اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 348 |
| تعداد مقالات | 2,872 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 3,265,923 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,402,116 |
Mapping Past, Current and Future TEFL Research Trends in Iran: A Synthetic Review of Topics and Paradigms in Three Decades | ||
| Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 5، شماره 4، بهمن 2018، صفحه 81-108 اصل مقاله (906.31 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/jmrels.2019.10434.1299 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mohammad Amini Farsani* 1؛ Esmat Babaii2 | ||
| 1Department of Foreign Languages, Iran University of Science and Technology | ||
| 2Department of Foreign Languages, Kharazmi University | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 26 فروردین 1398، تاریخ بازنگری: 08 تیر 1398، تاریخ پذیرش: 15 تیر 1398 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| We have recently witnessed a growing awareness of methodological research issues in the field of applied linguistics, which led to what Plonsky (2017) has referred to as “methodological awareness” (p. 517). To make a positive contribution to this nascent movement, this study, drawing on synthetic techniques, sought to describe the cumulative and developmental status of research paradigms and substantive/topical issues in an EFL context. As such, we analyzed a sample of 663 unpublished applied linguistics MA theses which were distributed over a 30-year period. The cumulative results revealed the distribution of the studies in a good range of substantive issues with “researching language classroom issues” as the most frequent topic in the data set and “research methods or researching research methodology”, “psycholinguistics”, and “sociolinguistics” as the least frequent issues across a wide range of age groups, proficiency levels, and time span. As for the cumulative analysis of research approaches, the results revealed that about 72% of the included MA theses were quantitative; around 18% of the studies employed mixed methods research; and a smaller percentage of the studies (11%, n=72) used a qualitative research approach. Chronologically, a clear increasing pattern of research paradigms was notable across time. Implications for the research consumers (e.g., supervisors, journal reviewers, postgraduate students, and material developer) are discussed. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| fugitive literature؛ research synthesis؛ research paradigms؛ substantive issues؛ EFL setting | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| بررسی روند موضوعات و پارادایم های تحقیقی در سه دهه: رویکرد ترکیب پژوهشها | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| محمد امین فراسانی1؛ عصمت بابایی2 | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| -- | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| ادبیات فراری, سنتز تحقیقات, پارادایمهای تحقیق, موضوعات اساسی, تنظیم EFL | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Amini Farsani, M. (2017). Exploring three decades of TEFL research in Iran: Conceptions and practices. (Unpublsihed doctoral dissertation). Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
Amini Farsani, M., & Babaii, E. (2019) EFL faculty members’research engagement: voices from Iran. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 24(1), 37–59.
Auger, C.P. (1998). Information sources in grey literature: Guides to information sources (4th ed.). London: Bowker Saur.
Babaii, E., Hashemi, M.R., & Amini Farsani, M. (2017). Exploring EFL applied linguists’ conceptions of research: A mixed methods study. Foreign Language Research Jouranl, 6(2), 501–533.
Byrnes, H. (2013). Notes from the editor. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 825–827.
Benson, P., Chik, A., Gao, X., Huang, J., & Wang, W. (2009). Qualitative research in language teaching and learning journals, 1997–2006. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 79–90.
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd publication.
Brown, J.D. (2015). Why bother learning advanced quantitative methods in L2 research. In L. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research (pp. 9–20). New York, NY: Routledge.
Chaudron, C.(2001). Progress in language classroom research: Evidence from the Modern Language Journal,1916-2000. The Modern Language Journal, 85(1), 57–76.
Cohen, D., & Macaro, E. (2010). Research methods in second language acquisition. In E. Macaro (Ed.), Continuum companion to second language acquisition (pp. 107–136). London: Continuum.
Cooper, H. (2016). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.
Cooper, H., & Hedges, L.V. (1994). Research synthesis as a scientific enterprise. In H. Cooper and L.V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 3–14), New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Davies, A., & Elder, C. (2004). Handbook of applied linguistics. London: Blackwell.
Ellis, R. (2015). Introduction: Complementarity in research syntheses. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 285–9.
Farhady, H., & Hedayati, H. (2009). Language assessment policy in Iran. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 132–141.
Gao, Y., Li, L., & Lu, J. (2001). Trends in research methods in applied linguistics: China and the West. English for Specific Purposes, 20(1), 1–14.
Grant, M.J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108.
Han, Z. (2015). Striving for complementarity between narrative and meta-analytic reviews. Applied Linguistics, 36, 409–415.
Harbon, L., & Shen, H. (2015). Researching language classrooms. In Paltridge and A. Phakiti (Eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: a practical guide (pp. 434–445). London: Bloomsbury Publications.
Hashemi, M.R., & Babaii, E. (2012). Exploring the nature of mixing methods in ESP research. ESP across Cultures, 9, 115–134.
Hashemi, M.R. & Babaii, E. (2013). Mixed methods research: toward new research designs in applied linguistics, the Modern Language Journal, 97(4), 828–852.
Hasrati, M., & Tavakoli, P. (2014). Globalization and MATESOL programs in the UK. Higher Education, advanced online publication, 69, 547–565.
Henning, G. (1986). Quantitative methods in language acquisition research. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 701–708.
Holliday, A. (2015). Analyzing qualitative data. In B. Partridge & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical guide (pp. 60–73). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Hudson, T., & Liosa, L. (2015). Design issues and inference in experimental L2 research. Language Learning, 65(S1), 76–96.
Hyland, K. (2015). Academic publishing: Issues and challenges in the construction of knowledge. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
In’nami, Y., & Koizumi, R. (2010). Database selection guidelines for meta-analysis in applied linguistics. TESOL Quarterly, 44, 169–184.
Johnson, R.B., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33, 14–26.
Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., & Turner, L.A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 112–133.
King, K.L., & Mackey, A. (2016).Research methodology in second language studies: trends, concerns, and new directions. The Modern Language Journal, 100, Supp. 1, 209–227.
Lazaraton, A. (2000). Current trends in research methodology and statistics in applied linguistics. TESOL Quarterly, 34(1), 175–181.
Lazaraton, A. (2005). Quantitative research methods. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 209–224). New York: Routledge.
Lei, L., & Liu, D. (2018). Research trends in applied linguistics from 2005-2016: A bibliometric analysis and its implications. Applied Linguistics, 40(3), 540–561.
Liu, Q., & Brown, D. (2015). Methodological synthesis of research on the effectiveness of corrective feedback in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 66–81.
Loewen, S. & Plonsky, L. (2016). An A-Z of applied linguistics research methods. New York, NY: Palgrave.
Mackey, A. (2015). Practice and progression in second language research methods. AILA Review, 28, 80–97.
Marefat, H. (1999). A review of MA theses in TEFL completed between January 1990 and March 1999 in the English department of the faculty of foreign languages at Tehran University. Research in Foreign Languages, 6, 111–116.
Martynychev, A. (2009). On research methodology in applied linguistics in 2002-2008. Unpublished PhD dissertation, George Fox University.
Mehrani, M.B., & Khodi, A. (2014). An appraisal of the Iranian academic research on English language teaching. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 6(3), 89–97.
Melzi, G., & Caspe, M. (2010). Research approaches to narrative, literacy, and education. In K.A. King and N.H. Hornberger (Eds.), Research methods in language and education: Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 151–163). New York, NY: Springer.
Morgan, D.L. (2018). Living within blurry boundaries: The value of distinguishing between qualitative and quantitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research,12(3), 268–279.
Norris, J.M., & Ortega, L. (2006). The value and practice of research synthesis for language learning and teaching. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 3−50). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Nunan, D. (1991). Methods in second language classroom-oriented research: A critical review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 249–274.
Ortega, L. (2015). Research synthesis. In B. Paltridge and A. Phakiti (Eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: a practical guide (pp. 219–237). London: Bloomsbury Publications.
Paltridge, B., & Phakiti, A. (2015). Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource. London, England: Bloomsbury.
Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
Plonsky, L. (2011). The effectiveness of second language strategy instruction: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 61, 993–1038.
Plonsky, L. (2014) Study quality in quantitative L2 research (1990–2010): A methodological synthesis and call for reform. The Modern Language Journal, 98, 450–70.
Plonsky, L. (2015). Advancing quantitative methods in second language research. New York, NY: Routledge.
Plonsky, L. (2017). Quantitative research methods. In Sh. Loewen, & M. Sato, M. (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition (pp. 505–521). Taylor and Francis Inc.
Plonsky, L., & Gass, S. (2011). Quantitative research methods, study quality, and outcomes: The case of interaction research. Language Learning, 61, 325–366.
Plonsky, L., & Gonulal, T. (2015). Methodological synthesis in quantitative L2 research: A review of reviews and a case study of exploratory factor analysis. Language Learning, 65, Supp. 1, 9–36.
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. (2015). Meta-analyzing second language research. In L. Plonsky (Eds.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research (pp. 106–128). New York, NY: Routledge.
Riazi, A.M. (2017). Mixed-methods research in language teaching and learning. United Kingdom, UK: Equinox Publishing.
Riazi, A.M., & Candlin, C.N. (2014). Mixed-methods research in language teaching and learning: Opportunities, issues and challenges. Language Teaching, 47, 135–173.
Richards, I. (2009). Trends in qualitative research in language teaching since 2000. Language Teaching, 42, 147–180.
Sahragard, R., & Meihami, H. (2016). An investigation into research methodology and research orientation of the studies published in journal of teaching Persian to speakers of other languages. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 5(1), 121–140.
Sandelowski, M. (2014). Unmixing mixed methods. Research in Nursing and Health, 37, 3–8.
Seliger, H.W., & Shohamy, E. (1989). Second language research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stapleton, P., & Shao, Q. (2018). A worldwide survey of MATESOL programs in 2014: Patterns and perspectives. Language Teaching Research, 22(1),10–28.
Usher, R. (1996). A critique of the neglected epistemological assumptions of educational research, In D. Scott & R. Usher (Ed.), Understanding educational research (pp. 9–33), New York: Routledge.
Zhao, J.J., Beckett, G., & Wang, L.L. (2017). Evaluating the research quality of education journals in China: Implications for increasing global impact in peripheral countries. Review of Educational Research, 87(3), 583–618. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 759 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 995 |
||