اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 360 |
| تعداد مقالات | 2,962 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 3,754,893 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,550,256 |
The Effect of Peer Scaffolding on Iranian EFL Learners’ Listening Comprehension | ||
| Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 3، شماره 1، اردیبهشت 2016، صفحه 65-49 اصل مقاله (319.45 K) | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Karim Shabani1؛ Sekineh Malekdar2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Allameh Mohaddes Nouri University | ||
| 2MSc Student, Allameh Mohaddes Nouri University | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 06 تیر 1395، تاریخ پذیرش: 06 تیر 1395 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This study investigated the extent to which peer scaffolding could contribute to the listening comprehension on Iranian EFL learners with elementary level of language proficiency. To fulfill this objective, 33 institute students were selected through Key English Test (KET) and assigned to two groups in experimental (scaffolding group) and control (non-scaffolding group). After the participants’ initial level of listening comprehension was measured by a pre-test, the interactive strategies of scaffolding were given to the experimental group in 10 sessions and the two groups’ achievement was measured by a post-test and a delayed post-test. The results of T-test indicated that collaborative scaffolding strategies were effective in enhancing EFL learners’ listening comprehension and the experimental group outperformed the control group. Also, the result of the qualitative data analyzes showed the use of peer scaffolding strategies in the experimental group and employment of L1 and background knowledge in the task performance. The frequency analyses of the detected strategies revealed a peer –peer scaffolding framework. On implication side, this study could prescribe different individual learning plans for learners with different learning needs. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Listening comprehension؛ scaffolding؛ peer scaffolding | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| تاثیر کمک رسانی همسالان بر درک شنیداری زبان آموزان ایرانی | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| کریم شعبانی1؛ سکینه ملک دار2 | ||
| 1استاد یار گروه زبان انگلیسی دانشگاه علامه محدث نوری | ||
| 2دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد آموزش زبان انگلیسی دانشگاه علامه محدث نوری | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| این مطالعه میزان کمک رسانی همسالان بر درک شنیداری زبان آموزان ایرانی در سطح ابتدایی را مورد بررسی قرارداده است. برای این منظور 33 زبان آموز از طریق آزمون KET انتخاب و در دو گروه آزمایش و کنترل قرار داده شدند. بعد از تعیین سطح درک شنیداری مشارکت کنندگان با یک پیش-آزمون راهبردهای تعاملی کمک رسانی در 10 جلسه به گروه آزمایش داده شد و فعالیتهای دو گروه با دو آزمون پس-آزمون و پس-آزمون با تاخیر مورد اندازه گیری قرار گرفت. نتایج آزمون آماری T-test نشان داد که راهبردهای تعاملی کمک رسانی در پیشرفت درک شنیداری زبان آموزان موثر بوده و گروه آزمایش عملکرد بهتری نسبت به گروه کنترل داشته است. همچنین نتایج حاصل از تحلیل داده های کیفی استفاده از استراتژی های کمک رسانی و بکارگیری زبان اول و دانش پس زمینه در انجام تمرین را درچارچوب کمک رسانی همسالان مشخص و نمایان ساخته است. علاوه بر آن، این مطالعه می تواند با راهبردهای مختلف یادگیری فردی برای زبان آموزان با توجه به نیازهای مختلف یادگیری موثر باشد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| درک شنیداری, کمک رسانی, کمک رسانی همسالان | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Al-yami, S. (2008). The effectiveness of scaffold interactive activities in developing of English listening comprehension. (Unpublished master's thesis), Saudi Arabia, Jeddah.
Cross, J. (2009). Effects of listening strategy instruction on new videotext comprehension. Language Teaching Research, 13, 151-176.
Danli, L. (2011). Scaffolding in second language learning of target forms in peer interaction. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34(4), 107-126.
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J.P. Lantolf, & G. Apple (Eds.), Vygotskian approach to second language research (pp. 33-56). Norwood.NJ. Albex
Garcia, P., & Asencion, Y. (2001). Interlanguage development of Spanish learners: Comprehension, Production and interaction. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 377-401.
Kim, Y., & McDonough, M. (2008). The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners, Language Teaching Research, 12, 211-234.
Lantolf, J. P., & Aljaafreh, A. (1996). L2 learning in the zone of proximal development: A revolutionary experience. International Journal of Educational Research, 23(7), 51-64.
McDonough, K. (2004). Learner-learner interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context. System, 32,207-224.
Mitchel, R., & Myles, F. (2013). Second language learning theories (3th ed.). London: Routledge.
Nakata, R., Frazier, K., Hoskins, B., & Graham, C. (2012). Let’s go 4, (4th ed.) Oxford. Oxford University Press.
Nunan, D. (1998). Approaches to teaching listening in the language classroom. In Proceeding of the 1997 Korea TESOL Conference Taejon, Kotesol, Oct 3.5.1997
Packer, M.J., & Goiceochea, J. (2000). Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning, ontology, not Just epistemology. Educational Psychologist, 34(4), 227-241.
Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS survival manual. New York. McGraw HillPoehner, M. (2007). Beyond the test: L2 dynamic assessment and the transcendence of mediated learning. The Mdern Language Journal, 91, 323-340.
Puntambekar, S., & Hubscher, R. (2005). Scaffolding in complex learning environment: What we have gained and what we have missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1-12.
Richards, J.(2005). Second thoughts on teaching listening. RELC Journal, 36(1), 85-92.
Richards, J.C., & Trew, G. (2010). Basic tactics for listening. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Richards, J.C., Hall, J., & Proctor, S. (2013). Interchange intro. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saxby, K. (2011). KET for school trainer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simmons, N. (2013). Family and friends 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Storch, N. (1999). Are two heads better than one? Pair work and grammatical accuracy. System, 27, 363-374.
Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language learning, 52(1), 119-158.
Storch, N. (2007). Investigating the merits of pair work on a text editing task in ESL classes. Language Teaching Research, 1(2), 143-59.
Talebinejad, M.R., & Akhgar, F. (2015). The impact of teacher scaffolding on Iranian intermediate EFL learners listening comprehension achievement. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(5), 1101-1105.
Thompson, T. (2014). Family and friends 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Villamil, O. S, & Gurrero, C. M. (1996). Peer revision in L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies and aspects of social behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(1), 51-75.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small group. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 21-40.
Williams, M., & Burden, R. (2000). Psychology for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The rule of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
Yazdanpanah, M., & Khanmohammad, H. (2014). Sociocultural theory and listening comprehension: Does the scaffolding of EFL learners improve their listening comprehension? Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(11), 2389-95 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,104 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,227 |
||