تعداد نشریات | 19 |
تعداد شمارهها | 380 |
تعداد مقالات | 3,141 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,263,419 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,858,462 |
نگرش کارآمدی حسابرس در مذاکره و بیطرفی حسابرس: تحلیلی بر نقش هویت حرفهای حسابرس | ||
دانش حسابداری مالی | ||
دوره 8، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 30، آبان 1400، صفحه 175-200 اصل مقاله (1.67 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/jfak.2020.11549.2537 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
سید نیما حسینی1؛ مهدی صفری گرایلی* 2؛ حسن ولیان3 | ||
1گروه حسابداری، واحد بندرگز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بندرگز، ایران | ||
2دانشیار گروه حسابداری، واحد بندرگز ،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، بندرگز، ایران. | ||
3استادیار گروه حسابداری، واحد شاهرود، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شاهرود، ایران | ||
تاریخ دریافت: 10 مهر 1398، تاریخ بازنگری: 03 بهمن 1398، تاریخ پذیرش: 06 بهمن 1398 | ||
چکیده | ||
هدف: هویت حرفهای حسابرس مبتنی بر نوعی نگرش است که لازمه آن ذهنی آگاه نسبت به محتوا و فرآیندهای حرفه حسابرسی است که در طی کار راهه شغلی برای حسابرسان ایجاد میشود. براساس این ویژگی حسابرس ضمن داشتن رفتارهای حرفهای تلاش مینماید تا بهترین استراتژی را چه در مذاکره و چه در تعاملات خود با صاحبکاران اتخاذ نمایند. هدف این پژوهش بررسی نگرش کارآمدی حسابرس در مذاکره بر بیطرفی حسابرس باتوجه به نقش تعدیلکننده هویت حرفهای میباشد. روش: در این پژوهش تعداد 390 نفر از حسابرسان شاغل در سازمان حسابرسی و موسساتحسابرسی بخش خصوصی مشارکت داشتند، که در بازه زمانی ۶ ماه دوم سال ۱۳۹۷ پژوهش صورت پذیرفت. ابزار پژوهش پرسشنامه بود و به منظور تحلیل و آزمون فرضیههای پژوهش از روش تحلیل حداقل مربعات جزئی استفاده گردید. یافتهها: نتایج نشان داد که نگرش کارآمدی حسابرس در مذاکره تاثیر مثبت و معناداری بر بیطرفی حسابرس دارد. همچنین، هویت حرفهای تاثیر مثبت نگرش کارآمدی حسابرس در مذاکره را بر بیطرفی حسابرس تقویت میکند. نتیجهگیری: خودکارآمدی در مذاکره نوعی رفتار اثربخش در تعامل مبتنی بر استانداردهای مذاکره محسوب میشود که موجب میشود، جایگاه شغلی و ماهیت مسئولانه حسابرس حفظ گشته و به افزایش بیطرفی حسابرس کمک مینماید. دانش افزایی: یافتههای پژوهش علاوه بر توسعه ادبیات و مطالعات صورت گرفته در این حوزه، میتواند برای قانونگذاران حرفه حسابرسی و بازار سرمایه در امر تصمیمگیری مفید باشد. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
نگرش کارآمدی حسابرس در مذاکره؛ بیطرفی حسابرس؛ هویت حرفهای | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Auditor Effectiveness Attitudes in Negotiating on the Auditor Objectivity: Analysis of the Role of Professional Identity | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Seyed Nima Hosseyni1؛ mehdi safari gerayli2؛ Hasan Valiyan3 | ||
1Department of accounting, Bandargaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bandargaz, Iran | ||
2Department of accounting,Bandargaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bandargaz,Iran | ||
3Assistant Professor Department of accounting, Shahroud Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahroud, Iran | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
Purpose: The auditor's professional identity is based on an attitude, which requires having an informed mind about the content and processes of the audit profession that is gradually being created as a career path for auditors. Based on this feature the auditor strives to have professional behaviors Choose the best strategy, both in negotiations and in their interactions with clients. The purpose of this research is auditor effectiveness attitudes in negotiating on the auditor objectivity analysis of the role of professional identity. Method: In this study, 390 auditors working in the Audit Organization and Private Audit Institutions participated, which was conducted during the second six months of 2018. The research instrument was a questionnaire and the analysis and partial least squares analysis was used to test the research hypotheses. Results: We find that the attitude of auditor efficiency in negotiation had a positive and significant effect on auditor objectivity. It was also found that professional identity attenuates the positive impact of the auditor's effective attitude on negotiation on auditor objectivity. Conclusion: Self-efficacy in negotiation is one of the most effective behaviors based on negotiation standards that preserves the auditor's job position and responsible nature and contributes to enhancing the auditor's objectivity. Contribution: The findings of this study not only fill the gap in the field, but also help policy makers and audit profession regulators make informed decisions | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Auditor Effectiveness Attitudes in Negotiating, Auditor objectivity, Professional Identity | ||
مراجع | ||
باقری، حدیث، رزمجویی، دامون، ساعی، الهام، (۱۳۹۷)، رابطه هوش هیجانی و خودکار آمدی مبتنی بر عملکرد شغلی کارکنان، مجله روانشناسی، ۲۲(۱): ۵۰-۵۶.
حساس یگانه، یحیی.، باباجانی، جعفر، برزیده، فرخ.، بیگلر، کیومرث، (۱۳۹۶)، عوامل اقتضایی مؤثر بر مذاکره برای حل و فصل اختلاف نظرهای حسابرس با صاحبکار در ارتباط با نحوه گزارشگری مالی، دانش حسابرسی، ۱۷(۶۷): ۵-۲۳.
داوری، علی و رضازاده، آرش، (1393)، مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری با نرمافزار PLS، انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی، تهران، چاپ دوم.
دیانتی دیلمی، زهرا و غفاریان قدیم، مهسا. (1395)، بررسی رابطه سبزبودن زنجیره تأمین با ارزش شرکتهای تولیدی. دانش حسابداری مالی، 3(1): 47-67.
رجبعلی زاده، جواد.، حصارزاده، رضا.، باقرپورولاشانی، محمدعلی، (1395)، بررسی رابطة بین دو بعد شکاکیت و بیطرفیِ تردید حرفهای با قضاوت حرفهای حسابرس، بررسیهای حسابداری و حسابرسی،23(2): 173-192.
رضایی، نرگس.، بنی مهد، بهمن.، حسینی، سیدحسین، (۱۳۹۷)، تاثیر هویت سازمانی و حرفهای بر تردید حرفهای حسابرس مستقل، دانش حسابرسی، ۷۱ (۲): ۱۷۵-۱۹۹.
غلامرضایی، محسن.، حسنی، محمد، (۱۳۹۶)، نقش طرز تفکر، ارزشهای اخلاقی و انحرافهای رفتاری در میزان تردید حرفهای حسابرسان، پژوهشهای کاربردی در گزارشگری مالی، ۱۱(۲): ۴۷-۸۴.
مهرانی، ساسان.، اسکندر، هدی، (1395)، تبیین مدلسازی پارادایم مذاکرات حسابرس-صاحبکار پیرامون گزارشگری مالی، پژوهشهای تجربی حسابداری، 6(2): 143-170.
یوسفی شارمی، میرامید و بنی مهد، بهمن، (1398)، تاثیر عواطف فردی بر بی طرفی حسابرس. دانش حسابداری مالی، 6(1): 163-185.
Agarwalla, S, K., Desai, N., Tripaty, A, (2017), The impact of self-deception and professional skepticism on perceptions of ethicality, Advances in Accounting, 37(10): 85-93. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F, (1989), Social identity theory and the organization, Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 20-39. Baghery, H., Razmjooei, D., and Saei, E, (2018), The Relationship between Emotional Intelligence and Self-Efficacy based on Job Performance, Journal of Psychology, 22(1): 50-56. (In Persian). Bamber, E. M., & Iyer, V. M, (2002). Big 5 auditors’ professional and organizational. identification: Consistency or conflict?, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 21(1): 21–38. Bamber, E. M., & Iyer, V. M, (2007), Auditors' identification with their clients and its effect on auditors' objectivity, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 26(2): 1-24. Bozeman D. P, Perrewe P, L., Hochwarter W, A., Brymer R, A, (2001), Organizational politics, perceived control, and work outcomes: Boundary conditions on the effects of politics, J Appl Soc Psychol , 31(3): 486-503. Bell, T. B., Peecher, M. E. & Solomon, I, (2005), The 21st century public company audit: conceptual elements of KPMG’s global audit methodology. New York: KPMG LLP. Bouffard-Bouchard, T, (1990), Influence of self-efficacy on performance in a cognitive task, The Journal of Social Psychology, 130(3): 353–363. Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S, (2006), Teachers' self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students' academic achievement: A study at the school level, Journal of School Psychology, 44(6): 473–490. Carmichael, D. R. & Craig, J. L, (1996), Proposal to say the ‘‘F’’ word in auditing standards, The CPA Journal, 66 (6): 22-38. Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D, (2001), Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale, Organizational Research Methods, 4(1): 62–83. Davari, A. & Rezazadeh, A, (2013), Structural Equation Modeling with PLS Software, Jahad University Press, Tehran, Second Edition. (In Persian) Dalton, T., & Kelley, T, (1997), A comparison of dysfunctional behaviours by tax accountants and auditors under time budget pressure, Advances in Accounting, 15: 193-208. De Bruin, M, (2004), Organizational, professional and gender identities: overlapping, coinciding and contradicting realities in Caribbean media practices, in de Bruin, M. and Ross, K, (Eds), Gender and Newsroom Cultures: Identities at Work, Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ, 1-16. De Cremer, D., & Van Vugt, M, (1999), Social identification effects in social dilemmas: a transformation of motives. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(7): 871-893. Dianati Deylami, Z., & Ghafraian Moghaddam, M, (2016), Evaluating the relationship between Green Supply Chain and the value of firms listed on Tehran Stock Exchange, Journal of Financial Accounting Knowledge, 3(1): 47-67. (In Persian) Djaddang, S., Lyshandra, sh., Wulamdjani, H., Sulistiawarni, E, (2018), The Relationship between Self-Efficacy towards Audit Quality with Individualism Culture As Mediates: Evidence from Indonesia, The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 5(04): 4577-4583 Fu, H., Tan, H, T., Zhang, J, (2011), Effect of Auditor Negotiation Experience and Client Negotiating Style on Auditors’ Judgments in an Auditor-Client Negotiation Context, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(3): 225-237. Gholamrezaee, M., hasani, M, (2018), The Role of Auditors’ Mindset, Moral Values and Behavioral Deviations on Their Professional Skepticism, Applied Research in Financial Reporting, 6(2): 47-84. (In Persian). Glover, S. M., Prawitt, D. F, (2013), Enhancing Auditor Professional Skepticism. Available at: http: //www.thecaq.org/docs/research/skepticismreport.pdf. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E, (2010), Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Hassas Yeganeh, Y., Babajaani, J., Barzideh, F., and Biglar, k, (2017), Contingent Factors Influencing Negotiation to Resolve Auditor's Discord with Owner on How to Report Financial Statements, Journal of Audit knowledge, 17(67): 5-23. (In Persian). Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J, (2000), Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts, Academy of Management Review, 25(1):121-140. Hurtt, R. K, (2010), Development of a scale to measure professional skepticism, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29 (1): 149–171. Hurtt, R.K., Brown-Liburd, H., Earley, C.E. & Krishnamoorthy, G, (2013), Research on Auditor Professional Skepticism: Literature Synthesis and Opportunities for Future Research, A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(1): 45-97. Hulland, J, (1999), Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2): 195-204. International Federation of Accountants (IFAC), (2012), Handbook of International Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance, and Related Services Pronouncements. New York: IFAC. Lee, C., Welker, R. B. & Wang, T, (2013), An Experimental Investigation of Professional Skepticism in Audit Interviews, International Journal of Auditing, 17(2): 213-226. Markus, H., & Wurf, E, (1987), The dynamic self-concept: a social psychological perspective, Annual Review of Psychology, 38: 299-337. McCracken, S., S. Salterio, and R. Schmidt, (2011), Do managers intend to use the same negotiation strategies as partners?, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 23 (1): 425. McMillan, J. J. & White, R. A, (1993), Auditors’ belief revisions and evidence search: The effect of hypothesis frame, confirmation and professional skepticism, The Accounting Review, 68 (3): 443-465. Mehrani, S., & Eskandar, H, (2017), Explaining of Modeling the Auditor- Client Negotiations Paradigm Concerning Financial Reporting. Empirical Research in Accounting, 6(2):143-170. (In Persian). Nelson, M, (2009), A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28 (2): 1-34. Paino, H., Thani, A., & Zulkarnai, S.I, (2011), Organisational and Professional Commitment on DysfunctionalAudit Behaviour, British Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 1(2): 94-105. Parker, S. K, (1998), Enhancing role breadth self‐efficacy: The roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions, Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6): 835–852. Petriglieri, G. and Petriglieri, J.L, (2010), Identity workspaces: the case of business schools, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9 (1) : 44-60 Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P, (2003), Common method bias in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88; 879-903. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), (2008), Proposed auditing standards related to the auditor’s assessment of and response to risk and conforming Amendments to PCAOB standards. PCAOB Release No. 2008- 006. Stamford, CT: PCAOB. Quadackers, L., Groot, T. & Wright, A, (2014), Auditors’ Professional Skepticism: Neutrality versus Presumptive Doubt, Contemporary Accounting Research, 31 (3): 639-657. Rajab Ali Zadeh, J., Hesarzadeh, R., Bagher Pour, M, (2016), An Investigation of the Relationship between Two Dimensions of Presumptive Doubt and Professional Skepticism With Professional Judgment of an Auditor, Accounting and Auditing Review, 23(2): 173-192. (In Persian). Rezaiee, N., Banimahd, B., and Hosseiny, H, (2018), The Impact of Organizational and Professional Identity on Professional Audit Doubt, Journal of Audit knowledge, 71(2): 175-199. (In Persian). Riggs, M., & Knight, P. A, (1994), The impact of perceived group success-failure on motivational beliefs and attitudes: A causal model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79: 755–766. Sanchez, M. H., C. P. Agoglia, and R. C. Hatfield, (2007), The effect of auditors’ use of a reciprocity-based strategy on auditor-client negotiations, The Accounting Review, 82 (1): 241–263. Stefaniak, C. M., Houston, R. W., & Cornell, R. M, (2012), The effects of employer and client identification on internal and external auditors' evaluations of internal control deficiencies, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 31(1): 39-56. Svanberg, J., Ohhman, P., Neidermeyer, P, E, (2018), Auditor objectivity as a function of auditor negotiation self-efficacy beliefs, Advances in Accounting, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2018.10.001. Svanberg, J., Ohhman, P., Neidermeyer, P, E, (2018), Auditor objectivity as a function of auditor negotiation self-efficacy beliefs, Advances in Accounting, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2018.10.001. Van Knippenberg, D., Haslam, S. A., & Platow, M. J, (2004), Work group diversity and work group identification: Diversity as an aspect of group identity. Paper presented at the 11th European Congress of Work and Organizational Psychology, Lisbon, Portugal. Wan-Huggins, V. N., Riordan, C. M., & Griffeth, R. W, (1998), The development and longitudinal test of a model of organizational identification, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(8): 724-749. Watson, T.J, (2008), Managing identity: identity work, personal predicaments and structural circumstances, Organization, 15 (1) :121-143. Youssef, C. M., & Luthans, F, (2005), A positive organizational behavior approach to ethical performance, Positive Psychology in Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility, 1–22. yuosefi, M., banimahd, B,(2019), Impact of individual emotions on the auditor's objectivity, Journal of Financial Accounting Knowledge, 6(1):163-185. (In Persian) | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 636 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 502 |