اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 360 |
| تعداد مقالات | 2,962 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 3,754,890 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,550,256 |
Challenges of English Teaching in Engineering Courses | ||
| Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 8، شماره 4، دی 2021، صفحه 20-1 اصل مقاله (559.24 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: research paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/jmrels.2020.13275.1640 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Edita Bekteshi* 1؛ Melihate Shala2؛ Brikena Xhaferi3 | ||
| 1Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Computing, University of Mitrovica "Isa Boletini" Mitrovica, Kosovo | ||
| 2Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Computing, University of Mitrovica” Isa Boletini”, Mitrovica, Kosovo. | ||
| 3English Department, Faculty of Languages, Cultures and Communications. South East European University, Tetovo, North Macedonia. | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 02 خرداد 1399، تاریخ بازنگری: 07 مهر 1399، تاریخ پذیرش: 05 مهر 1399 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The purpose of this experimental study was to investigate English teaching and its impact on students from the engineering faculty in bilingual CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) application. It was conducted in a public Higher Education Institution (HEI) in Kosovo, at the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Computing in which data were collected from 180 students. There were 56 students involved in the experimental group, whereas the control groups comprised of 68 students following conventional Technical Drawing with Descriptive Geometry class in native /Albanian language, and 56 students followed conventional English for Specific Purposes (ESP) classes as the second control group. Two teachers, one in engineering field, and one ESP teacher were involved in this study throughout the semester, i.e. fifteen weeks. The study incorporated parallel teaching, the same content in two different languages in the experimental group: Albanian/native language by the engineering practitioner, and English by the ESP teacher. The results of three test terms for all the three groups were analyzed by applying SPSS statistical package, and revealed that the experimental group achieved higher success in learning. The study concluded that if there is no teacher available to offer CLIL to future engineers, then teaching engineering courses with the engineering practitioner can be conducted in parallel fashion with the ESP teacher, who can contribute to positive effect in terms of certain engineering subcategories and English professional vocabulary. As such, this study may be considered as a potential example in offering new professional engineering courses which include bilingual paired teaching, of English and a professional course. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Paired Teaching؛ Collaboration؛ Engineering Students؛ CLIL | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Challenges of English Teaching in Engineering Courses | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Paired Teaching, Collaboration, Engineering Students, CLIL | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
References Ardeo, G. J. M. (2013). (In) compatibility of CLIL and ESP courses at university. Language Value, 5(1), 24–47.
Banegas, D. L. (2012). Identity of the teacher-researcher in collaborative action research: Concerns reflected in a research journal. Profile Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 14(2), 29-43.
Beutner, M., & Pechuel, R. (2017). Education and educational policy in germany: A focus on core developments since 1944. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 9(2), 9-24.
Bojović, M.(2006). Teaching foreign language for specific purposes: Teacher development. 31st Conference: Application of Teacher Education in Europe. Portoroz, Slovenia. DOI.:10.13140/2.1.4011.4566. Retrieved from:http://www.pef.uni-lj.si/atee/978-961-6637-06-0/487-493.pdf
Cheremissina, I. A. & Riemer, M.J. (2001 September). English for specific purposes in engineering education at the Tomsk Polytechnic University. The 5th Baltic Seminar on Engineering Education. Gdynia, Poland. 17-19.
Coe, R., Aloisi, C., Higgins, S. & Major, E. E. (2014). What makes great teaching? review of the underpinning research. project report. Sutton Trust.
Coyle, D., Hood, P., and Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press
Crosier, D. & Parveva,T. (2013). The Bologna process: Its impact on higher education development in Europe and beyond. International Institute for Educational Planning.
Dash, B. (2015). MEEPA: An ESP syllabus design for the engineering students of Biju Patnaik University of Technology, India. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 3(2), 385-401.
Dörnyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 273-284.
European Commission. The Bologna Process 2020: The European higher education area in the new decade’. Communiqué. Conference of European Ministers Responsible for Higher Education, Leuven and Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, 28–29 April 2009.Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_09_675
Farzannia, S., & Farnia, M. (2016). Metadiscourse markers in introduction sections of Persian and English mining engineering articles. English for Specific Purposes World, 49(17), 1-16.
Hurst, N., & Bekteshi, E. (2019). [R]Evolution in foreign language teaching-giving voice to international teachers. Via Panoramica: Revista de Estudos Anglo-Americanos, 7(2), 16-35.
Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review Of Research In Education, 32(1), 241-267.
Mitchell, P. J., & Mitchell, L. A. (2014). Implementation of the Bologna Process and language education in Russia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 154, 170-174.
Nunan, D. (Ed.) (2003). Collaborative language learning and teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Ramirez, A. V., Isabel, B. A., & Alfonso, L. V. (2018). Challenges of the English Teacher in the Engineering Faculty. English Language Teaching, 11(2), 149-155.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd edition). Cambridge University Press.
Rod, E. (2005). Instructed second language acquisition, a literature review report to the ministry of education. Auckland UniServices Limited
Scrivener, J. (2011). Learning teaching. The essential guide to English language teaching. MacMillan.
Spence, P., & Liu, G. Z. (2013). Engineering English and the high-tech industry: A case study of an English needs analysis of process integration engineers at a semiconductor manufacturing company in Taiwan. English for Specific Purposes, 32(2), 97-109.
Taillefer, G. (2013). CLIL in higher education: the (perfect?) crossroads of ESP and didactic reflection. ASp. la revue du GERAS, 63, 31-53.
Taysum, A. (2020). An English case of participation in school processes and practices. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 12(1). 1-10.
Uemura, T. (2017). CLIL and its possible application to engineering education to enhance undergraduates’ academic and subject-specific English literacy. International Journal of Engineering Innovation and Management, 7(2), 13-21.
Wächter, B. & Maiworm, F. (2008). English-Taught Programmes in European Higher Education. The Picture in 2007. ACA Papers on International Cooperation in Education. Bonn: Lemmens.
Williams, C. (2014). The future of ESP studies: Building on success, exploring new paths, avoiding pitfalls. ASp. la revue du GERAS, 66, 137-150.
Wolff, D. (2003). Integrating language and content in the language classroom: Are transfer of knowledge and of language ensured? ASp. la revue du GERAS, 41, 35-46. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 728 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 558 |
||