دانشگاه بین المللی امام خمینی

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات20
تعداد شماره‌ها348
تعداد مقالات2,872
تعداد مشاهده مقاله3,268,906
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله2,405,415
Yazdani, Samaneh. (1401). On the Effects of Task Load Involvement on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners Word Learning: Reading and writing Tasks vs. Translation Tasks. لسان مبین, 3(4), 73-63.
Samaneh Yazdani. "On the Effects of Task Load Involvement on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners Word Learning: Reading and writing Tasks vs. Translation Tasks". لسان مبین, 3, 4, 1401, 73-63.
Yazdani, Samaneh. (1401). 'On the Effects of Task Load Involvement on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners Word Learning: Reading and writing Tasks vs. Translation Tasks', لسان مبین, 3(4), pp. 73-63.
Yazdani, Samaneh. On the Effects of Task Load Involvement on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners Word Learning: Reading and writing Tasks vs. Translation Tasks. لسان مبین, 1401; 3(4): 73-63.

On the Effects of Task Load Involvement on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners Word Learning: Reading and writing Tasks vs. Translation Tasks

Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies
مقاله 4، دوره 3، شماره 4، بهمن 2016، صفحه 73-63    اصل مقاله (209.87 K)
نویسنده
Samaneh Yazdani
PhD Candidate islamic Azad university
تاریخ دریافت: 03 اردیبهشت 1396،  تاریخ پذیرش: 03 اردیبهشت 1396 
چکیده
Due to the fact that all language learners and teachers are aware of the fact that acquiring a second language involves a learning of the large number of vocabulary items, investigating how vocabulary is learned and what the best ways are to enhance effective acquisition have been important lines of investigation in the field of second language acquisition (SLA). The present study intended to compare the effect of enhancing the quality of vocabulary acquisition by reading, writing, and translation tasks with different degrees of involvement load. To this end, 60 intermediate third grade junior high school students were randomly assigned to four groups. In each group a task with a different level of involvement, including two different reading tasks, a writing task, and a translation task was instructed over a six-month period. The results of the descriptive statistics and one-way ANOVA revealed that the group with the highest involvement load task outperformed the other groups in terms of vocabulary acquisition, but the translation task even led to a greater performance in the post-test. These unique findings shed some light on the importance and the practicality of translation tasks in ESL contexts.
 
کلیدواژه‌ها
SLA؛ vocabulary acquisition؛ involvement load؛ task
عنوان مقاله [English]
در مورد تاثیر میزان درگیری در وظایف ترجمه بر یادگیری واژگان زبان آموزان سطح متوسط زبان انگلیسی ایران: وظایف خواندن و نوشتن وظایف در مقابل وظایف ترجمه
نویسندگان [English]
سمانه یزدانی
دانشجوی دکتری زبان انگلیسی ، مدرس ترجمه دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد شهرضا
چکیده [English]
با توجه به آگاهی زبان آموزان و معلمان از این واقعیت که فراگیری هر زبان دومی شامل یادگیری تعداد زیادی از واژگان است، بررسی چگونگی یادگیری واژگان و بهترین روش افزایش فراگیری موثر آن از جمله مهمترین زمینه های تحقیق در فراگیری زبان دوم (SLA) بوده است. مطالعه حاضر با هدف مقایسه تاثیر افزایش کیفیت فراگیری واژگان از طریق وظایف خواندن، نوشتن و وظایف ترجمه با درجات مختلف از میزان درگیری است. بدین منظور، 60  دانش آموزان سال سوم متوسطه با سطح زبانی متوسط ​​به طور تصادفی در چهار گروه قرار گرفتند. در هر گروه وظیفه ای با سطح متفاوتی از درگیری، از جمله دو وظیفه خواندن مختلف ، یک وظیفه نوشتن و یک وطیفه ترجمه  طی یک دوره شش ماهه آموزش داده شد. نتایج حاصل از آمار توصیفی و آنالیز واریانس یک طرفه نشان داد که گروهی با بالاترین میزان درگیری عملکرد چشمگیری نسبت به گروه های دیگر در فراگیری واژگان داشته ، اما وظیفه ترجمه حتی منجر به عملکرد بالاتری در آزمون پسین شده است. این یافته های منحصر به فرد به روشن شدن اهمیت و عملی بودن وظایف ترجمه در بافت یادگیری انگلیسی به عنوان زبان دوم اشاره دارد.
 
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
فراگیری زبان دوم, فراگیری واژگان, میزان درگیری, وظیفه
مراجع
Boggards, P., (1991). Dictionary of pedagogic vocabulary. Cahiers lexicology. 59. 93-       107.    

Boggards, p., (2001). Dictionary use while reading. THE MODERN LANGUAGE             JOURNAL. 78. 285-299.

Boggards, P., Laufer, B., (2004). Vocabulary in the second language. Selection,             acquisition and testing. John Benjamins pub.

Cohen, A., Aphek, K., (1981). Examining the effectiveness of bilingual dictionary.             International Journal of Lexicography. 19. 135-155.

Day, R., (2000). English dictionaries for foreign learners: A history. Oxford: Clarendon       press.

Doughty, C. J., Williams, J., (1998). Focus on form in classroom of SLA. Cambridge:     Cambridge university press.

Duquette, L., Painchaud, G., (1996). A comparison of vocabulary acquisition in contexts.         The Canadian Modern Language Review. 53, 143-172.

            Ebrahimzadeh. A.T. (2016). The effect of writing composition on Iranian young EFL                              learners’ L2 vocabulary learning. Journal of Applied Linguistics and                                               Language Research, 3.96-101.

Ellis, N., (1994). Consciousness in second language learning: psychological perspectives    on the role of conscious processes in vocabulary acquisition. AILA Review. 11,       37-56.

Ellis, R., (1995). Modified oral input and output in the incidental acquisition of word    meanings. Studies in second language acquisition, 21, 285-301.

Ellis, R., (2001). Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51.1-41.

Ellis, R., (2008). The study of second language acquisition. 2ed . Oxford: Oxford             university press.

Ellis, R., Tanaka, Y., Yamakazi, A., (1994). Classroom interaction, comprehension, and      L2 vocabulary acquisition. Language learning, 44. 449-491.

            Faragi, m. Arabmofrad . A. (2015). The effect of collaborative strategic vocabulary      learning on      EFL learners' self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Linguistics and      Language Research, 2.103-118.

Folse, K.S., (2006). The effect of type of written exercise on L2 vocabulary retention.        TESOL Quarterly, 40. 273-293.

Hazenberg, M., Hulstjin, J., (1996). Acquisition of vocabulary from the sweet valley kids     series: adult ESL acquisition. Journal of reading , 21. 303-317.

Horst, H., Cobb, K., Meara, P. (1998). The learning of foreign language vocabulary. In         Kroll and De Groot, 9-29.

Hulstjin, J., Laufer, B. (2001). Some empirical evidence for the involvement load             hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 51. 539-558.

Hu, M., Nation, P. (2000). L2 vocabulary acquisition: A synthesis of the research. In             Second language vocabulary acquisition: Cambridge University Press, 273-290.

Keating, G. (2008). Task effectiveness and word learning in second language: the             involvement load hypothesis on trial. Language teaching research, 12.365-386.

Laufer, B. (1998). Focus on form in second language vocabulary learning. Euro SLA             yearbook, 5.223-250.

Laufer, B. (2006). Focus on form and focus on forms in second language vocabulary             learning. The Canadian modern language review, 63.149-166.

Laufer, B., Hulstjin, J. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition: the construct of task-    induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22. 1-26.

Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: a design feature in language teaching methodology. In Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective. 39-52. Amsterdam:    John Benjamins.

Milton, B., Hopkins, V. (2006). Explicitness. Intake, and the issue of awareness: another            piece to puzzle. Studies in ALS acquisition, 21. 511-556.

Nation, I.S.P. (2008). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge      University Press.

Newton, J. (1995). Task-based interaction and incidental vocabulary learning: a case             study. Second language research, 11. 159-177.

Norris, J. M., Ortega, L. (2003). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: a research synthesis and      quantitative meta-analysis. Language learning, 50. 417-428.

Palmberg, L. (1987). Issues concerning the acquisition of knowledge” effects of             vocabulary training on reading comprehension. Review of educational research, 2. 253-279.

Qian, D. D. (1996). ESL vocabulary acquisition: contextualization and             decontextualization. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53. 112- 142.

Read. J. (1993). The impact of interaction in comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 21. 737-     758.

Sanaoui, J. (1995). A review of research into vocabulary acquisition through dictionary       use.  studies in the humanities and sciences, 44. 67-97.

Schmitt, N. (1997). Tracking the incremental acquisition of second language vocabulary.     Language learning, 48. 281-317.

Schmitt, N. (1998). Handbook of bilingualism: psycholinguistic approaches. Oxford:           OUP.

Van den Branden, K. (1997). Effects of negotiation on language learners’ output.             Language learning, 47. 589-636.

            Vosoughi. H, , Mehdipour. Z. (2013). effects of recognition task and production task on                              incidental vocabulary learning of Iranian EFL learners. International Research                                  Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences.                                                                                 Wesche, M. B. Paribakht, T. (1996). Assessing second language vocabulary. The      Canadian modern language review, 53. 13-41.

Wesche, M. B. Paribakht, T. (2007). The effects of repetition on vocabulary knowledge.     Applied linguistics, 28. 46-65.

            Yaqubi. B.,  Rayati R.A. ,  Allemzade Gorgi, N. (2010). The involvement load hypothesis                       and vocabulary learning: the effect of task types and involvement index on L2                               vocabulary acquisition. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS). 2. 1

   Ziyaeemehr , A. (2013). Investigating the effectiveness of task types on vocabulary                                     learning in multilevel language ability classes. European online journal of natural                               and social sciences, 2.European Online Journal

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 751
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 779


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب