تعداد نشریات | 19 |
تعداد شمارهها | 380 |
تعداد مقالات | 3,131 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,251,616 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,845,980 |
The Role of Learning-oriented Language Assessment in Promoting Interactional Metadiscourse in Ectenic and Synoptic EFL Learners | ||
Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies | ||
دوره 11، شماره 3، شهریور 2024، صفحه 181-206 اصل مقاله (982 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: research paper | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/jmrels.2024.19777.2305 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Rajab Esfandiari* 1؛ Omid Allaf-Akbary2 | ||
1Department of English Language Teaching, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Imam Khomeini international University, Qazvin, Iran | ||
2ِDepartment of English Language, Faculty of Literature, and Humanities, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran | ||
تاریخ دریافت: 10 دی 1402، تاریخ بازنگری: 12 اسفند 1402، تاریخ پذیرش: 13 اسفند 1402 | ||
چکیده | ||
In recent decades, undivided attention has been drawn to the examination of metadiscourse in different contexts, genres, languages, and disciplines. Nevertheless, a large body of research has been predominantly centred on the qualitative examination of potential metadiscourse markers and their associated functions. In the current study, we drew on an embedded design and followed learning-oriented language assessment (LOLA) in the use of interactional metadiscourse markers (IMMs) to better understand metadiscourse use by ectenic (n = 27) and synoptic (n = 30) learners using integrative writing tasks. To that end, 57 intermediate language learners completed Ehrman and Leaver’s (2003) learning style questionnaire. We followed Hyland’s (2019) interpersonal metadiscourse markers to determine the learners’ realisation of metadiscourse in their writing. SPSS (version 25) was run to analyse the quantitative data, and MAXQDA (version 2020) the think-aloud data. The results of chi-square analyses showed that ectenic learners outperformed synoptic ones following LOLA in the employment of IMMs. The results of inductive thematic analyses revealed that synoptic learners benefitted from the utilization of LOLA in employing IMMs in their integrative writing tasks. The findings suggest that the use of LOLA as a pedagogical method can effectively develop the writing proficiency of EFL learners. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Individual Differences؛ Interactional Metadiscourse؛ Learning-Oriented Language Assessment | ||
مراجع | ||
Brown, J. D., Coombe, C., & Lanteigne, B. (2021). Challenges in language testing around the world: Insights for language test users. Springer Nature.
Çakmak, F., Ismail, S. M., & Karami, S. (2023). Advancing learning-oriented assessment (LOA): Mapping the role of self-assessment, academic resilience, academic motivation in students’ test-taking skills, and test anxiety management in telegram-assisted-language learning. Language Testing in Asia, 13(20). 18-39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00230-8
Carless, D. (2007). Learning-oriented assessment: Conceptual basis and practical implications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(1), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290601081332
Chen, L., & Li, C. (2023). Interactional metadiscourse in news commentaries: A corpus-based study of China Daily and the New York Times. Journal of Pragmatics, 212(2), 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.04.018
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
Dafouz-Milne, E. (2008). The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross linguistic study of newspaper discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 95-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.003
D'Angelo, L. (2016). Academic posters: A textual and visual metadiscourse analysis. Peter Lang.
Derakhshan, A., & Ghiasvand, F. (2022). Demystifying Iranian EFL teachers’ perceptions and practices of learning-oriented assessment (LOA): Challenges and prospects in focus. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00204-2
Duane, G. (2018). Cracking TOEFL iBT writing tasks. CreateSpace independent publishing platform.
Ehrman, M., & Leaver, B. L. (2003). Cognitive styles in the service of language learning. System, 31(3), 393-415. https://doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00050-2
Enright, M., & Tyson, E. (2011). Validity evidence supporting the interpretation and use of TOEFL iBT scores. Educational Testing Service.
Esfandiari, R., & Allaf-Akbary, O. (2022a). Metadiscursive features in research articles: The role of stimulated recall. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 14(29), 245-263. https://doi.org/10.22034/elt.2022.51232.2487
Esfandiari, R., & Allaf-Akbary, O. (2022b). How task types and cognitive styles make a difference: Metadiscourse units and EFL learners’ oral production linguistic complexity. Iranian Journal of Learning and Memory, 4(16), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.22034/iepa.2022.150226
Estaji, M., & Safari, F. (2023). Learning-oriented assessment and its effects on the perceptions and argumentative writing performance of impulsive vs. reflective learners. Language Testing in Asia, 13(1), 31-54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00248-y
Fazel, I., & Ali, M. A. (2022). EAP teachers’ knowledge and use of learningoriented assessment: A cross contextual study. System, 104(2), 102-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102685
Gebril, A. (Ed.). (2021). Learning-oriented language assessment: Putting theory into practice. Routledge.
Gerbil, A. (2021). Learning-oriented language assessment: Putting theory into practice. Taylor & Francis.
Griffiths, C., & Soruç, A. (2020). Individual differences in language learning: A complex systems theory perspective. Springer Nature.
Hyland, K. (2019). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing (2nd edition). Continuum.
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2022). Metadiscourse choices in EAP: An intra-journal study of JEAP. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 60(2), 101-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101165
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in scholastic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156-177. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156
Izquierdo, M., & Blanco, M. (2023). Interactional metadiscourse: Building rapport and solidarity in informational-persuasive discourse. An English-Spanish case study. Journal of Pragmatics, 216(3), 106-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.08.005
Jalilzadeh, K., & Coombe, C. (2023). Constraints in employing learningoriented assessment in EFL classrooms: Teachers’ perceptions. Language Testing in Asia, 13(1), 473-489. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00226-4
Jalilzadeh, K., Dastgoshadeh, A., & Khosravi, R. (2023). The impact of an inservice professional development course on teachers’ language assessment knowledge. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies. https://doi.org/10.30479/jmrels.2023.18114.2152
Jones, N., & Saville, N. (2016). Learning oriented assessment. Cambridge University Press.
Kaliampos, J. (2022). EFL learners’ task perceptions and agency in blended learning: An exploratory mixed-methods study on the U.S. embassy school election project. Narr Francke Attempto Verlag.
Khatibi, Z., & Esfandiari, R. (2021). Comparative analysis of engagement markers in research article introductions and conclusions. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 8(3), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.30479/jmrels.2021.14944.1825
Konstantinidis, A. (2012). Implementing learning-oriented assessment in aneTwinning online course for Greek teachers. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 45–62. https://doi:10.1080/02602930600679043
Leaver, B. L., Campbell, C., & Davidson, D. E. (2021). Transformative language learning and teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Leung, C. (2020). Learning-oriented assessment: More than the chalk face. In M. E. Poehner, & O. Inbar-Lourie (Eds.), toward a reconceptualization of second language classroom assessment: Praxis and researcherteacher partnership (pp. 85–106). Springer Nature.
Li, M., Gibbons, J., & Pham, N. Q. (2023). Re-exploring writer-reader interaction: Analyzing metadiscourse in EAP students’ infographics. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 66(2), 101303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101303
Li, N. L. (2022). Cultural learning styles in language education: A special reference to Asian learning styles. Taylor & Francis.
Ma, M. (2023). Exploring learning-oriented assessment in EAP writing classrooms: Teacher and student perspectives. Language Testing in Asia, 23(3), 13-47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00264-y
Malecka, B., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., & Tai, J. (2022). An empirical study of student action from ipsative design of feedback processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(5), 801-815. https://doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1968338
Moslemi, N., & Dastghoshadeh, A. (2017). The relationship between cognitive styles and young adult learners’ preferences for written corrective feedback. How Journal, 24(2), 338-356. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.24.2.338
Nemtchinova, E. (2022). Enhancing beginner-level foreign language education for adult learners: Language instruction, intercultural competence, technology, and assessment. Taylor & Francis.
Ortega, L. (2014). Understanding second language acquisition. Taylor & Francis.
Pawlak, M. (2021). Exploring the interface between individual difference variables and the knowledge of second language grammar. Springer.
Pessoa, S., Mitchell, T., & Miller, R. (2017). Emergent arguments: A functional approach to analyzing student challenges with the argument genre. Journal of Second Language Writing, 38(3), 42-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.10.013
Przybył, J., & Pawlak, M. (2023). Personality as a factor affecting the use of language learning strategies: The case of university students. Springer.
Qiu, X., Wang, Y., Dartey, E. A., & Kim, M. (2024). Interactional metadiscourse in expert and student disciplinary writing: Exploring intrageneric and functional variation. English for Specific Purposes, 73(3), 124-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2023.10.007
Reinders, H., & Chong, W. S. (2023). Innovation in learning-oriented language assessment. Springer Nature.
Sadeghi, K., & Douglas, D. (2023). Fundamental considerations in technology mediated language assessment. Taylor & Francis.
Sun, P. P., Yuan, B., & Yan, X. (2023). Editorial: Individual differences in second/foreign language speech production: Multidisciplinary approaches and new sounds. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(4), 212-232. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1224059
Tsagari, D. (2020). Language assessment literacy: From theory to practice. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Turner, C. E., & Purpura, J. E. (2016). Learning-oriented assessment in second and foreign language classrooms. In D. Tsagari & J. Banerjee (Eds.), Handbook of second language assessment (pp. 255–274). DeGruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614513827-018
Wu, X., & Yang, H. (2022). A comparative analysis of English for academic purposes teachers' interactive metadiscourse across the British and Chinese contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(13), 36-49. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.879713
Yan, Z., & Carless, D. (2022). Self-assessment is about more than self: The enabling role of feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(7), 1116-1128. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.2001431
Yang, L. F., & Zhang, L. J. (2023). Self-regulation and student engagement with feedback: A case study of Chinese EFL student writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 63, 101226–101214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101226 | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3,921 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 249 |