تعداد نشریات | 19 |
تعداد شمارهها | 380 |
تعداد مقالات | 3,121 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,250,851 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,844,986 |
EFL Students' Engagement with Readers in Expository Writing: Contribution of Gender and Proficiency Level | ||
Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies | ||
دوره 11، شماره 4، آبان 2024، صفحه 1-24 اصل مقاله (689.01 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: research paper | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/jmrels.2024.19596.2290 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Zahra Alimorad* ؛ Sasan Nobahar | ||
Shiraz University | ||
تاریخ دریافت: 30 آبان 1402، تاریخ بازنگری: 21 دی 1402، تاریخ پذیرش: 14 بهمن 1402 | ||
چکیده | ||
The present mixed-methods conversion-design study applied the engagement framework of the appraisal theory to disclose whether EFL students’ gender and proficiency level have any effect on their use of engagement resources in their expository texts. To this end, through a convenience sampling procedure, 60 expository essays written by both male (N=30) and female (N=30) students of a language institute across three different proficiency levels (basic, intermediate, and advanced) were gathered and analyzed. Results of the chi-square test revealed that although generally, all students preferred to use more heteroglossic statements than monoglossic ones, the distribution of heteroglossic resources was significantly different in the essays of the three levels. Disclaim resources were dominantly used in the essays of all levels; however, more proficient students tended to use more Expand resources to leave room for opposing viewpoints while Attribute and Proclaim resources were considerably neglected in their writings. Additionally, no meaningful association was noted between the students' gender and their use of engagement resources. However, all types of resources were more frequent in male students' essays except for Proclaim. Based on the findings, this study provided insights into the need for incorporating engagement resources in writing instruction in order to help students construct a well-argued text to be able to communicate their viewpoints more efficiently. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
appraisal theory؛ heteroglossic؛ interpersonal meaning making؛ monoglossic | ||
مراجع | ||
Abdi, R., & Ahmadi, P. (2015). Research article introductions and disciplinary influences based on interactive metadiscourse markers. English Language Teaching, 2(1), 85-99.
Ai, H., & Lu, A. (2013). A corpus-based comparison of syntactic complexity in NNS and NS university students writing. In A. Díaz-Negrillo, N. Ballier, & P. Thompson (Eds.). Automatic treatment and analysis of learner corpus data (pp. 249–264). John Benjamins.
Alotaibi, H. (2016). Comparison of metadiscourse markers in Arabic and English research articles in the introduction and conclusion sections. The Linguistics Journal, 10(1), 182–202.
Ary, D., Jacobs, C., Irvine, S., & Walker, D. (2019). Introduction to research in education (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Bacang, B., Rillo, R., & Alieto, E. (2019). The gender construct in the use of rhetorical appeals, hedges and boosters in ESL writing: A discourse analysis. Asian EFL Journal, 25 (5.2), 210-224.
Bahmani, M., Chalak, A., & Tabrizi, H. (2021). The effect of evaluative language on high- and low- graded post-graduate students’ academic writing ability across gender. Cogent Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1905229
Bastola, M., & Hu, G. (2021). “Commenting on your work is a waste of time only!”: An appraisal-based study of evaluative language in supervisory feedback. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100962
Casanave, C. (2009). Training for writing or training for reality? Challenges facing EFL writing teachers and students in language teacher education programs. In R. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 256 – 277). Multilingual Matters.
Chu, C. (2014). Supporting new arrival students’ engagement with picture books: Analysis of teacher talk using the appraisal theory. Functional Linguistics: A Springer Open Journal, 1(12), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-014-0012-3
Clarke, L. W. (2006). Power through voicing others: Girls’ positioning of boys in literature circle discussions. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(1), 53–79. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3801
Cunningham, K. (2019). How language choices in feedback change with technology: Engagement in text and screencast feedback on ESL writing. Computers & Education, 135, 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.002
De Oliveira, L. C. (2015). A systemic-functional analysis of English language learners’ writing. DELTA, 31(1), 207-237. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-4450364601799092306
Fahy, P. (2002). Use of linguistic qualifiers and intensifiers in a computer conference. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1601_2
Fitriati, S. W., Solihah, Y. A., & Tusino. (2018). Expressions of attitudes in students’ narrative writing: An appraisal analysis. Lingua Cultura, 12(4), 333-338. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v12i4.4789
Garrido, M. E. (2017). Characterizing level iv students’ use of engagement resources in academic writing in English: An exploratory study from a systemic functional perspective. Doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Colombia, Barranquilla.
Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold.
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
Khatibi, Z., & Esfandiari, R. (2021). Comparative analysis of engagement markers in research article introductions and conclusions. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 8(3), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.30479/jmrels.2021.14944.1825
Kobayashi, Y. (2002). The role of gender in foreign language learning attitudes: Japanese female students’ attitudes towards English learning. Gender and Education, 14(2), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250220133021
Lau, K., Lin, C.-Y., & Odle, E. (2021). ‘I am just saying maybe …’: Engagement in dissertation defenses. Language and Education, 35, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2020.1828450
Lee, J. F. K. (2014). A hidden curriculum in Japanese EFL textbooks: Gender representation. Linguistics and Education, 27, 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.07.002
Lee, I., & Coniam, D. (2013). Introducing assessment for learning for EFL writing in an assessment of learning examination. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.11.00
Lin, C. Y. (2017). “I see absolutely nothing wrong with that in fact I think …”: Functions of modifiers in shaping dynamic relationships in dissertation defenses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 28, 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.05.001
Liu, S. (2014). Engaging with dialogic alternatives in ESL argumentative essays: Systemic functional linguistic and teacher perspectives. Doctoral dissertation, University of Montreal, Quebec.
Liu, X. (2013). Evaluation in Chinese university EFL students’ English argumentative writing: An appraisal study. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 10, 40–53.
Manalo, E., Watanabe, K., & Sheppard, C. (2013). Do language structure or language proficiency affect critical evaluation? Paper presented at the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Berlin.
Martin, J., & White, P. (2005). The language of evaluation. Palgrave Macmillan.
Martínez, A. C. L. (2015). The written competence of Spanish secondary education students in bilingual and non-bilingual programs. Porta Linguarum: An International and Interuniversity Journal of Foreign Language Didactics, 24, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.53796
Martínez, A. C. L. (2018). Analysis of syntactic complexity in secondary education EFL writers at different proficiency levels. Assessing Writing, 35, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2017.11.002
Mazgutova, D., & Kormos, K. (2015). Syntactic and lexical development in an intensive English for Academic Purposes programme. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.004
Miller, R. T., Mitchell, T. D., & Pessoa, S. (2014). Valued voices: Students’ use of engagement in argumentative history writing. Linguistics and Education, 28, 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.10.002
Mitchell, T. D., Miller, R. T., & Pessoa, S. (2016). Longitudinal changes in use of engagement in university history writing: A case study. In L. Lai, A. Mahboob, & P. Wang (Eds.). Multiperspective studies of language: Theory and application (pp. 153–163). Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Naghdipour, B. (2016). English writing instruction in Iran: Implications for second language writing curriculum and pedagogy. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32, 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.05.001
Namaziandost E., & Shafiee, S. (2018). Gender differences in the use of lexical hedges in academic spoken language among Iranian EFL learners: A comparative study. International Journal of Research in English Education, 3(4), 64-80. https://doi.org/10.29252/ijree.3.4.63
Newman, M. L., Groom, C. J., Handelman, L. D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2008). Gender differences in language use: An analysis of 14,000 text samples. Discourse Processes, 45, 211-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530802073712
Oteíza, T. (2017). The appraisal framework and discourse analysis. In T. Bartlett, & G. O’Grady (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics (pp. 457– 472). Routledge.
Pankova, M. (2014). Exploring academic argumentation in course-related blogs through Engagement. In G. Thompson & L. Alba-Juez (eds.), Evaluation in context (pp. 281302). John Benjamins.
Pavlenko, A., & Piller, I. (2008). Language education and gender. In S. May and N.H. Hornberger (eds.) Language policy and political issues in education (pp. 57–69). Springer.
Ritchie, S. M. (2002). Student positioning within groups during science activities. Research in Science Education, 32(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015046621428
Roquet, H., Llopis, J., & Pérez-Vidal, C. (2015). Does gender have an impact on the potential benefits learners may achieve in two contexts compared? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 19(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.992389
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). Language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2016). Content-based language teaching with functional grammar in the elementary school. Language Teaching, 49(01), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000093
Serholt, S. (2012). Hedges and boosters in academic writing: A study of gender differences in essays written by Swedish advanced learners of English. Doctoral dissertation. Goteborgs University, Sweden.
Stewart, M. (2015). The language of praise and criticism in a student evaluation survey. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 45, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.01.004
Swain, E. (2010). Getting engaged: Dialogistic positioning in novice academic discussion writing. In E. Swain (Ed), Thresholds and potentialities of systemic functional linguistics: Multilingual, multimodal and other specialised discourses (pp. 291–317). EUT Edizioni Universita` di Trieste.
Thompson, G., & Muntigl, P. (2008). Systemic functional linguistics: An interpersonal perspective. In G. Antos, & E. Ventola (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 107-132). De Gruyter, Inc.
Warsono, W., & Widhiyanto, M. (2019). The comparison of appraisal resources in argumentative essays written by students with different proficiency levels. English Education Journal, 9(4), 484 – 491. https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v9i4.31980
Williams, J. D., & Takaku, S. (2011). Gender, writing self-efficacy, and help seeking. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 1(3), 46–54.
Wu, S. M. (2007). The use of engagement resources in high- and low-rated undergraduate geography essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(3), 254–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2007.09.006
Xie, J. (2016). Direct or indirect? Critical or uncritical? Evaluation in Chinese English-major MA thesis literature reviews. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.05.001
Yang, W., & Sun, Y. (2012). The use of cohesive devices in argumentative writing by Chinese EFL learners at different proficiency levels. Linguistics and Education, 23, 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2011.09.004
Yuliana, D., & Gandana, I. S. S. (2018). Writer’s voice and engagement strategies in students’ analytical exposition texts. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 613-620. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i3.9812
Alimorad, Z., & Nobahar, S. (). EFL students' engagement with readers in expository writing: Contribution of gender and proficiency level. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, x(x), x-x. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 241 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 137 |