اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 19 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 380 |
| تعداد مقالات | 3,131 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,251,721 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,846,060 |
آموزش مستقیم کلاس-محور در مقابل آموزش معکوس وب‌کوئست-محور: به سوی تمرین موثرتر نگارش (مقاله لاتین) | ||
| پژوهش نامه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیر فارسی زبانان | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 11، (2)- ویژه نامه مقالات CALL ، زبان شناسی و آموزش زبان - شماره پیاپی 24، مهر 1401، صفحه 53-74 اصل مقاله (663.82 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/jtpsol.2023.17688.1607 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| فاطمه نامی* | ||
| نویسندۀ مسئول، استادیار گروه زبانهای خارجی، دانشگاه صنعتی امیرکبیر | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 15 مرداد 1401، تاریخ بازنگری: 02 آذر 1401، تاریخ پذیرش: 10 بهمن 1401 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| نگارش، یکی از چالش‌برانگیزترین مهارت‌های زبانی برای معلّم‌ها و زبان‌آموزان است. بهعنوان یکی از مهارت‌های تولیدی زبان، پیشرفت مناسب نگارش، نیازمند زمان و تمرین کافی است. ویژگی‌هایی که بهطور معمول، در کلاس‌های سنتی ارائه‌محور زبان دوم یا خارجی تأمین نمی‌شوند. درنتیجه، توانایی فراگیرندگان در تولید نوشتاری، منسجم و پیوسته بهطور معمول، کمتر از بسندگی کلی زبانی آن‌هاست. طرح کلاس‌های وارونه که فراگیرندگان را قادر می‌سازند در فعالیت‌های جستار محور؛ مانند وب‌کوئست‌ها، پیش از کلاس شرکت نمایند، می‌توانند راه حلی برای این مشکل باشند. معکوس نمودن ترتیب آموزش و تمرین به معلّم، امکان اختصاص زمان بیشتر برای تعامل ساختارمند و تمرین فراگیرندگان در محیط کلاس را می‌دهد. ویژگی‌هایی که بهطور ویژه می‌توانند برای پیشرفت مهارت نگارش، موثر باشند. مقالة حاضر، به گزارش پژوهشی تجربی، بر تاثیر آموزش و تمرین نگارش در کلاس معکوس وب‌کوئست–محور، بر توانایی فراگیرندگان، برای تولید مقاله‌های چندپاراگرافی منسجم می‌پردازد. تحلیل داده‌های به دست آمده از مقاله‌های نوشته شده از سوی فراگیرندگان در گروههای کنترل و تجربه، پیش و پس از تحقیق، حاکی از این امر بود که با وجود اثربخشی هر دو روش تحقیق، فراگیرندگان در کلاس وارونه، مقالات بلندتری حاوی نشانگرهای متعدّد و گوناگون انسجام متنی؛ مانند واژه‌های مرجع، جانشین، حذف به قرینه، کلمات ربط و انسجام واژگانی، به رشتة تحریر درآوردند. نتایج، نشانگر این نکته است که اگر یادگیری جستارمحور، بیرون از کلاس، با تعامل و تمرین ساختارمند درونکلاسی همراه شود، می‌تواند بسندگی نوشتاری فراگیرندگان را بهتر بهبود بخشد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| وب کوئست‌ها؛ کلاس وارونه؛ آموزش نگارش؛ فراگیرندگان زبان انگلیسی بهعنوان زبان خارجی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Direct Classroom- Versus Flipped WebQuest-Based Instruction: Toward a More Productive Writing Practice | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Fatemeh Nami | ||
| Corresponding Author, Department of Foreign Languages, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Writing is one of the most challenging language skills for both teachers and language learners. As a productive language skill, writing needs ample time and practice to be effectively developed, requirements that are not usually satisfied in conventional lecture-based second or foreign language classrooms. In effect, learners’ ability to produce cohesive and coherent texts usually lags behind their general language proficiency. Inverted classroom designs that enable learners to be engaged in inquiry-oriented activities such as WebQuests prior to classroom meetings might be solutions to this problem. Reversing the order of instruction and practice enables teachers to dedicate more in-class time to systematic interaction and learner practice which can be particularly fruitful for writing skill development. This paper reports an experimental study on the possible impact of flipped WebQuest-oriented writing instruction and practice on foreign language learners’ ability to produce cohesive multi-paragraph essays. Analyzing the data obtained from pre- and post-treatment essays written by language learners in control and experimental groups (N = 20 each), we observed that while both treatments were productive, learners in the flipped classroom produced longer essays containing more frequent and diverse markers of cohesion namely reference words, substitution, ellipsis, conjunctions, and lexical cohesion. The results indicate that when inquiry-based learning outside of the classroom setting is coupled with systematic in-class interaction and practice, it can better enhance learners’ writing proficiency. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| WebQuests, flipped classroom, writing instruction, EFL learners | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ahmed, A. H. (2010). Students’ problems with cohesion and coherence in EFL essay writing in Egypt: Different perspectives. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal (LICEJ), 1(4), 211-221.
Ahmed, H. O. K. (2016). Flipped learning as a new educational paradigm: An analytical critical study. European Scientific Journal, 12(10), 417-444. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n10p417
Andujar, A., & Nadif, F. Z. (2020). Evaluating an inclusive blended learning environment in EFL: A flipped approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(5-6), 1138-1167. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1774613
Awada, G., Burston, J., & Ghannage, R. (2020). Effect of student team achievement division through WebQuest on EFL students’ argumentative writing skills and their instructors’ perceptions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), 275-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1558254
Awada, G., & Diab, H. (2018, July). Effect of WebQuest media on learners’ intercultural communication debate and motivation [Paper presentation]. The XIXth International CALL Conference: CALL your Data, Bruges, Belgium. www.call2018.org
Aydin, S. (2016). WebQuests as language-learning tools. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 765–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1061019
Bailey, E., & Powell, P. (2007). The practical writer with readings. Cengage Learning.
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International society for technology in education.
Bikowski, D., & Vithanage, R. (2016). Effects of web-based collaborative writing on individual L2 writing development. Language Learning & Technology, 20(1), 79–99. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/february2016/bikowskivithanage.pdf
Blau, I., & Shamir-Inbal, T. (2017). Re-designed flipped learning model in an academic course: The role of co-creation and co-regulation. Computers & Education, 115, 69-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.014
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 17(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
Chuo, T. W. I. (2007). The effects of the WebQuest writing instruction program on EFL learners’ writing performance, writing apprehension, and perception. TESL Electronic Journal, 11(3), 1–2.
Crowhurst, M. (1987). Cohesion in argument and narration at 3 grade levels. Research in the Teaching of English, 21(2), 185-201.
Dodge, B. (1995). WebQuests: A technique for Internet-based learning. Distance Educator, 1(2), 10-13.
Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2018). An exploration into the impact of WebQuest-based classroom on EFL learners’ critical thinking and academic writing skills: A mixed methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(5-6), 617–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1449757
Ekmekci, E. (2017). The flipped writing classroom in Turkish EFL context: A comparative study on a new model. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(2), 151-167.
Fathi, J., & Rahimi, M. (2020). Examining the impact of flipped classroom on writing complexity, accuracy, and fluency: A case of EFL students. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(7), 1668-1706. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1825097
Georgakpoulou, A., & Goutsos, D. (2004). Discourse analysis and introduction. Edinburgh University Press.
Haghighi, H., Jafarigohar, M., Khoshsima, H., & Vahdany, F. (2019). Impact of flipped classroom on EFL learners' appropriate use of refusal: achievement, participation, perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(3), 261-293. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1504083
Halat, E. (2008). A good teaching technique: WebQuests. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 81(3), 109-112. https://doi.org/10.3200/TCHS.81.3.109-112
Halliday, M., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.
Hsieh, J. S. C., Huang, Y. M., & Wu, W. C. V. (2017). Technological acceptance of LINE in flipped EFL oral training. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 178-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.066
Huang, B., & Hew, K. F. (2018). Implementing a theory-driven gamification model in higher education flipped courses: Effects on out-of-class activity completion and quality of artifacts. Computers & Education, 125, 254-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.018
Hung, H. T. (2015). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.967701
Johnstone, B. (2008). Discourse analysis. Blackwell Publishing.
Kelly, R. (2000). Working with WebQuests. Teaching Exceptional Children, 32(6), 4-13.
Kvashnina, O. S., & Martynko, E. A. (2016). Analyzing the potential of flipped classroom in ESL teaching. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 11(03), 71-73. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i03.5309
Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100, 126-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.006
Liang, W., & Fung, D. (2020). Development and evaluation of a WebQuest-based teaching programme: Students’ use of exploratory talk to exercise critical thinking. International Journal of Educational Research, 104, 101652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101652
Liu, J., & Braine, G. (2005). Cohesive features in argumentative writing produced by Chinese undergraduates. System, 33(4), 623-636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.02.002
Mohamed, H., & Lamia, M. (2018). Implementing flipped classroom that used an intelligent tutoring system into learning process. Computers & Education, 124, 62-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.011
Nami, F., Marandi, S. S., & Sotoudehnama, E. (2016). CALL teacher professional growth through lesson study practice: an investigation into EFL teachers' perceptions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 658-682. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1016439
Nami, F., Marandi, S. S., & Sotoudehnama, E. (2018). Interaction in a discussion list: An exploration of cognitive, social, and teaching presence in teachers’ online collaborations. ReCALL, 30(3), 375-398. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344017000349
Putri, N. L. P. N. S., Artini, L. P., & Nitiasih, P. K. (2017). Project-based learning activities and EFL students' productive skills in English. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(6), 1147-1155. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0806.16
Rostami Abusaeedi, A. A. (2010). Use of cohesive ties in English as a foreign language students’ writing. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 2(1), 137-156.
Salkie, R. (1995). Text and discourse analysis. Routledge.
Samadian, S., & Mohseny, A. (2019). Analysis of cohesion and coherence in writing performance of Iranian intermediate EFL learners. Issues in Language Teaching, 8(2), 213-242. https://doi.org/10.22054/ilt.2019.21262.193
Santikarn, B., & Wichadee, S. (2018). Flipping the classroom for English language learners: A study of learning performance and perceptions. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(9), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i09.7792
Sharpe, P. J. (2005). How to prepare for the TOEFL. Barron.
Thompson, G. (2004). Introducing functional grammar. Arnold Publishers.
Tecedor, M., & Perez, A. (2021). Perspectives on flipped L2 classes: implications for learner training. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(4), 506-527. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1626439
Torres, I. P. (2007). WebQuest: A collaborative strategy to teach content and language (Vol. 1, pp. 1–15). University of Granada.
Tsai, Y. R. (2021). Promotion of learner autonomy within the framework of a flipped EFL instructional model: Perception and perspectives. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(7), 979-1011. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1650779
Vahid Dastjerdi, H., & Hayati Samian, S. (2011). Quality of Iranian EFL learners’ argumentative essays: Cohesive devices in focus. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2(2), 65-76.
Wang, F. H. (2019). On the relationships between behaviors and achievement in technology-mediated flipped classrooms: A two-phase online behavioral PLS-SEM model. Computers & Education, 142, 103653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103653
Webb, M., & Doman, E. (2020). Impacts of flipped classrooms on learner attitudes towards technology-enhanced language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), 240-274. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1557692
Wu, W. C. V., Yang, J. C., Scott Chen Hsieh, J., & Yamamoto, T. (2020). Free from demotivation in EFL writing: The use of online flipped writing instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(4), 353-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1567556
Zarinfard, S., Rahimi, M., & Mohseny, A. (2020). The impact of flipped classroom on EFL learners’ development of reading comprehension. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ), 14(2), 247-259.
Zou, D., & Xie, H. (2019). Flipping an English writing class with technology-enhanced just-in-time teaching and peer instruction. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1127-1142. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1495654 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 304 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 405 |
||