اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 385 |
| تعداد مقالات | 3,169 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,342,188 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,936,632 |
به‌گزینی در استفادۀ مجدد سازگار از بنای تاریخی بر اساس فرایند تحلیل سلسله مراتبی (نمونۀ موردی: خانۀ تاریخی خدیوی زنجان) | ||
| نشریه علمی اندیشه معماری | ||
| مقاله 8، دوره 8، شماره 15، فروردین 1403 | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/at.2024.20640.2042 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| شهرام جمشیدی* | ||
| استادیار، گروه مرمت و احیاء بناهای تاریخی، دانشکدۀ معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه بین المللی امام خمینی (ره)، قزوین، ایران. | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 27 تیر 1403، تاریخ بازنگری: 23 آذر 1403، تاریخ پذیرش: 25 آذر 1403 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| بیان مساله: سرشت چند وجهی مفهوم استفادۀ مجدد سازگار از بنای تاریخی و پیچیدگی آن با عوامل متعدد و متنوع تأثیرگذار در میدان عمل، از جمله تعدد گزینه‌های ممکن، تنوع معیارهای ارزیابی و تعارض محتمل در نظرات و انتظارات بازیگران ذی‌نفع، عرصۀ تصمیم‌گیری در این حوزه را با پیچیدگی مواجه کرده است. در همین راستا، لزوم اتخاذ یک روش علمی ایجاب می‌کند که فرایند تحلیل سلسله مراتبی با ارجاع به کارآیی آن در محیط‌های چند معیاره و چند گزینه‌ای مورد رجوع قرار گیرد تا با اتکا بر قضاوت‌های مقایسه‌ای خبرگان، امکان دستیابی به اجماع در تعیین گزینۀ بهینه فراهم شود. گزینش خانۀ تاریخی خدیوی نیز زمینه‌ای عینی پیش می‌کشد تا با اتکا بر قابلیت آن در استفادۀ مجدد سازگار، تعمیم روش مذکور در قلمرو بناهای واجد ارزش محلی به آزمون درآید. سوال تحقیق: چگونه می‌توان از فرایند تحلیل سلسله مراتبی برای انتخاب گزینۀ بهینه در استفادۀ مجدد سازگار از بنای تاریخی بهره برد؟ اهداف تحقیق: این مقاله مبتنی بر یک پژوهش تبیینی است که به منظور تدوین یک الگوی تصمیم‌گیری بر اساس فرایند تحلیل سلسله مراتبی به انجام رسیده تا بر مبنای آن امکان انتخاب گزینۀ بهینه در استفادۀ مجدد سازگار از بنای تاریخی فراهم شود. روش تحقیق: چارچوب روش‌شناسی در پژوهش پشتیبان این مقاله بر یک رویکرد کمی استوار بود که بر اساس فرایند تحلیل سلسله مراتبی و منطبق بر منطق ریاضی پیگیری شد. پاسخ‌دهندگان نیز بنا به ماهیت داده‌ها در یک جمع خبره نه نفره و یک گروه چهل و یک نفره تعریف شدند. در همین راستا، گردآوری داده‌ها در جهت شناسایی معیارها و زیرمعیارها به شیوۀ اسنادی و در جهت تعیین گزینه‌های ممکن و تشکیل ماتریس‌های مقایسۀ زوجی به شیوۀ میدانی صورت پذیرفت. پردازش داده‌ها نیز مبتنی بر تحلیل سلسله مراتبی، در راستای یک روند سه مرحله‌ای شامل تجزیه، سنجش و ترکیب و با استفاده از نرم افزار اکسپرت چویس نسخۀ 11 انجام شد. مهم ترین یافته ها و نتیجه گیری تحقیق: در چارچوب فرایند تحلیل سلسله مراتبی؛ تبیین رابطۀ بین متغیرهای اصلی تصمیم‌گیری مشتمل بر هدف، معیارها و زیرمعیارها و نیز گزینه‌ها نشان داد که استفادۀ مجدد سازگار از خانۀ تاریخی خدیوی به عنوان «خانه- موزه» یک انتخاب بهینه است و معیارهای معماری، فرهنگی و اقتصادی به ترتیب، مهم‌ترین عوامل تأثیرگذار در این گزینش هستند. علاوه بر این در روند پژوهش، الگوی مفهومی استفادۀ مجدد سازگار از بنای تاریخی مبتنی بر چهار مفهوم تحول، تکامل، تداوم و تطابق، همچنین؛ منظومۀ معیارها، زیرمعیارها و شاخص‌های ارزیابی در این رویکرد تدوین شدند که یافته ضمنی این پزوهش به حساب می‌آیند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| "استفادۀ مجدد سازگار"؛ "فرایند تحلیل سلسله مراتبی"؛ "گزینۀ بهینه"؛ "بنای تاریخی"؛ "خانۀ تاریخی خدیوی" | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Optimal selection in the adaptive reuse of historic building based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (Case study: Khadivi Historic House in Zanjan, Iran) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Shahram Jamshidi | ||
| Assistant Professor, Department of Conservation of Architectural Heritage, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Imam khomeini international university, Qazvin, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Research Problem: The multifaceted nature of the adaptive reuse of historic buildings concept and its complexity with numerous and diverse influencing factors in the field of action, including the multiplicity of possible alternatives, the variety of evaluation criteria, and the possible conflict in the opinions and expectations of stakeholders, has made the field of decision-making in this arena perplexingly complicated. In this regard, the need to adopt a scientific method requiring that the Analytic Hierarchy Process be used concerning its efficiency in multi-criteria and multi-alternative environments so that by relying on the comparative judgments of experts, a consensus can be reached in determining the optimal alternative. The selection of the Khadivi Historic House also provides an objective basis for testing the generalization of the method above, in the domain of locally valuable buildings by relying on its ability to be reused. Research Question: How can the Analytic Hierarchy Process be applied to choose the optimal alternative for adaptive reuse of historic buildings? Research Objectives: This article is based on explanatory research that was done to create a decision-making model in the adaptive reuse of historic buildings based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process to provide the possibility of choosing the optimal alternative based on it. Research Method: This article's methodological framework is based on a quantitative approach based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process and consistent with mathematical logic. According to the nature of the data, the respondents were defined as an expert group of nine people and a group of forty-one people. In this regard, Data collection was conducted using the documentary method to identify the criteria and sub-criteria, while the field method was employed to determine the alternatives and construct a pairwise comparison matrix. Also, Data processing employed a three-step hierarchical analysis: decomposition and structuring, measurement, and synthesis, using Expert Choice Software Version 11. The Most Important Results and Conclusions: Determining the relationship between the essential elements of decision-making showed that the adaptive reuse of Khadivi Historic House as a "house museum" is the optimal choice, and the architectural, cultural and economic criteria are the most critical factors in this selection, respectively. In addition, the conceptual model of adaptive reuse of historic buildings based on the four concepts of Transformation, Evolution, Continuity, and Adaptation, as well as the system of criteria, sub-criteria, and evaluation indicators in this approach, are implicit results of this research. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| "Adaptive Reuse", "Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)", "Optimal Alternative", "Historic Building", "Khadivi Historic House" | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Åhman, Henrik. 2013. "Social sustainability – society at the intersection of development and maintenance." Local Environment 18 (10): 1153–1166. ttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13549839.2013.788480.
Aigwi, Esther, Temitope Egbelakin, and Jason Ingham. 2018. "Efficacy of adaptive reuse for the redevelopment of underutilised historical buildings: Towards the regeneration of New Zealand’s provincial town centres." International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation 36 (4): 385–407. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJBPA-01-2018-0007/full/html.
Berger, Markus, Heinrich Hermann, and Liliane Wong. 2009. "ADAPTIVE REUSE TODAY: EDITORIAL." Int|AR, the journal of Interventions and Adaptive Reuse 01. http://intar-journal.risd.edu/new-products/editorial-volume-01.
Bosone, Martina, Pasquale De Toro, Luigi Fusco Gira, Antonia Gravagnuolo, and Silvia Iodice. 2021. "Indicators for Ex-Post Evaluation of Cultural Heritage Adaptive Reuse Impacts in the Perspective of the Circular Economy." Sustainability 13 (9): 4759. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/4759.
Boström, Magnus. 2012. "A missing pillar? Challenges in theorizing and practicing social sustainability: introduction to the special issue." Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 8 (1): 3-14. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15487733.2012.11908080.
BREEAM. 2017. BREEAM International Non-Domestic Refurbishment 2015. Technical Manual:Version: SD225 – Issue:1.4, Herts: BRE. https://bregroup.com/products/breeam/breeam-technical-standards/breeam-refurbishment-and-fit-out/.
Brooker , Graeme, and Sally Stone. 2004. Re-readings: Interior Architecture and the Design Principles of Remodelling Existing Buildings. RIBA Publishing.
Bullen , Peter A., and Peter E.D. Love. 2011a. "Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings." Structural Survey 29 (5): 411-421. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02630801111182439/full/html.
Bullen , Peter, and Peter Love. 2011b. "Factors influencing the adaptive re-use of buildings." Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology 9 (1): 32-46. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/17260531111121459/full/html.
Bullen, Peter A. 2007. "Adaptive reuse and sustainability of commercial buildings." Facilities 25 (1/2): 20-31. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02632770710716911/full/html.
Bullen, Peter, and Peter Love. 2011c. "A new future for the past: a model for adaptive reuse decision-making." Built Environment Project and Asset Management 1 (1): 32-44. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/20441241111143768/full/html.
Cantacuzino, Sherban. 1975. New uses for old buildings. London: Architectural Press.
Chan, Sin Yin, and Chee Keong Ch'ng. 2023. "TOPSIS for Analyzing the Risk Factors of Suicidal Ideation Among University Students in Malaysia." Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology 31 (02): 977 - 994. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369032438_TOPSIS_for_Analyzing_the_Risk_Factors_of_Suicidal_Ideation_Among_University_Students_in_Malaysia.
Chen, Chia-Sheng, Yin-Hao Chiu, and Lichiu Tsai. 2018. "Evaluating the adaptive reuse of historic buildings through multicriteria decision-making." Habitat International 81: 12-23. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397516304787.
Cherchi, Pier Francesco. 2016. Typological shift. Adaptive reuse of abandoned historic hospitals in Europe-Riuso degli ospedali storici abbandonati in Europa. 1st. Siracusa, Italy: LetteraVentidue.
Claver, Juan, A. García-Domínguez, and M. A. Sebastián. 2018. "Decision-Making Methodologies for Reuse of Industrial Assets." Complexity 1-17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323005664_Decision-Making_Methodologies_for_Reuse_of_Industrial_Assets.
Colantonio, Andrea, and Tim Dixon. 2009. Measuring Socially Sustainable Urban Regeneration in Europe. research project, Oxford: Oxford Institute for Sustainable Development (OISD). https://www.dcu.ie/sites/default/files/community/pdfs/SocialSust.pdf.
Conejos, Sheila, Craig Ashley Langston, and Jim Smith. 2011. "Improving the implementation of adaptive reuse strategies for historic buildings." The IX International Forum of Studies: S.A.V.E. Heritage. Naples: Institute of Sustainable Development and Architecture. 1-10. https://pure.bond.edu.au/ws/portalfiles/portal/27956715/2011_Improving_the_implementation_of_adaptive_reuse_strategies_for_historic_buildings.pdf.
Conejos, Sheila, Craig Langston, and Jim Smith. 2014. "Designing for better building adaptability: A comparison of adaptSTAR and ARP models." Habitat International 41: 85-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.07.002.
Cucco, Pasquale, Gabriella Maselli, Antonio Nesticò, and Federica Ribera. 2023. "An evaluation model for adaptive reuse of cultural heritage in accordance with 2030 SDGs and European Quality Principles." Journal of Cultural Heritage 59: 202-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2022.12.002.
Da Silva, J.A.R.M, and A.T.V.F Ramos. 2010. "Built environment: the sustainability of heritage." 18th CIB World Building Congress. Salford, United Kingdom: CIB. 205-218. https://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB_DC24595.pdf.
DEH. 2004. Adaptive Reuse: Preserving Our Past, Building Our Future. Canberra: Department of the Environment and Heritage. https://www.dcceew.gov.au/parks-heritage/heritage/publications/adaptive-reuse.
Dell’Ovo, Marta, Federico Dell’Anna, Raffaella Simonelli, and Leopoldo Sdino. 2021. "Enhancing the Cultural Heritage through Adaptive Reuse. A Multicriteria Approach to Evaluate the Castello Visconteo in Cusago (Italy)." Sustainability 13 (8): 4440. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084440.
Deloitte Real Estate. 2017. "Heritage Works: A toolkit of best practice in heritage regeneration." Historic England. April 28. Accessed 09 13, 2023. https://historicengland.org.uk/images-books/publications/heritage-works/.
Dempsey, Nicola, Glen Bramley, Sinéad Power, and Caroline Brown. 2011. "The Social Dimension of Sustainable Development: Defining Urban Social Sustainability." Sustainable Development 19 (5): 289-300. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229889535_The_Social_Dimension_of_Sustainable_Development_Defining_Urban_Social_Sustainability.
DGNB. n.d. DGNB SYSTEM FOR RENOVATION. Accessed 01 16, 2024. https://www.dgnb.de/en/certification/buildings/renovation.
Douglas, James. 2006. Building Adaptation. 2nd. Oxford: Elsevier.
Dreyfuss, Guillaume, Maria Mifsud, and Tom Van Malderen. 2013. "The Architectural Practice of Regeneration." sustainability 5 (9): 3895-3905. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/5/9/3895.
Dyson, Kristy, Jane Matthews, and Peter E.D. Love. 2016. "Critical success factors of adapting heritage buildings: an exploratory study." Built Environment Project and Asset Management 6 (1): 44- 57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-01-2015-0002.
Ferretti, Valentina, Marta Bottero, and Giulio Mondini. 2014. "Decision making and cultural heritage: An application of theMulti-Attribute Value Theory for the reuse of historical buildings." Journal of Cultural Heritage. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2013.12.007.
FORMAN, ERNEST H., and SAUL I. GASS. 2001. "THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS- AN EXPOSITION." Operations Research 49 (4): 469-486. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.49.4.469.11231.
Girard, Luigi Fusco, and Pasquale De Toro. 2007. "Integrated spatial assessment: a multicriteria approach to sustainable development of cultural and environmental heritage in San Marco dei Cavoti, Italy." Central European Journal of Operations Research 15 (03): 281-299. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10100-007-0031-1.
Green Building Council Italia. 2016. "GBC Historic Building." Green Building Council Italia. Accessed 01 12, 2024. https://gbcitalia.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GBC-HB_ENG_03-1.pdf.
Green Building Council of Australia. n.d. "Green Star - Performance: Summary of Categories and Credits." Green Building Council of Australia. Accessed 01 15, 2024. https://new.gbca.org.au/search/?q=Green+Star+categories.
Haroun, Hebatu-Allah Abdul Fattah, Ali Fouad Bakr, and Asmaa El-Sayed Hasan. 2019. "Multi-criteria decision making for adaptive reuse of heritage buildings: Aziza Fahmy Palace, Alexandria, Egypt." Alexandria Engineering Journal 58 (2): 467–478. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110016819300286.
Heritage Office, NSW Department of Planning and the Royal Australian Institute of Architects NSW. 2008. New Uses for Heritage Places: Guidelines for the adaptation of historic buildings and sites. Heritage Office of NSW, NSW Department of Planning. https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/research-and-publications/publications-search/new-uses-for-heritage-places-guidelines-for-the-adaptation-of-historic-buildings-and-sites.
Hsu, Yin-Hao, and Yi-Kai Juan. 2016. "ANN-based decision model for the reuse of vacant buildings in urban areas." International Journal of Strategic Property Management 20 (1): 31-43. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3846/1648715X.2015.1101626.
ICOMOS Australia. 2013. "The Burra Charter-Australia ICOMOS Charter for the Conservation of Places of Cultural Significance." ICOMOS. 10. Accessed 05 03, 2024. https://www.icomos.org/en/resources/charters-and-texts.
ICOMOS New Zealand. 2010. "ICOMOS New Zealand Charter for the Conservation of Places of Cultural Heritage Value." ICOMOS. September 04. Accessed 11 09, 2023. https://www.icomos.org/images/DOCUMENTS/Charters/ICOMOS_NZ_Charter_2010_FINAL_11_Oct_2010.pdf.
ICOMOS. n.d. Selected Resources on Heritage and Sustainable Development. https://www.icomos.org/en/focus/un-sustainable-development-goals/8774-selected-resources-on-heritage-and-sustainable-development.
İpekoğlu, Başak. 2006. "An architectural evaluation method for conservation of traditional dwellings." Building and Environment 41 (3): 386- 394. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360132305000715.
ITACA & UNI. 2023. UNI/PdR 13.1:2019. Milano: UNI. https://www.certifico.com/component/attachments/download/37012.
Kincaid, David. 2002. Adapting Buildings for Changing Uses: Guidelines for Change of Use Refurbishment. London: Spon Press.
Köksalan, Murat, Jyrki Wallenius, and Stanley Zionts. 2011. Multiple Criteria Decision Making: From Early History to the 21st Century. Singapore: World Scientific.
Lanz, Francesca, and John Pendlebury. 2022. "Adaptive reuse: a critical review." The Journal of Architecture 27 (2-3): 441-462. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13602365.2022.2105381.
Latham, Derek. 2000. Creative Reuse of Buildings. Vol. one. Shaftesbury: Donhead Publishing Ltd.
Li, Yuan, Long Zhao, Jingxiong Huang, and Andrew Law. 2021. "Research frameworks, methodologies, and assessment methods concerning the adaptive reuse of architectural heritage: a review." Built Heritage 5 (6). https://built-heritage.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s43238-021-00025-x.
Littig, Beate, and Erich Grießler. 2005. "Social Sustainability. A Catchword between Political Pragmatism and Social Theory." International Journal of Sustainable Development 8 (1-2): 65-79. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5107699_Social_sustainability_A_catchword_between_political_pragmatism_and_social_theory.
Liu, Fuying, Qi Zhao, and Yulan Yang. 2017. "An approach to assess the value of industrial heritage based on Dempster–Shafer theory." Journal of Cultural Heritage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2018.01.011.
Machado , Rodolfo. 1976. "Old buildings as palimpsest: Toward a theory of remodeling." Progressive Architecture 57 (11): 46-49.
Mardani, Abbas, Ahmad Jusoh, Khalil MD Nor, Zainab Khalifah, Norhayati Zakwan, and Alireza Valipour. 2015. "Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications – a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014." Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 28 (01): 516-571. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1331677X.2015.1075139#d1e190.
Maselli, Gabriella, Pasquale Cucco, Antonio Nesticò, and Federica Ribera. 2024. "Historical heritage–MultiCriteria Decision Method (H-MCDM) to prioritize intervention strategies for the adaptive reuse of valuable architectural assets." MethodsX 12 (102487). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2023.102487.
Mason, Randall. 2005. ECONOMICS AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION: AGUIDE AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE. A Discussion Paper Prepared for the Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 75. Accessed 08 28, 2023. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-economics-of-historic-preservation/.
McKenzie, Stephen. 2004. SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY: TOWARDS SOME DEFINITIONS. HAWKE RESEARCH INSTITUTE WORKING PAPER SERIES: No 27, Magill: Hawke Research Institute, University of South Australia. Accessed 07 06, 2023. https://unisa.edu.au/SysSiteAssets/episerver-6-files/documents/eass/hri/working-papers/wp27.pdf.
Mısırlısoy, Damla, and Kagan Günce. 2016. "Adaptive reuse strategies for heritage buildings: A holistic approach." Sustainable Cities and Society 26: 91-98. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670716301044.
Morano, Pierluigi, Marco Locurcio, and Francesco Tajani. 2016. "cultural heritage valorization: an application of AHP for the choice of the highest and best use." Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 223: 952-959. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042816304086.
Morkunaite, Zydrune, Darius Kalibatas, and Diana Kalibatiene. 2019. "A bibliometric data analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods in heritage buildings." ournal of Civil Engineering and Management 25 (02): 76-99. https://journals.vilniustech.lt/index.php/JCEM/article/view/8315.
Morris, Mimi. 2012. The Economic Impact of Historic Resource Preservation. paper, California Cultural and Historical Endowment. https://files.resources.ca.gov/docs/cche/EconomicImpact_of_HistoricResourcePreservation.pdf.
MURAKAMI, Shuzo, Kazuo IWAMURA, and Raymond J. COLE. 2014. CASBEE: A decade of Development and Application of an Environmental Assessment System for the Built Environment. Edited by Japan Sustainable Building Consortium (JSBC). Tokyo: Institute for Building Environment and Energy Conservation (IBEC). https://www.ibec.or.jp/CASBEE/english/downloadE.htm.
Murphy, Kevin. 2012. "The social pillar of sustainable development: a literature review and framework for policy analysis." Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 8 (1): 15-29. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15487733.2012.11908081.
Nadkarni, Rohit R., and Bimal Puthuvayi. 2020. "A comprehensive literature review of Multi-Criteria Decision Making methods in heritage buildings." Journal of Building Engineering 32: 101814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101814.
National Trust for Historic Preservation. 2011. "12 Economic Benefits of Historic Preservation." National Trust for Historic Preservation. 04. Accessed 08 26, 2023. my.preservationnation.org/site/DocServer/Economic_Benefits_of_HP_April_2011.pdf?docID=9023.
Nesticò, Antonio, and Piera Somma. 2019. "Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Methods for the Enhancement of Historical Buildings." Sustainability 11 (17): 4526. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/17/4526.
ODPM (Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, UK). 2005. Bristol Accord: Conclusions of Ministerial Informal on Sustainable Communities in Europe, UK PRESIDENCY, Bristol, 6 – 7 December 2005. Bristol: UK Presidency of the EU 2005. https://www.eib.org/attachments/jessica_bristol_accord_sustainable_communities.pdf.
Pavlovskis, Miroslavas, Darius Migilinskas, Jurgita Antucheviciene , and Vladislavas Kutut. 2019. "Ranking of Heritage Building Conversion Alternatives by Applying BIM and MCDM: A Case of Sapieha Palace in Vilnius." Symmetry 11 (8): 973. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/11/8/973.
Perng, Yeng-Horng, Yi-Kai Juan, and Huang-Shing Hsu. 2007. "Genetic algorithm-based decision support for the restoration budget allocation of historical buildings." Building and Environment 42 (2): 770-778. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360132305003835.
PLEVOETS , BIE, and KOENRAAD VAN CLEEMPOEL. 2019. Adaptive reuse of the built heritage: Concepts and cases of an emerging discipline. London: Routledge.
Radziszewska-Zielina, Elżbieta, and Grzegorz Śladowski. 2017. "Supporting the selection of a variant of the adaptation of a historicalbuilding with the use of fuzzy modelling and structural analysis." Journal of Cultural Heritage 26: 53-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2017.02.008.
Ribera, Federica, and Pasquale Cucco. 2020. "A methodology in choosing a new compatible function in the recovery project of disused religious buildings. Research study in Italy." VITRUVIO - INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL TECHNOLOGY AND SUSTAINABILITY 5 (1): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.4995/vitruvio-ijats.2020.13452.
Ribera, Federica, Antonio Nesticò, Pasquale Cucco, and Gabriella Maselli. 2020. "A multicriteria approach to identify the Highest and Best Use for historical buildings." Journal of Cultural Heritage 41: 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2019.06.004.
Rypkema, Donovan , and Caroline Cheong. 2011. "Measurements and indicators of heritage as development." ICOMOS 17th General Assembly. Paris, France, 2011-11-27/ 2011-12-02. https://openarchive.icomos.org/id/eprint/1283/.
RYPKEMA, DONOVAN. 2019. "Nine ways that heritage conservation is good for the economy." HERITAGE MATTERS. Oct 01. Accessed 08 26, 2023. https://www.heritage-matters.ca/articles/nine-ways-that-heritage-conservation-is-good-for-the-economy.
Rypkema, Donovan, Caroline Cheong, and Randall Mason. 2011. Measuring Economic Impacts of Historic Preservation: A Report to the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. Washington, DC: Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, 83. Accessed 08 31, 2023. https://www.achp.gov/sites/default/files/guidance/2018-06/Economic%20Impacts%20v5-FINAL.pdf.
SAATY, THOMAS L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Saaty, Thomas L., and Daji Ergu. 2015. "When is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods." International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 14 (06): 1171-1187. https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S021962201550025X?srsltid=AfmBOoq0IxZ6UJ3xQBRggoFG38tjZf3h6LoFSpMcAAfXt_cHVdgosgGJ.
Saaty, Thomas L., and Luis G. Vargas. 2012. Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. 2nd. New York: Springer.
Scott, Fred. 2008. On Altering Architecture. Oxon: Routledge.
Shetabi, Linda. 2015. "Heritage Conservation and Environmental Sustainability: Revisiting the Evaluation Criteria for Built Heritage." The threads of conservation. Adelaide: Australia ICOMOS. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284724421_Heritage_Conservation_and_Environmental_Sustainability_Revisiting_the_Evaluation_Criteria_for_Built_Heritage.
Steuer, Ralph E., and Stan Zionts. n.d. "Short MCDM History." International Society on MCDM. Accessed 03 21, 2024. http://www.mcdmsociety.org/content/short-mcdm-history-0.
Stone, Sally. 2019. UnDoing Buildings: Adaptive Reuse and Cultural Memory. New York: Routledge.
Tan, Yongtao, Chenyang Shuai, and Tian Wang. 2018. "Critical Success Factors (CSFs) for the Adaptive Reuse of Industrial Buildings in Hong Kong." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15 (7): 1546. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071546.
Tan, Yongtao, Li-yin Shen, and Craig Langston. 2014. "A fuzzy approach for adaptive reuse selection of industrial buildings in Hong Kong." International Journal of Strategic Property Management 18 (1): 66–76. https://research.bond.edu.au/en/publications/a-fuzzy-approach-for-adaptive-reuse-selection-of-industrial-build.
Torrieri, Francesca, Marina Fumo, Michele Sarnataro, and Gigliola Ausiello. 2019. "An Integrated Decision Support System for the Sustainable Reuse of the Former Monastery of “Ritiro del Carmine” in Campania Region." Sustainability 11 (19): 5244. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/19/5244.
Triantaphyllou, Evangelos, and Alfonso Sánchez. 1997. "A SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS APPROACH FOR SOME DETERMINISTIC MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS." Decision Sciences 28 (01): 151 - 194. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227656830_A_Sensitivity_Analysis_Approach_for_Some_Deterministic_Multi-Criteria_Decision-Making_Methods.
UNESCO. n.d. Culture & Sustainable Development: Powering Culture across Public Policies. Accessed 06 23, 2023. https://www.unesco.org/en/sustainable-development/culture.
—. 2015. "Policy Document for the Integration of a Sustainable Development Perspective into the Processes of the World Heritage Convention." World Heritage and Sustainable Development. Accessed 06 27, 2230. https://whc.unesco.org/en/sustainabledevelopment/.
USGBC. 2023. LEED v5 for Operations and Maintenance: Existing Buildings (Beta Version). Washington, DC: U.S. Green Building Council. https://www.usgbc.org/sites/default/files/2023-09/LEED-v5-OM-Existing-Buildings-beta-version_1.pdf.
Vafaie, Fatemeh, Hilde Remøy, and Vincent Gruis. 2023. "Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings; a systematic literature review of success factors." Habitat International 142 (1): 102926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102926.
Vardopoulos, Ioannis. 2019. "Critical sustainable development factors in the adaptive reuse of urban industrial buildings. A fuzzy DEMATEL approach." Sustainable Cities and Society 50: 101684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101684.
Vehbi, Beser Oktay, Kağan Günçe, and Aminreza Iranmanesh. 2021. "Multi-Criteria Assessment for Defining Compatible New Use: Old Administrative Hospital, Kyrenia, Cyprus." Sustainability 13 (4): 1922. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1922.
Wang, Huey-Jiun, and Zhi-Teng Zeng. 2010. "A multi-objective decision-making process for reuse selection of historic buildings." Expert Systems with Applications 37 1241–1249. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0957417409005636.
Wilkinson, Sara. 2014. "The preliminary assessment of adaptation potential in existing office buildings." International Journal of Strategic Property Management 18 (1): 77–87. https://journals.vilniustech.lt/index.php/IJSPM/article/view/3448.
Wong, Liliane. 2017. Adaptive Reuse: Extending the Lives of Buildings. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag GmbH.
Yau, Yung. 2009. "Multi-criteria decision making for urban built heritage conservation: application of the analytic hierarchy process." Journal of Building Appraisal 4 (3): 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1057/jba.2008.34.
ناصر خدیوی, شریف, مصاحبه توسط شهرام جمشیدی. 1402. خانۀ خدیوی (08 11). | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 381 |
||