تعداد نشریات | 19 |
تعداد شمارهها | 380 |
تعداد مقالات | 3,131 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,251,628 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,845,987 |
The Relationship of Iranian EFL Learners’ Beliefs about Writing with their L2 Writing Self-efficacy and performance | ||
Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies | ||
مقاله 6، دوره 2، شماره 3، آبان 2015، صفحه 118-103 اصل مقاله (403.93 K) | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Marzieh Rezaei1؛ Ehsan Rassaei2 | ||
1Islamic Azad University, Shiraz Branch | ||
2Department of Foreign Languages, Shiraz Branch Islamic Azad University | ||
تاریخ دریافت: 23 فروردین 1395، تاریخ پذیرش: 23 فروردین 1395 | ||
چکیده | ||
This paper discusses the relationship between Iranian EFL learners’ beliefs about writing with their L2 writing self-efficacy and performance. The participants of this study were 70 female and male Iranian undergraduate learners ranging in age from 20 to 35. Among three dimensions of beliefs about writing, recursive, audience orientation and transmission belief, recursive orientation and transmission beliefs had positive significant correlations with learners’ writing performance. This means that those who consider writing as a process but not a product as well as those who regard writing as a means for reporting what authorities think are more successful writers than others. The results showed that beliefs about writing correlate with students’ writing performance. In this study, it was found that no statistically significant relationship between audience orientation belief and learners’ writing performance. In other words, Iranian EFL learners do not pay attention to the needs of their readers. Moreover, there was significant relationship between learners’ beliefs about writing and their L2 writing self-efficacy. Also self-efficacy was shown to have a major impact on the students’ performance in this research. The results help teachers to predict influential effects of students’ beliefs on their L2 writing performance. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
beliefs about writing؛ writing self-efficacy and L2 writing performance | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
ارتباط بین باورهای فراگیران زبان انگلیسی در مورد مهارت نوشتن و خود کارامدی و عملکردشان در زبان دوم | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
مرضیه رضایی1؛ احسان رسایی2 | ||
1دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد شیراز | ||
2دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد شیراز | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
این تحقیق ارتباط بین باورهای فراگیران زبان انگلیسی در مورد مهارت نوشتن و خود کارآمدی و عملکردشان در زبان دوم را بررسی می کند. در این تحقیق هفتاد نفر از دانشجویان ترم آخر رشته زبان انگلیسی شرکت داشتند. از نرم افزار SPSS جهت بررسی داده ها استفاده گردیده است. با استفاده از این نرم افزار رابطه بین باورهای زبان آموزان در مورد مهارت نوشتن و خود کارآمدی و عملکردشان در زبان دوم مشخص گردید. در این آزمایش زبان آموزانی که اعتقاد به ویرایش و بازنویسی در نوشتار داشتند نمره بالاتری گرفتند و همچنین زبان آموزانی که خود کارآمدی آنها بالاتر بود نمره بالاتری در نوشتار داشتند. نتایج این تحقیق نشان داد که نوع باورهای فراگیران زبان انگلیسی در مورد مهارت نوشتن رابطه مستقیمی با خود کار آمدی آنها و همچنین عملکردشان در زبان دوم دارد. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
باورها در مورد نوشتار, خودکارامدی, عملکرد در زبان دوم | ||
مراجع | ||
Publication manual of the American psychological association (5th ed.) (2001). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
Boice, R. (1982). Teaching of writing in psychology: A review of sources. Teaching of psychology, 9(3), 143-147.
Boston, B. O. (1986). Stet! Tricks of the trade for writers and editors. Alexandria, VA: Editorial Experts, Inc.
Bruning, R., Dempsey, M., Kauffman, D. F., McKim, C., & Zumbrunn, S. (2012). Examining dimensions of self-efficacy for writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 25-38
Bruning, R., Dempsey, M., Kauffman, D., & Zumbrunn, S. (2011). Writing viewed as transmission and transaction: An empirical study of implicit writing beliefs. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Educaional Research Association, New Orleans.
Charney, D., Newman, J. H., & Palmquist, M. (1995). “I’m just no good at writing”: Epistemological style and attitudes toward writing. Written Communication, 12, 298-329.
Cooper, C. R., (1977). Holistic evaluation of writing. In C. Cooper, & L. Odell (Eds.), Evaluating writing: Describing, measuring, and judging (pp. 3-32). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Demirel, Ö. (1993). Eğitimterimlerisözlüğü: İngilizce-Türkçe, Türkçe-İngilizce. USEM Yayınları.
Eisenberg, N., Martin, C. L., & Fabes, R. A. (1996). Gender development and gender effects. In D. C. Berliner, & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 358-396). New York: Macmillan.
El-Hindi, A. (1997). Connecting reading and writing: College learners' metacognitive awareness. Journal of Developmental Education, 21(2), 10-16.
Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., Fear, K. L., & Anderson, L. M. (1988). Students' metacognitive knowledge about how to write informational texts. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11(1), 18-46.
Englert, C., Raphael, T., Fear, K., & Anderson, L. (1988). Students’ metacognitive knowledge about how to write informational texts. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 18-46.
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445-476.
Graham, S., Schwartz, S., & MacArthur, C., (1993). Knowledge of writing and the composing process, attitude toward writing, and self-efficacy for students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26(4), 237-249.
Gregorian, V. (2007). Foreword. In S. Graham, & D. Perin (Eds.), Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools—A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York (pp. 1-2). Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
Hackett, G. (1985). The role of mathematics self-efficacy in the choice of math-related majors of college women and men: A path analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32, 47-56.
Harter, S., Waters, P., & Whitesell, N. (1997). Lack of voice as a manifestation of false self-behavior among adolescents: The school setting as a stage upon which the drama of authenticity is enacted. Educational Psychologist, 32, 153 173.
Ismail, S. (2011). Exploring students’ perceptions of ESL writing. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 143-155.
Klassen, R. (2002). Writing in early adolescence: A review of the role of self-efficacy beliefs. Educational Psychology Review, 14(2), 173-203.
Komarraju, M., & Nadler, D. (2013). Self-efficacy and academic achievement: Why do implicit beliefs, goals, and effort regulation matter? Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 67-72.
Lin, C. H. S., & Wen, L. Y. M. (2007). Academic dishonesty in higher education: A nationwide study in Taiwan. Higher Education, 54(1), 85-97.
Lin, S., Monroe, B., & Troia, G. (2007). Development of Writing Knowledge in Grades 2-8: A Comparison of Typically Developing Writers and Their Struggling Peers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23(3), 207-230.
Mateos, M., Cuevas, I., Martin, E., Martın, A., Echeita, G., & Luna, M. (2011). Reading to write an argumentation: The role of epistemological, reading and writing beliefs. Journal of Research in Reading, 34(3), 281-292.
Matsui, T. (1994). Mechanisms underlying sex differences in career self-efficacy expectations of university students. Journal of vocational behavior, 45(2),177-184.
Meece, J. L. (1991). The classroom context and students’ motivational goals. In M. L. Maehr, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement, Vol. 7 (pp. 261-285). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
National Commission on Writing. (2004). Writing, a ticket to work…or a ticket out: A survey of business leaders. Retrieved from www.collegeboard.com/.../writingcom/writing-ticket-to-w.
Pajares, F. (1995). Self-efficacy in academic settings. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (SanFrancisco, CA, April 18-22, 1995).
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of educational research, 66(4), 543-578.
Pajares, F., & Miller, M. D. (1994). The role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem-solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 193- 203.
Pajares, F., & Johnson, M. J. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs and the writing performance of entering high school students. Psychology in the Schools, 33, 163-175.
Pajares, F., Hartley, J., & Valiante, G. (2001). Response format in writing self-efficacy assessment: Greater discrimination increases prediction. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 33, 214-221.
Pajares, F., Miller, D. M., & Johnson, M. J. (1999). Gender differences in writing self-beliefs of elementary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 50-61.
Palmquist, M., & Young, R. (1992). The notion of giftedness and student expectations about writing. Written Communication, 9, 137-168.
Perry, K. R. (2011) Implicit Beliefs About Writing: A Task-Specific Study of Implicit Beliefs. Education and Human Sciences, College of (CEHS), Paper 119; pp. 1-8.
Proett, J., & Gill, K. (1986). The writing process in action: A handbook for teachers. National Council of Teachers of English, 1111 Kenyon Rd., Urbana.
Raphael, T. E., Englert, C. S., & Kirschner, B. W. (1989). Students' metacognitive knowledge about writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 23(4), 343-379.
Saddler, B., & Graham, S. (2007). The relationship between writing knowledge and writing performance among more and less skilled writers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23(3), 231-247.
Schunk, D. H. (1995). Self-efficacy and education and instruction. In J. E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application (pp. 281-303). New York: Plenum Press.
Seow, A. (2002). The writing process and process writing. Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice, 315-320.
Taylor, P. S. (1990). EEI’s levels of editing. In A. R. Molpus (Ed.), The expert editor: Tips, advice, insights, and solutions (pp. 85-86). Alexandria, VA: Editorial Experts, Inc.
The Chicago manual of style: The essential guide for writers, editors, and publishers (15th ed.). (2003). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
White, M. J., & Bruning, R. (2005). Implicit writing beliefs and their relation to Writing quality. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 166-189.
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J., MacIver, D., Reuman, D., & Midgley, C. (1991). Transitions at early adolescence: Changes in children’s domain-specific self-perceptions and general selfesteem across the transition to junior high school. Developmental Psychology, 27, 5527565.
Wong, B. (1999). Metacognition in writing. In R. Gallimore, L. P., Bernheimer, D. L., MacMillan, D. L., Speece, & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Developmental perspectives on children with high-incidence disabilities (pp. 183-198). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,087 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 756 |