تعداد نشریات | 19 |
تعداد شمارهها | 380 |
تعداد مقالات | 3,132 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,252,040 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,846,375 |
تحلیل راهبردی عوامل کلیدی موفقیت همکاری-رقابت در بخش بهداشت و درمان: رویکرد تحلیل سناریو و نقشه شناختی فازی | ||
آینده پژوهی ایران | ||
دوره 9، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 12، شهریور 1403، صفحه 270-300 اصل مقاله (1.57 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/jfs.2024.20566.1559 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
اسماعیل مزروعی نصرآبادی* ؛ زهرا صادقی آرانی | ||
استادیار گروه مدیریت کسب و کار، دانشکده علوم مالی، مدیریت و کارآفرینی، دانشگاه کاشان، کاشان، ایران. | ||
تاریخ دریافت: 16 تیر 1403، تاریخ بازنگری: 25 آبان 1403، تاریخ پذیرش: 27 آبان 1403 | ||
چکیده | ||
هدف:راهبرد همرقابتی یا همکاری-رقابت یک رویکرداستراتژیک پرطرفداردر بخش بهداشت ودرمان است.علیرغم استقبال از این رویکرد، سازمانهادرپیادهسازی آن برای بهره مندی ازتمامی مزایای آن بامشکلاتی مواجه است.از این رو پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی عوامل کلیدی موفقیت راهبرد همکاری-رقابت در نظام سلامت و تحلیل سناریو این عوامل انجام شده است. روش:این پژوهش از نوع ترکیبی (کیفی-کمی) است، در مرحله اول تحقیق (کیفی) براساس مصاحبههای نیمه ساختاریافته وتحلیل مضمون، عوامل کلیدی موفقت شناسایی شده ودر مرحله دوم (کمی)، بهمنظور تحلیل این عوامل از نقشه شناختی فازی و تحلیل سناریو استفاده شده است. یافتهها: در نتیجه اقدامات تحقیق مرحله اول 74 عامل کلیدی موفقیت شناسایی شدکه در قالب 15 کلان دسته «مدیریت منابع انسانی»،«مهارت تشخیص و رفع ناسازگاریها»،«آموزش مدیران»،«مدیریت روابط بین سازمان»،«میزان وابستگی و مشابهت»،«مدیریت اطلاعات»،«نظارت وارزیابی هوشمندانه»،«خدمتدهی هوشمندانه»،«فرهنگسازی مناسب»،«مدیر مثبتنگر»،«چند منبعی بودن»،«طراحی محیط کاری»،«کار گروهی»،«مدیریت قراردادها»و«بهگزینی» گروهبندی شدند. بر اساس خروجی نقشه شناختی فازی «آموزش مدیران»و«مدیریت قراردادها» پیشران و«خدمتدهی هوشمندانه» دریافتکننده اثر است.سایر عوامل کلیدی موفقیت، نیز نقش متغیر معمولی را دارند. بالاترین درجات وابستگی به ترتیب برای «مدیریت روابط بین سازمان»و«نظارت وارزیابی هوشمندانه»است. «بهگزینی» و«مهارت تشخیص ورفع ناسازگاریها» بیشترین میزان اثرگذاری و «مدیریت روابط بین سازمان» و «مهارت تشخیص و رفع ناسازگاریها» بیشترین میزان مرکزیت را داراست. همپوشانی سناریوهای روبه عقب بیانگر جایگاه ویژه «نظارت و ارزیابی هوشمندانه»، «مدیریت قراردادها» و «فرهنگسازی مناسب» است. همچنین همپوشانی سناریوهای روبهجلو بیانگر اهمیت «بهگزینی» و «آموزش مدیران» است. نتیجهگیری: بر اساس یافتههای تحقیق، توسعه زیرساختهای اطلاعاتی، بهگزینی، تنظیم قراردادها بر مبنای پوشش چالشها و آموزشهای مدیریتی برای توسعه همرقابتی توصیه میگردد. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
عوامل کلیدی موفقیت؛ راهبرد همکاری-رقابت؛ بخش بهداشت و درمان؛ تحلیل سناریو؛ نقشه شناختی فازی | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Strategic Analysis of the Key Success Factors of Cooperation-Competition in the Healthcare: Scenario Analysis and Fuzzy Cognitive Map Approach | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Esmaeil Mazroui Nasrabadi؛ Zahra Sadeqi-Arani | ||
Assistant Professor, Department of management and Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Financial Science, Management and Entrepreneurship, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran. | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
Objective:Coopetition strategy(cooperation-competition)is a popular strategic approach in the healthcare.Despite the acceptance of this approach,organizations have faced difficulties in implementing it to benefit from all its advantages.Therefore,the current research was conducted with the aim of identifying the key success factors of the cooperation-competition strategy in the healthcare and analyzing the scenario of these factors. Method:This research is a mixed (qualitative-quantitative)research.In the first stage(qualitative)based on semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis,the key success factors were identified and in the second stage(quantitative),fuzzy cognitive map and scenario analysis was used to rank these factors. Results:As a result of the first stage,74key factors of success were identified and categorized to15categories:"human resource management","skills to detect and resolve inconsistencies","training of managers","management of relations between organizations","degree of dependence and similarity".,"Information management","Smart monitoring and evaluation","Smart service","Appropriate culture creation","Positive manager","Multiple sources","Work environment design","Team work","contracts Management"and,"benchmarking".Based on the output of the fuzzy-cognitive-map,"Training of managers"and"contracts Management "are the driver and"Smart service"is the receiver.Other key success factors are typical.The highest degrees of dependence are "inter-organizational relationship management"and"intelligent monitoring and evaluation"."benchmarking"and"skill to detect and resolve inconsistencies"have the highest degree of effectiveness,and"management of relations between organizations"and"skill to detect and resolve inconsistencies"have the highest degree of centrality.The overlap of the backward scenarios indicates the special position of"smart monitoring and evaluation","contract management"and"proper culture building".Also,the overlap of future scenarios shows the importance of"benchmarking"and"training managers". Conclusion: Based on the findings,the development of information infrastructure,benchmarking,regulation of contracts based on the coverage of challenges and management training are recommended for the development of cooperation-competition strategy in health care sector. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Key Success Factors, Cooperation-Competition Strategy, Healthcare, Scenario Analysis, Fuzzy Cognitive Map | ||
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
مراجع | ||
طالاری، محمد، و کشاورزی، فاطمه. (1402). ارائه مدل عوامل مؤثر بر توسعه راهبرد همرقابتی در بین شرکتهای نوآور و نوپا، مدیریت نوآوری در سازمانهای دفاعی، 6 (1): 150-131. Doi: 10.22034/qjimdo.2023.380735.1558
Al-Najaifi, Z. A., Andrews, D., & Ali, O. (2018). Exploring Factors that Enable Coopetition Strategy Success in Private Universities in Jordan: A Mixed Method Research Approach. Proceedings of Sydney International Business Research Conference, Novotel Sydney Central, Sydney, Australia.
Barretta, A. (2008). The functioning of co-opetition in the health-care sector: An explorative analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 24(3), 209-220.
Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2000). Coopetition in business networks—to cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(5), 411-426.
Bengtsson, M., & Raza-Ullah, T. (2016). A systematic review of research on coopetition: Toward a multilevel understanding. Industrial Marketing Management, 57, 23-39.
Bouncken, R., Kumar, A., Connell, J., Bhattacharyya, A., & He, K. (2024). Coopetition for corporate responsibility and sustainability: does it influence firm performance? International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 30(1), 128-154.
Butt, S., Raza, A., Siddiqui, R., Saleem, Y., Cook, B., & Khan, H. (2023). Healthcare employment landscape: comparing job markets for professionals in developed and developing countries. Journal of Work-Applied Management, (ahead-of-print).
Buttschardt, S. (2017). Evaluation of factors influencing the success of forced coopetition in IT multi-sourcing projects (Doctoral dissertation).
Ceptureanu, E. G., Ceptureanu, S. I., Radulescu, V., & Ionescu, S. A. (2018). What makes coopetition successful? An inter-organizational side analysis on coopetition critical success factors in oil and gas distribution networks. Energies, 11(12), 3447.
Chin, K. S., Chan, B. L., & Lam, P. K. (2008). Identifying and prioritizing critical success factors for coopetition strategy. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 108(4), 437-454.
Cygler, J., Sroka, W., Solesvik, M., & Dębkowska, K. (2018). Benefits and drawbacks of coopetition: The roles of scope and durability in coopetitive relationships. Sustainability, 10(8), 2688.
Czakon, W., Srivastava, M. K., Le Roy, F., & Gnyawali, D. (2020). Coopetition strategies: Critical issues and research directions. Long Range Planning, 53(1), 101948.
Dahl, J. (2014). Conceptualizing coopetition as a process: An outline of change in cooperative and competitive interactions. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 272-279.
Drăgoi, G., & Ciocoiu, C. N. (2021). "Coopetition and innovation: Exploring the role of collaborative networks in the automotive industry." Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167, 120716.
Gao, L., Deng, X., Yang, W., & Chang, T. (2021). Exploring Critical Factors Affecting Contractors’ Coopetition Relationship in International Construction Projects. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021, 1-16.
Gifford, R., van Raak, A., Govers, M., & Westra, D. (2024). Back to the Future: What Healthcare Organizations Need to Thrive in the Face of Persistent Environmental Uncertainty. In Research and Theory to Foster Change in the Face of Grand Health Care Challenges (pp. 3-27). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Javanmardi, E., Maresova, P., Xie, N., & Mierzwiak, R. (2024). Exploring business models for managing uncertainty in healthcare, medical devices, and biotechnology industries. Heliyon. 10, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25962
Liu, X., Bai, L., Leng, X., Yao, Y., Yang, Y., Li, D., & Yin, H. (2024). Coopetition, exploration and exploitation capabilities, and growth performance in digital healthcare ventures. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1369885.
Liu, X., Bai, L., Leng, X., Yao, Y., Yang, Y., Li, D., & Yin, H. (2024). Coopetition, exploration and exploitation capabilities, and growth performance in digital healthcare ventures. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1369885.
Luo, Y. (2007). "A coopetition perspective of global competition." Journal of World Business, 42(2), 129-144.
Mariani, M. M., & Belitski, M. (2023). The effect of coopetition intensity on first mover advantage and imitation in innovation related coopetition: Empirical evidence from UK firms. European Management Journal, 41(5), 779-791.
Mascia, D., Pallotti, F., & Iacopino, V. (2018). Beyond competition: Exploring collaboration for entrepreneurship in healthcare organizations. In Entrepreneurship in Healthcare (pp. 65-84). Routledge.
Meena, A., Dhir, S., & Sushil, S. (2024). Coopetition, strategy, and business performance in the era of digital transformation using a multi-method approach: Some research implications for strategy and operations management. International Journal of Production Economics, 270, 109068.
Monticelli, J. M., Verschoore, J. R., & Garrido, I. L. (2023). The emergence of coopetition in highly regulated industries: A study on the Brazilian private healthcare market. Industrial Marketing Management, 108, 35-46.
Niu, Y., Zhao, D., Deng, X., Lu, R., & Zhao, X. (2021). Determinants for coopetition strategies of international joint ventures in high-speed railway projects. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 27(5), 331-345.
Öztırak, M. (2023). ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ASSISTED RECRUITMENT FROM A STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVE. AI RENAISSANCE, 59.
Park, B. J. (R)., Srivastava, M. K., & Gnyawali. D. R. (2014). Walking the tight rope of coopetition: Impact of competition and cooperation intensities and balance on firm innovation performance. Industrial Marketing Management, (43),210–221.
Peng, T. J. A., & Bourne, M. (2009). The coexistence of competition and cooperation between networks: implications from two Taiwanese healthcare networks. British Journal of Management, 20(3), 377-400.
Perera, C. T. S. N., Weerawardena, R. T., & Fonseka, A. T. (2015). Factors affecting the success of coopetition in the Sri Lankan Banking Industry. Sri Lankan Journal of Management, 20(1). http://dr.lib.sjp.ac.lk/handle/123456789/9866
Petter, R. R. H., Resende, L. M., de Andrade Júnior, P. P., & Horst, D. J. (2014). Systematic review: an analysis model for measuring the coopetitive performance in horizontal cooperation networks mapping the critical success factors and their variables. The Annals of Regional Science, 53(1), 157-178.
Rodriguez-Repiso, L., Setchi, R., & Salmeron, J. L. (2007). Modelling IT projects success with fuzzy cognitive maps. Expert systems with applications, 32(2), 543-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.01.032.
Schilirò, D. (2023). Coopetition in Mearth. University of Messina. Available at: mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de
Talari, M., & Keshavarzi, F. (2023). Presenting the Model of Effective Factors on the Development of Coopetition Strategy among Innovative and Start-Up Companies. Innovation Management in Defensive Organizations, 6(1), 131-150. doi: 10.22034/qjimdo.2023.380735.1558 (in Persian)
Tang, Z., Bi, H., Sun, J., Xu, Y., & Wang, Z. (2023). Research on the coopetition relationship and the development of city-industry integration of urban agglomeration under the effect of HSR. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1082664.
Van den Broek, J., Boselie, P., & Paauwe, J. (2018). Cooperative innovation through a talent management pool: A qualitative study on coopetition in healthcare. European Management Journal, 36(1), 135-144.
Verulava, T. (2023). Strategic management and planning for health care organizations in Georgia. Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management, 18(3), 41-48.
Westra, D., Angeli, F., Carree, M., & Ruwaard, D. (2017). Coopetition in health care: A multi-level analysis of its individual and organizational determinants. Social Science & Medicine, 186, 43-51.
Westra, D., Angeli, F., Carree, M., & Ruwaard, D. (2017). Coopetition in health care: A multi-level analysis of its individual and organizational determinants. Social Science & Medicine, 186, 43-51.
Xie, Q., Gao, Y., Xia, N., Zhang, S., & Tao, G. (2023). Coopetition and organizational performance outcomes: A meta-analysis of the main and moderator effects. Journal of Business Research, 154, 113363.
Xin, K. K., & Zhang, Z. (2022). "Strategic coopetition and resource sharing in the high-tech industry." Journal of Strategic Marketing, 30(3), 210-225.
Yousaf, M. J., & Waheed, A. (2024). DOES COOPETITION FOSTER VALUE CREATION? AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF DYADIC AND MULTIPLE COOPETITORS. Remittances Review, 9(1), 368-401. https://doi.org/10.33182/rr.vx9il.31
Zheng, W., Tu, H., Gu, Y., & Sun, H. (2023). The “human side” of coopetition: the role of CEO mindsets in firm coopetition for innovation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1-29.
Zhu, G., Chou, M. C., & Tsai, C. W. (2020). Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic exposing the shortcomings of current supply chain operations: A long-term prescriptive offering. Sustainability, 12(14), 5858.
| ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 54 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 28 |