اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 19 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 380 |
| تعداد مقالات | 3,141 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,263,266 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,858,352 |
تأثیر تیپ شخصیت، جنسیت، سن، سابقه تدریس و مدرک تحصیلی بر سبک تدریس استادان آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسی‌زبانان | ||
| پژوهش نامه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیر فارسی زبانان | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 13، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 27، فروردین 1403، صفحه 35-60 اصل مقاله (1.1 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/jtpsol.2023.19121.1642 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| نوید اعطار شرقی1؛ علی نوازنی* 2 | ||
| 1استادیار مرکز آموزش زبان فارسی، دانشگاه بین المللی امام خمینی، قزوین، ایران | ||
| 2نویسندۀ مسئول، پژوهشگر پسادکترای دانشگاه اصفهان و مدرس مدعو مرکز آموزش زبان فارسی، دانشگاه بین‌المللی امام خمینی(ره)، قزوین، ایران. | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 03 مرداد 1402، تاریخ بازنگری: 26 شهریور 1402، تاریخ پذیرش: 11 مهر 1402 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| امروزه اهمیت آگاهی از ویژگی‌های شخصیتی و مسائل روان‌شناختی در امر آموزش، به‌ویژه آموزش زبان کاملاً مشخص شده است. نهتنها آگاهی از تفاوت‌های فردی و خصوصیات شخصیتی زبان‌آموزان و متناسب‌سازی اقدامات آموزشی با تنوع نیازها و ترجیحات آن‌ها توسط مدرس باعث بهبود و ارتقای آموزش می‌شود؛ بلکه شناخت و تحلیل ویژگی‌های فردی خود مدرس بهمنظور متناسب‌سازی روش تدریس با ترجیحات و نیازهای فراگیران، بسیار حائز اهمیت است. هدف از پژوهش حاضر، عبارت است از بررسی رابطۀ تیپ شخصیت، جنسیت، مدرک تحصیلی، سن، سابقۀ تدریس استادان آموزش زبان فارسی با سبک تدریس آن‌ها. آزمودنی‌ها، 45 مدرس از مراکز آموزش زبان فارسی دانشگاه بین‌المللی امام خمینی قزوین و دانشگاه تبریز هستند. در پیشبرد پژوهش، از روش‌های ترکیبی کمی و کیفی و روش پیمایشی متّکی بر پرسشنامه‌های مایرز – بریگز و گراشا استفاده شد و تحلیل دستاوردهای پژوهش، با اتّکا به روش‌های آماری و نرم‌افزار SPSS انجام شد.. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهند که در بین استادان، سبک‌های تسهیل‌کننده و خِبره، دارای بیشترین فراوانی است. همچنین زنان در مقایسه با مردان، بیشتر تمایل به سبک‌های تسهیل‌کننده دارند. علاوه بر این، بیشترین فراوانی در هر سطح مدرک تحصیلی کارشناسی ارشد و دکتری، متعلّق به سبک تسهیل‌کننده است و متغیرهای دوقطبی IE (درون‌گرا و برون‌گرا) در دو سبک فردی و تسهیل کننده معنی دارند. همچنین بین همۀ سبک‌های تدریس با سابقه تدریس اساتید، ارتباط وجود دارد و بهطور خاص در دو سبک خبره و آمرانه، این ارتباط معنی‌دار است | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| آموزش زبان فارسی؛ سبک تدریس؛ تیپ شخصیت؛ تیپ‌نمای شخصیتی مایرز– بریگز؛ مایر و بریگز؛ گراشا | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Effects of Personality Type, Gender, Age, Teaching Experience, and Academic Degree on the Teaching Style of Persian Language Instructors for Speakers of Other Languages | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Navid Atar Sharghi1؛ Ali Navazeni2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Persian Language Teaching Center, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran. | ||
| 2Corresponding Author, Postdoctoral researcher at University of Isfahan and Guest lecturer of Persian Language Teaching Center, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| In present scholarship, a clear awareness has been developed concerning the importance of personality traits and psychological issues within the realm of education, particularly in the field of language education. Not only does the awareness regarding individual differences and personality characteristics of language learners, and the adaptation of educational measures to the diversity of their needs and preferences by the teacher, improve and promote the learners' learning process, but it is also crucial to recognize and analyze the individual characteristics of the teacher. By doing so, it enables the adaptation of the teaching method to cater to the preferences and needs of the learners. This study aims to investigate the relationship between various factors, namely personality type, gender, academic degree, age, and teaching experience, of Persian language teachers and their teaching styles. The participants of this research consist of 45 instructors from the Persian Language Teaching Centers at Imam Khomeini International University and Tabriz University. To this end, a mixed-methods approach with the use of a survey method based on Myers-Briggs and Grasha questionnaires was adopted and the obtained data was analyzed with SPSS software. The findings of this study showed that among professors, facilitating and expert styles outnumbered other features. Furthermore, in comparison to men, women tend to exhibit a higher propensity for facilitating styles. In the case of the facilitating style, the variable exhibited the highest frequency among participants holdings master's and PhD degrees. The bipolar variables of introvert and extrovert were found to be statistically significant for both individual and facilitating styles. Ultimately, a relationship exists between all the teaching styles and the teaching experience possessed by the professors. Such relationship was statistically significant, especially when considering the expert and authoritarian styles. Extended Abstract: Introduction In modern approaches to language teaching, such as cognitive and communicative approaches, the influence of learners' cognitive and personality types, as well as those of their teachers, on the learning-teaching process is highly significant. In the process of learning, especially foreign language learning, students have different needs, preferences, goals, and individual characteristics. Successful teachers should design their syllabi to meet the diverse educational needs of their students. On the other hand, teachers have personal characteristics and preferences that significantly affect their teaching styles and methods, and thus, the learning of their students. It is truism that if teachers and curriculum designers further appreciate and recognize the individual differences that affect learning and teaching, their teaching quality and performance shall improve. This study aims to investigate how personality types and individual differences such as gender, age, teaching experience, and academic degrees of Persian Language Instructors for Speakers of Other Languages influence their teaching styles. According to contemporary educational theories and methodologies, the primary purpose of a teacher in the classroom is not to provide one-sided instruction and enforce discipline, but instead to establish a direct and authentic rapport with students that enables them to observe and acquire the desired behaviors and skills through modeling.Citton (2015) cited in Messaour (2022: 225-226) observes: "The role of a teacher involves adopting a type of reflective practice, also known as self-reflective, which constantly examines and analyzes their teaching methods to adapt them to the expectations and needs of learners. Within such spectrum, the notion of self-awareness, particularly with the aid of psychological [personality] typology, can assist the educator in gaining a better understanding of their psychological functioning. This naturally leads to enriching their reflective practices as well as improving their teaching practices." Personality, or personality type, refers to a set of physical, psychological, and behavioral characteristics that distinguish an individual from others (Sadeghian & Sheikhpour, 2011:9), and in various situations and circumstances, it maintains relative stability and continuity and determines the current and future patterns of behaviors in individuals (Poursaberi & Yagoubi Beglar, 2018:120). The renowned Swiss psychologist Carl Jung categorized personality types into 8 types (3 dichotomies) in order to describe them. Katherine Cook Briggs and Isabel Briggs Myers expanded on this to 16 personality types (4 dichotomies), known as the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. The MBTI helps individuals identify their own and others' motivations, abilities, and personality types (Kennedy & Kennedy, 2004: 38) (See table below). Personality Types in MBTI test Dichotomy feature Dichotomy element Dichotomy feature Dichotomy element Determining factors of personal preferences in decision-making They get energy from the environment and react faster to making decisions. They think out loud and are active. Extrovert They derive energy from within and have a limited communication circle. They are interested in mental activities such as studying. Introvert Energy source They use their sixth sense more and are interested in things that should be. They are imaginative and future-oriented and these people spend most of their time dreaming. Intuitive They receive most of their information from the environment using their five senses. They are detailed and focused on the objective. Sensor Perception of information They make their decisions and judgments based on logic and objectivity. Thinker They make most of their decisions based on their feelings and personal values. Feeler Decision making They look for a flexible and adaptable life. Their decision-making process is thorough and deliberate, as they prioritize gathering extensive information pertaining to the subject matter. They tend to defer making a decision until the last moment. Perceiver They are driven to lead an orderly, deliberative and disciplined life, finding satisfaction in structured decision making. Judger Life style As noted earlier, one of the objectives of this study is to examine the effects of gender, age, teaching experience, and educational background on the teaching styles of Persian language instructors based on the styles proposed by Grasha. As Larenas Diaz (2011) notes, Grasha believes in the existence of five different teaching styles that include, Expert, Formal, Authority, Personal model, Facilitator and Delegator. “Teaching style refers to how the educator acts at the level of practice and the tools they use when interacting with learners. Personal characteristics of the teacher can determine their styles. Methods refer to the techniques of teachers, while styles specifically refer to the distinct qualities of a teacher in a given situation, regardless of the content being taught” (Haghani et al., 2011:944). Methodology The participants of this study include 45 teachers and faculty members from Persian language teaching centers at Imam Khomeini International University (30) and Tabriz University (15), aged between 27 and 53. Among them, 15 were male and 30 were female. Furthermore, in terms of academic degrees, 20 participants held a doctoral degree and 25 had a master's degree. In terms of teaching experience, all participants were in teaching profession between 3 to 20 years. The data of this research were analyzed using SPSS 22 software and statistical methods (frequency, Cronbach's alpha, Pearson correlation coefficient) at a significant level of p < 0.05. Two questionnaires, Mayer and Briggs' personality types and Grasha's teaching styles, were used to collect data. To obtain reliability coefficient (Cronbach's alpha) for each teaching style separately, as well as for the total of all styles and personality types, the analysis was done and the result is presented in the following table. Personality type The sum of all styles Delegator Facilitator Personal model Formal Authority Expert 0.67 0.87 0.76 0.77 0.66 0.62 0.65 Cronbach's alpha Results and discussion Among the 45 participating educators in the study, 12 types of personality were identified out of the 16 Myers-Briggs personality types. Among these, the personality types ISTJ (introvert, sensor, thinker, and judger), ESTJ (extravert, sensor, thinker, and judger), and INTJ (introvert, intuitive, thinker, and judger) had the highest frequencies with 27%, 24%, and 9%, respectively. Based on the obtained results (Pearson correlation coefficient), there was a relationship between all personality types and teaching styles. This relationship, with a confidence level of 95% and p<0.05, was only significant in the dichotomous variables of introversion and extraversion in the personal model and facilitator teaching styles. Conclusion The findings of this research also posted a positive and significant relationship between personality types (introverted and extroverted dichotomy) and the selection of teaching styles, indicating that the personality types of teachers play a significant role in their teaching methods. With regard to specific teaching styles, the current research identified the Facilitator (16 individuals), Expert (13 individuals), Personal Model (6 individuals), Delegator (6 individuals), and Authority (4 individuals) styles, respectively, from the highest to the lowest frequency. Regarding the relationship between teaching styles and the academic qualifications of the teachers, it was observed that teachers with a doctoral degree preferred facilitator, expert, and advocacy styles, while teachers with a master's degree selected facilitator and expert styles. Furthermore, a relationship was found between all teaching styles and the teaching experience of the educators. Acknowledgment The authors would like to appreciate the teachers for their time and efforts to participate in this research. Conflict of Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Persian language teaching, teaching style, personality type, Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Myers & Briggs, Grasha | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
احقر بازرگان، نگین، صنایعی، علی و انصاری، آذرنوش. (1396). بررسی تأثیر ابعاد شخصیتی مایرز – بریگز بر تمایل به خرید الکترونیکی خریداران، نشریه مدیریت بازرگانی، 9 (1)، 21-42.
اعطار شرقی، نوید و اکبری، بیتا. (1399). بررسی نقش عوامل انگیزشی و خودهای شخصیتی در یادگیری زبان فارسی. پژوهش‌نامۀ آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسی‌زبانان، دورۀ 9، شمارۀ 2، (پیاپی 20)، 65- 86 .
پورصابری، رقیه و یعقوبی بگلر، نرگس. (1397). بررسی نقش تیپ‌های شخصیتی مایرز بریگز در پیش‌بینی تعلل‌ورزی تحصیلی دانشجویان دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز. نشریه راهبردهای آموزش در علوم پزشکی، 11(1)، 118-125.
حقانی، فریبا، چاوشی، الهام، والیانی، علی و یارمحمدیان، محمد حسین. (1389). سبک‌های تدریس اساتید مقطع علوم پایه دانشکده پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهان. مجله ایرانی آموزش در علوم پزشکی (ویژه‌نامه توسعه آموزش)،10(5)، 943- 949 .
درویش‌قدیمی، فرشته و رودباری، مسعود. (1390). سبک‌های تدریس اعضای هیات علمی دانشکده‌های تابعه دانشگاه علوم پزشکی ایران. مجله ایرانی آموزش در علوم پزشکی، 11(8)، 917- 925.
رازقی‌نژاد، محمدحسین، بخشی، حمید و مشایخی، ناصر. (1389). بررسی سبک های تدریس اعضای هیأت علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی رفسنجان. مجله پزشکی هرمزگان، 14(3)، 198- 205.
عسگری، محمدهادی، کیاکجوری، داوود و بابایی، مریم. (1390). رابطه بین نوع شخصیت معلمان و سبک تدریس آنان در مدارس راهنمایی غرب استان مازندران در سال تحصیلی 89-1388. دوماهنامه مهندسی مدیریت، 5 (4) پیاپی 44، 18- 25.
غلامی، طاهره. (1398). بررسی و تبیین انواع گوناگون سبک تدریس، مجله پیشرفت‌های نوین در روانشناسی، علوم تربیتی و آموزش و پرورش، 2(21)، 50-63 .
کیخا، اسماء، مرزیه، افسانه و جناآبادی، حسین. (1397). رابطه سبک تدریس معلّم با انگیزش و درگیری تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان. پژوهش‌های آموزش و یادگیری، 15(2)، 37- 48.
مرادی‌دولیسکانی، مرتضی و محمدی‌مهر، مژگان. (1397). بررسی رابطه بین ویژگی های شخصیتی و کیفیت تدریس در میان استادان دانشگاه علوم پزشکی ارتش از دیدگاه دانشجویان. مجله علوم مراقبتی نظامی، 5(4)، 273- 281.
هادی‌ندوشن، حسین، کریمی، حسین و فتاحی، علی. (1384). بررسی ویژگی های مدیریت تدریس اعضای هیات علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شهید صدوقی یزد. مجله ایرانی آموزش در علوم پزشکی، 5 (14)، 25- 48.
یارمحمدزاده، پیمان، فیضی، ایوب، محمدیان، کویستان و آق آتابای، آمنه. (1396). رابطه ویژگی‌های شخصیت و سبک رهبری کلاس درس با کیفیت تدریس اساتید دانشگاه به روش خود ارزیابی: ارائه یک مدل ساختاری، فصلنامه آموزش و ارزیابی، 10(39) ، 29-51.
References:
Alibakhshi, G. (2011). On the Impacts of Gender and Personality Types on Iranian EFL Teachers’ Teaching Efficacy and Teaching Activities Preferences. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL), 14(1) 1-22.
Asgari, M.H., Kiakjuri, D., & Babaei, M. (2012). Relationship between the personality type of teachers and their teaching style in the middle schools of the west of Mazandaran province in the academic year 2010-2015. Bimonthly Journal of Management Engineering, 5(4), (Tome 44), 18-25. [In Persian]
Atar Sharghi, N., & Akbari, B. (2020). Examining the role of motivational factors and personal selves in Persian language learning. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 9 (2), (Tome 20), 75-94. [in persian]
Baleghizadeh, S., & Shakouri, M. (2014). The effect of gender and teaching experience on Iranian ESP instructors’ teaching styles. Journal of Education and Human Development, 3(2), 979 -989.
Basyirah H. B. I, Abdul Jobar, N., Mokhtar, M. M., Bahari, A.A., Jamian, A. R., & Mohd Rusli, N. (2021). The Relationship between Personality and Teaching Style of Bahasa Melayu Teacher in Secondary Schools. Journal of new advances in English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 579-591. DOI: 10.22034/Jeltal.2021.3.2.2
Cooper, C. Saggino, A. & Kline, P. (2001). A confirmatory factor analysis of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 3-9.
Darvish Ghadimi, F., Roudbari, M. (2012). Teaching Styles of Faculty Members in Schools Affiliated with Iran University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 11 (8), 917-925. [In Persian]
Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and Leadership Style: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 223-256, Retrieved from:
https://opencommons.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=chip_docs (Accessed September 17, 2023)
Gholami, T. (2020), Investigation and explanation of different types of teaching style. Journal of New Developments in Psychology, Educational Sciences and Education, 2(21), 50-63. [In Persian]
Grasha, A. F. (1996). Teaching with style. A practical guide to enhancing learning understanding teaching and learning styles. Aliance publishers.
Hadinadoshan, H., Karimi, H., & Fatahi, A. (2004). Investigating the teaching management characteristics of academic staff members of Shahid Sadougi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd. Iranian Journal of Education in Medical Sciences, 5 (14), 25-48. [In Persian]
Retrieved from: https://www.sid.ir/paper/447519/fa (Accessed September 17, 2023)
Haghani, F., Chavoshi, E., Valian, A. & Yarmohammadian, M. H. (2011). Teaching Styles of Teachers in Basic Sciences Classes in Medical School of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 10(5), 943-949. [In Persian]
Karimnia, A., & Mohammdi, N. (2019). The Effects of Teachers’ Gender, Teaching Experience, and Brain Dominance on their Teaching Styles. International Journal of Research in English Education, 4(1), 37-46.
Kennedy, R. B., & Kennedy, D. A. (2004). Using the MyersBriggs Type Indicator in career counseling. Journal of employment counseling. 41, 38-44.
Kikha, A., Marzieh, A., Janabadi, H. (2019). The Relationship between Teaching Styles with Academic Motivation and Engagement in Students. Teaching and Learning Research, 15(2), 37-48. [In Persian] doi: 10.22070/tlr.2020.2527
Larenas Díaz, H. C., Rodríguez Moran, A. V., & Poblete Rivera, K. J. (2011). Comparing Teaching Styles and Personality Types of EFL Instructors in the Public and Private Sectors. Profile, 13(1), 111-127.
Mahmoudi Maymand, M., Vazirzanjani, H., & khalili yadegari, M. (2013). Dimensions of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and the customers' purchase Intention. New Marketing Research Journal, 2(4), 151-165. [In Persian].
Mayers, I. B. & Mayers, P. B. (1980). Mayers-Briggs Type indicator, Form M. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.
Messaour, R. (2022). Vers un profil psychologique type de l'enseignant : Réflexions sur les impératifs psychologiques inhérent à l'exercice de l'enseignement (Thèse pour l'obtention du titre de : Docteur en science, Option : Didactique des Langues Étrangères). Faculté des letters et des langues étrangères, université de Batna2, Algérie.
Moradi Doliskani M., & Mohammadi Mehr M. (2019), The Relationship between Personality Traits and Teaching quality among the Faculty Members of AJA University of Medical Sciences from Students' Viewpoint. MCS; 5 (4): 273-281. [In Persian]. DOI: 1029252/mcs.5.4.273
Poursaberi, R. & Yagoubi Beglar, N. (2018). The Study of the Role of Myers/Briggs Personality Traits in Predicting Students Academic Procrastination in Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Educational Strategies in Medical Sciences, 11 (1), 118-125. [In Persian]
Rahimi, M., & Asadollahi, F. (2012). Teaching styles of Iranian EFL teachers: Do gender, age, and experience make a difference? International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(2), 157-164. doi:10.5539/ijel.v2n2p157
Razeghinejad, M. H., Bakhshi, H., & Mashayekhi, N. (2010). A survey on teaching style of academic members in Rafsanjan University of medical sciences, Medical Journal of Hormozgan University, 14(3), 198-205. [In Persian]
Sadeghian, F., & Sheikhpour, N. (2011), The importance of identifying students' personality types for choosing a profession and job, Rushd Magazine, 6(3), 8-11. [In Persian]
Sprague, M. M. (1997). Personality type matching and student teacher evaluation. Contemporary Education, 69(1), 54–57.
Yarmohammadzadeh, P., Faizi, A., Mohammadian, K. & Agh Atabai, A. (2017), Investigating the relationship among university teachers' personality traits, classroom leadership style, and efficacy through self-evaluation: Providing a structural model. Journal of Instruction and Evaluation, 10(39), 29-51. [In Persian] | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 409 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 322 |
||