اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 19 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 385 |
| تعداد مقالات | 3,153 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,300,966 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,894,086 |
بررسی روند رشد ساخت فعل در نوشتههای فارسیآموزان کرهای (سطح پایه و میانی) براساس رویکرد کاربرد بنیان | ||
| پژوهش نامه آموزش زبان فارسی به غیر فارسی زبانان | ||
| دوره 13، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 28، مهر 1403 اصل مقاله (1.6 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30479/jtpsol.2024.5974.1604 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| رضامراد صحرایی1؛ طاهره عبداللهی پارسا* 2 | ||
| 1استاد گروه زبانشناسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2نویسنده مسئول، دانشجوی دکترای آموزش زبان فارسی به غیرفارسی زبانان، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 28 تیر 1401، تاریخ بازنگری: 01 خرداد 1402، تاریخ پذیرش: 24 خرداد 1402 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| زبانشناسیِ شناختی، شاخهای است که به مطالعه زبان بهمنزله بخشی از قوه شناخت میپردازد. ازاینرو، بسیاری از پژوهشگرانِ حوزههای زبانشناسی، علومشناختی و عصبشناسی زبان به آن توجه ویژهای داشتهاند. دستور ساخت، یکی از دستورهای شناختی است که همچون زبانشناسی شناختی، قوه شناخت را مبدأ تحلیل قرار داده است. این دستور، دستوری توانمند در ارائه تحلیلی جامع و یکپارچه از زبان به شمار میرود. در دستور ساخت تمام الگوهای زبانی بهمثابه ساخت تلقی میشوند. یکی از این ساختها، ساختار موضوعی فعل است که پل ارتباطی نحو و معنا محسوب میشود. بنابراین باتوجه به اهمیت افعال و یادگیری آنها، در این پژوهش برآن شدیم تا ساختارهای ظرفیتی و ساخت موضوعی افعال در 30 نوشته فارسیآموزان کرهای سطح پایه و 30 نوشته فارسیآموز سطح میانی را طبق نظریه دستور شناختی گولدبرگ (١٩٩۵) و نیز ساختارهای ظرفیتی مهرجو (١٣٩۷) مورد بررسی قرار دهیم. در بررسیهای انجام شده، در سطح پایه 54 فعل (غیرتکراری) و در سطح میانی 114 فعل (غیرتکراری) دیدهمیشود که از میان آنها بیشترین تعداد از نوع افعال دو ظرفیتی و یکظرفیتی هستند و از میان ساختهای موضوعی، «ساخت مسیر» در هر دو سطح بسامد بیشتری دارند. درنهایت طبق مبانی رویکرد کابردبنیان، روند رشد تدریجی و تکوینیِ ساخت فعل از سطح پایه به سطح میانی در فارسیآموزان کرهای مشاهده و تبیین میشود. فرآیند فراگیری افعال در متون نوشتاری درگذر از سطح پایه به سطح میانی رشدی با شیب ملایم دارد که این تکوین نیز حاصل برهمکنش ساز وکارهای شناختی و درونداد زبانی تلقی میشود. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| زبانشناسی شناختی؛ ساخت موضوعی فعل؛ ساخت ظرفیتی فعل؛ رویکر کاربردبنیان؛ فارسیآموزان کرهای | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Studying the growth process of verb construction in writings samples of Korean-speaking Persian learners ( of elementary and intermediate) based on the usage-based approach | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Rezamorad Sahraee1؛ Tahereh Abdollahi Parsa2 | ||
| 1Professor of Linguistics, Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Corresponding Author, PhD candidate in Linguistics-Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Cognitive linguistics is an interdisciplinary approach that attempts to study language from a cognitive viewpoint. The verb's argument structure is a sub-category of cognitive linguistics for defining the subject and conveying the correct meaning, which is needed for the language learning process. So, the present study aimed at analyzing the cognitive-based argument structure and the constructive process of the verb in 30 writing samples of elementary and 30 writing samples of intermediate Korean Persian learners based on Goldberg’s Construction Grammar (1995) and Mehrjoo’s (2017) Verb Valency Structures. Running a semi-quantitative study, the researcher initially examined the valency structures to find the elements that should accompany the verb in the sentence. In the second part of the research, the argument structure of the verbs at elementary and intermediate levels was examined based on Goldberg's theory. Also, the usage-based approach was employed to analyze the movement of learners from attention into application mastery. For analyzing writing samples, a total number of 54 and 114 non-repetitive verbs were found and extracted at the elementary and intermediate levels, respectively. The results revealed that bivalent and monovalent verbs were the most frequent in all writing samples. Consequently, it can be said that the Cognitive linguistic approach is generally integrated with the language learning process and considers all form-meaning combinations as one integrated entity. Most importantly, this approach can assist language teachers in teaching more efficiently. Extended Abstract: Introduction Cognitive linguistics is an interdisciplinary approach that attempts to study language from a cognitive viewpoint. Therefore, it has received special attention in linguistics, cognitive sciences, and language neurology, characterized by a commitment to the inseparability of meaning and form in the study of language. Among various theories within the field of cognitive linguistics, construction grammar claims that constructions, or learned pairings of linguistic patterns with meanings, are the fundamental building blocks of human language, providing a comprehensive and integrated analysis of the language where all language patterns are considered as a construction. Therefore, the verb's argument structure is a sub-category of cognitive linguistics to bridge syntax and meaning to make a complete sentence. In other words, the argument structure of the verb reveals the basic and necessary elements of the sentence to define the subject and convey the correct meaning, which is needed for the language learning. Since language teaching should be meaning-oriented and in line with the communication needs of language learners to express the intended meanings, teaching the verb-based structures on its constructions can meet such needs well. To this end, the present study aimed at analyzing the cognitive-based argument structure and the constructive process of the verb among 60 native Korean Persian learners based on Goldberg’s Construction Grammar (1995) and Mehrjoo’s (2017) Verb Valency Structures: Goldberg's constructions consists of ditransitive construction, caused argument construction, resultative construction, way construction and conative construction, and Mehrjo’s valence structures of verbs in Persian are including three categories: monovalent verb, bivalent verb, trivalent verb. Then, the growth process of verb construction in writing samples of Korean-speaking Persian learners (of elementary and intermediate) based on the usage-based approach is elaborated. Methodology Running a semi-quantitative study, the researcher initially examined the valency structures to find the elements that should accompany the verb in the sentence. In the second part of the research, the argument structure of the verbs at elementary and intermediate levels was examined based on Goldberg's theory. Also, the usage-based approach was employed to analyze the movement of learners from attention into application mastery. Analyzing 60 writing samples, 30 writing samples of elementary and 30 other writing samples of intermediate Persian learners at the level, thus, a total number of 54 and 114 non-repetitive verbs were found and extracted at the elementary and intermediate levels, respectively. Results The results revealed that bivalent and monovalent verbs were the most frequent in all writing samples. Moreover, Way Construction was the most frequent structure in the extracted data. The findings also showed the development process from the elementary to the intermediate level. In terms of grammatical construction, the Persian learner first employed way construction because it assists them in making a way and continuing to reach the second construction, two object verbs that include purposeful switching from someone to something. Considering the usage-based approach in the four-stage process of learning language structure in linguistics named Attention, Initial learning, Semantic mastery, and Application mastery, the Persian learners have achieved the third level, semantic mastery, in their learning achievement process. This movement from the elementary to the intermediate level occurred due to repeating a language structure. Employing these language constructions helps learners to utilize cognitive grammar in a more complete and better way, assisting them to connect the syntax and semantic aspects of language in making sentences. The language proficiency distance between the two elementary levels and the language learning construction threshold becomes smaller. Thus, the form and meaning of construction are adopted to complete the learning achievement. Although various factors such as experience, frequency, and repetition affect the links between form and meaning, based on the learning stages of a language structure, it can be said that Persian learners get a mental impression when they encounter a structure-like way of construction at the basic level. Such mental perception links the features of linguistic construction (such as the sequence of phonemes or the order of its characters) with its image and representation. However, the mapping of form and meaning is incomplete, which is why the Persian learners of the present study employed and generalized a capacity like "arriving" to make a double valency. These types of errors can be fixed at higher levels by increasing the frequency, repetition, selective attention, role salience, perceptual learning, and other factors, and the learners can reach the third level of semantic mastery and, finally the fourth and completed level of functional mastery/automatization. Thus, passing from the elementary to the intermediate level can improve the verb-learning process because of the interaction between cognitive mechanisms and linguistic structures. Conclusion The language teaching should be meaning-oriented and in line with the communication needs of language learners to express the intended meanings, teaching the verb-based structures on its constructions can meet such needs well. To this end, the present study aimed at analyzing the cognitive-based argument structure and the constructive process of the verb among native Korean Persian learners based on Goldberg’s Construction Grammar (1995) and Mehrjoo’s (2017) Verb Valency Structures. The research has showen If foreign Persian learners purposefully employ the verb constructions to express their intended meaning within correct forms, they can understand the meaning of the verb and its dependents, and most importantly, they can conceive the existing links between syntax and semantic parts of each sentence. In fact, the employing language constructions helps learners to utilize cognitive grammar in a more complete and better way, assisting them to connect the syntax and semantic aspects of language in making sentences. The language proficiency distance between the two elementary levels and the language learning construction threshold becomes smaller as well, since the Cognitive linguistic approach is generally integrated with the language learning process and considers all form-meaning combinations as one integrated entity. In general, cognitive approach such as usage-based approach have a unified and holistic view of language and consider all form-meaning of verbs as integrated units. Therefore, it can be used in various fields of Persian language learning, including curricullum development, teaching, testing and so on. So, implementing of usage-based approach makes Persian learning mechanism more effective and efficient. Acknowledgment The authors would like to appreciate the teachers for their time and efforts to participate in this research. Conflict of Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Cognitive linguistics, argument structure of the verb, valence structure of the verb, usage-based approach, Korean-speaking Persian learners | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
بامشادی، پارسا و انصاری، شادی. (١٣٩۷). کاربرد رویکرد زبانشناسی شناختی در اموزش واژههای مشتق زبان فارسی. مجموعه مقالات دومین همایش ملی دو سالانه آزفا دانشگاه شهیدبهشتی (165-188). تهران: انتشارات خاموش.
طبیب زاده، امید. (١٣۸۵). ظرفیت فعل و ساختهای بنیادین جمله در فارسی امروز: پژوهشی بر اساس نظریه ی دستور وابستگی. تهران: نشر مرکز.
فلاحی، محمدهادی. (١٣٩۸). بررسی و طبقهبندی افعال پیشوندی و مرکب زبان فارسی بر پایه مؤلفههای معنایی موضوعهای افعال. طرح پژوهشی وزارت علوم تحقیقات و فناوری.
مهرجو، علی. (١٣٩۷). ظرفیت فعل در منتخبی از داستانهای معاصر فارسی. رساله دکتری زبانشناسی همگانی. دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.
References:
Achard, M., & Niemeier, S. (Eds.) (2004). Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching. Berlin: Germany Mouton de Gruyter.
Åfarli, T.A. (2007). Do verbs have argument structure? In E. Reuland, T. Bhattacharya & G. Spathas (eds.), Argument Structure (1-16). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bamshadi, Parsa & Ansari, Shadi. (2018). Application of Cognitive Linguistics Approach to the teaching of Persian derivational words. Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Standardization of Curriculum material in TPSOL (165-188). Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran: Khamosh. [In Persian]
Bernardez, E. (1999). Some Reflections on the Origins of Cognitive Linguistics. Journal of English Studies. 1, 9-27.
Chmosky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Ellis, Nick C. & Matthew B. O’Donnell. (2014). Second Language Verb-Argument Constructions are Sensitive to Form, Function, Frequency, Contingency, and Prototypicality. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4(4), 405-431.
Ellis, N.C. & Cardierno, T. (2009). Constructing a second language: Introduction to the special section. Annual Review of Cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 7 (1), 111-139.
Fallahi, Mohammad Hadi. (2019). Investigation and classification of prefixed and compound verbs of Persian language based on the semantic components of verb positions. Iran: Research Design for Ministry of science [In Persian] Retrieved from https://en.ricest.ac.ir/research_author/dr-mohammad-hadi-fallahi/
Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P., & O'connor, M. C. (1988). Regularity and Idiomacity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone. Language 64(3), 501-538. The United States: Linguistic Society of America.
Fried, M., & Ostman, J.-O. (2004). Construction Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 2,3, 12.
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 514
Goldberg, A.E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 143.
Haegeman, L. (1994). Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Kroeger, P. R. (2005). Analysing grammar: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lambrecht, K. (1987). Sentence Focus, Information Structure and the Thetic-Categorial Distinction. Journal of Berkeley Linguistics Society. 13 (1), 366-382.
Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 494.
Mehrjoo, Ali . (2018). Verbal Valency in Selected Modern Persian Stories (Ph.D Dissertation). Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran. [In Persian]
Michaelis, L. A. (2006). Construction Grammar. In K. Brown, The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Elsevier. 73-84
Perek, F. (2015). Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 24.
Tabibzade, Omid. (2006). Verb Valency and Basic Constructions of Sentences in Modern Persian; a Survey based on Dependency Grammar Theory. Iran: Nashre Markaz. [In Persian]
Tyler, A. (2012). Cognitive linguistics and second language learning: Theoretical basics and experimental evidence. New York: Routledge.
Zakeri, Fatemeh., et. al., (2021). Argument Structure of the Persian Perception verb “didæn”: Goldberg's Construction Grammar Approach. Journal of Research in Western Iranian Language and Dialects. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 165 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 132 |
||