اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 396 |
| تعداد مقالات | 3,218 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,560,170 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 3,086,041 |
Iranian EFL Teachers’ Cognition of Corrective Feedback as an Element of Classroom Management: A Qualitative Study | ||
| Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies | ||
| دوره 11، شماره 2، تیر 2024، صفحه 2-24 اصل مقاله (930.79 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: research paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/jmrels.2023.18807.2216 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Abbas Ali Rezaee1؛ Mohammad Hussein Norouzi2؛ Nafeeseh Aryaeian* 3 | ||
| 1Associate Professor, Faculty of Foreign Languages and Literatures, University of Tehran | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Faculty of Foreign Languages and Literatures, University of Tehran | ||
| 3PhD Candidate, Faculty of Foreign Languages and Literatures, University of Tehran | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 29 اردیبهشت 1402، تاریخ بازنگری: 24 تیر 1402، تاریخ پذیرش: 03 مرداد 1402 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This qualitative study aimed to explore Iranian EFL teachers’ cognition of corrective feedback as one of the elements of classroom management in the EFL context of Iran’s language institutes. Participants of the study were 12 in-service Iranian EFL teachers who taught adult EFL learners. The participants were selected through purposeful sampling, and the sample size was determined based on saturation. The main instrument of the study was a semi-structured one-to-one in-person interview, which aimed to elicit the participants’ cognition of corrective feedback. These individual interviews were audio-recorded and then they were transcribed. Thematic analysis of the data indicated that the participants considered corrective feedback an important element of classroom management in EFL classes. Moreover, the participants believed that corrective feedback should be provided for common errors and errors related to lesson objectives. They classified EFL learners’ errors in terms of the purpose of activities (communication vs. form, and fluency vs. accuracy). In addition, they knew about different timings for the provision of corrective feedback (delayed vs. immediate/on-the-spot). Furthermore, they highlighted the inclusion of teacher correction, peer correction, and self-correction for sufficiently providing corrective feedback in EFL classes. They also foregrounded EFL learners’ proficiency level and their affective factors for appropriate provision of corrective feedback. On the whole, the participants had a sound cognition of corrective feedback as one of the elements of classroom management in EFL classes in Iran. The findings of the present study have implications for language teacher educators, EFL teachers, and language institute supervisors. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Teacher Cognition؛ Corrective Feedback؛ Classroom Management؛ Teacher Education؛ Language Institutes | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Baleghizadeh, S., & Rezaei, S. (2010). Pre-service teacher cognition on corrective feedback: A case study. Journal of Technology of Education, 4(4), 321–327.
Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. Continuum.
Borg, S. (2009). Language teacher cognition. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge Guide to second language teacher education (pp. 163–171). Cambridge University Press.
Borg, S. (2011). Language teacher education. In J. Simpson (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Applied Linguistics (pp. 215–228). Routledge.
Borg, S. (2019). Language teacher cognition: perspectives and debates. In X. Gao (Ed.), Second Handbook of English Language Teaching (pp. 1–23). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58542-0_59-1
Buchanan, H. & Timmis, I. (2019). Classroom management: Art, craft, or science?. In S. Walsh, & S. Mann (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English Language Teacher Education (pp. 319–334). Routledge.
Burns, A., Freeman, D., & Edwards, E. (2015). Theorizing and studying the language-teaching mind: mapping research on language teacher cognition. The Modern Language Journal, 99(3), 585–601. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12245
Couper, G. (2019). Teachers’ cognitions of corrective feedback on pronunciation: Their beliefs, perceptions, and practices. System, 84, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.04.003
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1,3-18.
Ellis, R. (2015). Understanding second language acquisition (2nd Ed.). Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R., & Shintani, N. (2014). Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. Routledge.
Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach English. Pearson.
Harmer, J. (2012). Essential teacher knowledge: Core concepts in English language teaching. Pearson.
Kubanyiova, M., & Feryok, A. (2015). Language teacher cognition in applied linguistics research: Revisiting the territory, redrawing the boundaries, reclaiming the relevance. The Modern Language Journal, 99(3), 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12239
Li, L. (2019). Teacher cognition and teacher expertise. In S. Walsh, & S. Mann (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English language teacher education (pp. 335–349). Routledge.
Mirzaei Shojakhanlou, M., & Saeedian, A. (2023). Developing EFL teachers’ cognition of corrective feedback using a task-based approach. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 10(2), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.30479/jmrels.2022.17313.2075
Moradkhani, S., & Goodarzi, A. (2020). A case study of three EFL teachers’ cognition in oral corrective feedback: Does experience make a difference?. Issues in Language Teaching, 9(1), 183–211. https://doi.org/10.22054/ilt.2020.51449.482
Mori, R. (2011). Teacher cognition in corrective feedback in Japan. System, 39, 451–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.10.014
Rinda, R. K., & Indrastana, N. S. (2020). The crucial elements of classroom management. Journal of English in Academic and Professional Communication, 6(2).
Shafiee, Z., Nejadghanbar, H., & Parsaiyan, S. F. (2018). Transformation of an EFL teacher’s cognition underlying oral corrective feedback: A case of reflective inquiry, Teaching English Language, 12(1), 1–30.
Spratt, M., Pulverness, A., & Williams, M. (2011). The TKT (Teaching Knowledge Test) Course: Modules 1, 2, and 3. Cambridge University Press.
Zolghadri, M., & Jafarpour Mamaghani, H. (2022). Pathology of language teaching ineffectiveness: A case study exposing teacher cognition stepwise. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 9(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.30479/jmrels.2021.14845.1814 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,044 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 418 |
||