اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 400 |
| تعداد مقالات | 3,255 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,605,766 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 3,127,760 |
ارزیابی محتوایی مجموعه فارسی بیاموزیم براساس چارچوب طبقهبندی تجدیدنظرشده بلوم | ||
| پژوهش نامه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیر فارسی زبانان | ||
| دوره 13، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 27، فروردین 1403، صفحه 101-130 اصل مقاله (1.93 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/jtpsol.2024.20294.1666 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| زهرا علیمراد* 1؛ رویا رزمی یگانه2 | ||
| 1نویسنده مسئول، دانشیار آموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران. | ||
| 2دانش آموختۀ کارشناس ارشد آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسی زبانان، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران. | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 12 اردیبهشت 1403، تاریخ بازنگری: 18 مرداد 1403، تاریخ پذیرش: 22 مرداد 1403 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| پژوهش حاضر مجموعه کتابهای "فارسی بیاموزیم" (چاپ اول) را بر اساس چارچوب طبقهبندی تجدیدنظرشده بلوم بررسی نمود. بدین منظور، تمامی فعالیت‌ها و تمرین‌های این مجموعه کدگذاری گردید و جهت اطمینان از قابل-اعتمادبودن کدگذاری‌ها، از دو روش پایایی بین دو کدگذار مستقل و بازکدگذار استفاده شد. سپس، فراوانی نسبی وقوع اهداف یادگیری مختلف محاسبه گردید. یافته‌ها نشان داد که به طور کلی، در این مجموعه، فراوانی نسبی مهارت‌های تفکر سطوح پایین‌تر (به‌یادآوردن، فهمیدن و بهکاربردن) نسبت‌به مهارت‌های تفکر سطوح بالاتر (تحلیل‌کردن، ارزیابی‌کردن و خلق‌کردن) بیشتر بود. بااین‌وجود، کدهای "به‌یادآوردن دانش واقعی"، "فهمیدن دانش واقعی"، "فهمیدن دانش مفهومی"، "بهکاربردن دانش واقعی"، "بهکاربردن دانش مفهومی"، "بهکاربردن دانش روندی"، و "به‌یادآوردن دانش مفهومی" که به‌ترتیب از پرتکرارترین تا کم‌تکرارترین هدف‌های سطوح پایین یادگیری در این مجموعه بودند، دارای سیر کاهشی فراوانی نسبی از جلد اول به جلد پنجم بودند. از طرف دیگر، سیر استفاده از کدهای سطوح بالای تفکر که به ترتیب از پرتکرارترین، کدهای "خلق‌کردن با استفاده از حقایق، مفاهیم، اصول و مراحل"، "تجزیه‌و‌تحلیل با استفاده از حقایق، مفاهیم، اصول و مراحل" و "ارزیابی‌کردن با استفاده از حقایق، مفاهیم، اصول و مراحل" می‌باشند، از جلد اول به جلد پنجم افزایشی بود. در راستای این یافته، نتایج حاصل از آزمون مجذور خی نیز تفاوت آماری معناداری را از نظر بازنمایی اهداف یادگیری طبقهبندی تجدیدنظرشده بلوم در جلد‌های مختلف این مجموعه نشان داد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| ارزیابی کتب آزفا؛ تحلیل محتوا؛ طبقهبندی تجدیدنظرشده بلوم؛ فارسی بیاموزیم | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Evaluating Farsi Biamouzim (Let’s Learn Persian) Series Using Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Zahra Alimorad1؛ Roya Razmi Yegane2 | ||
| 1Corresponding author, Assoiciate Professor of TEFL, Department of Foreign Languages and Linguistics, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. | ||
| 2MA in TEPSOL, Department of Foreign Languages and Linguistics, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The present study evaluated Farsi Biyamouzim (Let's Learn Persian First Edition) series using Bloom's revised taxonomy. To this aim, all exercises and activities of this series were coded and to ensure the reliability of the coding procedure, inter- and intra-coder reliabilities were estimated. Then, the relative frequency of occurrence of different learning objectives was calculated. Findings revealed that overall, lower-order thinking skills (Remember, Understand, and Apply) were more frequent than higher-order thinking skills (Analyze, Evaluate, and Create) in the series. Nevertheless, A1 (Remember factual knowledge), B1 (Understand factual knowledge), B2 (Understand conceptual knowledge), C1 (Apply factual knowledge), C2 (Apply conceptual knowledge), C3 (Apply procedural knowledge), and A2 (Remember conceptual knowledge) were the most to the least frequent codes of low learning objectives which exhibited a decreasing trend of relative frequency from the first to the fifth volume. On the other hand, higher-order thinking skills, which were F0 (Create using facts, concepts, principles, and procedures), D0 (Analyze using facts, concepts, principles, and procedures), and E0 (Evaluate using facts, concepts, principles, and procedures) from the most to the least frequent, respectively, showed an increasing trend from the first to the fifth volume. In line with this finding, results of the Chi-Square test also indicated statistically significant differences among different volumes in terms of Bloom's revised taxonomy's learning objectives. Extended Abstract: Introduction In the teaching and learning process, instructional books play a very important role in achieving educational goals (Ebadi & Mozafari, 2016). Ebadi and Mozafari believe that having a textbook for learners leads to their purposefulness and seriousness in passing course units. Therefore, the success or failure of any educational program is dependent on textbooks. In fact, textbooks are considered as sources for transferring knowledge to learners and have a significant role in curricula. Hence, evaluating textbooks to examine their impact on higher levels of learning is essential. That is why various frameworks have been introduced for analyzing the content of instructional books. One of the well-known and widely accepted frameworks is Bloom's taxonomy and its revised version (Nejatian Bostani & Miri, 1396). So far, however, only a few researchers have evaluated Persian language textbooks based on Bloom's revised taxonomy. Therefore, it seems that examining the content of these textbooks based on this taxonomy requires researchers' special attention. Among Persian language textbooks, the book "Let's Learn Persian" (Zolfaghari et al., 1382) has also been specifically analyzed and evaluated based on various frameworks. However, previous research indicates that the only study conducted on this series based on Bloom's revised taxonomy is Ebadi and Mozafari's (2016) study on three lessons of this series, randomly selected from each volume. Therefore, as far as current researchers are aware, no research has been conducted to examine all the exercises and activities of this five-volume series based on Bloom's revised taxonomy. To fill this research gap, the present study examined all the questions and exercises of this series by seeking answers to the following research question: In the activities and exercises of each volume of "Let's Learn Persian", how are different levels of Bloom's revised taxonomy distributed? In terms of the representation of different levels of this taxonomy, is there any statistically significant difference among different volumes? Methodology Due to lack of comprehensive studies on "Let's Learn Persian" series using Bloom's revised taxonomy, the present researchers selected this series for evaluation. Given that in this study, all lessons of each of the five volumes (i.e., the entire population) were considered, no specific sampling procedure was used. To collect data, all exercises and activities of the five volumes were extracted lesson by lesson and noted in separate tables. Then, they were coded based on the coding scheme developed by Razmjoo and Kazempourfard (2012). Two weeks after coding, the second researcher randomly coded a portion of the data to ensure intra-coder reliability. Additionally, another individual (a graduate of the English language teaching doctoral program who was a faculty member of another university) who was familiar with the taxonomy and had previously used it for coding in her doctoral dissertation, coded a portion of the data randomly selected. The index of the former was 99% while that of the latter was 98%, which were acceptable. It is worth mentioning that the researchers and the independent coder discussed and examined cases where they disagreed with each other in detail during several meetings to reach an agreement. Next, the relative frequency of each learning objective in each volume was calculated. Then, the chi-square test was used to compare different volumes in terms of the distribution of different levels of the taxonomy. Results In this series, overall, A1 which is the lowest level of Bloom's revised taxonomy was the most frequent code in the five volumes with a total relative frequency of 23.7. On the other hand, apart from codes with zero frequency, the least frequent code was A2, with a relative frequency of 2.2. Table 1. Chi-square test results 857.065a Chi-square 36 df 0.000 Asymp.sig Additionally, as shown in the above table, there was a statistically significant difference in the use of different levels of the taxonomy among different volumes of this series (Sig.=0.000). Table 2. Relative frequency of use of higher- and lower-level learning objectives in the entire series Higher learning objectives Lower learning objectives Learning objectives in "Let's Learn Persian" 7.8 92.2 Relative frequency Volume 1 15.3 84.8 Relative frequency Volume 2 12.9 87.1 Relative frequency Volume 3 31.3 68.6 Relative frequency Volume 4 42.7 57.4 Relative frequency Volume 5 Overall, it seems that lower-level learning objectives have received more attention in this series. More specifically, compared to higher-level learning objectives, lower-level ones, namely, "Remembering," "Understanding," and "Applying," were more utilized. This finding aligns with the results of numerous previous studies (e.g., Gordani, 2010; Rashidi & Raghnezhad, 2014; Seo et al., 2010) indicating a discrepancy in the presentation order of lower-level learning objectives. On the other hand, however, this finding is consistent with the results of several other studies (e.g., Razmjoo & Kazempourfard, 2012; Sahragard & Zahed Alavi, 2016). However, comparing the relative frequency of higher-level learning objectives in different volumes showed that the use of these levels has an increasing trend, and parallel to the increase in the educational level of the volumes from elementary to advanced, the relative frequency of higher levels also significantly increased (from 25 to 216) (Table 2). Based on these findings, in response to the research question, the results showed that A1 had the highest relative frequency in the entire series. Considering that exercises and lesson activities involving reading, repetition, and listening are coded A1, learners encountering such exercises are not engaged in any complex cognitive processes such as analysis, evaluation, and creation and may not even need to understand the meaning of the content. In fact, it can be said that learning such materials in the form of parrot-like memorization instead of focusing on the formation of knowledge through higher-level cognitive skills will not lead to the growth and advancement of learners' higher-order thinking skills. It is worth noting that codes A3, A4, B3, B4, C4, D4, E4, and F4 were totally absent throughout this series. In general, cognitive awareness includes metacognitive knowledge, task-related cognitive knowledge, including appropriate background knowledge, conditional knowledge, and self-knowledge. This finding is consistent with the results of Razmjoo and Kazempourfard's study (2012) who believed that the absence and utilization of this type of knowledge in textbooks may be because this knowledge, as an internal cognitive activity, is like an internal question that every learner must ask themselves in response to a specific lesson question or exercise, and since it is considered an internal cognitive activity, it may not be clearly visible in textbooks, and perhaps for this reason, no instances of these codes were observed in this collection. Conclusion Data analysis indicated that although, in general, the relative frequency of lower-level learning objectives was higher compared to higher-level ones, higher-level thinking skills were not only well covered but also properly distributed so that these skills increased from Volume 1 to Volume 5. Therefore, we witness learners' progress from lower-level learning objectives to higher-level ones, which is consistent with the learners' language proficiency level. Overall, it can be concluded that the design of activities and exercises in this series aims to increase learners' engagement with cognitive processes, indicating that the authors of the series have made increasing efforts to develop learners' higher-order thinking skills and have tailored their content as much as possible to educational cognitive objectives. As the series has been revised in recent years, future researchers can analyze and evaluate the revised textbooks using the same taxonomy. Additionally, another research can be conducted to uncover the reflection of this taxonomy in the tests administered based on this series in AZFA centers, the results of which can determine the direction in which the design of these tests is promoting learning objectives. Conflict of Interest The authors have no conflict of interest. Acknowledgement We would like to thank JTPSOL anonymous reviewers for providing us with their insifgtful and constructive comments which undoubtedly led to the betterment of this manuscript. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy, Content Analysis, Let’s Learn Persian Textbooks Series, TEPSOL Textbooks Evaluation | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
اسکندری، ب. (1396). بررسی، ارزیابی و تحلیل مجموعه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسیزبانان فارسی بیاموزیم ذوالفقاری و همکاران (1380-1396) براساس شاخص‌های ارزیابی کانینگزورث (1997 2007). پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران.
بقایی، ع. ( 1396). بررسی ساخت شرطی در متون خوانداری مجموعه فارسی بیاموزیم. دومین همایش ملی آموزش زبان و ادبیات فارسی، مشهد.
جهانگردی، ک.، عاصی، م.، افراشی، آ. و وکیلی فرد، ا. ر.(1395). واژه در کتابهای آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسیزبانان؛ پژوهشی پیکرهبنیاد. پژوهشنامه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسیزبانان، 5(12)، 26-3.
خویینی، ع. پارسانسب، م. و کرمانی، ن. ( 1399) . نقد مجموعه فارسی بیاموزیم . پژوهش نامه انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی، 20 (4)، 155-179.
ذوالفقاری، ح. غفاری، م، محمودی بختیاری، ب (1380). فارسی بیاموزیم (جلد اول). اداره کل چاپ و توزیع کتابهای درسی
ذوالفقاری، ح. غفاری، م، محمودی بختیاری، ب (1382). فارسی بیاموزیم (جلد پنجم). انتشارات مدرسه
رشیدی، ن. و اله یار، ف. (1393). توصیف و تحلیل مجموعه فارسی بیاموزیم بر اساس الگوی لیتل جان (2011). پژوهشنامه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسیزبانان، 4(9)، 136-103
رشیدی، ن. و راغ نژاد، م. (1393). ارزیابی محتوای کتابهای زبان فارسی (درسهای پایه و پایتخت ایران) درچارچوب طبقهبندی تجدیدنظرشده بلوم. علم زبان، 2 (3)، 83-106 .
رضایی، ح. و علی پور، م. (1391). بررسی متون خوانداری مجموعه فارسی بیاموزیم براساس نقش‌های هفتگانه‌ی زبان از دیدگاه هلیدی. پژوهشنامه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسیزبانان. 2( 1)، 163-179
سیف، ع. ( 1388). سنجش فرآیند و فراورده‌های یادگیری روش‌های قدیم و جدید. انتشارات دوران.
طالبی، م. و صحرایی، ر. ( 1396) . بازنمایی نقش‌ها و مفاهیم زبان در دو مجموعه آموزشی فارسی بیاموزیم و زبان فارسی. جستار‌های زبانی، 1، (36)، 127-153
عبادی، س. و ابراهیمی مرجل، ب. (1394). بازنمایی جنسیت در کتابهای آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسیزبانان. پژوهشنامه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسیزبانان، 4(10)، 27-46
عسکری رباطی، غ. و خلیلی کلاکی، ز. (1399) . تحلیل محتوای کتاب درسی ریاضی پایه نهم با تکنیک ویلیام رومی و طبقهبندی بلوم . فصلنامه پویش در آموزش علوم پایه، 2 (19)، 30-39
فتحی آذر، ا. (1391). روش‌ها و فنون تدریس. انتشارات دانشگاه تبریز.
مجیدی، ش. و صحرایی، ر. (1395). ارزیابی مجموعه آموزشی فارسی بیاموزیم از منظر برخی شاخص‌های گزینش کتاب مناسب. ارائه شده در نخستین همایش ملی واکاوی منابع آموزشی زبان فارسی به غیرفارسیزبانان، دانشگاه بهشتی، تهران.
موسوی حسن‌آباد، ر. و علیمراد، ز. (1395). بررسی نحوه بازنمایی شخصیت‌های مرد و زن در دو کتاب فارسی بیاموزیم و آموزش نوین زبان فارسی. ارائه شده در نخستین همایش ملی واکاوی منابع آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسیزبانان، دانشگاه بهشتی، تهران.
مهرپور، س. سعادت، م. و جعفری، س. ( 1394) . مقایسه کتابهای انگلیسی با اهداف ویژه برای دانشجویان رشته های مهندسی، علوم انسانی و پزشکی در دانشگاه‌های ایران براساس طبقهبندی اصلاحشده بلوم . پژوهش و نگارش کتب دانشگاهی، 19 (36)، 67-89
نجاتیان بستانی، ح. و میری، م. ( 1396) . تحلیل محتوای جلد اول کتاب آموزش نوین زبان فارسی بر اساس نظریه حیطه‌های شناختی بلوم . ارائه شده در دومین همایش ملی آموزش زبان و ادبیات فارسی، مشهد.
نخستین، س. و علیمراد، ز. (1401). بررسی چگونگی بازنمایی جنسیت در مجموعه فارسی بیاموزیم. پژوهشنامه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسیزبانان، 11(2)، 245-267.
References:
Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D., Airrasian, P., Cruikshak, K., Mayer, R., Pintrich, P., Rath, J & Wittrock, M. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Askari Robati, G. H., & Khalili Kelaki, Z. (1399). Content analysis of the ninth grade mathematics textbook based on William Romey's technique and Bloom's cognitive domain. Quarterly Journal of Education in Basic Sciences, 2(19), 30-39. [In Persian]
Baghaee, A. (1396). Examining the conditional construction in the reading texts of Let's Learn Persian series. Paper presented at the 2nd National Conference on Teaching Persian Language and Literature [In Persian]
Black, S. M., & Ellis, R. B. (2010). Evaluating the level of critical thinking in introductory investment courses. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 14(4), 99-106.
Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: cognitive domain. Longman.
Coleman, V. M. (2013). National music education standards and adherence to Bloom's revised taxonomy. Doctoral dissertation, Walden University, the USA.
Divsar, H. (2016). Critical thinking across TEFL, translation, and English Literature curricula at BA and MA Levels: Evaluating and reconstructing curricula for critical thinking. MA Thesis, Payame Noor University.
Durukan, E. (2009). A taxonomic study on questions about understanding the meaning of the texts in seventh class Turkish language textbooks. MilliEgitim, 181, 84-93.
Ebadi, S., & Ebrahimi Marjal, B. (2015). Gender representations in the textbooks of teaching Persian to non-Persian speakers: A case study of “Let’s Learn Persian” (Volumes 2 and 3). Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 4(TOME 10), 27-46. [In Persian]
Ebadi, S., & Mozafari, V. (2016). Exploring Bloom’s revised taxonomy of educational objectives in TPSOL textbooks. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 5 (1), 65-93.
Eskandari, B. (1396). Review, evaluation and analysis of the collection of Persian language textbooks for non-Persian speakers, entitled Let's learn Persian based on Cunningsworth Evaluation Indicators. Unpublished master's thesis, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]
Fathi Azar, A. (1391). Teaching methods and techniques. Tabriz University Press. [In Persian]
Gegen, S. E. (2006). The effects of higher-level questioning in a highschool mathematics classroom. Master’s thesis, Wichita University.
Gordani, Y. (2010). An analysis of English textbooks used at Iranian guidance schools in terms of Bloom's taxonomy. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 7(2), 249-278.
Jahangardi, K., Assi, M., Afrashi, A., & Vakilifard, A. (2016). Vocabulary in the textbooks of teaching Persian to non-Persian speakers: A corpus-based study. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 5(TOME 12), 3-26. [In Persian]
Khoeini, E., Parsanasab, M., & Kermani, N. (2020). A review on the second edition of Farsi Biyamuzim. Pizhuhish nāmah-i intiqādī-i mutūn va barnāmah hā-yi ̒ulūm-i insāni (Critical Studies in Texts & Programs of Human Sciences), 20(4), 155-179. doi: 10.30465/crtls.2020.26528.1592 [In Persian]
Majidi, S., & Sahraee, R. (1395). Evaluating the educational collection of Farsi Biyazim from the point of view of some suitable book selection indicators. Paper presented at the First National Conference on Investigating TPSOL (Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages) Textbooks [In Persian]
Mehrpur, S., Saadat, M., & Jafari, S. (2015). Comparison of English-for-specific-purposes textbooks for engineering, humanities and medicine students in Iranian universities based on Bloom's revised taxonomy. Biannual Journal of University Textbooks: Research and Writing, 19(36), 67-89. [In Persian]
Moosavi Hassan Abad, R., & Alimorad, Z. (1395). Investigating the representation of male and female characters in two Persian textbooks, Farsi Biyamuzim and Modern Persian Language Teaching. Paper presented at the First National Conference on Investigating TPSOL (Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages) Textbooks [In Persian]
Mosallanejad, N. (2008). Evaluation of high school English textbooks on the basis of Bloom's taxonomy. Unpublished master’s thesis, Shiraz University, Iran.
Nakhostin, S., & Alimorad, Z. (2022). Uncovering gender representation in Farsi Biyamuzim (Let’s Learn Persian) series. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 11(2), 245-267. doi: 10.30479/jtpsol.2023.18596.1635 [In Persian]
Nejatian Bostani, H., & Miri, M. (1396). Analysis of the content of the first volume of the modern Persian language teaching book based on Bloom's theory of cognitive domains. Paper presented at the 2nd National Conference on Farsi Language Teaching and Linguistics [In Persian]
Pickard, M. J. (2007). The new Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview for family and consumer sciences. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education, 25(1), 45-55.
Pratiwi, R., Suparwa, I., & Satyawati, M. (2021). Textbook evaluation of ‘Economic and Developmental study’. International Journal of Research Publications (IJRP), 81(1), 115-123.
Rashidi, N., & Allahyar, F. (2015). Describing and analyzing “Farsi Biamouzim” series within the framework of LittleJohn (2011). Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 4(TOME 9), 103-136. [In Persian]
Rashidi, N., & Raghnezhad, M. (1393). A content analysis of the Persian language textbooks (“Base Courses” and “Capital of Iran”) in terms of Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy. Language Science, 2(3), 86-103. [In Persian]
Razmjoo, S. A., & Kazempourfard, E. (2012). On the representation of Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy in Interchange coursebooks. Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS), 4(1), 171-202.
Rezai, H., & Alipur, M. (2013). A study of the reading passages from “Farsi Biamuzim” based on Halliday’s seven functions of language. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 1(2), 163-179. [In Persian]
Roohani, A., Jam, B., & Shamsi, A. (2015). Investigating cognitive processes in the tests of Top-Notch series using Bloom’s taxonomy. Journal of Educational International Investigations, 2(10), 10-19.
Sahragard, R., & Zahed Alavi, S. (2016). Investigating the predominant levels of learning objectives in general English books. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 17(8), 93-114.
Seif, A. (1388). Assessing process and product of learning. Doran Publications [In Persian]
Seo, Y.J., Kim, H. S. & Chae, H. K. (2010). Analysis of the end-of-chapter questions in Chemistry II according to Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy of educational objectives. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 54(3), 329-337.
Shahbazian, F. (2016). Exploring the cognitive and knowledge dimension of national English final exam items of Iranian high school based on Bloom’s revised taxonomy. Unpublished MA thesis, Razi University, Iran.
Talebi, M., & Sahraee, R. (2017). The representation of Persian language functions and notions in Let's Learn Persian and Persian Language series. Language Related Research, 8(1), 127-153. [In Persian]
Usluoglu, B., & Toptas, V. (2020). Investigation of unit evaluation questions in elementary school 1st and 2nd grade mathematics textbooks according to Revised Bloom Taxonomy. Eğitim Kuram ve Uygulama Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(2), 136-14
Wang, V., & Farmer, L. (2008). Adult teaching methods in China and Bloom’s taxonomy. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 13.
Wong, M., & Evans, D. (2007). Improving basic multiplication fact recall for primary school students. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19(1), 89-106.
Zolfaghari, H., Ghaffari, M., & Mahmoodi Bakhtiari, B. (1380). Let's Learn Persian (First Volume). Department of Printing and Distribution of Textbooks [In Persian]
Zolfaghari, H., Ghaffari, M., & Mahmoodi Bakhtiari, B. (1382). Let's Learn Persian (Fifth Volume). Madreseh Publications [In Persian]
Zorluoglu, S., L., Kizilaslan, A., & Yapucuoglu- Donmez, M. (2020). The analysis of 9th grade chemistry curriculum and textbook according to revised Bloom’s taxonomy. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science, 15(1), 9-2.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 312 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 236 |
||