اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 359 |
| تعداد مقالات | 2,954 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 3,365,465 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,502,652 |
انتقال آوایی در گفتار فارسی آموزان چینی و عربی: مطالعه ی موردی انفجاری های بدنه ای (مقاله علمی پژوهشی) | ||
| پژوهش نامه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیر فارسی زبانان | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 9، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 19، فروردین 1399، صفحه 3-23 اصل مقاله (1019.86 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/jtpsol.2020.10185.1428 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| وحید صادقی* | ||
| نویسنده ی مسئول، دانشیار گروه آموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه بین المللی امام خمینی (ره) | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 08 اسفند 1397، تاریخ بازنگری: 01 اردیبهشت 1398، تاریخ پذیرش: 09 خرداد 1398 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| این پژوهش به بررسی شیوهی تولید انفجاریهای بدنهایِ فارسی در گفتار فارسیآموزان چینی و عربی میپردازد. انفجاریهای بدنهای در نظام آوایی زبان فارسی با زبانهای عربی و چینی تفاوت بنیادین دارد: انفجاریهای بدنهای فارسی بسته به محل تولید واکهی مجاور به صورت گونه‌های سخت‌کامی و نرم‌کامی تولید میشوند. در مقابل، انفجاریهای بدنهای در زبانهای عربی و چینی فقط نرم‌کامیاند و گونهی سخت‌کامیِ انفجاریهای بدنهای در این زبانها تظاهر آوایی ندارد. با توجه به این تفاوت واجی، پرسشی مطرح می‌شود مبنی بر آنکه تا چه اندازه الگوهای تولیدی- صوتی همخوانهای انفجاری بدنهایِ فارسی در گفتار فارسیآموزان عربی و چینی با ویژگی‌های تولیدی-صوتیِ بومی این همخوانها مطابقت دارد. برای پاسخگویی به این پرسش ابتدا دادههایی متناسب با پرسش پژوهش طراحی و توسط شرکتکنندگان آزمایش (شامل سه گروه فارسیزبانان بومی، فارسیآموزان چینی و فارسیآموزان عربی)، تولید شدند. سپس الگوی توزیع انرژی بر روی طیف بسامدی رهش انفجاریهای بدنهای در گفتار شرکت کنندگان آزمایش بررسی شد؛ همچنین، معادلهی خط رگرسیونِ حاصل از اندازهگیری مقادیر فرکانس F2 در آغاز واکه و ناحیهی ایستای واکهی بعد از همخوان انفجاری به دست آمد. نتایج نشان داد در حالی که فارسیزبانان بومی، مطابق انتظار، انفجاریهای بدنهای را در بافت واکهای پیشین بهصورت سخت‌کامی و در بافت واکهای پسین بهصورت نرم‌کامی تولید میکنند، فارسیآموزان چینی و فارسیآموزان عربی، این همخوانها را در هر دو بافت واکهایِ پیشین و پسین به صورت نرم‌کامی تلفظ میکنند. یافتههای این پژوهش در چارچوب نظریه‌ی یادگیری گفتار (SLM) مورد بحث قرار گرفته و پیشنهادهایی در خصوص کاربرد نتایج به دست آمده در حوزهی آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسیزبانان ارائه شده است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| انفجاریهای بدنهای؛ فارسی آموزان چینی؛ فارسی آموزان عربی؛ نظریه ی یادگیری گفتار؛ معادله ی مکانی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Phonetic transfer in the production of Chinese and Arabic learners of Persian: A case study on Persian dorsal stops | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Vahid Sadeghi | ||
| Corresponding author, Associate professor, Faculty of Humanities, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| This research aims at investigating the pronunciation of Persian dorsal stops in the the production of Chinese and Arabic learners of Persian. Dorsal stops are different in Persain from both Chinese and Arabic. Persian dorsal stops are pronounced as either palatal or velar depending on the front/backness of the following vowel, while dorsal stops in Chinese and Arabic are always produced as velar irrespective of the place of articulation of the following vowel. Givn this phonological difference between the Persian and the Chinese and Arabic sound systems, we asked to what extent the acoustic phonetic characteristics of Persian dorsal stops in the the production of Chinese and Arabic learners of Persian agree with those of native Persian speakers. A courpus was designed to test the research hypothesis. Three sets of spekers, namely native Persian spekers, Chinese learners of Persian and Arabic learners of Persian participated in the experiment. Data analysis included spectral examination at stop release as well as regression locus equation computed from messurement of F2 at vowel onset and the steady state of the vowel. Results suggested that while Persain speakers’ productions of dorsal stops fall within two different phonetic categories, namely palatal and velar, depending on the following vowel; Chinese and Arabic learners of Persian realize Persian dorsal stops as only velar irrespective of the vowel context. The findings are discussed with respect to the theory of Speech Learning Model (SLM), and suggestions are made as how the research findings may be applied in teaching Persian as a second language. Extended Abstract: The interference of native phonetics and phonology on the acquisition of non-native vowels and consonants has been studied extensively, and results typically suggest that discrimination of non-native sounds can be predicted from the perceptual relatedness of non-native categories to native categories. According to Speech Learning Model (SLM), proposed by Flege (1995), L1 and L2 sounds exist in a common phonological space, and thus influence each other. As argued by Flege et al. (2003), the interaction between the two systems involves two mechanisms, namely, category assimilation and category dissimilation. An L2 sound assimilates to an L1 sound when it is perceived as an instance of the L1 sound, despite audible differences between the two sounds. However, category dissimilation happens when learners can auditorily differentiate an L2 sound from the closest L1 sound and from the neighboring L2 sound. Flege makes the assumption that under such a condition a new phonetic category for an L2 sound can be established. This research aims at investigating the pronunciation of Persian dorsal stops in the production of Chinese and Arabic learners of Persian. Dorsal stops are different in Persian from both Chinese and Arabic. Persian dorsal stops are pronounced as either palatal or velar depending on whether the following vowel is front or back, while dorsal stops in Chinese and Arabic are always produced as velar, irrespective of the place of articulation of the following vowel. Given this phonological difference between Persian on the one hand and Chinese and Arabic on the other hand, we asked to what extent the acoustic phonetic characteristics of Persian dorsal stops in the production of Chinese and Arabic learners of Persian agree with those of native Persian speakers. A corpus was designed to test the research hypothesis. Three sets of speakers, namely native Persian speakers, Chinese learners of Persian and Arabic learners of Persian participated in the experiment. The participants were recorded individually in a quiet room using a digital audio recorder, Sound Blaster X- Fi 5.1, and a directional condenser microphone. The stimulus tokens were digitized at 22.05 kHz and low-pass filtered at 4.8 kHz. The output amplitude levels for each individual speaker were normalized to the maximum amplitude range. All acoustic measurements were made using Praat acoustic software (Boersma and Weenink, 2010). Data analysis included spectral examination at stop release as well as regression locus equation computed from measurement of F2 at vowel onset and the steady state of the vowel. Results suggested that patterns of spectral energy distribution in dorsal stops (the release section) are significantly different in the production of native Persian speakers from both Chinese and Arabic speakers, when the stop consonants are produced before front vowels, but they are rather similar when the target stops are produced before back vowels. More specifically, in back vocalic contexts, all speakers, irrespective of their mother tongue (differences in L1) pronounced the dorsal stops in such manner that the distribution of energy was rather compact, with energy being distributed in a polar fashion in three different spectral regions, namely, low formant frequencies, mid formant frequencies, and high formant frequencies. However, in the front vowel context, the native and non-native speakers of Persian differed as to whether the spectral shape of the target stops were diffuse or compact in their pronunciations. While, Chinese and Arabic speakers uttered the dorsal stops in the front vocalic context in almost the same fashion as the back context, Persian speakers pronounced the consonants such that there were less poles in the spectrum, and thus the spectral shape of the target stops were more diffuse than compact. Furthermore, the results indicated that the locus equation slopes serve as phonetic descriptors of stop place in CV utterances. Using the locus equation measurement sites for F2 onsets, dorsal stop consonants in the production of Chinese and Arabic speakers had lower locus equation slopes relative to native Persian speakers. When locus equations were derived using F2 onsets for dorsal stops that were measured closer to the stop release burst, the slopes were radically different between the native and non-native speakers of Persian. These results can be interpreted to suggest that while Persian speakers’ productions of dorsal stops fall within two different phonetic categories, namely palatal and velar, depending on the following vowel; Chinese and Arabic learners of Persian realize Persian dorsal stops as only velar irrespective of the vowel context. The findings are discussed with respect to the theory of Speech Learning Model (SLM), and suggestions are made as how the research findings may be applied in teaching Persian as a second language. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| dorsal stops, Chinese learners of Persian, Arabic learners of Persian, speech learning model, locus equation | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
اشرف زاده، فریبا. و نوربخش، ماندانا. (1393). مرکز تمرکز انرژی، پارامتر تعیین محل تولید همخوانهای انسدادی بدنهای در زبان فارسی: یک تحلیل صوتشناختی. مجموعه مقالات دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، شماره‌ی 331، صص: 117-132. بیجنخان، محمود. (1392). نظام آوایی زبان فارسی. تهران: سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی دانشگاه‌ها (سمت). پرمون، یدالله. (1380). نظام آوایی فارسی محاوره‌ای معیار امروز: رویکردی زایشی، وزنی، عروضی، رساله دکتری، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران. ثمره، یدالله. (1378). آواشناسی زبان فارسی: آواها و ساخت آوایی هجا. تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی. عظیمی، الناز. (1394). بررسی صوتشناختی همخوانهای انسدادی بدنهای در گزیدهای از زبانهای ایرانی. پایان‌نامهی کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه علامهی طباطبایی، تهران. صادقی، وحید. (1385). بازشناسی واجی کلمات فارسی: رویکردی مبتنی بر نظریه‌ی بهینگی. رسالهی دکتری، دانشگاه تهران، تهران. مشکوهالدینی، مهدی. (1374). ساخت آوایی زبان. مشهد: انتشارات دانشگاه فردوسی.
References:
Aoyama, K. & Flege, J. E. (2011). Effects of L2 experience on perception of English /r/ and /l/ by native Japanese speakers. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan, 15(3), 5-13.
Aoyama, K., Guion, S., Flege, J. E., Yamada, T., & Akahane-Yamada, R. (2008). The first years in an L2-speaking environment: A comparison of Japanese children and adults learning American English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 46, 61-90.
Ashrafzade, F. & Nourbakhsh, M. (2014). The center of energy as a parameter to determine the place pf articulation Persian dorsal stops: An acoustic analysis. Proceedings of papers published by Allame Tabataba'i Uninversity (PP. 117-132). [In Persian]
Azimi, A. (2015). An acoustic study of dorsal stops in some selected Iranian languages (Master’s thesis). Allame Tabataba'i Uninversity. [In Persian]
Bijankhan, M. (2013). Phonetic System of the Persian Language. Tehran: Samt. [In Persian]
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2018). Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer (Version 5.0.36) [Computer Program]. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/.
Chen, H. (2010). Second Language Timing Patterns and Their Effects on Native Listeners’ Perceptions. Studies in Linguistics, 36, 183-212.
Chen, H., Cheung, H., Wong, O., & Hills, M. (2001). The Development of Phonological Awareness: Effects of Spoken Language Experience and Orthography. Cognition, 81(3), 227-241. Elsevier.
Chao, K. Y., Khattab, G., & Chen, L. M. (2006). Comparison of VOT Patterns in Mandarin Chinese and in English. in Proceedings of the 4th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Arts and Humanities (pp. 840–859).
Flege, J. E. (1987). Effects of Equivalence Classification on the Production of Foreign Language Speech Sounds. In J. Leather & A. James (Eds.), Sound Patterns in Second Language Acquisition. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second Language Speech Learning: Theory, Finding, and Problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech Perception, and Linguistic Experience )233-277(. Baltimore: York Press.
Flege, J. E. (2003). Methods for Assessing the Perception of Vowels in a Second Language: a Categorail Discrimination Test. In E. Fava, & A. Mioni (Eds.), Issues in Clinical Linguistics )19-44(. Padova: Unipress.
Flege, J. E. & Wayland, R. (2019). The role of input in native Spanish Late learners’ production and perception of English phonetic segments. Journal of Second Language Studies. Vol. 2(1).
Keating, P. & Lahiri, A. (1993). Fronted velars, palatalized velars, and palatals. Phonetica, 50(2), 73-101.
Liao, S. J. (2005). Interlanguage production of English stop consonants: A VOT analysis, (Master’s thesis). National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Lindblom, B. (1963). Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. The journal of the Acoustical society of America, 35(11), 1773-1781.
Lord, G. (2005). How can we teach foreign language pronunciation? On the effects of a Spanish phonetics course. Hispania, 3, 57–567.
Meshkatodini, M. (1995). Sound structure of language. Mashhad. Ferdwsi University Press (3rded). [In Persian]
Modarresi Ghavami, G. (2002). The effects of syllable boundary, stop consonant closure duration, and VOT on VCV coarticulation (Doctoral dissertation).
Obrecht, D. H. (2017). Effects of the second formant on the perception of velarization consonants in Arabic (Vol. 39). Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
Parmoon, Y. (2001). The sound system of contemporary Persian: A generative, metrical and prosodic approach. (PhD Thesis). Tarbiat Modarres University. [In Persian]
Pisowicz, A. (1985). Origions of the New and Middle Persian Phonological Uniwersytetu: Giellonskiego.
Sadeghi, V. (2006). Persian spoken word recognition: An optimality treatment (PhD Thesis). University of Tehran. [In Persian]
Samare, Y. (1999). Persian Phonetics, Sound and Syllable Structure (2nded).Tehran: Center of academic publications. [In Persian]
Stevens, K. N. (1998). Acoustic Phonetics. Cambridge (Master’s thesis). London: MIT Press.Yarmohammadi, L. (1995). A contrastive phonological Analysis of English and Persian.Shiraz University Press.
Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Caramazza, A., & Preston, M. S. (1977). A study of voicing Lebanese Arabic. Journal of Phonetics, 5, 35-48.
Zhang, Y., & Nissen, S. L., & Francis, A. L. (2008). Acoustic characteristics of English lexical stress produced by Mandarin speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(6), 4498-4513
Zhang, Y., Francis, A. (2010). The Weighting of Vowel Quality in Native and Non-native Listeners’Perception of English Lexical Stress. Journal of Phonetics, 38(2), 260-271. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 295 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 374 |
||