تعداد نشریات | 19 |
تعداد شمارهها | 379 |
تعداد مقالات | 3,116 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,235,934 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,833,359 |
آموزش معکوس زبان فارسی به غیرفارسیزبانان مبتنی بر نظریۀ مهارتآموزی (مقاله فارسی) | ||
پژوهش نامه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیر فارسی زبانان | ||
مقاله 11، دوره 11، (2)- ویژه نامه مقالات CALL ، زبان شناسی و آموزش زبان - شماره پیاپی 24، مهر 1401، صفحه 165-189 اصل مقاله (1.28 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/jtpsol.2023.17400.1591 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
علی کوهگرد* 1؛ رضامراد صحرایی2 | ||
1نویسندۀ مسئول، دانشجوی دکتری آموزش زبان فارسی به غیر فارسیزبانان، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی(ره) | ||
2استاد گروه زبانشناسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی(ره) | ||
تاریخ دریافت: 25 خرداد 1401، تاریخ بازنگری: 08 مهر 1401، تاریخ پذیرش: 26 مهر 1401 | ||
چکیده | ||
در کلاس معکوس، برخلاف کلاس سنتی، دریافت اطلاعات جدید و آموزش، در منزل و انجام تکالیف درسی در کلاس صورت میگیرد. در یادگیری معکوس نیز آموزش مستقیم، از فضای آموزش گروهی به فضای آموزش فردی منتقل میشود و درنتیجه فضای گروهی در کلاس، تبدیل به محیط آموزشیِ پویا و تعاملی میگردد و معلم بهجای ارائه درس در کنار زبانآموزان، آنها را برای بهکاربردن مفاهیم و تعامل خلّاقانه با موضوع آموزشی، راهنمایی میکند و زبانآموزان در فرایند یادگیری فعّال قرار میگیرند. در بین نظریههای زباندومآموزی، نظریة مهارتآموزی، نظریهای کاملاً روانشناختی است که ریشه در سه نوع روانشناسی رفتارگرا، شناختی و پیوندگرا دارد. این نظریه، اختصاص به زبانآموزی ندارد، بلکه برای تبیین فراگیری انواع مهارتها بهطور عام بهکار گرفته میشود. این پژوهش، کیفی و از نوع اقدامپژوهی عملی[1] است. هدف پژوهش، بررسی چگونگی اجرای رویکرد معکوس برای آموزش زبان است و به این دلیل، از بین نظریههای زباندومآموزی، نظریة مهارتآموزی در نظر گرفته شده است؛ لذا در این پژوهش، با مروری بر پیشینه و مبانی نظری، رویکرد معکوس و قالب نظریه مهارتآموزی، همسو شدن این دو رویکرد در اجرای آموزش معکوس زبان فارسی به عربزبانان سطح میانی، بهعنوان یک تجربة زیسته، بیان شده است. یافتههای پژوهش نشان داد که قالب نظریة مهارتآموزی برای اجرای رویکرد معکوس در آموزش زبان مناسب است. [1]. practical action research | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
رویکرد معکوس؛ نظریه مهارتآموزی؛ دانش بیانی؛ دانش روندی؛ خودکارشدگی | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Flipped Teaching Persian to Non-Persian Speakers Based on Skill Acquisition Theory | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Ali Koohgard1؛ Reza Morad Sahraei2 | ||
1Corresponding Author, PhD Candidate in Linguistics-Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, Allameh Tabataba’i University. | ||
2Professor of Linguistics,- Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, Allameh Tabataba’i University | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
In the flipped class, unlike in the traditional class, new information and instruction are given at home, and homework is done in class; In flipped learning, direct instruction is transferred from the group learning space to the individual learning space, and as a result, the group space in the classroom becomes a dynamic and interactive learning environment, and the teacher, Instead of presenting lessons, along with language learners, guides them to apply concepts and interact creatively with the subject matter; and learners are also involved in the active learning process. Among the theories of secondary language learning, the skill acquisition theory is a purely psychological theory that is rooted in three types of behavioral, cognitive and relational psychology. This theory is not specific to language acquisition but is commonly used to explain the acquisition of a variety of skills. This research is a qualitative and practical action research type. The purpose of this study is to investigate how to implement a filipped approach to language teaching; For this purpose, among the theories of secondary language acquisition, the skill acquisition theory has been considered. Therefore, in this study, by reviewing the literature and theoretical foundations of the flipped approach and the framework of the skill acquisition theory, the alignment of these two approaches in the implementation of flipped Persian language teaching to intermediate Arabic speakers as a lived experience has been expressed. Findings showed that the format of skill acquisition theory is suitable for implementing the flipped approach in language teaching. Extended Abstract: Today, with the advancement of technology and its popularity among the majority of language learners, the need to synchronize processes of language teaching and learning/acquisition with this progress has become more important. The widespread use of technology has become an integral part of the life of individuals (language learners), so providing technology-compatible language teaching materials encourages language learners to make optimal use of these teaching materials. Flipped approach is one of the new educational approaches that tries to employ technology in training and meet this need by optimally managing time and using active learning methods. This approach is often used in the format of two terms: flipped class and flipped learning. In the flipped class, student receive new information and training at home and homework is done in class. Additionally, in flipped learning, direct learning is transferred from the group learning space to the personal (/private) learning space; as a result, the group space becomes a dynamic and interactive learning environment, where the teacher guides language learners to apply concepts and interact creatively with the educational subject. The purpose of this study is to investigate how to implement a flipped approach to language teaching. For this purpose, from the theories of Second Language Acquisition, considering the properties of the flipped approach, it seems that the Skill Acquistion theory is a good framework for implementing such an approach in the second language acquistion. Therefore, in this research, we have implemented flipped approach in the framework of skill acquisition theory to teach Persian to speakers of other languages and explained in detail how it was implemented and the results as an experience. This research is a qualitative and practical action research type. So, the flipped implementation of teaching Persian language for intermediate Arab learners was planned virtually in May 2020. The course was designed as a four-skill course with more emphasis on reading skill. The classes were virtual, online and simultaneously on the Skyroom platform, three sessions per week (in three days) and each session was an hour and a half. To accurately record the implementation process, two types of portfolios were created: Teacher portfolio and language learner portfolio. In the Teacher Portfolio, a folder was created for each lesson to store and categorize the educational contents which were produced by the teacher. For each lesson, a pre-study file, a supplementary lesson presentation file, a homework file and the relevant audio and video files have been prepared and saved. Also, the teacher’s teaching method was recorded in each session for saving in the teacher's portfolio for future lesson analysis research. In addition, all teaching techniques and activities were recorded in the teacher's portfolio. For this course in the Edmodo platform, a backup system was designed at https://edmo.do/j/zkswyw with the login code "ciswyy". All language learners became members of this system with the help of the teacher, and each session, in addition to the files shared in WhatsApp application, they were simultaneously uploaded to Edmodo system. Assessment of learners' performance in the course was considered as a combination of formative and summative assessment. 40% of each learner's assessment was dedicated to their formative assessment and 60% of it was allocated to the final (/summative) assessment. At the end of the course, it was tried to adapt the final assessment to the conditions of the course and the characteristics of the flipped approach. The test was held in virtual form. Before the testing day, a file titled "Test Process" was shared in the WhatsApp group and backup system. The testing procedure was fully explained in that file so that no ambiguity remains for language learners. Findings of this study mentioned that due to the popularity of technology and the increasing use of learners in virtual and online environments and the compatibility of the flipped approach with this development, this approach is easily implemented and applicable, and in most cases was found pleasurable by language learners. Evidence from the course (class participation and pre-study and assignments) suggests that learners were more involved with the content during the implementation of this approach. In general, the benefits of flipped execution of this course can be listed as follows: Good interaction between teacher and learner. Appropriate and real-time feedback (both before and in class). Personalized and differentiated training of learners according to their needs. Transparency of the learning process and the participation of language learners in it and holding them accountable in this process. Keeping learners in sync with the assessment plan and their good participation in the assessment process. Appropriate output of learners' learning experience in the format of a portfolio. Complete the learning cycle and achieve deep learning. Very valuable experience for the teacher. By implementing the flipped approach in the framework of skill acquisition theory, the three stages a) contact and understanding of knowledge, b) acquisition and relative mastery, and c) deterministic mastery can be well implemented. In the deterministic mastery stage, the learner, with the support and experience that was gained from using language in the flipped classroom environment, can easily use the language in the authentic situations and achieve deterministic mastery. It seems that the learning cycle in the flipped approach can be considered as preparation <-> application <-> group discussion that is easily adapted to the first and second stages of the three stages of skill acquisition. On the other hand, by using the flipped approach to language teaching with participation activities in group discussion, practicing by doing and teaching others in the flipped classroom provides active learning conditions for language learners; moreover, according to Edgar Dale’s cone of experience, the lifespan rate of this type of learning grows to 90%. According to the researchers of this study, in the flipped implementation of the course, the implementation of the flipped approach in virtual had deprived us from some facilities and opportunities of this approach that can be best implemented in the classroom; however, a significant part of the objectives of each lesson and the goals of the course, which was to teach Persian language in a four-skill manner with a focus on reading skill as well as improving the level of language skills of learners, was achieved. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
flipped approach, skill acquisition theory, declarative knowledge, procedural knowledge, automaticity | ||
مراجع | ||
ایزدی، صمد؛ نجفنژاد، فاطمه، عزیزی و شمامی، مصطفی. (1399). تأثیـر اجرای رویکرد کلاس معکوس بر پیشرفت تحصیلی، انگیزه یادگیـری، احساس تعلّق، انگیزه پیشرفت و خودتنظیمی در مقایسه با رویکرد سنتی در بین دانشآموزان پایه ششم دوره ابتدایی. تدریسپژوهی، 8 (3)، 253- 282.
برگمن، جاناتان و سمز، ارون. (1395). یادگیری معکوس. ترجمه به فارسی از محمد فرحمند و مریم خانقاه. تهران: مرآت.
ثناگو، اکرم؛ عراقیان مجرد، فرشته و جویباری، لیلا. (۱۳۹۴). کلاس وارونه؛ شیوهای جدید و مناسب برای درس روش تحقیق. آموزش در علوم پزشکی. ۱۵ (۵۵)، 443 - 442.
جوادی، ناهید؛ پناه علی، امیر و علیوندی وفا، مرضیه. (1399). مقایسه اثربخشی روش آموزش کلاس معکوس و روش سخنرانی، بر اشتیاق تحصیلی دانشجویان. تدریسپژوهی. 8 (2)، 161- 176.
خیرآبادی، رضا. (1396). تأثیر راهبرد کلاس معکوس بر یادگیری بخش گرامر درس زبان انگلیسی پایه دهم تحصیلی. نوآوریهای آموزشی، 16 (64)، 141- 162 .
دهاقین، حمیده و حجازی، الهه. (1398). بررسی فرایند یادگیری و انگیزش در کلاس معکوس: مقاله مروری. رویش روانشناسی، 8 (11)، 158- 149 .
طوفانینژاد، احسان؛ هوشمندجا، منیژه و اللهکرمی آزاد. (1398). بررسی استفاده از رویکرد کلاس معکوس در آموزش عالی: یک مرور نظاممند. روانشناسی تربیتی. 15 (53)، 183- 224.
عبدی، علی. (1398). کلاس معکوس: کارآیی آموزشی و تأثیر آن بر عملکرد درسی و بار شناختی ادراک شده دانشجویان (مورد مطالعه: درس فناوری اطلاعات در روانشناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور). پژوهش در نظامهای آموزشی، 13(45)، 45-58.
قرطالی، احمد؛ رضاییزاده، مرتضی و علمالهدی، جمیله. (1399). شناسایی موانع بهکارگیری کلاس معکوس در آموزش عالی ایران. تدریس پژوهی، 8(4)، 212- 230.
کاویانی، حسن؛ لیاقتدار، محمدجواد؛ زمانی، بیبی عشرت و عابدینی، یاسمین. (1396 الف). فرایند یادگیری در کلاس معکوس: بازنمایی از برنامه درسی تجربه شده در آموزش عالی. مطالعات برنامه درسی آموزش عالی، 8(15)، 179- 214.
کاویانی، حسن؛ لیاقتدار، محمدجواد؛ زمانی، بیبی عشرت؛ عابدینی، یاسمین. (1396 ب). چارچوب نظری کلاس معکوس: ترسیم اشارههایی برای یادگیری فراگیرمحور. پژوهشنامه مبانی تعلیم و تربیت. 7(2)، 78- 59.
نعمتی، محبوبه. (1398). بررسی تأثیر روش یاددهی – یادگیری معکوس بر پیشرفت مهارت خواندن و نوشتن فارسیآموزان غیرفارسیزبان. پژوهشنامة آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسیزبانان، 8 (18)،251 - 266.
وحیدی، زهرا؛ پوشنه، کامبیز. (1397). تأثیر کلاس معکوس بر مهارتهای فراشناختی و انگیزش تحصیلی دانشآموزان هنرستان. فنآوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات در علوم تربیتی، 8 (3(31))، 141- 168.
References:
Abdi, A. (2019). The flipped classroom: Instructional efficiency and impact on Students' Perceived Cognitive load and Academic Performance (Case Study: The Information Technology Course in Psychology, Payame Noor University). Journal of Research in Educational Science, 13(45), 45-58. (in Persian)
AlKhoudary, Y. A., & AlKhoudary, J. A. (2019). The effectiveness of flipping classroom model on EFL secondary school speaking skills. Indonesian EFL Journal, 5(2), 1-10. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2014). Flipped learning. Translation: Mohammad Ataran & Maryam Farahmand Khanghah. Publisher: Meraat. (InPersian)
Dehaqin V, & Hejazi E. (2020). Investigating the Process of Learning and Motivation in the flipped classroom: Review Article. Rooyesh. 8 (11) :149-158. (in Persian)
Egbert, J. Herman, D., & Lee, H. (2015). Flipped Instruction in English Language Teacher Education: A Design based study in Complex, Open-ended Learning Environment. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language ,19(2).
Evseeva, A., & Solozhenko, A. (2015). Use of Flipped Classroom Technology in Language Learning. XV International Conference "Linguistic and Cultural Studies: Traditions and Innovations”, LKTI 2015, 9-11 November 2015, Tomsk, Russia.
Ezadi, S., Najafnezhad, F., & Azizi- Shomami, M. (2020). The Effect of Flipped Classroom Approach on Academic Achievement, Learning Motivation, Sense of belonging, Achievement Motivation, and Self-Regulation Compared to Traditional Approach among Elementary Sixth Grade Students. Research in Teaching, 8(3), 253-282. (in Persian)
Ghartali, A., Rezaei Zadeh, & M., Alamolhoda, G. (2020). Identifying barriers to using flipped class in Iranian higher education. Research in Teaching, 8(4), 212-230. (in Persian)
Hurtubise, L., Hall, E., Sheridan, L., & Han, H. (2015). The flipped classroom in medical education: engaging students to build competency. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 2, 35-43.
Javadi, N., Panah ali, A., & Alivandi Vafa, M. (2020). Comparison of the effectiveness of reverse class teaching method and lecture method on students' academic enthusiasm. Research in Teaching, 8(2), 161-176. (in Persian)
Kavyani, H., Liaghatdar, M., Zamani, B., & Abedini, Y. (2018). A Theoretical Framework of Flipped Classroom: Drawing Pointers for Learner-Centered Learning. Foundations of Education, 7(2), 59-78. (in Persian)
Kavyani, H., Liaghatdar, M., Zamani, B., & Abediny, Y. (2017). The Learning Process in the Flipped Classroom: A Representation of Experienced Curriculum in Higher Education. Journal of higher education curriculum studies, 8(15), 179-214. (in Persian)
Kheirabadi, R. (2017). The impact of flipped classroom model on teaching English grammar at 10th grade of high school. Educational Innovations, 16(4), 141-162. (in Persian)
Muldrow, Karen. (2013). A New Approach to Language Instruction- Flipping The Classroom. The Language Educator, 28-31.
Nemati, M. (2019). Investigating the Effect of Flipped Teaching-Learning Method on Persian Language Learners' Reading and Writing Skills. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 8(18), 251-266. (in Persian)
Nikitova, I., Kutova, S., & Shvets, T. (2020). “Flipped Learning” Methodology in Professional Training of Future Language Teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 19-31.
Sanagoo A, Araghian Mojarad F, & Jooybari L. (2015). Flipped Classroom: A New and Appropriate Teaching Method for The Research Course. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 15(55), 442-443. (in Persian)
Toofaninejad, E., Hooshmandja, M., & Alahkarami, A. (2019). Use of Flipped Classroom Approach in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Educational Psychology, 15(53), 183-224. (In Persian)
Vahidi, Z., & Poushaneh, K. (2018). Effectiveness of flipped Classroom on Meta-cognitive Skills and Educational Motivation in Conservatory Students. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 8(8(31)), 141-168. (In Persian)
VanPatten, B., & Williams, J. (2015). Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 400 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 424 |