تعداد نشریات | 19 |
تعداد شمارهها | 380 |
تعداد مقالات | 3,131 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,251,787 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,846,167 |
Scrutinizing the Utility of Flipped and Online Instructions for Ameliorating EFL Learners’ Writing Ability | ||
Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies | ||
مقاله 4، دوره 10، شماره 3، مهر 2023، صفحه 71-94 اصل مقاله (1.36 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: research paper | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/jmrels.2023.18587.2192 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Leila Dobakhti* 1؛ Mohammad - Zohrabi2؛ Sevda Masoudi3 | ||
1Faculty of Multimedia, Tabriz Islamic Art University | ||
2Dr. Mohammad Zohrabi Associate Professor English Department Faculty of Farsi Literature University of Tabriz Tabriz Iran | ||
3Texas State University | ||
تاریخ دریافت: 12 فروردین 1402، تاریخ بازنگری: 06 خرداد 1402، تاریخ پذیرش: 22 خرداد 1402 | ||
چکیده | ||
The present study made an endeavor to determine the degree to which online and flipped approaches to writing instruction affected the EFL learners’ writing ability. To this end, first, the researchers selected 75 intermediate-level female EFL learners in three intact classrooms of a private language institute in Urmia (Iran) as the participants. These classes were randomly selected from among the online, flipped, and in-person classes of the relevant institute and were assigned to the online, flipped, and control groups. Second, the researchers administered the writing pretest of the study to all of the groups. Third, they used Adobe Connect learning management system to provide the online and flipped groups with the pertinent writing instruction treatment in ten sessions. Nonetheless, they provided the control group with in-person writing instruction. Fourth they administered the immediate and delayed writing posttests of the study to all of the groups immediately after the termination of the treatment sessions and one month subsequent to the end of treatment respectively. Finally, they used SPSS 24 to perform the data analysis. Based on the obtained results, although both of the online and flipped approaches had immediate and delayed positive impacts on the participants’ writing ability, the flipped approach was more beneficial than the online. The results may provide EFL teacher educators, course developers, syllabus designers, and teachers with guiding principles regarding the uses of online and flipped courses in foreign language contexts. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
flipped instruction؛ online instruction؛ writing ability | ||
مراجع | ||
Afrilyasanti, R., Cahyono, B. Y., & Astuti, U. P. (2016). Effect of flipped classroom model on Indonesian EFL students’ writing ability across and individual differences in learning. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research, 4(5), 65-81. Ahmadi Safa, M., & Zareian, N. (2022). The effect of online interaction on the use of discourse markers: A comparison of two flipped classes. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly, 41(2), 1-35. Alghasab, M. B. (2020). Flipping the writing classroom: Focusing on the pedagogical benefits and EFL learners’ perceptions. English Language Teaching, 13(4), 28-40. Allan, D. (2004). Oxford placement test. Oxford University Press. Brown, J. D., & Bailey, K. M. (1984). A categorical instrument for scoring second language writing skills. Language Learning, 34, 21-24. Buitrago, C. R., & Díaz, J. (2018). Flipping your writing lessons: Optimizing time in your EFL writing classroom. In J. Mehring, & A. Leis (Eds.), Innovations in flipping the language classroom (pp. 69-91). Springer. Burke, A. S., & Fedorek, B. (2017). Does flipping promote engagement? A comparison of a traditional, online, and flipped class. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18(1), 11-24. Chuang, H. H., Weng, C. Y., & Chen, C. H. (2018). Which students benefit most from a flipped-classroom approach to language learning? British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 56-68. Engin, M. (2014). Extending the flipped classroom model: Developing second language writing skills through student-created digital videos. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 4, 12-26. Farrah, M., & Qawasmeh, A. (2018). English students’ attitudes towards using flipped classrooms in language learning at Hebron University. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 6(2), 275-294. Fauzan, A., & Ngabut, M. N. (2018). EFL students’ perception on flipped learning in writing class. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 8(2), 115-129. Ferreri, S. P., & O’Connor, S. K. (2013). Redesign of a large lecture course into a small-group learning course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(1), 34-52. Fisher, R., Ross, B., LaFerriere, R., & Martiz, A. (2017). Flipped learning, flipped satisfaction, getting the balance right. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 5(2), 114-126. Goodson, P. (2012). Becoming an academic writer. Thousand Oaks: Sage. He, W., Holton, A., Farkas, G., & Warschauer, M. (2016). The effects of flipped instruction on out-of-class study time, exam performance, and student perceptions. Learning and Instruction, 45, 61-71. Heidari Tabrizi, H., Sharifi, A. A., & Chalak, A. (2023). Effect of vision-based program on willingness to communicate among Iranian ADHD adolescents involved in online English learning. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly. doi:10.22099/tesl.2023.45107.3158. Hsieh, J. S., Wu, W. V., & Marek, M. W. (2017). Using the flipped classroom to enhance EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning,30(1-2), 1-21. Hung, H. T. (2015). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 81-96. Karimi, M. & Hamzavi, R. (2017). The effect of flipped model of instruction on EFL learners’ reading comprehension: Learners’ attitudes in focus. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(1), 95-103. Khalifeh, A., Bavali, M., & Rassaei, E. (2022). Evaluating the impact of a flipped, a traditional, and an online course on grammar knowledge development and content coverage: Flipped class’s perception in focus. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 9(3), 101-129. Khodabandeh, F., & Tharirian, M. H. (2020). Exploring the impact of blended, flipped, and traditional teaching strategies for teaching grammar on Iranian EFL learners through English newspaper articles. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly, 39(3), 89-129. Khosravani, M., Khoshsima, H., & Mohamadian, A. (2020). On the effect of flipped classroom on learners’ achievement, autonomy, motivation and WTC: Investigating learning and learner variables. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 12(25), 175-189. LaFee, S. (2013). Flipped learning. The Education Digest, 79(3), 13-25. Leis, A., Cooke, S., & Tohei, A. (2015). The effects of flipped classrooms on English composition writing in an EFL environment. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 5(4), 37-51. Li, J., Link, S., & Hegelheimer, V. (2015). Rethinking the role of automated writing evaluation feedback in ESL writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 1-18. Li, Z., Link, S., Ma, H., Yang, H., & Hegelheimer, V. (2014). The role of automated writing evaluation holistic scores in the ESL classroom. System, 44, 66-78. Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2016). Second language research: Methodology and design (2nd Ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Mahmoudi-Dehaki, M., Chalak, A., & Heidari Tabrizi, H. (2021). The Impact of learning through management system vs. learning through experience platform on exam results of digital natives and digital immigrants. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly, 40(3),117-158. Pavanelli, R. (2018). The flipped classroom: A mixed methods study of academic performance and student perception in EAP writing context. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 5(2), 16-26. Rahimi, S., Ghonsooly, B., & Rezai, A. (2021). An online portfolio assessment and perception study of Iranian high school students English writing performance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly, 40(3), 197-231. Roehl, A., Reddy, S. L., & Shannon, G. J. (2013). The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning strategies. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences, 105(2), 44-49. Sergis, S., Sampson, D. G., & Pelliccione, L. (2018). Investigating the impact of flipped classroom on students’ learning experiences: A selfdetermination theory approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 368-378. Sheikhipour, A., Hashemian, M., & Roohani, A. (2021). EFL learners’ attitudes toward flipped teaching and its effect on their oral complexity, accuracy, and fluency. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 8(4), 51-21. Shooli, E., Rahimi Esfahani, F., & Sepehri, M. (2021). Impacts of flipped classroom on micro/macro writing subskills in Iranian EFL context. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 8(4), 85-109. Su Ping, R. L., Verezub, E., Adi Badiozaman, I. F. B., & Chen, W. S. (2019). Tracing EFL students’ flipped classroom journey in a writing class: Lessons from Malaysia. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 4, 1-12. Tse, W. S., Choi, L. Y., & Tang, W. S. (2019). Effects of video‐based flipped class instruction on subject reading motivation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 385-398. Wang, Y.-J., Shang, H.-F., & Briody, P. (2013). Exploring the impact of using automated writing evaluation in English as a foreign language university students’ writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(3), 234-257. Xiao, L., Larkins, R., & Meng, L. (2018). Track effect: Unraveling the enhancement of college students’ autonomous learning by using a flipped classroom approach. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 5, 1-13. Xu, C., & Qi, Y. (2017). Analyzing pauses in computer-assisted EFL writingA computer- keystroke-log perspective. Educational Technology & Society, 20(4), 24-34. Yang, C. C. R. (2017). An investigation of the use of the flipped classroom pedagogy in secondary English language classrooms. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 16, 1–20. Ye, S. H., Hsiao, T. Y., & Sun, C. T. (2018). Using commercial video games in flipped classrooms to support physical concept construction. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 1-13. Yilmaz, R. (2017). Exploring the role of e-learning readiness on student satisfaction and motivation in flipped classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 251-260. Yousofi, N., & Bashiri, S. (2023). Exploring the impact of mobile-flipped classrooms on Iranian EFL learners’ writing proficiency. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 10(2), 91-117. Zarrinabadi, N., & Ebrahimi, A. (2018). Increasing peer collaborative dialogue using a flipped classroom strategy. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 21, 1-11. Zhang, H., Du, X., Yuan, X., & Zhang, L. (2016). The effectiveness of the flipped classroom model on the English pronunciation course. Creative Education, 7, 1340–1346. Zheng, B., Warschauer, M., & Farkas, G. (2013). Digital writing and diversity: The effects of school laptop programs on literacy processes and outcomes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(3), 267-299. Zou, D., & Xie, H. (2019). Flipping an English writing class with technologyenhanced just-in-time teaching and peer instruction. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1127-1142. Zuo, X. (2016). Motivation in a flipped classroom, a case study of teaching oral English in a vocational college in mainland China. Sino-US English Teaching, 13(6), 460–467. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 366 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 928 |