اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 400 |
| تعداد مقالات | 3,256 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,608,316 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 3,129,762 |
The Impact of Dropbox Paper as an Online Collaborative Tool on the Academic Writing Skills of Iranian EFL Learners | ||
| Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies | ||
| دوره 12، شماره 3، مهر 2025، صفحه 101-127 اصل مقاله (398.9 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/jmrels.2024.21117.2441 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Shima Taheri؛ Hooshang Khoshsima* ؛ Ali Beikian؛ Amir Mohammadian | ||
| Department of English Language, Chabahar Maritime University, Chabahar, Iran | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 07 آبان 1403، تاریخ بازنگری: 25 آذر 1403، تاریخ پذیرش: 10 دی 1403 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Technology integration into language learning has appeared as a prominent research focus in the past few years. The present study aimed to investigate the comparative effects of using Dropbox Paper as an online collaborative tool versus traditional non-collaborative writing instruction on the academic writing skills of Iranian EFL learners across varying proficiency levels. The research utilized a quasi-experimental research design, focusing on the collection and analysis of quantitative data. A total of 90 Iranian EFL learners were selected through convenience sampling and randomly assigned to either the experimental group, which utilized Dropbox Paper for collaborative academic writing, or the control group, which engaged in non-collaborative writing methods. Each group contained 45 learners with three different proficiency groups, i.e., high, mid, and low. The instructional phase included a pretest, followed by targeted instruction on academic essay writing for two months for both groups. Collaborative practices using Dropbox Paper as an online collaborative tool to write comments and notes and to receive teacher and peer feedback on their writings were considered for the experimental group and only direct teacher's feedback for the control group, culminating in a posttest to evaluate the outcomes. The findings highlighted the need to align technology-enhanced writing instruction with learners’ proficiency levels. Collaborative tools like Dropbox Paper are more effective for mid and high-proficiency learners, emphasizing the importance of scaffolding for lower-proficiency learners to ensure equitable benefits. These insights provide practical guidance for integrating collaborative tools into EFL classrooms to optimize writing instruction. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Academic writing؛ dropbox paper؛ Online collaboration؛ Proficiency | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Alsahil, A. (2024). Exploring students’ perceptions and affordances of Google Docs-supported collaborative writing. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 18, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2326030
Alyafaei, Y. & Mudhsh, B. A. (2023). A review study on the impact of online collaborative learning on EFL students' writing skills. International Journal of Linguistics Studies. 3(3), 8-18. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijls.2023.3.3.2
Ayan, E., & Seferglu, S. S. (2017). Using Etherpad for online collaborative writing activities and learners with different language learning strategies. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 42-59. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.461000
Bandura, A. (1986). Fearful expectations and avoidant actions as a coeffect of perceived self-inefficacy. American Psychologist, 41(12), 189-191. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.41.12.1389
Buchner, J., & Kerres, M. (2023). Media comparison studies dominate comparative research on augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 195, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104711
Celce-Murcia, M., & Olshtain, E. (2000). Discourse and context in language teaching (pp. 44-56). Cambridge University Press.
Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky's analysis of learning and instruction. In Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V. & Miller, S. (Eds.). Vygotsky's educational theory and practice in cultural context. Cambridge University Press.
Dincer, N., & Bal, S. (2024). A Qualitative Journey on Instructors' Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in EFL Education. In AI in Language Teaching, Learning, and Assessment (pp. 78-100). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.17576/apjitm-2021-1002
Dobakhti, L., Zohrabi, M., & Masoudi, S. (2023). Scrutinizing the utility of flipped and online instructions for ameliorating EFL learners’ writing ability. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 10(3), 71-94. https://doi.org/10.30479/jmrels.2023.18587.2192
Esfandiari, R., & Allaf-Akbary, O. (2024). The role of ChatGPT-based instruction and flipped language learning in metadiscourse use in EFL learners’ argumentative writing and their perceptions of the two instructional methods. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills), 43(3), 27-52. https://doi.org/10.22099/tesl.2024.49975.3277
Fathi, J., & Nourzadeh, S. (2019). Examining the effects of writing instruction through blogging on second language writing performance and anxiety. Issues in Language Teaching, 8(1), 63-91.
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). What we know, what we still need to know: Teaching adolescents to write. Scientific Studies in Reading,11(4), 313-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530664
Hafner, C. A., and Ho, W. Y. J. (2020). Assessing digital multimodal composing in second language writing: Towards a process-based model. Journal of Second Language Writing, 47(2), 100710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100710
Hewitt, J. and M. Scardamalia. (1998). Design principles for the support of distributed processes. Educational Psychology Review 10 (1), 75-96. http://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022810231840
Jalili, Sh. (2024). Effect of online collaborative learning via Google Docs on writing performance of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 12 (48), 41-50. https://doi.org/10.30495/JFL.2023.706285
Kessler, M. (2020). Technology-mediated writing: exploring incoming graduate students’ L2 writing strategies with activity theory. Computers and Composition, 55, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102542
Knox, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence and education in China. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 298-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1754236
Kolowich, S. (2014). Can universities use data to fix what ails the lecture? The Chronicle of Higher Education.
Lee, I. (2017). Portfolios in classroom L2 writing assessment. In Classroom writing assessment and feedback in L2 school contexts (pp. 105–122). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3924-9_8
Li, T. & Zhang, Y. (2020). The construct of English competence and test design for non-English major postgraduates. English Language Teaching,14(1), 58-63. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n1p58
Liu, G. Z., Fathi, J., and Rahimi, M. (2023). Enhancing EFL learners’ intercultural communicative effectiveness through telecollaboration with native and non-native speakers of English. Computer-assisted Language Learning, 36, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2164778
Marandi, S. S., & Seyyedrezaie, M. S. (2017). The multi-course comparison of the effectiveness of two EFL writing environments: Google Drive versus face-to-face on Iranian EFL learners’ writing performance and writing apprehension. CALL-EJ, 18(1), 9-21.
Moreno, J. de J. (2012). Using social network and Dropbox in blended learning: An application to university education. Business, Management and Education, 10(2), 220–231. https://doi.org/10.3846/bme.2012.16
Muluk, S., & Dahliana, S. (2024). Investigating students’ writing performance and attitude towards a Web 2.0-based flipped classroom instruction. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 12(1), 137-164. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v12i1.1090
Olshtain, E. (2001). Functional tasks for mastering the mechanics of writing and going just beyond. In M.Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd edition, pp. 206-217). USA Heinle & Heinle.
Pardede, P. (2024). Collaborative writing in EFL settings: A review. JET (Journal of English Teaching), 10(1), 92-109. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v10i1.5631
Rahimi, M., and Fathi, J. (2022). Exploring the impact of wiki-mediated collaborative writing on EFL students’ writing performance, writing self-regulation, and writing self-efficacy: A mixed methods study. Computer-assisted Language Learning. 35 (2), 7–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1888753
Razak, N. A., Alakrash, H., & Sahboun, Y. (2018). English language teachers’ readiness for the application of technology towards the fourth industrial revolution demands. Asia-Pacific Journal of Information Technology and Multimedia, 7(2), 89-98. https://doi.org/10.17576/apjitm-2018-0702(02)-08
Reinhardt, J. (2019). Social media in second and foreign language teaching and learning: Blogs, wikis, and social networking. Language Teaching 5(2), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444818000356
Saricaoglu, A. (2019). The impact of automated feedback on L2 learners’ written causal explanations. ReCALL, 31(2), 189-203. https://doi.org/10.1017/s095834401800006x
Shooli, E., Rahimi Esfahani, F., & Sepehri, M. (2021). Impacts of the flipped classroom on micro/macro writing subskills in Iranian EFL context. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 8(4), 85-109. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1530290
Soller, A. (2001). Supporting social interaction in an intelligent collaborative learning system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12(1), 40-62. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr01223
Stapleton, P., and Radia, P. (2010). Tech-era L2 writing: Towards a new kind of process. ELT Journal. 64(2), 175-183. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp038
Strobl, C. (2013). Affordances of Web 2.0 technologies for collaborative advanced writing in a foreign language. Calico Journal, 31(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.31.1.1-18
Taheri, Sh., Shahrokhi, M. (2016). The impact of blog peer feedback on improving Iranian English foreign language students' writing. In Handbook of Research on Foreign Language Education in the Digital Age (pp. 365-386). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0177-0.ch017
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wang, J. (2017). Cloud computing technologies in writing class: Factors influencing students’ learning experience. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(3), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.328954
Wang, Z. (2022). Computer-assisted EFL writing and evaluations based on artificial intelligence: A case from a college reading and writing course. Library Hi-Tech, 40(1), 80-97. https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-05-2020-0113
Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M. (2007). Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research,11(2), 121-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880607074599
Xu, J. (2021). Chinese university students’ L2 writing feedback orientation and self-regulated learning strategies in online teaching during Covid-19. The Asia- Pacific Education Research, 30(6), 563-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00586-6
Zioga, c., & Bikos, K. (2020). Collaborative writing using Google Docs in primary education: Development of argumentative discourse. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(1), 133-142. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.690372 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 205 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 26 |
||