تعداد نشریات | 19 |
تعداد شمارهها | 380 |
تعداد مقالات | 3,143 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,279,972 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,866,868 |
The Role of Motivational Strategies on Young EFL Learners’ Basic Psychological Needs: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective | ||
Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies | ||
مقاله 1، دوره 10، شماره 1، فروردین 2023، صفحه 1-23 اصل مقاله (910.93 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: research paper | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/jmrels.2022.17055.2042 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Narges Sardabi* ؛ Mehrnoosh Kia؛ Amir ghajarieh | ||
TEFL Department, Ershad Damavand University, Tehran, Iran | ||
تاریخ دریافت: 05 فروردین 1401، تاریخ بازنگری: 21 تیر 1401، تاریخ پذیرش: 28 تیر 1401 | ||
چکیده | ||
Abstract Enhancing young learners’ motivation has often been a primary concern in teaching English as a foreign language (EFL). Adopting a self-determination perspective, this study attempted to examine the impact of teacher's motivational strategies on young EFL learners' basic psychological needs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. The present research employed a mixed-methods design using data from questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, and reflective journals. A total of 30 EFL young learners were selected and assigned to two classes, an experimental group in which the implementation of motivational strategies was studied and a control group. Four motivational strategies namely generating initial motivation, creating the basic motivational conditions, encouraging positive self-evaluation, and maintaining and protecting motivation were instructed in the experimental group. At the end of the treatment, all the participants filled out two questionnaires: The Student Questionnaire on Motivational Strategies Effectiveness and The Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale. Also, semi-structured interviews were conducted with the young learners of the experimental group. The results revealed that motivational strategies impacted young learners' basic psychological needs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness positively. Additionally, the qualitative data from the interviews and reflective journals shed more light on the young learners’ autonomy, competence, and their relatedness. Findings have implications for EFL teachers and materials designers. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Autonomy؛ Competence؛ Motivational Strategies؛ Relatedness؛ Young Learners | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
نقش استراتژی های انگیزشی بر نیازهای اساسی روانشناختی کودکان زبان آموز بر اساس نظریه خود تعیین گری | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
نرگس سردابی؛ مهرنوش کیا؛ امیر قاجاریه | ||
گروه آموزش زبان، دانشگاه ارشاد دماوند، تهران، ایران. | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
چکیده افزایش انگیزه کودکان همواره یکی از مهمترین دغدغه ها در تدریس زبان انگلیسی بوده است. مطالعه حاضر با اتخاذ نظریه خودتعیینگری در نظر داشت تا تاثیر استراتژی های انگیزشی را بر نیازهای بنیادین کودکان زبان آموز شامل نیاز به خودمختاری، شایستگی و احساس تعلق بررسی کند. علاوه بر این، تاثیر استراتژی های انگیزشی بر یادگیری لغت زبان آموزان کودک مورد مطالعه قرار گرفت. در این مطالعه از طرح پژوهشی آمیخته استفاده شد که در آن داده ها از طریق پرسشنامه، مصاحبه های نیمه ساختاریافته و یادداشتهای فکورانه معلم جمع آوری شدند. برای انجام تحقیق، 30 کودک زبان آموز انتخاب شدند و به دو کلاس تقسیم شدند: گروه آزمایشی که در آن استراتژی های انگیزشی تدریس شد، و گروه شاهد. در گروه آزمایشی چهار استراتژی انگیزشی زیر تدریس شد: ایجاد انگیزه اولیه، فراهم آوردن شرایط اولیه انگیزه، تشویق به خودارزیابی مثبت، و حفظ انگیزه. در پایان دوره هر دو گروه پرسشنامه تاثیر استراتژی های انگیزشی و پرسشنامه نیازهای بنیادین روانشناختی را تکمیل کردند. همچنین با زبان آموزان گروه آزمایشی مصاحبه هایی انجام شد. یافته ها نشان داد که استراتژی های انگیزشی تاثیر مثبتی بر نیازهای بنیادین روانشناختی خودمختاری، شایستگی و احساس تعلق در کودکان زبان داشته است. نتایج حاصل از مصاحبه ها و یادداشتهای فکورانه ابعاد بیشتری از خودمختاری، شایستگی و احساس تعلق در کودکان زبان را نشان داد. یافته ها پیشنهاداتی برای معلمین زبان انگلیسی و طراحان مطالب درسی دارد. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
خودمختاری, شایستگی, استراتژی های انگیزشی, احساس تعلق, کودکان زبان آموز | ||
مراجع | ||
Alamer, A. (2022). Basic psychological needs, motivational orientations, effort, and vocabulary knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(1), 164-184.
Alamer, A., & Lee, J. (2019). A motivational process model explaining L2 Saudi students’ achievement of English. System, 87, 102133. doi:10.1016/j.system.2019.102133
Boo, Z., Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). L2 motivation research 2005–2014: Understanding a publication surge and a changing landscape. System, 55, 145-157.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Cheng, H. F., & Dörnyei, Z. (2007). The use of motivational strategies in language instruction: The case of EFL teaching in Taiwan. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 153-174.
Chen, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers, W., Boone, L., Deci, E. L., Van der Kaap-Deeder, J., Duriez, B., Lens, W., Matos, L., Mouratidis, A., Ryan, R. M., Sheldon, K. M., Soenens, B., Van Petegem, S., & Verstuyf, J. (2014). Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 39(2), 216-236.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2014). Autonomy and need satisfaction in close relationships: Relationships motivation theory. In N. Weinstein (Ed.), Human motivation and interpersonal relationships. (pp. 53-73). Springer.
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). New themes and approaches in second language motivation research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 43-59.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation (2nd ed.). Longman.
Ezzy, D. (2002). Qualitative analysis: Practice and innovation. Routledge.
Fried, L. J., & Konza, D. M. (2013). Using self-determination theory to investigate student engagement in the classroom. The International Journal of Pedagogy and Curriculum, 19(2), 27–40. DOI: 10.18848/2327-7963/CGP/v19i02/48898
Garton, S., Copland, F., & Burns, A. (2011). Investigating global practices in teaching English to young learners. ELT Research Papers, 11(1), 1-24.
Guilloteaux, M. J., & Dörnyei, Z. (2008). Motivating language learners: A classroom‐oriented investigation of the effects of motivational strategies on student motivation. TESOL Quarterly, 42(1), 55-77.
Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2016). Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learning and Instruction, 43, 27-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.002
Jiang, A. L., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). University teachers’ teaching style and their students’ agentic engagement in EFL learning in China: a self-determination theory and achievement goal theory integrated perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 704269. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.704269
Joe, H. K., Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2017). Classroom social climate, self-determined motivation, willingness to communicate, and achievement: A study of structural relationships in instructed second language settings. Learning and Individual Differences, 53, 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.11.005
King, R. B., & McInerney, D. M. (2014). Culture’s consequences on student motivation: Capturing cross-cultural universality and variability through Personal Investment Theory. Educational Psychologist, 49(3), 175-198.
Lambert, C., Philp, J., & Nakamura, S. (2017). Learner-generated content and engagement in second language task performance. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 665-680.
Littlewood, W. (1999). Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts. Applied linguistics, 20(1), 71-94.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Blackie, R. A. (2012). Action control, motivated strategies, and integrative motivation as predictors of language learning affect and the intention to continue learning French. System, 40(4), 533-543.
Mercer, S. (2019). Language learner engagement: Setting the scene. In: X. Gao (Ed.), Second Handbook of English Language Teaching (pp. 643–660). Springer.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
Moskovsky, C., Alrabai, F., Paolini, S., & Ratcheva, S. (2013). The effects of teachers’ motivational strategies on learners’ motivation: A controlled investigation of second language acquisition. Language Learning, 63(1), 34-62.
Muñoz, A., & Ramirez, M. (2015). Teachers’ conceptions of motivation and motivating practices in second-language learning: A self-determination theory perspective. Theory and Research in Education, 13(2), 198-220.
Nakamura, S., Phung, L., & Reinders, H. (2021). The effect of learner choice on L2 task engagement. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(2), 428-441.
Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133-144.
Noels, K. A., Clément, R., & Pelletier, L. G. (1999). Perceptions of teachers’ communicative style and students’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. The Modern Language Journal, 83(1), 23-34.
Noels, K. A., Pelletier, L. G., Clément, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (2003). Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self‐determination theory. Language Learning, 53(S1), 33-64.
Oga-Baldwin, W. L., & Nakata, Y. (2015). Structure also supports autonomy: Measuring and defining autonomy-supportive teaching in Japanese elementary foreign language classes. Japanese Psychological Research, 57(3), 167-179.
Oga-Baldwin, W. Q., Nakata, Y., Parker, P., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Motivating young language learners: A longitudinal model of self-determined motivation in elementary school foreign language classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 140-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.01.010
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Designing qualitative studies. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3, 230-246.
Printer, L. (2021). Student perceptions on the motivational pull of teaching proficiency through reading and storytelling (TPRS): A self-determination theory perspective. The Language Learning Journal, 49(3), 288-301.
Reeve, J., & Shin, S. H. (2020). How teachers can support students’ agentic engagement. Theory Into Practice, 59(2), 150-161.
Rudy, D., Sheldon, K. M., Awong, T., & Tan, H. H. (2007). Autonomy, culture, and well-being: The benefits of inclusive autonomy. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(5), 983-1007.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. Doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self‐regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self‐determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1557-1586.
Safdari, S. (2018). Iranian EFL learners’ perception of the importance and frequency of teachers’ motivational strategies. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 17-25.
Saldana, J. (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
Sugita McEown, M., & Takeuchi, O. (2014). Motivational strategies in EFL classrooms: How do teachers impact students’ motivation?. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 20-38.
Tian, L., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Learner engagement with automated feedback, peer feedback and teacher feedback in an online EFL writing context. System, 91, 102-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102247
Ushioda, E. (Ed.). (2013). International perspectives on motivation. Palgrave Macmillan.
Williams, M., & Burden, R. (1997). Motivation in language learning: A social constructivist approach. Cahiers de l’APLIUT, 16(3), 19-27.
Wong, R. M. (2014). An investigation of strategies for student motivation in the Chinese EFL context. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 132-154. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 534 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 903 |