تعداد نشریات | 19 |
تعداد شمارهها | 380 |
تعداد مقالات | 3,143 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,283,161 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,870,524 |
Differential Effects of Input/Output Tasks on Learning English Collocations by Iranian EFL Learners Through the Corpus-Based Instruction | ||
Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies | ||
دوره 9، شماره 4، دی 2022، صفحه 143-168 اصل مقاله (1.14 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/jmrels.2022.17054.2040 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Mohammad Oveidi1؛ Mehrdad Sepehri* 2؛ Sajad Shafiee3 | ||
1English Department, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran, | ||
2English Department, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran | ||
3Department of English, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran | ||
تاریخ دریافت: 04 فروردین 1401، تاریخ بازنگری: 28 خرداد 1401، تاریخ پذیرش: 04 تیر 1401 | ||
چکیده | ||
Learning of English collocations has been found quite demanding for many language learners in general and for the Iranian EFL learners in particular. Recent second language educators have proposed two crucial perspectives for teaching collocations: the corpus-based view and the traditional methods. This study examined the mixed effects of explicit instruction, collaborative output, pushed output, corrective feedback, and visual input enhancement through a set of corpus-based instructional materials for the learning of English collocations. Using a quasi-experimental research design, the data were obtained through a pretest, a posttest, and a delayed posttest. Participants included 125 intermediate EFL students, who were assigned to 4 experimental (E1, E2, E3, and E4) groups and 1 control group (n = 25 for each group). Fifty collocations were selected as the teaching materials in both control and experimental groups. Experimental groups were taught the collocations through corpus-based materials, and the control group was taught through a conventional method. One-way ANOVA and a series of post hoc Scheffé tests were performed on the obtained data. Results indicated that all the combined procedures had positive effects on the learning of the English collocations. Also, the results showed that all the experimental groups could retain their collocational knowledge. Final conclusion led us to the idea that the input-output and corpus-based instructions were the learners’ strategies in solving the problem of understanding the collocations. The results may also have some pedagogical implications for ESL/EFL practitioners, too: The input-based and output-based instructions can assist L2 teachers to employ successful techniques to raise their learners’ knowledge of collocations. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Corpus-Based Instruction؛ Input/Output Instruction؛ English Collocations | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
تأثیرات متفاوت تکالیف ورودی/خروجی بر یادگیری همایندهای انگلیسی زبانآموزان ایرانی زبان انگلیسی از طریق آموزش مبتنی بر پیکره | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
محمد عویدی1؛ مهرداد سپهری2؛ سجاد شفیعی3 | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
یادگیری همایندهای انگلیسی برای بسیاری از زبان آموزان به طور کلی و برای زبان آموزان ایرانی (EFL ) به طور بسیار دشوار است. اخیراً مربیان زبان دوم دو دیدگاه مهم را برای آموزش لغات همایند پیشنهاد کردهاند: دیدگاه مبتنی بر پیکره و روشهای سنتی. این مطالعه اثرات ترکیبی آموزش صریح، خروجی مشارکتی، خروجی تحت فشار، بازخورد اصلاحی، و افزایش ورودی بصری را از طریق مجموعهای از مواد آموزشی مبتنی بر پیکره برای یادگیری لغات همایند زبان انگلیسی بررسی کرد. با استفاده از طرح پژوهشی نیمه تجربی، داده ها از طریق پیش آزمون، پس آزمون و پس آزمون با تأخیر به دست آمد. شرکتکنندگان شامل 125 دانشآموز زبان انگلیسی سطح متوسط بودند که در 4 گروه آزمایشی (E1، E2، E3، و E4) و 1 گروه کنترل (25 نفر برای هر گروه) قرار گرفتند. در هر دو گروه کنترل و آزمایش، 50 کلمه همایند به عنوان مواد آموزشی انتخاب شدند. گروههای آزمایشی از طریق مواد مبتنی بر پیکره و گروه کنترل با روش مرسوم، همایندها را آموزش دادند. ANOVA یک طرفه و یک سری آزمون post hoc Scheffé بر روی داده های به دست آمده انجام شد. نتایج نشان داد که تمامی رویه های ترکیبی تأثیر مثبتی بر یادگیری همایندهای انگلیسی داشتند. همچنین، نتایج نشان داد که تمامی گروههای آزمایشی توانستند دانش همایندهای خود را حفظ کنند. نتیجهگیری نهایی ما را به این ایده هدایت کرد که روش های آموزشی ورودی-خروجی و پیکره محور، استراتژیهای فراگیران در حل مشکل درک همایندها هستند. نتایج همچنین ممکن است پیامدهای آموزشی برای فعالان عرصع آموزش زبان انگلیسی نیز داشته باشد. آموزش های مبتنی بر ورودی و خروجی میتواند به معلمان زبان دوم کمک کند تا از تکنیکهای موفقی برای بالا بردن دانش فراگیران خود در مورد لغات همایند استفاده کنند. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
آموزش مبتنی بر پیکره, آموزش مبتنی بر داده های ورودی / خروجی, لغات همایند انگلیسی | ||
مراجع | ||
References
Agah, M., & Soori, A. (2015). Comparative study of collocation among the languages. Language in India, 15(1), 527-537.
Altun, H. (2021). The learning effect of corpora on strong and weak collocations: implications for corpus-based assessment of collocation competence. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 8(3), 509-526. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.845051
Aston, G. (2000). Corpora and language teaching. In L. Burnard and T. McEnery (Eds), Rethinking language pedagogy from a corpus perspective: Papers from the Third International Conference on Teaching and Language Corpora (pp. 7-17). Peter Lang.
Basal, A. (2019). Learning collocations: Effects of online tools on teaching English adjective‐noun collocations. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 342-356. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12562
Binkai, J. (2012). An empirical study on corpus-driven English vocabulary learning China. English Language Teaching, 5(4), 131-137. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n4p131
Bazzaz, F. E., & Samad, A. A. (2011). The Use of Verb Noun Collocations in Writing Stories among Iranian EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 158-163.
Boulton, A., & Cobb, T. (2017). Corpus Use in Language Learning: A Meta-Analysis. Language Learning, 67(2), 348-393. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12224
Corbeil, G. (2005). Effectiveness of focus-on-form instruction. The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 27-46.
Cao, D., & Badger, R. (2021). Cross-linguistic influence on the use of L2 collocations: the case of Vietnamese learners. Applied Linguistics Review. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2020-0035
Chan, A. Y. W., & Li, D. C. S. (2002). Form-focused remedial instruction: an empirical study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 24-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00023
Choi, S. (2017). Processing and learning of enhanced English collocations: An eye movement study. Language Teaching Research, 21(3), 403–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816653271
Eguchi, M. & Kyle, K. (2020). Continuing to explore the multidimensional nature of lexical sophistication: The case of oral proficiency interviews. The Modern Language Journal, 104(2), 381–400.
Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2012). Language teaching research and language pedagogy. John Wiley & Sons.
Erturk, E. (2013). The impact of intellectual property policies on ethical attitudes toward Internet piracy. Knowledge Management: An International Journal, 12(1), 101-109. https://doi.org/ 10.18848/2327-7998/cgp/v12i01/50790
Fakher Ajabshir, Z. (2020). Teaching second language collocations via concordances: The case of deductive and inductive approaches. Journal of Foreign Language Research, 10(2), 362-375. doi: 10.22059/jflr.2020.303435.731
Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T. (2017). Collocations in corpus‐based language learning research: Identifying, comparing, and interpreting the evidence. Language Learning, 67(S1), 155–179. doi:10.1111/lang.12225
Gholami, N., & Farvardin, M. T. (2017). Effects of input-based and output-based instructions on Iranian EFL learners’ productive knowledge of collocations. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 6(3), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.3p.123
González Fernández, B., & Schmitt, N. (2015). How much collocation knowledge do L2 learners have? ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 166(1), 94-126. https://doi.org/ 10.1075/itl.166.1.03fer
Hamed Mahvelati, E., & Mukundan, J. (2012). The effects of input flood and consciousness-raising approach on collocation knowledge development of language learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 1(6), 182-192. https://doi.org/10.7575/ ijalel.v.1n.6p.182
Hulstijn, J. H., & Laufer, B. (2001). Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 51(3), 539-558. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00164
Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
Hunt, A., & Beglar, D. (2005). A framework for developing EFL reading vocabulary. Reading in Foreign Language, 17(1), 23-59.
Kyle, K., & Crossley, S. A. (2015). Automatically assessing lexical sophistication: Indices, tools, findings, and application. TESOL Quarterly, 49(4), 757-786.
Lee, L. (2002). Synchronous online exchanges: A study of modification devices on nonnative discourse. System, 30(3), 275-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0346-251x (02)00015-5
Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). John Benjamins. Malekshahi, N., & Amini Harsini, M. (2017). The effect of input-based and output-based tasks on the intermediate Iranian EFL learners’ writing achievement in terms of coherent writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 7(1), 184–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.1p.184
Malmir, A., & Yousof, Q. (2019). The integration of explicit instruction and implicit meaning-focused experience for L2 vocabulary development: The comparative effect of time sequence. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 37(4), 71–108. DOI: 10.22099/jtls.2019.34651.2730
McCarthy, M., & O’Dell, F. (2005). English collocations in use: How words work together for fluent and natural English: Self-study and classroom use. Cambridge University Press.
Namaziandost, E., Dehkordi, E. S., & Shafiee, S. (2019). Comparing the effectiveness of input-based and output-based activities on productive knowledge of vocabulary among pre-intermediate EFL learners. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 4(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-019-0065-7
Nassaji, H., & Tian, J. (2010). Collaborative and individual output tasks and their effects on learning English phrasal verbs. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 397-419.
Naseri, E., & Khodabandeh, F. (2019). Comparing the impact of audiovisual input enhancement on collocation learning in traditional and mobile learning contexts. Applied Research on English Language, 8(3), 383-422.
Naserpour, A., Zarei, A., & Esfandiari, R. (2020). The effects of task orientation and involvement load on learning collocations. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 39(1), 71-114. doi: 10.22099/jtls.2020.37032.2809
Nguyen, T. M., & Webb, S. (2017). Examining second language receptive knowledge of collocation and factors that affect learning. Language Teaching Research, 21(3), 298-320. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1362168816639619
O’Dell, F., & McCarthy, M. (2008). English collocations in use. Cambridge University Press.
Park, Y., & Warschauer, M. (2016). Syntactic enhancement and second language literacy: An experimental study. Language Learning & Technology, 20(3), 180-199. http://dx.doi.org/10125/44488
Rutherford, W., & Sharwood Smith, M. (1988). Grammar and second language teaching: A Book of Readings. Newbury House.
Saito, K. (2020). Multi‐or single‐word units? The role of collocation use in comprehensible and contextually appropriate second language speech. Language Learning, 70(2), 548-588.
Saudin, H. (2014). The realization of collocation in EFL students’ written texts across three proficiency levels. In the Proceedings of the 61st TEFLIN International Conference. Book (Vol. 1, pp. 367-370).
Sepehri, M. (2015). The effects of data-driven learning on Iranian EFL learners’ writing skills development (Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham).
Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language Learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129
Shah, M. I., Singh, K. S., & Amreet, K. (2020). Role of collocation in lexical behavior of foreign language learners: a corpus-based study of Pakistani English learners. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(2), 1955-1963.
Sinclair, J. (2003). Corpora for lexicography. In P. V. Sterkenberg (Ed.), A practical guide to lexicography (pp. 167-179). John Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.6.21sin
Sonbul, S., & El-Dakhs, D. (2020). Timed versus untimed recognition of L2 collocations: Does estimated proficiency modulate congruency effects? Applied Psycholinguistics, 41(5), 1197-1222. https://doi.org/10.1017/s014271642000051x
Tavakoli, P., & Uchihara, T. (2020). To what extent are multiword sequences associated with oral fluency? Language Learning, 70(2), 506-547.
Thornbury, S. (2004). How to teach vocabulary. Pearson Education Limited.
Toomer, M., & Elgort, I. (2019). The development of implicit and explicit knowledge of collocations: A conceptual replication and extension of Sonbul and Schmitt (2013). Language Learning, 69(2), 405-439. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12335
Winke, P. M. (2013). The effects of input enhancement on grammar learning and comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(2), 323–352. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000903
Wu, S., Witten, I., & Franken, M. (2010). Utilizing lexical data from a web-derived corpus to expand productive collocation knowledge. ReCALL, 22(1), 83-102.
Zaabalawi, R. S., & Gould, A. M. (2017). English collocations: A novel approach to teaching the language’s last bastion. Ampersand, 4, 21-29. doi:10.1016/j.amper.2017.03.002 | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 413 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 513 |