اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 360 |
| تعداد مقالات | 2,962 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 3,780,590 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,554,266 |
Analysis of Lexical Patterning and Semantic Elements in Reading Comprehension Sections of EFL Textbooks | ||
| Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 3، شماره 4، بهمن 2016، صفحه 25-1 اصل مقاله (337.42 K) | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Saemeh Askani1؛ Omid Khatin Zadeh2 | ||
| 1Azad University of Chabahar | ||
| 2Chabahar Maritime University | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 03 اردیبهشت 1396، تاریخ پذیرش: 03 اردیبهشت 1396 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This study aimed to investigate patterns of encoding motion events in the sentences of ‘Reading Comprehension’ sections of English textbooks that are taught in Iranian guidance schools and high schools. To achieve this objective, all sentences that described motion events were collected from textbooks. These sentences were examined on the basis of two factors: 1) The encoding of Figure, Manner, Path, Source, Goal, Cause, and Ground; 2) Metaphorical description of non-motion events in terms of motion events. Based on the obtained results, it was concluded that sentences of these books are the simplified versions of typical English sentences that are used to describe motion events. In other words, these sentences minimize the details of motion events and do not offer a complete picture of such events. Regarding the use of metaphors to describe non-motion events in terms of motion events, the obtained results showed that metaphors are underused in English textbooks that are taught in Iranian schools. Therefore, it is recommended that some modifications be made in these textbooks to improve the quality of teaching these aspects of language to L2 learners in Iranian high schools and guidance schools. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Motion event؛ Figure؛ Manner, Path؛ Source؛ Goal | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| تحلیل الگوهای واژگانی در متون درسی | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| سائمه آسکانی1؛ امید خاتین زاده2 | ||
| 1دانشگاه آزاد چابهار | ||
| 2دانشگاه دریایی چابهار | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| هدف از این تحقیق بررسی نحوه توصیف حرکت اشیا در متون درک مطلب کتاب های درسی دروه راهنمایی و دبیرستان در مدارس ایران بود. برای رسیدن به این هدف، تمام جملاتی که حرکات اشیا را توصیف می کردند از این کتب گردآوری شدند. این جملات از دو جنبه مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند: (1) نحوه توصیف شی حرکت کننده، روش حرکت، مسیر حرکت، مبدا، مقصد، عامل و زمینه (2) توصیف آرایه ای وقایع غیر حرکتی بر حسب وقایع حرکتی. بر اساس نتایج بدست آمده، نتیجه گرفته شد که جملات کتب درسی که حرکت های اشیا را توصیف میکنند شکل ساده شده جملاتی هستند که در متون معمول انگلیسی برای توصیف حرکت ها مورد استفاده قرار میگیرند. به عبارت دیگر، جملات کتب درسی وقایع حرکتی را با جزییات کمتر مورد توصیف قرار میدهند. همچنین از لحاظ توصیف وقایع غیر حرکتی بر حسب وقایع حرکتی، داده های بدست آمده نشان داد که جملات آرایه ای به شکلی موثر برای توصیف وقایع غیر حرکتی بر حسب وقایع حرکتی مورد استفاده قرار نمی گیرند. بنابراین پیشنهاد می شود که تغییراتی در متون درک مطلب کتب درسی اعمال شود تا زبان آموزان قابلیت بهتری برای توصیف وقایع حرکتی در جملات زبان دوم بدست آورند | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| جا به جا شونده, روش, مسیر, مبدا, مقصد | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Allen, S. (2007). Language-specific and universal influences in children’s syntactic packaging of Manner and Path: A comparison of English, Japanese, and Turkish. Cognition, 102, 16–48.
Cifuentes-Férez, P. (2010). The semantics of the English and the Spanish motion. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 8(2), 233-271.
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170.
Graesser, A. C., Mio, J., & Millis, K. K. (1989). Metaphors in persuasive communication. In D. Meutsch & R. Viehoff (Eds.), Comprehension of literary discourse: Results and problems of interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 131-154). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Havasi, C., & Snedeker, J. (2004). The adaptability of language specific verb lexicalization biases. Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Honeck, R.P. (1997). A proverb in mind: The cognitive science of proverbial wit and wisdom. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Landau, B., & Jackendoff, R. (1993). “What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 217–255.
Miller, G., & Johnson-Laird, P. (1976). Language and perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ozcalıskan, S. (2004). Typological variation in encoding the manner, path, and ground components of a metaphorical motion event. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 2, 73-102.
Pollio, H., Barlow, J., Fine, H., & Pollio, M. (1977). Psychology the poetics of growth: Figurative language in psychology, psychotherapy, and education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Slobin, D. I. & Hoiting, N. (1994). Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations. Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 487-505.
Slobin, D. I. (1996). Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In Shibatani, Masayoshi and Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 195–220.
Slobin, D. I. (1997). Mind, code, and text. In Essays on Language Function and Language Type: Dedicated to T. Givón, J. Bybee, J. Haiman, and S. A. Thompson (eds) 437-467. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Slobin, D. I. (2000). Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In Evidence for Linguistic Relativity, S. Niemeier and R. Dirven (eds), 107-138. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Slobin, D. I. (2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In Language in Mind: Advances in the Investigation of Language and Thought, D. Gentner and S. Goldin-Meadow (eds), 157-191. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Slobin, D. I. (2004). The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Relating Events in Narrative: Typological and Contextual Perspectives, S. Strömqvist and L. Verhoeven (eds). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Slobin, D.I. (2005). Linguistic representations of motion events: What is signifier and what is signified? In C. Maeder, O. Fischer, & W. Herlofsky (Eds.). Iconicity Inside Out: Iconicity in Language and Literature 4 (pp. 307-322). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Talmy, L. (1972). Semantic Structures in English and Atsugewi. Berkeley: University of California Ph.D. dissertation.
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and semantic description. Vol. 3 (Grammatical categories and the lexicon). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 36-149.
Talmy, L. (1991). Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 17, 480-519.
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,329 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,077 |
||