اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 404 |
| تعداد مقالات | 3,303 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,706,454 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 3,189,829 |
بررسی میزان همبستگی بین توانش بینافرهنگی در مدرسان زبان فارسی به غیرفارسی زبانان و عملکرد فارسی‌آموزانشان | ||
| پژوهش نامه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیر فارسی زبانان | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 13، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 28، مهر 1403، صفحه 27-51 اصل مقاله (1.52 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/jtpsol.2025.21174.1683 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| زهرا ابوالحسنی چیمه1؛ مائده جعفری ندوشن* 2 | ||
| 1دانشیار زبان شناسی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد آموزش زبان فارسی به غیر فارسی‌زبانان، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 21 آبان 1403، تاریخ بازنگری: 18 فروردین 1404، تاریخ پذیرش: 16 اسفند 1403 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| با گسترش ارتباطات جهانی، انعطاف‌پذیری در برابر فرهنگ‌های مختلف و توانایی مدیریت تعاملات بینافرهنگی اهمیت ویژه‌ای پیدا کرده است. زبان به‌عنوان مهم‌ترین ابزار انتقال فرهنگ، نیاز به متخصصانی دارد که با تفاوت‌ها و تشابهات فرهنگی آشنا باشند. هدف اصلی این پژوهش بررسی میزان همبستگی بین توانش بینافرهنگی در مدرسان زبان فارسی به غیرفارسی‌زبانان و عملکرد فارسی‌آموزانشان بود. برای انجام این پژوهش از پرسشنامۀ بستۀ هوش بینافرهنگی آنگ و همکاران (2004) با چهار مؤلفه فراشناختی، دانشی، انگیزشی و رفتاری استفاده شد. همچنین از هر مدرس خواسته شد نمرات زبان‌آموزان آخرین ترمی که تدریس داشته‌اند را در اختیار پژوهشگر قرار دهند. همبستگی میان نمرات به‌دست‌آمده از پرسشنامه و میانگین نمرات زبان‌آموزان هر مدرس با فرمول ضریب همبستگی پیرسون محاسبه شد. نتایج نشان داد میزان توانش بینافرهنگی مدرسان آموزش زبان فارسی با کیفیت تدریس آنان رابطۀ مستقیم دارد، یعنی هرچه میزان شناخت از فرهنگ‌های متفاوت و متنوع زبان‌آموزان، داشتن انگیزه و علاقه به تعامل بینافرهنگی، احترام به آن فرهنگ‌ها، به کارگیری راهبردهای مناسب در روش تدریس و داشتن دیدگاهی پذیرا در محیط آموزشی بیشتر باشد، می‌توان انتظار افزایش یادگیری و بهبود نمرات زبان‌آموزانی که از فرهنگ‌های متفاوت هستند را داشت. همچنین در همین مطالعه مشخص شد که مدرسان ایرانی آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسی‌زبانان از توانش بینافرهنگی بالایی برخوردار هستند. در آخر نیز استراتژی‌ها و راهکارهایی برای ایجاد محیطی مناسب برای پذیرش تنوعات فرهنگی در کلاس درس فارسی و افزایش هوش بینافرهنگی مدرسان نیز ارائه شده است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| توانش بینافرهنگی؛ مدرس آزفا؛ هوش بینافرهنگی؛ فارسی‌آموز | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Investigating The Correlation Between The Intercultural Competence Of Persian language Teachers To Non-Persian Speakers And Their Persian Learners’ Performance | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Zahra Abolhassani Chimeh1؛ Maedeh Jafari Nodoushan2 | ||
| 1Associate Prof, Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Literature & Humanities, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Corresponding author MA Student, Department of Teaching Persian to non-Persian Speakers, Faculty of Literature & Humanities, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| With the expansion of global communications, flexibility towards different cultures and the ability to manage intercultural interactions have become particularly important. Language, as the most important means of transmitting culture, requires specialists who are familiar with cultural differences and similarities. The main objective of this study was to investigate the correlation between intercultural competence in Persian language teachers (teaching to non-Persian speakers) and the performance of their Persian language learners. To conduct this research, the Ang (2004) Intercultural Intelligence Questionnaire with four components (metacognitive, cognitive, motivational, and behavioral) was employed. Then, each teacher was asked to provide the grades of their last term’s Persian language learners. The correlation between the questionnaire-derived scores and the average student grades for each teacher was calculated with the Pearson's correlation coefficient formula. The results of this study demonstrated a direct relationship between teachers’ intercultural competence and their teaching quality. In other words, the more teachers were knowledgeable about diverse cultures and respectful toward them, having the motivation in intercultural interaction, being respectful for cultures, incorporating this awareness into their teaching methods and maintaining an open-minded approach in their educational environment, the higher the expected improvement in learning outcomes and grades from students with different cultural backgrounds will be. Furthermore, this study indicated that these teachers exhibited a high level of intercultural competence. At the end of the study, strategies and recommendations were proposed to create an inclusive Persian language classroom environment that embraces cultural diversity instruction and also increases the intercultural intelligence in teachers. Extended Abstract: Introduction Today mutual understanding and intercultural competencies are vital as they help us overcome prejudice, discrimination, and misunderstandings among individuals from different cultural backgrounds. Language and culture are interconnected and interact with their environment (Van Lier, 2004). The ability to continuously adapt with people from diverse cultures and manage intercultural communications is crucial. In the global workplace, particularly in foreign language education, it is essential to have individuals who are familiar with various cultures and can communicate effectively (Fayazi, Jan-NesarAhmadi, 2006). Thus, 21st-century teachers must possess multicultural perspectives and intercultural competencies. They should be flexible and tolerant towards different lifestyles, respect the rights of other citizens, and take a strong stand against discrimination (Pederson, 2001). Conflicts and differences in opinion are likely to arise when teachers and learners come from diverse cultural backgrounds (Israth, Thatcher, and Galley, 2008). Lack of adequate knowledge about a nation's culture can lead to negative and sometimes false positive prejudices in people's minds (Beischel et al., 1999). These intercultural communication skills in foreign language education enable teachers to successfully communicate with representatives of the target language's culture (Reid, 2015). Moreover, intercultural teaching competencies in educators serve as a model for students to engage comfortably and respectfully in global cultural discussions in the classroom. Competent intercultural educators are open to various ways of knowing (Archibald, 2008; Heig-Brown, 2008), reflect on their approaches to curriculum design and evaluation (Page, 1996), and promote multiple perspectives when selecting content and conducting educational activities (Dardorff, 2011). This research answers these two questions: What is the level of intercultural competence in Persian language teachers to non-Persian speakers? Is there a correlation between the intercultural competence of Persian language teachers to non-Persian speakers and the performance of their Persian students at the end of the semester? The hypothesis is that Iranian Persian language teachers to non-Persian speakers should have a high level of intercultural competence. Also, there seems to be a correlation between the intercultural ability of these teachers and Persian learners. Methodology In this study, a questionnaire developed by Ang and colleagues (2004) was used to assess intercultural intelligence. The questionnaire consisted of 20 questions designed on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree". The selection process for teachers (participants) involved several steps: initially, licensed Azfa centers across the country were identified through the Student Affairs Organization portal. Then, Azfa teachers from these centers were identified via their specialized websites, and the questionnaire was sent online to those accessible. Out of 74 available teachers, 27 teachers were interested and completed the questionnaire. This questionnaire evaluates participants' ability to communicate better in a different culture through four components: metacognitive, cognitive, motivational, and behavioral. Additionally, each teacher was asked to enter the grades of their students from the last term they taught into the questionnaire. Given that the maximum score in assessments varied among teachers, with grades being either out of 100 or out of 20, all scores were normalized to a 20-point scale for the analysis of this study. Results So far, the correlation between the intercultural competence of Persian language teachers to non-Persian speakers and its four factors with the quality of education and their language learners was investigated by the 4-component intercultural intelligence questionnaire of Ang et al. (2004). The first component was metacognitive, which had 4 questions and measured the mental model of teachers and their understanding of different cultural norms. With the correlation coefficient of this component, which was reported as 0.82, it can be concluded that the ability of Azfa teachers in planning, predicting, evaluating, revising mental models and understanding the cultural norms of people of different countries in multicultural situations has a great impact on the quality of their teaching and increasing the scores of Persian learners. The next component, knowledge, which consisted of 6 questions, measures the level of teachers' knowledge and information about values, laws, vocabulary and grammar, marriage system, artistic industries, and generally the economic, legal, and social systems of different cultures. The correlation coefficient of this component with the teaching quality of Persian language teachers to non-Persian speakers was 0.67, which can be concluded that Azfa teachers' knowledge and awareness of cultures, norms, values, cultural similarities and differences, and even the source language of their Persian students, is effective in learning and improving the grades of Persian students. The third was the motivational component with 5 questions that measure the motivation and amount of energy that teachers spend to interact with different cultures and learn about them. The correlation coefficient of 0.65 in this component shows that this component is also considered as one of the influential and important components in increasing intercultural intelligence and as a result intercultural ability. So, the more teachers are motivated to interact with the different cultures of their Persian students and the more they enjoy and even control their emotions and behavior when there is a cultural difference, the better the quality of teaching. Finally, the behavioral component with 5 questions that measures the ability to adapt behavior to intercultural knowledge and the degree of flexibility in facing different cultures and, in general, verbal and non-verbal actions appropriate to the situation in front of Persian learners who were from different cultures, has a moderate correlation with quality had teaching and its coefficient was 0.41. It can be concluded that it is important to show appropriate behavior to intercultural conditions; But the potential change and correction of the worldview and views is more important than the actual and explicit change in behavior. Also, at the end, the correlation level of the whole test with the language learners' scores was reported as 0.72, which indicates that there is a positive correlation between the intercultural competence of Azfa teachers and Persian learners. Then; According to the findings of this research, the average score of all the components of intercultural intelligence of the teachers is 101.4, which is higher than the average of the sum of the scores of all the components (80), so it is a confirmation that the teachers have intercultural ability. Also, the highest score is related to the motivational component with an average of 28.3 and the lowest score is related to the metacognitive component with an average of 21.5, which shows that teachers of Persian language teaching to non-Persian speakers have a great desire to interact in different cultures and a high motivation to know cultures. Therefore, it can be concluded that these teachers of Persian language, unlike non-Persian speakers, generally have a high intercultural competence. Conclusion This article examines the correlation between the intercultural competence of Iranian Persian language teachers for non-Persian speakers and the performance of their students. It aims to answer two main questions: the extent of teachers' intercultural competence and the significance of its relationship with teaching quality and their student performance. Using a quantitative approach based on theoretical frameworks from Cross (1989), Dimitrov (2014), and Earley and Ang (2003), the study employs Ang's (2004) cultural intelligence measurement tool, focusing on four components: metacognitive, cognitive, motivational, and behavioral. Data were collected through student score averages after Persian language courses and an online questionnaire on cultural intelligence for teachers. Findings indicate that Iranian teachers possess high intercultural competence, aligning with previous researches such as Eslami (1399), Kazazi (1401) and Sadeghi (1394). The data reveal a positive correlation between teachers' intercultural competence and student performance, particularly in the metacognitive component, suggesting that effective intercultural communication enhances learning outcomes which was in line with the researches of Egitim (2022), Tzoli (2023) and Guler and Karabiner (2013), who believe that teachers' intercultural competence has a positive effect on the quality of their teaching. The study emphasizes that understanding diverse cultural backgrounds and having the motivation to apply this knowledge can significantly improve student engagement and achievement. This identifies intercultural competence as a crucial factor in enhancing the quality of Persian language instruction. Additionally, the article offers strategies for teachers to improve their cultural intelligence, including reflective practices, cultural education, fostering curiosity, and adapting behaviors to various cultural contexts. Overall, strengthening intercultural competence can lead to more effective teaching and better management of diverse classrooms. Conflict of Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Intercultural competence, Persian teacher to non-Persian speakers, Intercultural intelligence, Persian language learners | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
اسلامی، فرانک (1399). «هوش فرهنگی مدرسان آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسی‌زبانان و متغیرهای پیش‌بینی‌کنندۀ آن». پژوهشنامه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسی‌زبانان، دوره 19، شماره 1.
اطیفیان، آمنه. (1394). تعیین شایستگی‌های چندفرهنگی معلمان و سنجش آنها در مدارس ابتدایی. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد. دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران.
افضلی، سعیده؛ صادقی، علی رضا؛ موسی پور، نعمت الله و قادری، مصطفی (1401). «ارزیابی ابعاد سواد چندفرهنگی دانشجومعلمان دانشگاه فرهنگیان». مطالعات آموزشی و آموزشگاهی، دوره 11، شماره1.
بریجانیان، ماری (1373). فرهنگ اصطلاحات فلسفه و علوم اجتماعی. تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.
حقانی، نادر (1384). «مهارت پنجم». پژوهش زبان‌های خارجی، شماره 25.
خدادادیان، مهدی و ابطحی، سید مهدی (1395). «هوش فرهنگی و یادگیری مهارتهای زبان فارسی در فارسی آموزان غیرایرانی». پژوهشنامه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسی زبانان، دوره5 ، شماره 2.
دوبختی، لیلا (1400). «کنکاشی در توانش فرهنگی در آموزش و فراگیری زبان انگلیسی: معلمان، زبان‌آموزان و مطالب درسی در عصر جهانی‌سازه شده». مطالعات زبان و ترجمه، دوره 54، شماره3.
رضایی اردانی، فضل الله و صادقی، مهدی (1402). «بررسی تأثیر هوش فرهنگی بر سازگاری بینافرهنگی و عملکرد زبان آموزان غیرفارسی زبان در یادگیری زبان فارسی». نشریۀ پژوهش در آموزش زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دوره 4، شماره 1.
رضایی‌شریف، علی؛ شیخ الاسلامی، علی و رجب پور نیک نام، فاطمه (1395). «اعتباریابی مقیاس صلاحیت چندفرهنگی روانشناسی مدرسه در مشاوران مدارس». فصلنامه اندازه گیری تربیتی، دوره 7، شماره 25.
صادقی، علیرضا (1391). چندفرهنگی و نسبت آن با آموزش. رشد تکنولوژی آموزشی، دوره 28، شماره 4.
فیاضی، مرجان و جان‌نثاراحمدی، هدی (1385). «هوش فرهنگی؛ نیاز مدیران در قرن تنوع». نشریه تدبیر، شماره 172.
کزازی، منصور (1401). تعیین میزان شایستگی چندفرهنگی معلمان ابتدایی شهر تهران، همایش ملی پژوهش‌های مدیریت و علوم انسانی در ایران، دوره 10.
مالمیر، علی (1400). «رابطه بین تعامل توان بینافرهنگی معلمان زبان خارجه و دانش منظورشناختی زبان‌آموزان در زمینه کنش‌های کلامی پربسامد انگلیسی». مطالعات زبان و ترجمه، دوره 54، شماره 3.
وکیلی فرد، امیررضا و عباسی جوکندان، الهام (1403). «توانش ارتباطی بینافرهنگی در کلاس‌های آموزش زبان فارسی: دیدگاه فارسی آموزان غیرایرانی». فصلنامه تحقیقات فرهنگی ایران، دوره 17، شماره 1.
References:
Afzali, S., Sadeghi, A., Musapour, N., Ghaderi, M. (2022). Evaluation of Multicultural Literacy Dimensions of Farhangian University Students – teachers. Educational and Scholastic Studies, 11 (1). [In Persian]
Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., Koh, C., Ng, K. Y., Templer, K. J., Tay, C., Chandrasekar, N. A. (2007). Cultural intelligence: Its measurement and effects on cultural judgment and decision making, cultural adaptation and task performance. Management and organization review, 3(3), 335-371.
Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., Koh, C., Ng, K.Y. (2004). The measurement of cultural intelligence. Academy of Management Meetings Symposium on Cultural Intelligence in the 21st Century.
Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., Tan, M. L. (2011). Cultural Intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg & S. B. Kaufman (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence (pp. 582–602). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Archibald, J. A., Davis, L., Haig-Brown, C. (2008). Indigenous knowledges and the university. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 31(1), 1-9.
Atifian, A. (2015). Determining the multicultural competencies of teachers and assessing them in elementary schools (Master’s thesis). Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]
Baker, W. (2008). A critical examination of ELT in Thailand: The role of cultural awareness. RELC, 39 (1), 131-146
Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51: 269–290.
Bischof, M. Kessling, V. et al. (1999). Landeskunde und Literaturdidaktik. Berlin: Langenscheidt.
Bridjanian, M. (1995). A Glossory of technical terms of Philosophy and Social science. Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural studies. [In Persian]
Brislin, R., Worthley, R., MacNab, B. (2006). Cultural intelligence: Understanding behaviors that serve people’s goals. Group and Organization Management, 31: 40–55
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence, Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Cross, Terry. (2012). Cultural competence continuum. Journal of Child and Youth Care Work, 24, 83-85.
Deardorff, D. K. (2011). Assessing Intercultural Competence. New Directions for Institutional Research, 149, 65-79.
Deardorff, Darla K. (2009). Exploring Interculturally Competent Teaching in Social Sciences Classrooms. Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences, 2 (1), 1-18.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Dimitrov, N. Haque, A. (2016). Intercultural Teaching Competence: A Multidisciplinary Framework for Instructor Reflection. Intercultural Education: Learning at Intercultural Intersections, 27(5), 437-456.
Dimitrov, N. Haque, A. (2016). Intercultural Teaching Competence in the Disciplines, Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Dimitrov, Nanda, Debra L. Dawson, Karyn C. Olsen, and Ken N. Meadows. (2014). Developing the Intercultural Competence of Graduate Students. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 44 (3), 86–103.
Dimitrov, Nanda. (2012a). The Development of Disciplinary Communication Competence among Teaching Assistants. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
Dimitrov, Nanda. (2012b). Teaching without borders: Assessing the intercultural competence of teaching assistants, Paper presented at the Teaching Graduate Students to Teach Conference, Vancouver, BC.
Dobakhti, L. (2021). An Exploration of Linguistic and Cultural Competence in Language Teaching and Acquisition: Teachers, Learners and Materials in the Globalized Era. Language and Translation Studies, 54 (3). [In Persian]
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. NewYork: Random House.
Earley, P. C., & Ang, S. (2003). Cultural intelligence: Individual interactions across cultures. CA: Stanford University Press.
Egitim, S. (2024). Does language teachers’ intercultural competence influence oral participation in EFL classrooms?: unveiling learner perspectives through a mixed methods inquiry. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 44, 1–16.
Eslami, F. (2020). Cultural Intelligence of Persian Language Teachers to Non-Persian Speakers and Its Predicting Variables. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 19 (1). [In Persian]
Fayyazi, M., Jannesar, A., H. (2006). Cultural intelligence is a necessity for managers in the age of diversity. Tadbir, 172. [In Persian]
Gooden, Doreen J, Carole, Creque and Chin-Loy, Claudette (2017). The impact of metacognitive, cognitive and motivational cultural intelligence on behavioral cultural intelligence. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), 16 (3), 223.
Gudykunst, W. B., Ting-Toomey, S., & Chua, E. (1988). Culture and interpersonal communication. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage.
Haghani, N., (2005). The fifth skill. Research in contemporary world literature, 10 (25). [In Persian]
Hall, E. T. (1959). The silent language. New York: Doubleday.
Hu, Shangui, et al. (2020). Proactive personality and cross-cultural adjustment: Roles of social media usage and cultural intelligence. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 74, 42-57.
Kanfer, R., & Heggestad, E. D. (1997). Motivational traits and skills: A person-centered approach to work motivation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19: 1–56.
Karabinar, S., & Guler, C. Y. (2013). A review of intercultural competence from language teachers’ perspective. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1316-1328.
Kazazi, M. (2022). Determining the level of multicultural competence of primary school teachers in Tehran, National Conference on Management Research and Humanities in Iran, 10. [In Persian]
Khodadadian, M., Abtahi, M. (2016). Cultural Intelligence and Learning Linguistic Abilities in Non- Iranian Persian Language Learners. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 5 (2). [In Persian]
Lázár, I. (2015). EFL learners’ intercultural competence development in an international web collaboration project. The Language Learning Journal, 43(2), 208-221.
Liddicoat, A. J. (2014). Pragmatics and intercultural mediation in intercultural language learning. Intercultural Pragmatics, 11(2), 259-277.
Malmir, Ali. (2021). The Relationship between EFL Teachers’ Intercultural Communicative Competence (ICC) and their Students’ Pragmatic Knowledge: A Case of Common English Speech Acts. Language and Translation Studies, 54 (3). [In Persian]
Ng, K.Y., Van Dyne, L., & Ang, S. (2012). Cultural Intelligence: A Review, Reflections, and Recommendations for Future Research. In A.M. Ryan, F.T.L. Leong, & F.L. Oswald (Eds.), Conducting Multinational Research: Applying Organizational Psychology in the Workplace (p. 29-58). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Paige, R. Michael. (1996). Intercultural Trainer Competencies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pedersen, P. B. (2001). Multiculturalism and the paradigm shift in counselling: Controversies and alternative futures. Canadian Journal of Counselling, 35(1), 15–25.
Polat, S., & Ogay Barka, T. (2014). Preservice Teachers' Intercultural Competence: A Comparative Study of Teachers in Switzerland and Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 54, 19-38.
Rajaram, K. (2023). Cultural Intelligence in Teaching and Learning. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 14 (3), 57-118.
Reid, Eva. (2015). Techniques Developing Intercultural Communicative Competences in English Language Lessons. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 939-943.
Rezaei, A., F., Sadeghi, M. (2023). Investigating the effect of cultural intelligence on intercultural adaptation and the performance of non-Persian language learners in learning Persian language. Research in Teaching Persian Language and Literature, 4 (1). [In Persian]
Rezaeisharif, A., Sheykhoeslami, A., Rajabpoor, N., F. (2016). Validation of a Multicultural school psychology competency inventory in school counselors. Quarterly of Educational Measurement, 7 (25). [In Persian]
Sadeghi, Alireza. (2012). Multiculturalism and Education. Educational Technology Magazine, 28 (4). [In Persian]
Sadker, D. and Sadker, M. (2001) Gender bias: From colonial America to today’s classrooms .New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning Theories, an Educational Perspective. Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.
Sharifian. F. (2013). Globalisation and developing metacultural competence in learning English as an International Language. Multilingual Education, 3(7), 1-11.
Srite. M., Thatcher J. B., & Galy, E. (2008). Does within-culture variation Matter? An empirical study of computer usage. Journal of Global Information Management, 16(1), 1-16.
Triandis, H. C. (1994). Culture and social behavior. New York: McGraw Hill.
Triandis, H. C. (2006). Cultural intelligence in organizations. Group and Organization Management, 31: 20–26.
Tzu‑Yin Lee, Yun‑Chi Ho and Che‑Han Chen. (2023). Integrating intercultural communicative competence into an online EFL classroom: an empirical study of a secondary school in Thailand. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 8 (1).
Vakilifard, A.R., & Abbasi Jokandan, E. (2024). Intercultural communication competence in Persian language teaching classes: The perspective of non-Iranian learners. Journal of Iranian Cultural Research, 17(1). [In Persian]
Van Lier, L. (2004). The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 218 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 22 |
||