اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 19 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 380 |
| تعداد مقالات | 3,121 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,250,687 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,844,920 |
The Impact of Peer Corrective Feedback on Extroverted and Introverted Iranian Elementary L2 Learners’ Reading Comprehension | ||
| Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 10، شماره 4، دی 2023، صفحه 87-111 اصل مقاله (1.05 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: research paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/jmrels.2023.17541.2095 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Afshin Mansouri Qadikolaei1؛ Amir Marzban* 2 | ||
| 1Allameh Mohaddes Nouri University, Nour, Mazandaran, Iran | ||
| 2Faculty member, Islamic Azad University, Qaemshahr, Mazandaran, Iran | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 20 تیر 1401، تاریخ بازنگری: 11 بهمن 1401، تاریخ پذیرش: 04 فروردین 1402 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| There seems to be a link between the type of corrective feedback students receive in the classroom and their personality styles. The current study investigated the effect of peer corrective feedback on the reading comprehension of extroverted and introverted Iranian elementary L2 learners. At first, a Quick Oxford Placement Test (QOPT) was used to select thirty-three elementary EFL students as participants. Then, based on their responses to the Persian translation of the Eysenck Personality Inventory (EPI) questionnaire, the participants were classified as extroverted and introverted learners. The participants were also divided into two groups; peer corrective feedback–extroverted learners and peer corrective feedback–introverted learners. In terms of the quantitative part of the study, a pre-test (a reading comprehension test), eight treatment sessions (peer corrective feedback sessions), and a post-test (the same as the pre-test) were administered in reading comprehension classes over the course of a semester. As the qualitative part of the study, there was an interview session to assess the participants’ attitudes towards the provision of peer corrective feedback. The quantitative data analysis results revealed that both groups benefited from the intervention. Although there was no statistically significant difference between the groups, introverted students outperformed extroverted ones. The findings of the qualitative data analysis revealed that the majority of the participants agreed with the provision of peer corrective feedback in reading comprehension classes. According to the study’s findings, using peer corrective feedback in reading comprehension courses improved both extroverted and introverted L2 learners’ reading comprehension. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Peer corrective feedback؛ Extroversion؛ Introversion؛ Reading Comprehension | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| تاثیر بازخورد اصلاحی توسط همکلاسی ها بر توانایی خواندن و درک مطﻠب زبان آموزان سطح مقدماتی برونگرا و درونگرای ایرانی | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| افشین منصوری قادیکلایی1؛ امیر مرزبان2 | ||
| 1دانشگاه علامه محدث نوری-نور-مازندران-ایران | ||
| 2عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد قائمشهر | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| به نظر میرسد بین نوع بازخورد اصلاحی که دانش‌آموزان در کلاس دریافت می‌کنند و سبک‌های شخصیت آن‌ها، ارتباط وجود دارد. تحقیق حاضر، تأثیر بازخورد اصلاحی توسط همکلاسی‌ها بر خواندن و درک مطلب زبان‌آموزان سطح مقدماتی برونگرا و درونگرای ایرانی را مورد بررسی قرار داده است. در ابتدا، از آزمون تعیین سطح آکسفورد برای انتخاب سی و سه نفر از زبان‌آموزان سطح مقدماتی به عنوان شرکت‌کننده استفاده شد. سپس شرکت‌کنندگان بر اساس نمرات خود در ترجمه فارسی پرسشنامه شخصیتی آیزنک به دو گروه زبان‌آموزان برونگرا و درونگرا طبقه‌بندی شدند. همچنین، شرکت‌کنندگان به دو گروه «زبان‌آموزان برون گرا و بازخورد اصلاحی توسط همکلاسی ها» و «زبان‌آموزان درون گرا و بازخورد اصلاحی توسط همکلاسی ها» تقسیم شدند. به منظور انجام بخش کمّی پژوهش، جلسه پیش آزمون (آزمون خواندن و درک مطلب)، هشت جلسه آموزش (جلسات بازخورد اصلاحی توسط همکلاسی‌ها) و جلسه پس آزمون (مشابه پیش آزمون) در کلاس‌های خواندن و درک مطلب در طول یک ترم برگزارشد. برای انجام بخش کیفی پژوهش نیز یک جلسه مصاحبه به منظور بررسی نگرش شرکت‌کنندگان در مورد بکارگیری بازخورد اصلاحی توسط همکلاسی‌ها انجام شد. نتایج آنالیز کمی داده‌ها نشان داده است که اقدامات انجام شده در جلسات آموزش برای هر دو گروه سودمند بوده است. اگرچه تفاوت آماری معناداری بین دو گروه مشاهده نشد، زبان‌آموزان درون گرا عملکرد بهتری نسبت به زبان‌آموزان برونگرا داشتند. نتایج آنالیز کیفی داده‌ها نشان داده است که بیشتر افراد شرکت‌کننده نظرات مثبتی در مورد بکارگیری بازخورد اصلاحی توسط همکلاسی‌ها داشتند. یافته‌های تحقیق حاضر اظهار دارد که بکارگیری بازخورد اصلاحی توسط همکلاسی‌ها در کلاس‌های خواندن و درک مطلب، توانایی خواندن و درک مطلب زبان‌آموزان برونگرا و درونگرا را بهبود می‌بخشد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| بازخورد اصلاحی توسط همکلاسی ها, برونگرایی, درونگرایی, خواندن و درک مطلب | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdorahimzadeh, S. (2014). Gender differences and EFL reading comprehension: Revisiting topic interest and test performance. System, 42, 70-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.11.008.
Adams, R. (2007). Do second language learners benefit from interacting with each other? In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 29–51). Oxford University Press.
Alavinia, P., & Sameei, A. (2012). Potential Bonds between Extroversion/Introversion and Iranian EFL Learners’ Listening Comprehension Ability. English Language Teaching, 5(5), 19-30.
Alderson, J.C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge University Press.
Al-Homoud, F., & Schmitt, N. (2009). Extensive reading in a challenging environment: A comparison of extensive and intensive reading approaches in Saudi Arabia. Language Teaching Research, 13(4), 383-401.
Alibakhshi, G. (2011). On the Impacts of Gender and Personality Types on Iranian EFL Teachers’ Teaching Efficacy and Teaching Activities Preferences. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 1-22.
Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method?. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3), 227-257.
Bell, T. (2001). Extensive reading: Speed and comprehension. The Reading Matrix, 1(1), 1–13.
Bruffee, K. A. (1984). Collaborative learning and the “conversation of mankind”. College English, 46(7), 635-652.
Caulk, N. (1994). Comparing teacher and student responses to written work. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 181-188.
Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2011). Learning by Reviewing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 73-84.
Davies, F. (1995). Introducing reading. Penguin English.
Dewaele, J. M., & Furnham, A. (2000). Personality and speech production: A pilot study of second language learners. Personality and Individual Differences, 28(2), 355-365.
Diab, N. M. (2010). Effects of peer-versus self-editing on students’ revision of language errors in revised drafts. System, 38(1), 85-95.
Durkin, D. (1993). Teaching them to read (6th Ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Ehrman, M. E. (1993). Ego boundaries revisited: Toward a model of personality and learning. In Alatis, J.E. (Ed.). Strategic interaction and language acquisition: theory, practice, and research (pp. 331-362). Georgetown University Press.
Ehrman, M. E., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). Cognition plus: Correlates of language learning success. The Modern Language Journal, 79(1), 67-89.
Elbow, P. (1973). Writing without teachers. Oxford University Press.
Elbow, P. (1981). Writing composing profess of twelfth graders. National Council of Teachers of English.
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Entwistle, N. J. & Wilson J. D. (1977). Degrees of Excellence: The Academic Achievement Game. Hodder & Stoughton, London.
Esfandiari, R. (2019). How predictable ratings are: The role of personality traits. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 6(3), 33-55.
Eysenck, H. J. (1965). Fact and Fiction in Psychology. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Eysenck, H. J. (1981). General features of the model. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), A model of personality (pp. 1-37). Springer-Verlag.
Eysenck, S. B., & Chan, J. (1982). A comparative study of personality in adults and children: Hong Kong vs. England. Personality and Individual Differences, 3(2), 153-160.
Foltz, P., Gilliam, S., & Kendall, S. (2014). Supporting content-based feedback in online writing evaluation with LSA. Interactive Learning Environments, 8(2), 111-129.
Gere, A. R. (1987). Writing groups: History, theory and implications. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 304-315.
Grabe, W. (1997). Reading research and its implications for reading assessment (Language Teaching Resource Center Paper). Northern Arizona University.
Grant, A. & Ashford, S.J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28(1), 3-34.
Hassan, B.A (2001). Extroversion/introversion and gender in relation to the English pronunciation accuracy of Arabic speaking college students. Report-Research Press.
Hedgcock, J. S. & Ferris, D. R. (2009) Teaching Readers of English: Students, Texts, and Contexts. Routledge.
HemmatNezhad, S., Jahandar, S., & Khodabandehlou, M. (2014). The impact of extraversion vs. introversion on Iranian EFL learners’ writing ability. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 4(1), 119-128.
Hjelle, L. A., & Ziegler, D. J. (1992). Personality theories: Basic assumptions, research, and applications. McGraw-Hill.
Boroujeni, A. A. J., Roohani, A., & Hasanimanesh, A. (2015). The impact of extroversion and introversion personality types on EFL learners’ writing ability. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(10), 212–218.
Kaplan, R. B. (2002). The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Krashen, S. (2007). Extensive reading in English as a foreign language by adolescents and young adults: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 3(2), 23-29.
Layeghi, F. (2011). Form and content in the argumentative writing of extroverted and introverted Iranian EFL learners. Iranian EFL Journal, 7(3), 166-183.
Mansouri Nejad, A., Bijami, M., & Ahmadi, M. R. (2012). Do personality traits predict academic writing ability? An EFL case study. English Linguistics Research, 1(2), 145-152.
Maria, K. (1990). Reading Comprehension Instruction, Issues and Strategies. York Press.
McDonough, K. (2004). Learner-learner interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context. System, 32(2), 207-224.
McNamara, D. S. (2007). Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies. Erlbaum.
Mendonca, C. O., & Johnson, K. E. (1994). Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), 745-769.
Nation, K. (2005). Children’s reading comprehension difficulties. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 248–265). Blackwell.
Nourzad Haradasht, P., Saeidi, M., & Ahangari, S. (2020). The Comparative Effect of Collaborative Strategic Reading and Metacognitive Reading Strategies on Extrovert and Introvert EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension. The Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 13(27), 129-149.
Pardo, L. S. (2004). What every teacher needs to know about comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 58(3), 272-280.
Pazhuhesh, P. (1994). The role of extroversion/introversion in EFL reading. Unpublished MA Thesis, Tehran University, Iran.
Safdarian, Z., Ghyasi, M., & Farsani, M. A. (2014). How reading strategy use and personality types are related. Reading, 14(1), 121-135.
Sato, M., & Ballinger, S. (2012). Raising language awareness in peer interaction: a cross-context, cross-methodology examination. Language Awareness, 21(1-2), 157-179.
Shabani, K., Samarghandi, S. & Bakhshi, E. M., (2016). The Effect of Content Feedback on Extroverted and Introverted English Learners’ Reading Comprehension Ability. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 3(2), 1579-1599.
Shapurian, R., & Hojat, M. (1985). Psychometric characteristics of a Persian version of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Psychological Reports, 57(2), 631-639.
Sippel, L., & Jackson, C. N. (2015). Teacher vs. peer oral corrective feedback in the German language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 48(4), 688-705.
Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. RAND Education.
Suparman, U. (2010). Psycholinguistic: The Theory of Second Language Acquisition. Arfino Raya.
Tabatabaei, O., & Banitalebi, A. (2011). Feedback strategies in foreign language reading classes. Asian Culture and History, 3(2), 59-70.
Van den Broek, P., & Espin, C. A. (2012). Connecting cognitive theory and assessment: Measuring individual differences in reading comprehension. School Psychology Review, 41(3), 315-325.
Venugopalan, M. (2000). The relationship between extroversion/introversion and university level ESL language proficiency. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas, Lawrence.
Yovanoff, P., Duesbery, L., Alonzo, J., & Tindal, G. (2005). Grade‐level invariance of a theoretical causal structure predicting reading comprehension with vocabulary and oral reading fluency. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 24(3), 4-12.
Zafar, S., & Meenakshi, K. (2012). A study on the relationship between extroversion-introversion and risk-taking in the context of second language acquisition. International Journal of Research studies in language learning, 1(1), 33-40.
Zarei, A. A., Esfandiari, R., & Akbari, A. (2016). Self-regulated learning strategies as predictors of reading comprehension. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 3(2), 21-34.
Zarei, A. A., & Rezadoust, H. (2020). The effects of scaffolded and unscaffolded feedback on speaking anxiety and self-efficacy. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 7(4), 111-132.
Zhao, H. (2010). Investigating learners’ use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom. Assessing Writing, 15(1), 3-17.
Zhao, H. (2014). Investigating teacher-supported peer assessment for EFL writing. ELT Journal, 68(2), 155-168. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 569 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 963 |
||