اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 311 |
| تعداد مقالات | 2,565 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 2,844,931 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,150,738 |
Analyzing the Russian 's interventionist policy in the Syrian crisis | ||
| مطالعات سیاسی جهان اسلام | ||
| دوره 9، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 36، دی 1399، صفحه 1-18 اصل مقاله (618.58 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/psiw.2020.12350.2698 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| حسین دهشیری1؛ مهدیه حیدری* 2 | ||
| 1استاد گروه علوم سیاسی دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2دکتری راوبط بین الملل، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 08 دی 1398، تاریخ بازنگری: 30 تیر 1399، تاریخ پذیرش: 21 آبان 1399 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Purpose: The main purpose of this article is to understand theinterventionist policy of Russia in the Syrian crisis Method: is an explanatory – description method and from the perspective of the Stanford School. So, the main question is “why did Russia use interventionist policy and violent behavior in the Syrian crisis?” The temporary hypothesis is that Russia, based on its threat perception to its important values, used the interventionist policy in the Syrian crisis. So, Russia's core values, based on the Stanford School, including: supporting of its strategic allay such as Iran, fighting with terrorist and take away from its back – yard and rising its bargaining power in the international system, these values deal with the actor's position and quality of life in the international system. Therefore, they fall into the category of important or secondary values than vital values. Result: by applying the Stanford School Model, this result has been concluded that there was a positive correlation between the Russian’s perception threat (stimulus) and its interventionist and violent behavior (response) in the Syrian crisis. Findings: At least, findings of this article declared that Russian decision maker, by proper perception concerns and fears of environmental threats, could make balance of power in front of USA and its allies in negotiations table and in ground operations, freezed successfully the Islamic extremist in Syria and supported Iranian forces and their plans just due to its benefit and its interest both during the war and during the post war. In this article, the Russian threat perception is an independent variable of research, and use of interventionist behavior is the dependent variable of this research. Data collection and information methods are also based on library and Internet methods. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Threat Perception؛ Russia؛ Syria؛ Stanford School؛ Response -Stimulus؛ Crisis Management | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Analyzing the Russian 's interventionist policy in the Syrian crisis | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Hossein Daheshiar1؛ Mahdieh Heydari2 | ||
| 1Prof. of Law and Political Science, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Ph.D. International Relations, Allameh Tabatabai University | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Purpose: The main purpose of this article is to understand theinterventionist policy of Russia in the Syrian crisis Method: is an explanatory – description method and from the perspective of the Stanford School. So, the main question is “why did Russia use interventionist policy and violent behavior in the Syrian crisis?” The temporary hypothesis is that Russia, based on its threat perception to its important values, used the interventionist policy in the Syrian crisis. So, Russia's core values, based on the Stanford School, including: supporting of its strategic allay such as Iran, fighting with terrorist and take away from its back – yard and rising its bargaining power in the international system, these values deal with the actor's position and quality of life in the international system. Therefore, they fall into the category of important or secondary values than vital values. Result: by applying the Stanford School Model, this result has been concluded that there was a positive correlation between the Russian’s perception threat (stimulus) and its interventionist and violent behavior (response) in the Syrian crisis. Findings: At least, findings of this article declared that Russian decision maker, by proper perception concerns and fears of environmental threats, could make balance of power in front of USA and its allies in negotiations table and in ground operations, freezed successfully the Islamic extremist in Syria and supported Iranian forces and their plans just due to its benefit and its interest both during the war and during the post war. In this article, the Russian threat perception is an independent variable of research, and use of interventionist behavior is the dependent variable of this research. Data collection and information methods are also based on library and Internet methods. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Threat Perception, Russia, Syria, Stanford School, Response -Stimulus, Crisis Management | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
. Ahmad Sadek,LubnaSafey Eldin (2015). "Russia's Resurgence in Syria: A New Cold War?” The America University in Cario School of Global Affairs and Department of Public Policy and Administration, 20-58. 2. Barnard, Anne, Macfarquhar, John (2015). "Middle East, Vladimir Putin Plunges into a Caldron in Syria: Saving Assad", NY Times 4 Oct/2015. 3. Barzegar, Keyhan (2015). "Russia's Intention, an Opportunity for Iran". In The Iran Project Disrupting the Chess Board: Perspectives on the Russian Intervention in Syria. Belfer Centerfor Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, October, 2015, 12-67. 4. Bogeskoveviksew, Mikkel, Erikson, Robert (2017). "Russia's Engagement in Syria: What are Russia's Motives?” Copenhagen, October, NO.5, 15-30. 5. Borshcherskaya, Anna (2018). "Russia's & Goals Go beyond Damascus". Middle East Quarterly, Vol, 5. 100-143. 6. Boulding, Kenneth E (1959). "National Image and International System", the Journal of Conflict Resolution, VOL, 3, NO, 4, 115-157. 7. Brody, Richard A, North, Robert C. (1964). "Violence and Hostility: The Path to World War". Journal of Peace Research, VOL, 3, NO, 2, 120-162. 8. Cornell, Svante E., (2016). "The Fallacy of Compartmentalization: The West and Russia from Ukraine to Syria". European View,VOL, 15, NO, 3. 9. Demir, Sertif (2016). "The Impact of Syria Crisis". Foreign Policy, NO, 12. 58-83. 10. Duclos, Michel (2019).” Russia and Iran in Syria- a Random Partnership or an Enduring Alliance?” Atlantic Council. 11. Financial Times, (2015). "Russia Scuppers No-Fly Zon Plans, the Gun- Buying Rush and the Prospect of a Mega Tsunami". https://www.ft.com/.html, 10 October.
12. Garrilis, George (2016). "Can Russia's Peac Plan for Syria". Belfer Cent for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, 4-37. 13. Gornburg, Dmitry (2012). "Why Russia Supports Repressive Regimes in Syria and The Middle East".PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo, No, 198, 10-42. 14. Haddad,Bassam (2015). "The Russian Moment via Syria", In the Iran Project Disrupting the Chess Board: Perspectives on the Russian. Harvard Kennedy School, October, 2015. 70-122. 15. Hedayati Shahidani, Mehdi, Vladimrovich, Pinkossff' (2015). "Russian and American Behavioral Patterns in Regional Crisis Management; a Study of the Syrian Crisis”.Pajoheshhaye Rahbordi, 3 (12), 54-86. 16. Holsti, Ole R, Richard A. Brody, North, Robert C. (1975). "Measuring Affect and Action in International Reaction Model: Empirical Materials from the 1962 Cuban Crisis International Conflict and Integration”. Stanford University, 170-243. 17. Kelin, Margarete (2012). "Russia's Policy on Syria: On the Way to Isolations?” German Institute for International and Security Affairs (SWP), Vo.1, No. 3, 1-45. 18. Kiani, Davood, Khan Mohammadi, Zohreh (2013). "Analysis of the Causes of Russia's Presence in the Syrian Crisis". Faslnameh Rahbord, Vol 22, No 69, 101-146. (In persian) 19. Kolaei, Elahe, Sultannejad, Mohammad (2016). "Causes and Motives of Russian Military Operations in Syria”.Motaleate Rahbordy, Vol. 19, No. 3, Serial No. 73, 7-42. (In persian) 20. Kolaei, Elaheh (2006). "Relations between Iran and Russia, Continuity or Change", Moasase Farhangi Motaleati Orasiay va Ghafghaz, 1 (1), 10-53. 21. Koushki, Mohammad Sadegh, Taheri Bezi, Ebrahim (2015). "Russia's Presence in the Middle East during the Putin Period (Reviving Russia's Influence in Soviet-Influenced Countries". Central Eurasian Studies, Vol 8, No 1, 42-68. (In persian) 22. Massoudnia, Hussein, et al. (2012). "Leaving the Syrian Crisis from Mediation to Supporting Opposition to the Government".Motaleate Siasie Jahane Eslam, No. 4, (5), 102-138. (In persian) 23. Misto, Mohamad, Temizer, Selen (2019). “Russia establishes new Military Bases in Northern Syria”. AA, https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/russia-establishes-new-military-bases-in-northern-syria/1661570 24. Mohseni, Payam, (2015). "Introduction: The Russian Intervention in Syria". In The Iran Project disrupting the chessboard perspectives on the Russian Intervention Syria". Harvard Kennedy School Belfercenter for science and international Affairs, Octobr (2015)
25. North, Robert C., Koch, Howard E JR, Zinnes, Dina A. (1960). "The Integrative Functions of Conflict", Conflict Resolution, Vol, IV, No, 3, 320-384.
26. North, Robert, C. (1975). "Decision- Making in Crisis an Introduction". Conflict Management and Peace Science, VOL, 6, NO, 2, 12-48. 27. Peyrouse, Sebastien, Boonstr, Jos, and Laruelle, Marlene (2012). "Security and Development Approaches to Central Asia: the Eu Compared to China and Russia". Eu Cam Working Paper, No, 11. 3-122 28. Phillips, Christopher (2012). "Into the Quagmire: Turkey's Frustrated Syria Policy". The Royal Institute of International Affairs, London, 1-112. 29. Schelling, Thomasc (1966). Arms and Influence. New Haven and London yale University Press, 10-428 30. Shaykh al-Islami, Mohammad Hassan; Begi, Meysam (2013). "Analysis of the Role of Creation and the Policies of the Russian Federation in the Face of the Syrian Crisis". Faslnameh Afaq Amniyat, 6 (20), 150-186. (In persian) 31. Shumilin, Alexander (2016). "Russia's Diplomacy in the Middle East: Back to Geopolitics". Russia. Nei. Visions, No, 93. 50- 94. 32. Simbar, Reza, Sotoudeh, Ali Asghar, Esmaili, Ali (2016). "Russia's Strategy in the Syrian Crisis, (2001-2014)". Motaleate Orasiae Marcazi, Vol 9, No 2. 300-364. (in persian) 33. Sladden, James, Wasser, Becca, Connable, Ben, Grand, Clement, Sarah (2017). "Russian Strategy in the Middle East". Rand Corporation, NO.4. 34. Tarmi, Kamran (2002). "Iran-Russia Cooperation and US Policies towards Iran". Majles va Pajohesh, 9(35). 50-93. (in persian) 35. Trenin, Dimitri (2017). "Puttin's Plan for Syria: How Russia Wants to End the War". Foreign Affairs. No. 9. 10-48. 36. Trenin, Dmitri (2013). "The Mythical Alliance: Russia's Syria Policy". Washington D.C., Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 1-168. 37. Vaezi, Mahmoud (2010). "New International System and International Crisis Management". Rahbord, No. 59. (In persian) 38. Wakim, Jamal (2015). "Russian Troops in Syria: Ensuring Access to the East Mediterranean". In the Iran Project in Iran Project Disrupting the Chess Board: Perspectives on the Russian Intervention in Syria, Belfer center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, No19. 20-67. 39. Wilkenfeld, jonathan (1991). “Trigger-Response Transitions in Foreign Policy Crisis". Journal of conflict resolution, Vol; 3, No, 1.130-185. 40. Zinnes. Dina (1966). "Why War". Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol; 5, No, 2. 140-179. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 286 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 365 |
||