation of the text. In this research, based on the common methods of sampling in qualitative research, samples of studies that are more suitable to achieve the goals of the research have been selected. In fact, the focus is on texts that contain a lot of information according to the purpose of the research. Therefore, the analysis of the content of the texts that are among the most famous and most referenced sources in the field of "power and urban planning" has been done.
Findings and Discussion: The findings show that different themes of power in urban studies can be seen as different aspects of the concept of power that, not separately but intertwined and integrated, represent the dynamic and complex concept of power relationships. Also, among the conceptual discourses of power, including the “government-oriented”, “legal-institutional”, “structural”, “commodity”, “symbolic”, and “network” that each represents an aspect of the power relations. Foucault's network approach has a widespread application in urban studies and urban planning research due to having other aspects of power and the ability to analyze the network of official and unofficial, hidden and obvious power relations. In Foucault's "network-oriented" approach to power, the predominant emphasis is on policies, tactics and relationships such as formal and informal networking, hidden alliances, negotiations and deals, through which "spatial actions" in the form of Projects and material space are formed. Therefore, this attitude has a very high capacity to analyze the network of formal and informal relationships, overt and hidden power in the research and professional field of urban planning.
Conclusion: A review of extensive research in the field of power shows that knowledge of the complex concept of "power" gives a practical understanding of it for analysis in relation to urban planning and spatial policies and for finding effective analytical tools to identify what, why and How to apply power in urban development processes will be fruitful. The studies of the field of power, especially in Foucault's perspective, help us to search for power beyond the concept of the government and the official system, in relation to the most detailed issues and the open and hidden relations of actors in the processes of planning, it is in relation to the knowledge of revelation. and finally strengthen our understanding of the discourse situations in which activists, managers and city planners are located. |
- Albrechts, L. (2003). Planning and power: Towards an emancipatory planning approach. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 21(6), 905-924. DOI:10.1068/c29m
- Ashworth, G. J., & Voogd, H. (1990). Selling the city: Marketing approaches in public sector urban planning. Belhaven Press. DOI: 10.1177/030913259201600413
- Bashiriyeh, H. (1996). History of political thoughts in the 20th century. Tehran: Ney publication. [In Persian]
- Bashiriyeh, H. (2003). Political sociology. Tehran: Mahi publication. [In Persian]
- Bisschops, S., & Beunen, R. (2018). A new role for citizens’ initiatives: the difficulties in co-creating institutional change in urban planning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 1-16. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2018.1436532
- Blaikie, N. (2007). Approaches to social enquiry: Advancing knowledge. Polity.
- Booher, D. E., & Innes, J. E. (2002). Network power in collaborative planning. Journal of planning education and research, 21(3), 221-236. DOI: 10.1177/0739456X0202100301
- Boorboor Azhdari, R. (2011). Investigating the representation of power in urban images and writings and its impact on the urban space (case study: Valiasr Street, Tehran). Master's thesis, Azad university- Tehran Markaz, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Department of Urbanism. [In Persian]
- Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo Academicus.Cambridge: Polity Press. [English Translation]
- Bourdieu, P. (1990) The logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Bourdieu, P. (1994). Theory of Action; Scientific Reasons and Rational Choice. Translated by Morteza Mardiha. Tehran: Naghah va Negar Publication. [In Persian]
- Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. University of Chicago press.
- Brenner, N., Marcuse, P., & Mayer, M. (2012). Cities for people, not for profit: Critical urban theory and the right to the city: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203802182.
- Certomà, C et, al. (2015). Expanding the ‘dark side of planning’: Governmentality and biopolitics in urban garden planning. Planning Theory, 14(1), 23-43. DOI: 10.1177/1473095213506202.
- Clegg, S. (1989) Frameworks of power. Translated by Mustafa Yonsi. Tehran: Kharazmi Publication. [In Persian]
- Craib, I. (1992). Modern social theory: from parsons to Habermas. Translated by Abbas Mokhbar. Tehran: Agah Publication. [In Persian]
- Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. Translated by Hassan Danaei Fard and Hossein Kazemi. Tehran: Saffar Publication. [In Persian]
- Dadashpoor, H, Sheydayi, A & Esmaeili, M. (2024). Perspectives on the Public Interest and Social Justice in Planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X241237540.
- De Souza, M. L. (2006). Social movements as ‘critical urban planning ‘agents. City, 10(3), 327-342. DOI: 10.1080/13604810600982347.
- Den Hond, F., Boersma, F. K., Heres, L., Kroes, E. H., & van Oirschot, E. (2012). Giddens à la Carte? Appraising empirical applications of Structuration Theory in management and organization studies. Journal of Political Power, 5(2), 239-264. DOI: 10.1080/2158379X.2012.698901.
- Dreyfus, H. L., & Rabinow, P. (2014). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Translated by Hossein Bashiriyeh. Tehran: Markaz Publication. [In Persian]
- Esmaeili, M. (2022). Scrutinizing power relations in planning praxis. Case study: district 22 of Tehran municipality. PH. D dissertation, department of urban planning and management, faculty of Urban Planning, University of Tehran. [In Persian]
- Esmaeili, M., & Sheydayi, A. (2024). Understanding and Explaining the Interaction of the Social-Communicative Aspects of Urban Planning and the Key Criteria of Sustainable Development. Journal of Environmental Studies, 49(4), 471-484. [In persina]. doi: 10.22059/jes.2023.365474.1008449
- Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and power: Democracy in practice. University of Chicago press.
- Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making Social Science Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge university press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511810503.
- Flyvbjerg, B. (2002). Bringing Power to Planning Research. Journal of planning education and research 21:353-366. DOI: 10.1177/0739456X0202100401.
- Flyvbjerg, B., & Richardson, T. (2002) Planning and Foucault: In Search of the Dark Side of Planning Theory (2002). Philip Allmendinger and Mark Tewdwr-Jones, eds., Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory, London and New York: Routledge, 2002, pp. 44-62, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2278389.
- Forester, J. (1982). Planning in the Face of Power. Journal of the American planning association, 48(1), 67-80. DOI: 10.1080/01944368208976167
- Forester, J. (1988). Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley: University of California press.
- Forester, J. (1993). Critical Theory, Public Policy and Planning Practice. Albany: State University of New York Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069501600507
- Forester, J. (1999). The Deliberative Practitioner. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Forester, J. (2006). Exploring urban practice in democaticizing society: opportunities, techniques, and challenges. Development South Africa 23(5) December. DOI: 10.1080/03768350601021814
- Forester, J. (2012). On the Theory and Practice of Critical Pragmatism: Deliberative Practice and Creative Negotiations. Planning theory, 12(1): 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095212448750
- Foucault, M. (1991). "Space, knowledge, and power”, in P Rainbow (ed), The Foucault Reader, London: Penguin Books, pp.239-256.
- Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and Punish, The birth of prison. Translated by Niko Sarkhosh and Afshin Jahandideh. Tehran: Ney Publication. [In Persian]
- Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. Pantheon.
- Foucault, M. (1982). The Subject and Power, in Drefyus and Rabinow (eds), Brighton: Harvester.
- Fox-Rogers, L., & Murphy, E. (2014). Informal strategies of power in the local planning system. Planning theory, 13(3), 244-268. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095213492512
- Friedmann, J. (1973). The spatial organization of power in the development of urban systems. Development and Change 4(3):12 – 50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1973.tb00643.x
- Friedmann, J. (1987). Planning in the Public Domain. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv10crf8d
- Friedmann, J. (1998). Planning theory revisited. European Planning Studies, 6(3), 245-253. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09654319808720459
- Giddens, A. (1976). New rules of sociological Method, London: Hutchinson.
- Giddens, A. (1995). Politics, Sociology and Social Theory. Translated by Manouchehr Sabouri. Tehran: Ney Publication. [In Persian]
- Gordon, R., Kornberger, M., & Clegg, S. R. (2009). Power, rationality and legitimacy in public organizations. Public Administration, 87(1), 15-34. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23484729
- Grange k. (2012). Shaping acting space: In search of a new political awareness among local authority planners. Planning Theory 12(3), 225-243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095212459740
- Grant, J. (2001). The dark side of the grid: power and urban design. Planning perspectives, 16(3), 219-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665430152469575.
- Gregory, D., Martin, R., & Smith, G. (Eds.). (1994). Human geography: society, space and social science. Macmillan International Higher Education.
- Hamilton, P. (1983). Talcott Parsons. Translated by Ahmad Tadayon. Tehran: Hermes Publication. [In Persian]
- Harris, N. (2001) Collaborative Planning: From Theory to Action. Cited in: Planning Futures: New directions for planning theory. London: Routledgehttps://doi.org/10.1080/1356347032000153151
- Harvey, D. (2018). The limits to capital. Verso books.
- Hasanpoor, H. (2013). The relationship between visibility and power representation in the urban planning process of Tehran. Master's thesis, Azad university- Tehran Markaz, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Department of Urbanism. [In Persian]
- Healy, P. (2003). Collaborative Planning in Perspective. Journal of Planning Theory, London: 2 (2):101-123. https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952030022002.
- Hillier, J. (2002). Shadows of Power: An allegory of Prudence in Land-Use Planning. London: Routledge.
- Hillier, J. (2003). Agonizing over Consensus: Why Habermasian Ideals Cannot Be Real. Journal of Planning Theory 2 (1): 37-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095203002001005
- Hindess, B. (1996). Discourses of power: from Hobbes to Foucault. Translated by Mustafa Yousefi. Tehran: Shirazeh Publication. [In Persian]
- Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan. Translated by Hossein Bashiriyeh, Tehran: Ney Publication. [In Persian]
- Hobbes, T. (2016). Thomas Hobbes: Leviathan .Longman Library of Primary Sources in Philosophy: Routledge.
- Hobden, s. (1956). International relation and historical sociology: breaking down boundaries. Translated by Jamshid Zanganeh. Tehran: Publications of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. [In Persian]
- Holub, R. (1992). Antonio Gramsci: beyond Marxism and Postmodernism. Translated by Mohsen Hakimi. Tehran: Cheshmeh Publication. [In Persian]
- Hoseinpoor Biji, H. (2013). The influence of power on the formation and development of squares in the central part of Tehran. Master's thesis, Azad university- Tehran Markaz, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Department of Urbanism. [In Persian]
- Howe, J. and Langdon, C. (2002). Towards a Reflexive Planning Theory. Planning Theory, 1, 209-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/147309520200100302
- Huxley, M., & Yiftachel, O. (2000). New paradigm or old myopia? Unsettling the communicative turn in planning theory. Journal of planning education and research, 19(4), 333-342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0001900402
- Karki, T.K. (2017). Should planner join Politics? Would that help them make better cities? Planning Theory 16(2), 186-202. https://10.1177/1473095218809747.
- Kort, W., & Gharbi, J. E. (2013). Structuration theory amid negative and positive criticism. International Journal of Business and Social Research, 3(5), 92-104. https://doi.org/10.18533/ijbsr.v3i5.10
- Krumholz, N. (2001). Planners and politicians: A commentary based on experience from the United States. Planning Theory & Practice, 2(1), 96-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350122852
- Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (Vol. 142). Blackwell: Oxford.
- Lennon, M., & Fox-Rogers, L. (2017). Morality, power and the planning subject. Planning Theory, 16(4), 364-383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095216648185
- Lukes, S. (1982). Power: a radical view. Translated by Emad Afrough. Tehran: Rasa Publication. [In Persian]
- Machiavelli, N. (1532). The Prince. Translated by Darius Ashouri. Tehran: Parvaz Publication. [In Persian]
- Maginn, P. J. (2017). Urban regeneration, community power and the (in) significance of'race': Routledge.
- Mashhadi Moghadam, N. (2021). Power Relations in the Urban Planning Apparatus of Tehran. PH. D dissertation, Tarbiat Modares University. Faculty of Art and Architecture, Department of Urban and Regional Planning. [In Persian]
- McGuirk, P. M. (1995). Power and influence in urban planning: community and property interests' participation in Dublin's Planning System. Irish Geography, 28(1), 64-75. https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3147&context=sspapers
- Metzger, J., Soneryd, L., & Tamm Hallström, K. (2017). ‘Power’ is that which remains to be explained: Dispelling the ominous dark matter of critical planning studies. Planning Theory, 16(2), 203-222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095215622502
- Njoh, A. J. (2009). Urban planning as a tool of power and social control in colonial Africa. Planning perspectives, 24(3), 301-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665430902933960
- Noorian, F. & Esmaeili, M. (2023). Investigating the concept of "praxis" in reducing the gap between theory and practice: the necessity of developing "soft/political" skills along with "hard/technical" skills based on modern urban planning trainings. Amayesh Mohit, (16) 61, 27-48. [In Persian]. https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/ebtp/Article/988206
- Oesch, L. (2020). An improvised dispositif: Invisible urban planning in the refugee camp. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 44(2), 349-365. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12867
- Sheydayi, A., & Dadashpoor, H. (2023). Conducting qualitative content analysis in urban planning research and urban studies. Habitat International, 139, 102878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102878.
- Shin, Y. (2015). Bourdieu and urban politics: Conceptualizing a Bourdieusian relational framework for urban politics research. Planning Theory, 12(3), 267-289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095212465926
- Stein, S.M. and Harper, T.L. (2003). Power, Trust and Planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23:125-139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X03258636
- Taylor, C. (2017). Foucault on freedom and truth. In Michel Foucault (pp. 89-120). Routledge.
- Therborn, G. (2017). Cities of Power: The Urban, The National, The Popular, The Global: Verso Books. https://www.versobooks.com/products/234-cities-of-power
- Uddin, K. F., & Piracha, A. (2023). Urban planning as a game of power: The case of New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Habitat International, 133, 102751. https://researchdirect.westernsydney.edu.au/islandora/object/uws:69084/
- Weber, M. (2005). Rationality and Freedom. Translated by Ahmad Tadayon and Yadollah Movaghan. Tehran: Hermes Publication. [In Persian]
- Yiftachel, O. (1998). Planning and Social Control: Exploring the Dark Side. Journal of Planning literature 12(4): 395- 406. https://doi.org/10.1177/088541229801200401
- Yiftachel, O. (2016). “Ethnocracy”: The Politics of Judaizing Israel/ Palestine. published by De Gruyter Oldenbourg. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110351637-048.
- Zaimaran, M. (2000). Michel Foucault: Knowledge and power. Tehran: Hermes publication. [In Persian]
- Zaimaran, M. (2007). Nietzsche after Heidegger, Derrida and Deleuze. Tehran: Hermes Publication. [In Persian]
|
