اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 19 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 380 |
| تعداد مقالات | 3,141 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,263,384 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,858,427 |
A Path Analysis of Autonomy Supportive Teaching, EFL Learners’ Willingness to Communicate, Self-regulation, Academic Engagement, and Perceived Locus of Control | ||
| Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 9، شماره 4، دی 2022، صفحه 25-49 اصل مقاله (1.21 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: research paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/jmrels.2022.16948.2032 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| saeedeh Javidkar؛ hoda Divsar* ؛ Masoud Saeedi؛ Ali Hadavizadeh | ||
| Department of Linguistics and Foreign Languages, Payame Noor University (PNU), Tehran, Iran | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 04 اسفند 1400، تاریخ بازنگری: 22 اردیبهشت 1401، تاریخ پذیرش: 24 اردیبهشت 1401 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The current study investigated whether autonomy-supportive teaching (AST) could predict EFL learners’ willingness to communicate (WTC), self-regulation (SR), academic engagement (AE), and perceived locus of control (LOC). To this end, 120 intermediate EFL learners were selected based on convenience sampling. To ensure the participants’ familiarity with autonomy supporting strategies, they received instruction based on Reeve’s (2009) model in 18 sessions. Oxford Quick Placement Test, Learning Climate Questionnaire, Willingness to Communicate Questionnaire, Academic Self-regulated Learning Scale, Academic Engagement Questionnaire, and Index of Internal Locus of Control were utilized to gather the data. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was evaluated on path coefficient estimates, t-value, the effect sizes (f2), and the coefficient of determination (R2). The overall model fit SRMR < 0.080 < HI95 supported the postulated model. The f2 values for the weight of the magnitude effect size predicted a significant effect size in the structural model. The results of R2 revealed significant positive paths from AST to SR, AE, WTC, and LOC implying that the observants merged in coalition with each other in a contingent context to predict the viability of autonomy-supportive teaching. Further significant paths were identified from SR to WTC and AE, and from AE and the LOC to WTC. The findings also indicated that AE and SR indirectly influence learners’ WTC via LOC. The study offers theoretical and pedagogical implications to EFL teachers and students. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Academic-engagement؛ Autonomy-supportive teaching؛ Perceived locus of control؛ Self-determination theory؛ Willingness to communicate | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| تحلیل مسیر تدریس حمایتی خودمختاری بر تمایل فراگیران زبان انگلیسی به برقراری ارتباط، خودتنظیمی، مشارکت تحصیلی، و منبع کنترل درک شده | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| سعیده جاویدکار؛ هدی دیوسر؛ مسعود سعیدی؛ علی هادوی زاده | ||
| گروه زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی ، دانشگاه پیام نور ،تهران ،ایران | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| مطالعه حاضر به بررسی رابطه ی پیش بینی کننده ی تدریس حمایتی خودمختار (AST)، تمایل زبان آموزان زبان انگلیسی برای برقراری ارتباط (WTC)، خودتنظیمی (SR)، درگیری تحصیلی (AE) و منبع کنترل درک شده (LOC) را می پردازد. بدین منظور 120 زبان آموز زبان انگلیسی متوسطه بر اساس نمونه گیری تصادفی انتخاب شدند. برای اطمینان از آشنایی شرکت‌کنندگان با استراتژی‌های حمایت از خودمختاری، بر اساس مدل ریو (2009) در 18 جلسه آموزش دریافت کردند. برای جمع‌آوری داده‌ها از آزمون قرارگیری سریع آکسفورد، پرسش‌نامه اقلیم یادگیری، پرسش‌نامه تمایل به برقراری ارتباط، مقیاس یادگیری خودتنظیمی تحصیلی، پرسش‌نامه مشارکت تحصیلی، و شاخص منبع کنترل داخلی استفاده شد. مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری حداقل مربعات جزئی (PLS-SEM) بر اساس تخمین‌های ضریب مسیر، t-value، اندازه‌های اثر (f2)، و ضریب تعیین (R2) مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. مقادیر f2 برای وزن اندازه اثر بزرگی، اندازه اثر قابل‌توجهی سازه‌ها را در مدل ساختاری پیش‌بینی کرد. نتایج R2 مسیرهای مثبت قابل توجهی را از AST به WTC، SR، AE، و LOC نشان داد که متغیرها در ائتلاف با و بر یکدیگر در یک زمینه احتمالی برای پیش‌بینی قابلیت تدریس حمایت از خودمختاری ارتباط داشتند. مسیرهای دیگری از SR به WTC و AE و از AE و LOC به WTC منتهی می‌شوند، پیدا شدند. یافته ها همچنین نشان داد که AE و SR می توانند به طور غیرمستقیم WTC فراگیران را از طریق میانجیگری LOC تحت تاثیر قرار دهند. این مطالعه مفاهیم نظری و آموزشی را برای معلمان زبان انگلیسی، دانش‌آموزان و سیاست‌گذاران زبان انگلیسی ارائه می‌کند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| مشارکت تحصیلی, آموزش حمایتی خودمختار, منبع کنترل ادراک شده, نظریه خودتعیین, خودتنظیمی, تمایل به برقراری ارتباط | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aghayani, B. (2021). Learner autonomy and internal locus of control in EFL context. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 4(2), 2021–2038.
Aghayani, B. & Hajmohammadi, E. (2019). Internal locus of control as a predictor of EFL learners’ autonomy. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 185–196.
Assor, A. (2012). Allowing choice and nurturing an inner compass: Educational practices supporting students’ need for autonomy. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 421-439). Springer.
Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(2), 740–756.
Carver C., Jung D., Gurzynski-Weiss L. (2021). Examining learner engagement in relationship to learning and communication mode, in Hiver P., Al-Hoorie A. H., Mercer S. (Eds.). Student engagement, the language classroom (pp. 210-229). Multilingual Matters.
Chen, Y. L. E., & Kraklow, D. (2015). Taiwanese college students’ motivation and engagement for English learning in the context of internationalization at home: A comparison of students in EMI and Non-EMI programs. Journal of Studies in International Education, 19(1), 46-64.
Chin, R. (1998). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(1), 189-217.
Darasawang, P. & Reinders, H. (2021). Willingness to communicate and second language proficiency: A correlational study. Educational Science, 11(2), 500–517.
Davoudi Filabadi, M. (2011). The effect of self-regulation learning strategies on self-regulation skills, academic engagement, and test anxiety in third-year high school girls [Master’s thesis, University of Shiraz].
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. A. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, perspectives on motivation (pp. 237–288). University of Nebraska Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘‘what’’ and ‘‘why’’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(3), 227–268.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. The University of Rochester Press.
Dincer, A., Yesilyurt, S., & Takkac, M. (2012). The effects of autonomy-supportive climates on EFL learner’s engagement, achievement, and competence in English speaking classrooms. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46(7), 3890–3894.
Dincer, A., & Yesilyurt, S. (2017). Motivation to speak English: A self-determination theory perspective. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 53(3), 1–25.
Dincer, A., Yesilyurt, S., Noels, K., & Lascano, V. (2019). Self-determination and classroom engagement of EFL learners: A mixed-methods study of the self-system model of motivational development. Sage, 9(12), 1–15.
Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2009). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Routledge.
Duchatelet, D., & Donche,V. (2019). Fostering self-efficacy and self-regulation in higher education: a matter of autonomy support or academic motivation? Higher Education Research & Development, 38(4), 1–15.
Duttweiler, P. C. (1984). The internal control index: A newly developed measure of locus of control. Education and Psychological Measurement, 44(4), 209–221.
Fallah, N. (2014). Willingness to communicate in English, communication self-confidence, motivation, shyness and teacher immediacy among Iranian English-major undergraduates: A structural equation modeling approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 30(4), 141–147.
Garson, G. D. (2016). Partial least squares: Regression and structural equation models. Associates Publishers.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2020). IBM SPSS Statistics 26 Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference (16th ed.). Routledge.
Hair, Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage.
Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A.H., & Mercer, S. (Eds.) (2021). Student engagement in the language classroom. Multilingual Matters.
Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2016). Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learning and Instruction, 43(2), 27-38.
Joe, H., Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2017). Classroom social climate, self-determined motivation, willingness to communicate, and achievement: A study of structural relationships in instructed second language settings. Learning and Individual Differences, 53(3), 133–144.
Karimi, N., & Abaszadeh, A. (2017). Autonomy-supportive teaching, willingness to communicate in English, motivation, and English-Speaking self-efficacy among EFL Learners: A structural equation modeling study, Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20(2), 113– 156.
Kaur, A., Hashim, R. A., & Norman, M. (2014). Teacher autonomy support: Does it hinder motivation among Thai students? Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 11(6), 171–189.
Kaur, A., Awang Hashim, R., & Noman, M. (2015). Teacher autonomy support intervention as a classroom practice in a Thai school e a self-determination theory perspective. Journal for Multicultural Education, 9(1), 10 –27.
Khajavi, G. H., Ghonsooly, B., Fatemi, A., & Choi, C. (2016). Willingness to communicate in English: A microsystem model in the Iranian EFL classroom context. TESOL Quarterly, 50(1), 154–180.
Khatib. M., & Nourzadeh. S. (2015): Development and validation of an instructional willingness to communicate questionnaire, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural, 36(3), 266–283.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. The Guilford Press.
Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma‐exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227–261.
MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., & Conrod, S. (1998). Willingness to communicate, social support, and language-learning orientations of immersion learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(3), 369–388.
Magno, D. (2010). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(11), 497–529.
Montazeri. V. H. (2017). The effect of self-regulatory learning strategies on academic engagement and task value. World Family Medicine, 2(10), 242–247.
Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (2021). The link between different facets of willingness to communicate, engagement, and communicative behavior in task performance. In K. Budzińska, & O. Majchrzak (Eds.), Positive psychology in second and foreign language education (pp. 95–113). Springer.
Noels, K. A. (2015). Supporting students’ self-determined motivation to learn languages. Contact, 41(4), 21–32.
Noels, K. A., Vargas Lascano, D. I., & Saumure, K. (2019). The development of self-determination across the language course: Trajectories of motivational change and the dynamic interplay of psychological needs, orientations, and engagement. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(4), 821–851.
Noels, K. A., Chaffee, K. E., Lou, N. M., & Dincer, A. (2016). Self-determination, engagement, and identity in learning German: Some directions in the psychology of language learning motivation. Fremdsprachen Lehren und Lernen, 45(2), 12–29.
Oga-Baldwin, W. L. Q., & Nakata, Y. (2015). Measuring and defining autonomy-supportive teaching in Japanese elementary foreign language classes. Japanese Psychological Research, 57(7), 167–179.
Pae, T. (2011). A study on the structural model of willingness to communicate in the L2. English Teaching, 66(3), 307–327.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. The Guilford Press.
Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159–175.
Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149-172). York Press.
Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579–595.
Reeve, J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Self-Determination theory: A dialectical framework for understanding socio-cultural influences on student motivation. In D. M. Mclnerney, & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Big Theories Revisited (pp. 31-60). Information Age Press.
Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Barch, J., & Jeon, S. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(4), 147–169.
Reeve, J., Nix, G., & Hamm, D. (2003). Testing models of the experience of self-determination in intrinsic motivation and the conundrum of choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 375–392.
Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257–267.
Ryan, R.M., & Connell, J.P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(2), 749–761.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2008). A self-determination theory approach to psychotherapy: The motivational basis for effective change. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 186 –193.
Sarstedt, M., Diamantopoulos, A., Salzberger, T., & Baumgartner, P. (2016a). Selecting single items to measure doubly-concrete constructs: A cautionary tale. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3159–3167.
to measure doubly-concrete constructs: A cautionary tale. Journal of Business Research, 69(8),
3159–3167.
Wang, J., Ng, B., Liu, W., & Ryan R. M. (2016). Can being autonomy-supportive in teaching improve students’ self-regulation and performance? In L. W. Chia, J. Wang, R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Building autonomous learners: perspectives from research and practice using self-determination theory (pp. 227-243). Springer.
Williams, G. C., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 767–779.
Yashima, T. (2012). Willingness to communicate: Momentary volition that results in L2 behavior. In S. Mercer, M. Williams, & S. Ryan (Eds.), Psychology for language learning: Insights from research, theory, and practice (pp. 119–135). Palgrave.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 424 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 477 |
||