اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 312 |
| تعداد مقالات | 2,571 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 2,863,788 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,158,235 |
Exploring Novice and Experienced Iranian EFL Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices regarding Classroom Interactional Competence and Uncovering Reasons behind Their Belief-Practice Misalignment | ||
| Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 9، شماره 3، مهر 2022، صفحه 131-158 اصل مقاله (1.15 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: research paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/jmrels.2022.16814.2021 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Majid Nemati1؛ Seyed Reza Dashtestani2؛ Ahmad Izadi* 3 | ||
| 1Associate Professor, Faculty of Foreign Languages and Literatures, University of Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, University of Tehran, Faculty of Foreign Languages & Literature | ||
| 3University of Tehran | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 02 بهمن 1400، تاریخ بازنگری: 11 فروردین 1401، تاریخ پذیرش: 17 فروردین 1401 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Due to its significance in language teaching and learning, research on teachers’ classroom interactional competence (CIC) is well-visited in L2 classroom research; however, exploring EFL teachers’ beliefs about CIC and their actual instructional practices is a completely under-researched area. Accordingly, this study aimed to explore this belief-practice relationship in light of the role of teaching experience. To this end, 258 novice and experienced English teachers filled out a questionnaire about CIC. Then six teachers (three per group) were observed for 4 sessions, and the observed classes were video-recorded for following stimulated recall sessions. The results of the quantitative data analysis showed that novice and experienced teachers had significantly different beliefs with regard to maximizing interactional space, effective use of gestures, and increased awareness of unwillingness to participate (UTP). On the other hand, the results of the classroom observations and stimulated recall sessions indicated that although the two groups’ pedagogical practices were different from each other, the relationship between their beliefs and practices was not straightforward, and their practices were affected by internal and external factors at micro and macro levels including contextual factors, educational system, and constraints. The paper finally discusses implications for second language teachers and teacher educators by highlighting the significance of teachers’ reflective practice and their participation in CIC development workshops. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Classroom Interactional Competence (CIC)؛ Effective Use of Gestures؛ Increased Awareness of UTP؛ Maximizing Interactional Space؛ Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| بررسی باورها و عملکرد معلمان کم‌تجربه و باتجربه زبان انگلیسی ایرانی در ارتباط با توانش تعاملی کلاسی و پی بردن به دلایل عدم تطابق باورها و عملکرد آنها | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| مجید نعمتی1؛ سید رضا دشتستانی2؛ احمد ایزدی3 | ||
| 1دانشیار آموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشکده زبانها و ادبیات خارجی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2استادیار آموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشکده زبانها و ادبیات خارجی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران | ||
| 3دانشگاه تهران | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| به دلیل اهمیت توانش تعاملی کلاسی معلمان در آموزش و یادگیری زبان، مطالعات زیادی در مورد این موضوع در حوزه تحقیقات کلاسی انجام گرفته شده است. با این حال، بررسی باورهای معلمان زبان انگلیسی در مورد توانش تعاملی کلاسی و اقدامات آموزشی آنها در کلاس درس حوزه‌ای کاملاً جدید است. بر این اساس، مطالعه حاضر با هدف بررسی این رابطه‌ی باور-عمل با توجه به نقش تجربه‌ی تدریس انجام شد. بدین منظور 258 معلم کم‌تجربه و باتجربه زبان انگلیسی پرسشنامه‌ای در مورد توانش تعاملی کلاسی را تکمیل کردند. سپس شش معلم (سه نفر در هر گروه) به مدت چهار جلسه مشاهده شدند و کلاس های مشاهده شده برای جلسات یادآوری فرآیند فکری به صورت ویدئویی ضبط شدند. نتایج تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌های کمی نشان داد که معلمان مبتدی و باتجربه باورهای متفاوتی در خصوص به حداکثر رساندن فضای تعاملی، استفاده مؤثر از حرکات بدن و افزایش آگاهی نسبت به عدم تمایل دانش آموزان به مشارکت داشتند. از سوی دیگر، نتایج مشاهدات کلاسی و جلسات یادآوری فرآیند فکری نشان داد که اگرچه شیوه‌های آموزشی دو گروه با یکدیگر متفاوت است، رابطه‌ی بین باورها و عملکرد معلمان مستقیم نبود و عملکردشان تحت تأثیر عوامل درونی و بیرونی در سطوح خرد و کلان شامل عوامل زمینه‌ای، سیستم آموزشی و محدودیت ها بود. این پژوهش در انتها پیامدهایی را برای معلمان و مربیان معلمان مطرح می‌کند و اهمیت اقدام تفکری معلمان و شرکت کردن آنها در کارگاه های پیشرفت توانش تعاملی کلاسی را مورد تاکید قرار می دهد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| توانش تعاملی کلاسی, استفاده موثر از حرکات بدن, افزایش هوشیاری نسبت به عدم تمایل دانش آموزان به مشارکت, افزایش فضای تعامل به بالاترین سطح, باورها و رفتارهای معلمان | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
References
Ahmadianzadeh, B., Seifoori, Z., & Hadidi Tamjid, N. (2020). Exploring EFL teachers’ beliefs about and practices of learner autonomy across experience and licensure. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(2), 97-113.
Akbari, R., Behzadpoor, F., & Dadvand, B. (2010). Development of English language teaching reflection inventory. System, 38(2), 211-227.
Allen, L. Q. (2002). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and the standards for foreign language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 35(5), 518-529.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2018). Introduction to research in education. Cengage Learning.
Ashkani, P., Shabani, M. B., Karimi, M. N., & Esfandiari, R. (2021). Correspondence between EFL teachers’ cognitive and behavioral manifestations of pedagogical beliefs: The moderating role of teacher grit. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills), 40(4), 35-60.
Atai, M. R., & Taherkhani, R. (2018). Exploring the cognitions and practices of Iranian EAP teachers in teaching the four language skills. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 36, 108-118.
Basturkmen, H. (2012). Review of research into the correspondence between language teachers’ stated beliefs and practices. System, 40(2), 282-295.
Borg, S. (1999). Studying teacher cognition in second language grammar teaching. System, 27(1), 19-31.
Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81-109.
Borg, S. (2015). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Borg, S., & Al-Busaidi, S. (2012). Teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding learner autonomy. ELT Journal, 66(3), 283-292.
Borko, H., & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 473-498.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Brock, C. A. (1986). The effects of referential questions on ESL classroom discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 20(1), 47-59.
Brown, H. D. (2002). English language teaching in the “post-method” era: Toward better diagnosis, treatment, and assessment. In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 9-18). Cambridge University Press.
Burns, A. (1992). Teacher beliefs and their influence on classroom practice. Prospect, 7(3), 56-66.
Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 709-725). Macmillan.
Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 255-296). Macmillan.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002). Research methods in education. Routledge.
Crookes, G., & Arakaki, L. (1999). Teaching idea sources and work conditions in an ESL program. TESOL Journal, 8(1), 15-19.
Ebsworth, M. E. (1997). What researchers say and practitioners do perspectives on conscious grammar instruction. Applied Language Learning, 8(2), 237-260.
Fallah, N., & Nazari, M. (2019). L2 teachers’ beliefs about corrective feedback: The mediating role of experience. English Teaching & Learning, 43(2), 147-164.
Farrell, T. S. (2013). Reflecting on ESL teacher expertise: A case study. System, 41(4), 1070-1082.
Farrell, T. S. (2015). Reflective language teaching: From research to practice. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Farrell, T. S., & Bennis, K. (2013). Reflecting on ESL teacher beliefs and classroom practices: A case study. RELC Journal, 44(2), 163-176.
Farrell, T. S., & Ives, J. (2015). Exploring teacher beliefs and classroom practices through reflective practice: A case study. Language Teaching Research, 19(5), 594-610.
Farrell, T. S., & Lim, P. C. P. (2005). Conceptions of Grammar Teaching: A Case Study of Teachers’ Beliefs and Classroom Practices. TESL-EJ, 9(2), 1-13.
Flores, B. B. (2001). Bilingual education teachers’ beliefs and their relation to self-reported practices. Bilingual Research Journal, 25(3), 275-299.
Freeman, D. (2001). Second language teacher education. In D. Nunan & R. Carter (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (pp. 72-79). Cambridge University Press.
Freeman, D. (2002). The hidden side of the work: Teacher knowledge and learning to teach. A perspective from North American educational research on teacher education in English language teaching. Language Teaching, 35(1), 1-13.
Gahin, G. H. M. A. (2001). An investigation into EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices in Egypt: An exploratory study [Doctoral dissertation, University of Exeter, UK].
Gatbonton, E. (2008). Looking beyond teachers’ classroom behaviour: Novice and experienced ESL teachers’ pedagogical knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 161-182.
Gholami, L. (2021). Incidental corrective feedback provision for formulaic vs. Non-formulaic errors: EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language Awareness, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2021.1943421
Goldouz, E., & Baleghizadeh, S. (2021). Exploring tensions between novice and experienced EFL teachers’ written corrective feedback beliefs and practices. Language Related Research, 12(3), 347-376.
Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach English. Pearson Education.
Housner, L. D., & Griffey, D. C. (1985). Teacher cognition: Differences in planning and interactive decision making between experienced and inexperienced teachers. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 56(1), 45-53.
Johnson, K. E. (1992). Learning to teach: Instructional actions and decisions of preservice ESL teachers. TESOL Quarterly, 26(3), 507-535.
Kagan, D., & Tippins, T. (1992). Implications of research on teacher beliefs. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65-90. Kane, R., Sandretto, S., & Heath, C. (2002). Telling half the story: A critical review of research on the teaching beliefs and practices of university academics. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 177-228.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (1994). The postmethod condition:(E)merging strategies for second/foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 27-48.
Li, L. (2013). The complexity of language teachers’ beliefs and practice: One EFL teacher’s theories. The Language Learning Journal, 41(2), 175-191.
Li, L. (2017). Social interaction and teacher cognition. Edinburgh University Press.
Li, L., & Walsh, S. (2011). ‘Seeing is believing’: Looking at EFL teachers’ beliefs through classroom interaction. Classroom Discourse, 2(1), 39-57.
Li, W., & Zou, W. (2017). A study of EFL teacher expertise in lesson planning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 231-241.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Mansour, N. (2009). Science teachers’ beliefs and practices: Issues, implications and research agenda. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(1), 25-48.
Matsumoto, Y., & Dobs, A. M. (2017). Pedagogical gestures as interactional resources for teaching and learning tense and aspect in the ESL grammar classroom. Language Learning, 67(1), 7-42.
Mok, W. E. (1994). Reflecting on reflections: A case study of experienced and inexperienced ESL teachers. System, 22(1), 93-111.
Mullock, B. (2006). The pedagogical knowledge base of four TESOL teachers. The Modern Language Journal, 90(1), 48-66.
Norouzian, R. (2015). Does teaching experience affect type, amount, and precision of the written corrective feedback?. Journal of Advances in English Language Teaching, 3(5), 93-105.
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.
Pennycook, A. (1989). The concept of method, interested knowledge, and the politics of language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 23(4), 589-618.
Richards, J. C. (1998). Teacher beliefs and decision making. In J. C. Richards (ed.), Beyond training (pp. 65-85). Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. Temple Smith.
Sepehrinia, S., Fallah, N., & Torfi, S. (2020). English language teachers’ oral corrective preferences and practices across proficiency groups. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 22(2), 163-177.
Sert, O. (2011). A micro-analytic investigation of claims of insufficient knowledge in EAL classrooms. [Doctoral dissertation, Newcastle University, UK].
Sert, O. (2013, March 16-19). (Un) willingness to participate as participants’ concern: Reconsidering research on motivation in applied linguistics. American Association for Applied Linguistics 2013 Conference, Dallas, Texas, the United States.
Sert, O. (2015). Social interaction and L2 classroom discourse. Edinburgh University Press.
Taherkhani, R. (2019). A nationwide study of Iranian language teachers’ and content teachers’ cognitions and practices of collaborative EAP teaching. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 7(2), 121-139.
Tercanlioglu, L. (2001). Pre-service teachers as readers and future teachers of EFL reading. TESL-EJ, 5(3), 1-17.
Tsui, A. (2003). Understanding expertise in teaching: Case studies of ESL teachers. Cambridge University Press.
Üstünel, E., & Seedhouse, P. (2005). Why that, in that language, right now? Code‐switching and pedagogical focus. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(3), 302-325.
Van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy and authenticity. Longman.
Walsh, S. (2003). Developing interactional awareness in the second language classroom through teacher self-evaluation. Language Awareness, 12(2), 124-142.
Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating classroom discourse. Routledge.
Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. Routledge.
Walsh, S. (2013). Classroom discourse and teacher development. Edinburgh University Press.
Wang, L., Lee, I., & Park, M. (2020). Chinese university EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices of classroom writing assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100890
Westerman, D. A. (1991). Expert and novice teacher decision making. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 292-305.
White, J., & Lightbown, P. M. (1984). Asking and answering in ESL classes. Canadian Modern Language Review, 40(2), 228-243.
Woods, D. (1996). Teacher cognition in language teaching: Beliefs, decision-making and classroom practice. Cambridge University Press.
Young, T. J., & Sachdev, I. (2011). Intercultural communicative competence: Exploring English language teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language awareness, 20(2), 81-98.
Yu, S., Xu, H., Jiang, L., & Chan, I. K. I. (2020). Understanding Macau novice secondary teachers’ beliefs and practices of EFL writing instruction: a complexity theory perspective. Journal of Second Language Writing, 48, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100728
Ziegler, G., Durus, N., Sert, O., & Family, N. (2015). Multilingual practices in ELT classrooms: The case of Luxembourg. In C. Jenks & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), International perspectives on ELT classroom interaction (pp. 188-207), Palgrave Macmillan. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 263 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 232 |
||