تعداد نشریات | 19 |
تعداد شمارهها | 380 |
تعداد مقالات | 3,132 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,252,731 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,846,765 |
Examining EFL Teachers’ Perceptions of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Web 2.0 Technologies Using a Structural Equation Modeling Technique | ||
Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies | ||
مقاله 3، دوره 9، شماره 2، تیر 2022، صفحه 51-76 اصل مقاله (1.25 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: research paper | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/jmrels.2021.14550.1779 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Behrang Mohammad-Salehi؛ Mehdi Vaez-Dalili* | ||
Department of English, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran | ||
تاریخ دریافت: 23 آبان 1399، تاریخ بازنگری: 08 دی 1399، تاریخ پذیرش: 05 اسفند 1399 | ||
چکیده | ||
Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) provides a framework of teacher knowledge to integrate technology into education successfully. Applying digital technologies to TPACK in order to understand the range of language teachers’ ability levels is of considerable importance. The present study sought to examine Iranian EFL teachers’ perceived knowledge of Web 2.0 technologies in light of Mishra and Koehler’s (2006) TPACK framework. To this end, a structural model was put forth on the basis of interactions of the TPACK seven-factor model. The participants of the study consisted of 160 EFL teachers, who were selected through an alternative sampling procedure. The data were collected from the participants through a TPACK-EFL questionnaire. The structural equation modeling (SEM) technique was employed to analyze the pathways of Web 2.0 technology, pedagogy, and content and their interactions in the TPACK model. The results revealed that Web 2.0 technological knowledge (TK), pedagogical knowledge (PK), and content knowledge (CK), as core knowledge components, influenced the second-level knowledge bases, namely technological pedagogical knowledge (TPK), pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), and technological content knowledge (TCK) positively and directly except for one construct. Conversely, the impacts of TK, PK, and CK on TPACK were not statistically significant, and, as a result, did not work towards developing EFL teachers’ TPACK. Furthermore, TPK, TCK, and PCK were found to serve as contributing factors in the development of TPACK. Finally, the pedagogical and theoretical implications of interrelationships between the constructs and possible interpretations are discussed. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)؛ Web 2.0 Technologies؛ Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
بررسی برداشت معلمان زبان انگلیسی از دانش محتوایی آموزشی فناوری و فناوری های نسل دوم اینترنت با استفاده از رویکرد مدل سازی معادلات ساختاری | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
دانش محتوایی آموزشی فناوری چهارچوبی درباره دانش معلم برای ادغام موفقیت آمیز فناوری در آموزش ارائه می کند. استفاده از فناوری های دیجیتال در این چهارچوب به منظور درک دامنه سطح توانایی معلمان زبان انگلیسی از اهمیت قابل توجهی برخوردار است. مطالعه حاضر به منظور بررسی دانش برداشت شده معلمان زبان انگلیسی ایرانی از فناوری های نسل دوم اینترنت با لحاظ چارچوب دانش محتوایی آموزشی فن آوری میشرا و کوهلر (2006) می باشد. برای این منظور، یک مدل ساختاری بر اساس تاثیرات مدل هفت عاملی دانش محتوایی آموزشی فناوری ارائه شد. داده ها از 160 معلم که از طریق روش نمونه گیری جایگزین انتخاب شدند، از طریق پرسشنامه دانش محتوایی آموزشی فناوری مختص معلمان زبان انگلیسی جمع آوری شد و تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها برای بررسی مسیرها با اسفاده از روش مدل سازی معادلات ساختاری انجام شد. یافته های این مطالعه نشان داد که دانش فناوری نسل دوم اینترنت، دانش آموزشی و دانش محتوایی به عنوان مولفه های اصلی دانش، بر پایه های دانشی سطح دوم یعنی دانش آموزشی فنی، دانش محتوایی آموزشی و دانش محتوایی فن آوری به طور مثبت و مستقیم به جز یک سازه تأثیر می گذارد. برعکس، تأثیرات دانش فناوری، دانش آموزشی و دانش محتوایی بر دانش محتوایی آموزشی فن آوری از نظر آماری معنادار نبوده، و در نتیجه، در جهت توسعه دانش محتوایی آموزشی فن آوری معلمان زبان انگلیسی کارایی ندارد. علاوه بر این، دانش آموزشی فنی، دانش محتوایی آموزشی و دانش محتوایی فن آوری به عنوان عوامل موثر در توسعه دانش محتوایی آموزشی فن آوری شناخته شدند. سرانجام، اثرات روابط متقابل بین سازه ها و تفسیرهای احتمالی مورد بحث قرار گرفت. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
دانش محتوایی آموزشی فناوری, فناوریهای نسل دوم اینترنت, مدل سازی معادلات ساختاری | ||
مراجع | ||
Akkaya, R. (2016). Research on the development of middle school mathematics pre-service teachers’ perceptions regarding the use of technology in teaching mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(4), 861-879.
Arbuckle, J. L. (2017). IBM SPSS Amos 25 user’s guide. Amos Development Corporation.
Arslan, Y. (2015). Determination of technopedagogical content knowledge competencies of preservice physical education teachers: A Turkish sample. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 34(2), 225-241.
Bagheri, M. (2020). Validation of Iranian EFL teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) scale. TESL-EJ, 24(2), 1-20.
Baser, D., Kopcha, T. J., & Ozden, M. Y. (2016). Developing a technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) assessment for preservice teachers learning to teach English as a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 749-764.
Best, W. B., & Kahn, J. V. (2006). Research in education (10th Ed.). Pearson Education Inc.
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS (2nd Ed.). Routledge.
Celik, I., Sahin, I., & Akturk, A. O. (2014). Analysis of the relations among the components of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK): A structural equation model. Journal of educational computing research, 51(1), 1-22.
Chai, C. S., Chin, C. K., Koh, J. H. L., & Tan, C. L. (2013). Exploring Singaporean Chinese language teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and its relationship to the teachers’ pedagogical beliefs. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(4), 657-666.
Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Ho, H. N. J., & Tsai, C.-C. (2012). Examining preservice teachers’ perceived knowledge of TPACK and cyberwellness through structural equation modeling. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(6), 1000-1019.
Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Tsai, C.-C., & Tan, L. L. W. (2011). Modeling primary school pre-service teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers & Education, 57(1), 1184-1193.
Chai, C. S., Ng, E. M., Li, W., Hong, H.-Y., & Koh, J. H. (2013). Validating and modeling technological pedagogical content knowledge framework among Asian preservice teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1), 41-53.
Chapelle, C. A., & Sauro, S. (Eds.). (2017). The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning. Wiley.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th Ed.). Pearson Education Inc.
Davies, G., Otto, S. E. K., & Rüschoff, B. (2013). Historical perspectives on CALL. In M. Thomas, H. Reinders & M. Warschauer (Eds.), Contemporary computer-assisted language learning (pp. 19-38). Bloomsbury Academic.
Deng, F., Chai, C. S., So, H.-J., Qian, Y., & Chen, L. (2017). Examining the validity of the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) framework for preservice chemistry teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 1-14.
Ekrem, S., & Recep, Ç. (2014). Examining Preservice EFL Teachers’ TPACK Competencies in Turkey. Journal of Educators Online, 11(2), 1-22.
Habibi, A., Yusop, F.D., & Razak, R.A. (2020). The role of TPACK in affecting pre-service language teachers’ ICT integration during teaching practices: Indonesian context. Education and Information Technology.
Hao, Y., & Lee, K. S. (2017). Inquiry of pre-service teachers’ concern about integrating Web 2.0 into instruction. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(2), 191-209.
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic journal of business research methods, 6(1), 53-60.
Jang, S.-J., & Tsai, M.-F. (2013). Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese secondary school science teachers using a new contextualized TPACK model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(4), 566-580.
Khine, M. S., Ali, N., & Afari, E. (2017). Exploring relationships among TPACK constructs and ICT achievement among trainee teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 22(4), 1605-1621.
Khine, M. S, Afari, E., & Ali, N. (2019). Investigating Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge competencies among trainee teachers in the context of ICT course. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 65(1), 22-36.
Kiray, S. A., Çelik, İ., & Çolakoğlu, M. H. (2018). TPACK self-efficacy perceptions of science teachers: A structural equation modeling study. Education & Science/Egitim ve Bilim, 43(195), 253-268.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th Ed.). The Guilford Press.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 101-111). Springer.
Koehler, M. J., Shin, T. S., & Mishra, P. (2012). How do we measure TPACK? Let me count the ways. In Educational technology, teacher knowledge, and classroom impact: A research handbook on frameworks and approaches (pp. 16-31). IGI Global.
Koh, J. H. L. (2013). A rubric for assessing teachers’ lesson activities with respect to TPACK for meaningful learning with ICT. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(6), 887-900.
Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). Examining practicing teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) pathways: A structural equation modeling approach. Instructional Science, 41(4), 793-809.
Koh, J. H. L., & Divaharan, S. (2013). Towards a TPACK-fostering ICT instructional process for teachers: Lessons from the implementation of interactive whiteboard instruction. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 233-247.
Kurt, G., Mishra, P., & Kocoglu, Z. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge development of Turkish pre-service teachers of English. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference.
Lin, T.-C., Tsai, C.-C., Chai, C. S., & Lee, M.-H. (2013). Identifying science teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(3), 325-336.
Liu, M.-H., & Kleinsasser, R. (2015). Exploring EFL teachers’ knowledge and competencies: In-service program perspectives. Language Learning & Technology, 19(1), 119-138.
Miguel-Revilla, D., Martínez-Ferreira, J. M., & Sánchez-Agustí, M. (2020). Assessing the digital competence of educators in social studies: An analysis in initial teacher training using the TPACK-21 model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 1-12.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
Nazari, N., Nafissi, Z., Estaji, M., Marandi, S. S. (2019). Evaluating novice and experienced EFL teachers’ perceived TPACK for their professional development. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1-26.
Njiku, J., Mutarutinya, V., & Maniraho, J. F. (2020). Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge survey items: A review of literature. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education.
Pamuk, S., Ergun, M., Cakir, R., Yilmaz, H. B., & Ayas, C. (2013). Exploring relationships among TPACK components and development of the TPACK instrument. Education and Information Technologies, 20(2), 241-263.
Parmaxi, A., & Zaphiris, P. (2017). Web 2.0 in computer-assisted language learning: A research synthesis and implications for instructional design and educational practice. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(6), 704-716.
Rahimi, M., & Pourshahbaz, S. (2016, February). In-service EFL teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Applied Research in Language Studies, Tehran, Iran. https://www.civilica.com/Paper-ELSCONF03-ELSCONF03_254.html
Raygan, A., & Moradkhani, S. (2020). Factors influencing technology integration in an EFL context: investigating EFL teachers’ attitudes, TPACK level, and educational climate. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1839106
Sadaf, A., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2016). An investigation of the factors that influence preservice teachers’ intentions and integration of Web 2.0 tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(1), 37-64.
Schmid, M., Brianza, E., & Petko, D. (2020). Developing a short assessment instrument for technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK. xs) and comparing the factor structure of an integrative and a transformative model. Computers & Education, 157, 103967.
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2016). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (4th Ed.). Routledge.
Şen, Ş. (2020). Modelling the relations between Turkish chemistry teachers’ sense of efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge in context. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-14.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
Taghizadeh, M., & Hasani Yourdshahi, Z. (2020). Integrating technology into young learners’ classes: Language teachers’ perceptions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(8), 982-1006.
Teo, T., Sang, G., Mei, B., & Hoi, C. K. W. (2019). Investigating pre-service teachers’ acceptance of Web 2.0 technologies in their future teaching: a Chinese perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(4), 530-546.
Tzotzou, M. (2018). Integrating Web 2.0 technologies into EFL learning in the Greek state-school context: A mixed-method study. Research Papers in Language Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 32-55.
Valtonen, T., Sointu, E., Kukkonen, J., Mäkitalo, K., Hoang, N., Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Näykki, P., Virtanen, A., Pöntinen, S., Kostiainen, E., & Tondeur, J. (2019). Examining pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge as evolving knowledge domains: A longitudinal approach. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12353
Wang, S., & Vásquez, C. (2012). Web 2.0 and second language learning: What does the research tell us? CALICO Journal, 29(3), 412-430.
Wang, W., Schmidt-Crawford, D., & Jin, Y. (2018). Preservice teachers’ TPACK development: A review of literature. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(4), 234-258.
Willermark, S. (2018). Technological pedagogical and content knowledge: a review of empirical studies published from 2011 to 2016. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(3), 315-343.
Yang, J., Wang, Q., Wang, J., Huang, M., & Ma, M. (2019). A study of K-12 teachers’ TPACK on the technology acceptance of E-schoolbag. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(7), 1062-1075.
Zhang, S., Liu, Q., & Cai, Z. (2019). Exploring primary school teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in online collaborative discourse: An epistemic network analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3437-3455. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 740 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 541 |